Floyd County Comprehensive Plan - Demographic Data Report FLOYD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Poverty and Unemployment in Lima and Bluffton.
Advertisements

Indianapolis-Carmel MSA
University as Entrepreneur A POPULATION IN THIRDS Arizona and National Data.
Arizona Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
A Knowledge Based Approach to Community Planning Dr. Patricia Byrnes Patrick Curry Arwiphawee Srithongrung.
Fuerza Latina: A Paradox of Success and Hardship Phillip J. Bowman Lecture Institute for Research on Race and Public Policy Sylvia Puente Executive Director.
Oklahoma Regional Demographic Profiles Created from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey ( Public Use Microdata Sample) June 2009.
Changing Demographics in Texas
Office of Social and Economic Data Analysis March 3, 2011 Springfield, Missouri Bill Elder Ozarks Chapter of AGA 2011 Membership Professional Development.
Texas: Demographic Characteristics and Trends Texas Association of Healthcare Interpreters and Translators August 19, 2011 Dallas, TX.
2008 Lake Business Conference March 25, 2008 Tan-Tar-A Resort in Osage Beach, MO Bill Elder, Director Office of Social & Economic Data Analysis (OSEDA)
Office of Social and Economic Data Analysis March 11, 2011 Columbia, Missouri Bill Elder Missouri Rural Convening Missouri Rural Development Partners “The.
Demographic Trends and Missouri’s Children Missouri State Board of Education April 21, 2005 Dr. Bill Elder University of Missouri-Columbia Office of Social.
High-Density Affordable Housing In 2004, 51 % of American families could not afford to purchase a modestly priced home 1 in the state where they lived.
Office of Social and Economic Data Analysis April 13, 2011 Springfield Area Chamber of Commerce Springfield, Missouri Dr. Bill Elder Dr. Bill Elder Missouri.
Alan Berube Brookings Institution. Nationally, suburbs have become home to the largest and fastest growing poor population Source: Brookings analysis.
1 Education Attainment. 2 Percent of Adults Age with a High School Diploma, 2005 (Estimates and 90% Confidence Intervals) Source: U.S. Census Bureau,
California Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Colorado Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Georgia Unemployment Rate by Educational Level Change in Georgia Full-Time Employment to by Educational Level.
CITY DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS Understanding Your City’s Population | 2 mi | 2 mi | 200’
Urban Planning 206A Prof. Leo Estrada By Pedro E. Nava Fresno County & The San Joaquin Valley: Agricultural Production, Unemployment, & Educational Attainment.
Demographic Profile. Population GrowthDiversityAgeHouseholdsEducationIncome.
August 3, Introductions 2. Status Reports 3. Demographics Presentation 4. Community Engagement—Plan Norwalk by MindMixer 5. Project Team—City.
Triennial Community Needs Assessment A Project of the Valley Care Community Consortium.
LTISD Demographic Update Session V – February 26, 2015.
1 The Changing Face of Washington’s Families Annabel R. Kirschner, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Washington State University Olympia, WA
Presented by: ECONorthwest March 3, Agenda Project progress report (5 minutes) Preliminary results of the HNA (20 minutes) Presentation by ECONorthwest.
Older Moms Deliver. How Increased Births to Older Mothers Are Impacting School Enrollment Richard Lycan and Charles Rynerson Population Research Center.
Measuring Up 2004 Texas. Measuring Up: The Basics Looks at higher education for the entire state, not individual colleges and universities. Focuses on.
Civic Forum [Region Name] [Date]. SET Purpose: Doing Better Together Guide the SET regional team in developing and implementing a High Quality Regional.
Minnesota Demographic Change And Dentistry Tom Gillaspy, State Demographer Mn Dept of Administration March 2008.
Goal 2025: To increase the proportion of Americans with high-quality degrees and credentials to 60 percent by the year 2025.
Timebanking and Poverty: Creating Abundance in a Challenged Economy.
Old Louisville by the Numbers A Statistical Profile by Michael Price Urban Studies Institute University of Louisville Spring 2006.
Weaving a story of poverty in Multnomah County. Per capita income, Portland MSA, US Metro, Multnomah County, Source: Regional Economic Information.
Alaska Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Northwest Connecticut CEDS Region Demographic & Economic Analyses May 2012.
Action Plan Update July 8, Where We Are Community meetings Community Conditions Survey Results Invite Community Leaders Last Action Plan Define.
HUD Consolidated Plan Cuyahoga County Planning Commission Cuyahoga Urban County September 16, 2009.
Louisiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Demographic Trends: Carl Onubogu. Average household income Percentage of population over 25 with less than high school education Percentage.
Oklahoma Regional Demographic Profiles Created from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey ( Public Use Microdata Sample) June 2009.
Indiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Texas Demographic Data Users Conference May 22, 2014 Austin, Texas.
Tennessee Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
William McKinley School IPS 39 Data and Statistics of our school and community of Fountain Square.
Missouri Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
SACO, formerly known as Pepperellborough named in In 1805 dropped the old name in favor of the ancient Native American name of SACO. QUICK FACTS:
Analyzing State Equilibrium Unemployment Rates. Persistence of unemployment rates Unemployment rates among states tend to stay low or stay high year after.
Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce The Foreign-Born Population in New Mexico Size, Distribution, and.
Iowa Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Greene County Community Health Needs Assessment Sociodemographic Indicators.
Rensselaer County Community Health Needs Assessment Sociodemographic Indicators.
By Taylor Dellinger, GISP Western Piedmont Council of Governments Prepared For: “Hickory Metro Economic Perspective” Foothills APICS Chapter May 9, 2013.
Albany County Community Health Needs Assessment Sociodemographic Indicators.
Texas Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Columbia County Community Health Needs Assessment Sociodemographic Indicators.
We change the way people use energy™ OPALCO Low Income Assessment and Market Profile.
Oklahoma Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Trends and Characteristics of the Elderly Population in West Virginia Christiadi WVU Bureau of Business and Economic Researc h.
New Hampshire Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
North Carolina Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Vermont Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Kansas Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Results of the Civil Rights Movement Data & Trends
Morristown, NJ.
Plainfield, NJ.
Westfield, NJ.
Presentation transcript:

