Maintaining healthy watersheds in the Chesapeake LGAC meeting December 4, 2014 Mark Bryer The Nature Conservancy Chair, Healthy Watershed Goal Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roundtable on Sustainable Forests. Forests cover about 750 million acres -- more than a quarter of the entire United States -- and sustainable management.
Advertisements

Planning for Our Future:
Biodiversity Land Degradation Climate Change Chemicals International Waters Sustainable Forest Management Sustainable Cities Food Security Fisheries Forests.
Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency November 21, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
ANTIDEGRADATON and NITROGEN IN GREAT BAY Paul Currier, P.E., P.G. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services NHEP Technical Advisory Committee.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
Alberta’s Strategy for Sustainability presented to Prairie Water Policy Symposium Beverly Yee, Assistant Deputy Minister Alberta Environment September.
Title Text for Slide “ The region’s environmental and economic health will improve when we fully implement the Blueprint. The cleanup plan was designed.
Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
1 The Chesapeake Bay Program James Edward, Deputy Director EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC meeting, June 1, 2012 EO Action Plan, Progress Report.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team.
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Convention on Wetlands “The conservation and wise use of.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
JT Petty: WMAN 445 Lecture Notes Lecture 5.2: STATE POLICY.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Public Access Plan. The Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed was released in May 2010, in response.
Title Text for Slide “ The region’s environmental and economic health will improve when we fully implement the Blueprint. The cleanup plan was designed.
What does the SALCC do? Mission: Create a shared blueprint for landscape conservation actions that sustain natural and cultural resources.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Integrated Catchment Management Key Elements - Julie Burke.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure (and millions of dollars in savings): Balancing our investment in the Chesapeake by maintaining healthy.
Activities, Results and Preliminary Report ACWI Meeting September 14, 2005 The Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable (SWRR)
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
A Partnership of U.S. Federal, State and Tribal Fish and Wildlife Agencies with support from the Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Shared solutions.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Goals and Indicators. Sustainable Measures Goals, Principles, Criteria, and Indicators  Goal – a description of future condition community members wish.
WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Module 7, part A – Issues and Description.
Stream Quality Metric Ted Graham RMS Meeting June 8, 2009.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
One Water LA is a collaborative approach to develop an integrated framework for managing the City’s watersheds, water resources, and water facilities in.
Abridged Chesapeake Bay Agreement: Initial Reactions WRTC September 6, 2013.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Land Use Metrics & Methods Outcome Management Strategy Peter Claggett U.S. Geological Survey December 4, 2014.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
Lake Management in Alberta. Lake Issues ~2500 lakes in total with 800 fish-bearing lakes in Alberta Many lakes have changed due to Watershed alteration.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Managing the Human Footprint. Planning, Policy, and Management  Key elements in the process of identifying problems and their possible solutions  Essential.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
NATIONAL REDD+ SECRETARIAT Zonal Level REDD+ Awareness Creation Workshop MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST Tigray Regional State, Mekele September 3 &
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
CBP CLIMATE RESILIENCY WORKGROUP Cross-Goal Climate Resiliency Analysis and Decision-Making Matrix and Implementation Methodology.
Todd Petty, Mike Strager, and Michael Hasenmyer
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
December 14, 2017 Christine brittle, Ph.d.
NATIONAL REDD+ SECRETARIAT
Local Planning Process…
Riparian Forest Buffers
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Achieving the Goal of Stewardship
2016 – 17 Bay Barometer.
8 million new pounds of nitrogen (10% of the TMDL) $28 billion in offsets Map courtesy of Peter Claggett, USGS.
Achieving the Goal of Stewardship
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Outcomes and Phase III WIPs
LGAC Input on Outcomes.
Presentation transcript:

Maintaining healthy watersheds in the Chesapeake LGAC meeting December 4, 2014 Mark Bryer The Nature Conservancy Chair, Healthy Watershed Goal Team

© Doug Cook

What are healthy watersheds…  waters and watersheds, recognized for their exceptional quality and/or high ecological value

Definitions and more info at

Why healthy watersheds matter…

Map courtesy of Peter Claggett, USGS 8 million new pounds of nitrogen (10% of the TMDL) $28 billion in offsets

Restoration is not an easy answer The cost of repairing damaged ecosystems is high and has a low success rate

Healthy Watersheds Outcome Land Use Methods and Metrics Outcome Land Use Options Evaluation Outcome Healthy Watersheds Goal Team is responsible for:

Healthy Watersheds Outcome 100 percent of state-identified currently healthy waters and watersheds remain healthy.