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan - Demographic Data Report FLOYD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan – Data Demographic Report

Demographic Characteristics for Floyd County – BY THE NUMBERS  Population: 76,244  Households: 29,807  Median Age: 39.7 average  Household Size: 2.55 average  Household Ownership: 65.2 Owner Occupied Source * 2013 American Community Survey Estimate and Stats Indiana

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan – Data Demographic Report Demographic Characteristics for Floyd County – BY THE NUMBERS  Educational Attainment: 88.0 percent with High School Diploma or higher  Educational Attainment: 22.6 percent with Bachelor’s Degree or higher  Median Household Income: $53,961  Poverty Rate: 13.4 percent Source * 2013 American Community Survey Estimate and Stats Indiana

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan – Data Demographic Report Demographic Characteristics for Floyd County – BY THE NUMBERS  Floyd County (unincorporated areas)  Population: 35,529 – 46.6 percent of total  Households: 12,665 – 42.5 percent of total  Median Age: 41.0 average – 1.3 years old than total  Household Size: 2.8 average – ½ percent higher than total  Household Ownership: 91.3 Owner Occupied – 36 percent higher than total Source * 2013 American Community Survey Estimate and Stats Indiana

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan – Data Demographic Report Demographic Characteristics for Floyd County Planning Area – BY THE NUMBERS  Floyd County (unincorporated areas)  Educational Attainment: 91.5 percent with High School Diploma or higher – 3 percent higher than total  Educational Attainment: 25.7 percent with Bachelor’s Degree or higher -3 percent higher than total  Median Household Income: $73, percent higher income than total  Poverty Rate: 4.0 percent – 9.4 percent lower Source * 2013 American Community Survey Estimate and Stats Indiana

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan – Data Demographic Report  Income – More affluent than County and State as a whole  Education – More educated in terms of high school graduates, bachelor’s and advance degrees than County and State as a whole  Home Ownership – High percentage of home ownership among residents  Staying Put – More likely to have lived in same home for a long period of time  Larger Households – More likely to have larger households  Older – More likely to be older than County as whole and State

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan – Data Demographic Report  Trends  Population Growth has lagged near bottom of Metro Area for past twenty years in comparison  Population is getting older faster than State and Metro areas  Housing stock is getting older – median housing unit now – 30 years old  School Age population projects through Stats Indiana indicate a flat to slight reduction in school age children  Limited traditional industrial opportunities  2030 and beyond aging population will dramatically increase  Area is gaining in terms of residents with college and advanced degrees  Area is gaining in terms of residents income levels

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan – Data Demographic Report Demographic Characteristics for Floyd County Planning Area – BY THE NUMBERS So who are we?

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan – Data Demographic Report So who are we really … a descriptive approach  ERSI – Geographic Data and Analytics  Describes 67 unique demographic characteristics that make the population of United States  For our area – Five unique demographic groups emerged from their research  Green Acres  Salt of the Earth  Savy Surbanities  Soccer Moms  Middleburgs

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan – Data Demographic Report

 2025 Population and Housing Projections  Community will need to plan for between a 5.9 to 9.8 percent anticipated population growth  Stats Indiana has 5.9 percent growth rate  IUPUI Planning Model has 9.8 percent growth rate  Middle ground analysis – 8.0 percent population growth or 80,452 by 2025  New residents – 4,208 new residents by 2025  Housing units – 1,650 needed to accommodate growth of new residents

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan – Data Demographic Report  2025 Population and Housing Activity  Each table will have a map of the entire county  The purpose of the activity to determine the best locations for the proposed number of housing units.  Rules  Each Blue dot represents single family detached  Each Red dot represents single family attached (patio or duplex) units  Each Yellow dot represents multi-family units  Blue dots = 50 single family units  Red dots = 25 single family attached units  Yellow dots = 10 multi-family units

Floyd County Comprehensive Plan – Data Demographic Report 2025 Population and Housing Activity  Rules  At least fifty percent of the housing units must be located in the unincorporated areas  Red and Yellow dots for higher density must be located near to commercial areas and transportation corridors  Can not be placed inside flood plain or steep slope areas