Outcome: 100% of state- identified currently healthy waters and watersheds remain healthy Tracking Where are the healthy waters and how are they doing? Action! Activities that secure the health of waters and watersheds Build and maintain inventory; track progress Direct protection Policies and programs Local community engagement We will not achieve this outcome without effective local community engagement

Questions Do you know about healthy watersheds in your jurisdiction? Do you consider them an asset? Why or why not? What do you need to secure healthy watersheds and the benefits they provide?

Land Use Methods and Metrics Outcome Continually improve the knowledge of land conversion and the associated impacts throughout the watershed. By 2016, develop a Chesapeake Bay watershed-wide methodology and local level metrics for characterizing the rate of farmland, forest and wetland conversion, measuring the extent and rate of change in impervious surface coverage and quantifying the potential impacts of land conversion to water quality, healthy watersheds and communities. Launch a public awareness campaign to share this information with citizens, local governments, elected officials and stakeholders.

Land Use Options Evaluation Outcome By the end of 2017, with the direct involvement of local governments or their representatives, evaluate policy options, incentives and planning tools that could assist them in continually improving their capacity to reduce the rate of conversion of agricultural lands, forests and wetlands as well as the rate of changing landscapes from more natural lands that soak up pollutants to those that are paved over, hardscaped or otherwise impervious. Strategies should be developed for supporting local governments’ and others’ efforts in reducing these rates by 2025 and beyond.

Define what is meant by a healthy watershed (show map and explain how each jurisdiction defines) Talk about why this Outcome is in the Agreement (only outcome focused on protection) Ask if they know whether their community is in a healthy watershed (or contains any healthy watersheds) Talk briefly about cost of protection versus restoration (Beth McGee is doing lunch presentation on CBF's Economic Benefits report so this will be fresh in their minds) Talk about threats (or theory of change) Solicit their ideas for the management strategy (you could focus on the following Key Elements: 3.a, 4.a and 5.a)

I've suggested that others use items 3.a., 4.a., and 5.a in the Key Elements as the place to focus your questions, unless you have something very specific you need input on. Here are those elements: Include a statement about whether there is a general or specific role for local governments, watershed associations, nonprofits, the private sector or others in achieving the outcome. When relevant, include a brief description of the role and level of participation of each entity (3.a). Identify specific actions, tools or technical support needed at the local level (4.a). If relevant, describe what steps will be taken to facilitate greater local participation, including underserved and underrepresented communities as a way to include more diverse participation, in achieving the outcome, including what actions, tools or technical support will be provided to empower local governments and others to do their part (5.a).

Management Strategy Issues – Action Healthy Watersheds Stream Health Fish Passage Climate Change WIPsBrook TroutWetlands Forest Buffers Tree CanopyStewardship Protected Lands Land Use Options ◦Healthy Watersheds Management Strategies are connected to Management Strategies of other Outcomes

Virginia’s Ecologically Healthy Waters Criteria: Driven by fish and macroinvertebrate community composition and abundance at stream locations throughout the state. Partnership between Virginia Commonwealth University, VA DCR, and VA DEQ

Pennsylvania Healthy Watershed Criteria: Water quality criteria are used to protect designated water uses, such as fish and aquatic life, recreation, and water supply. State designations of Exceptional Value or High Quality were used as the basis for identifying Healthy Watersheds. Pennsylvania DEP makes designations.

Maryland Tier II Catchments Non-tidal watersheds, under regulatory anti-degradation protection, that exceed minimum applicable water quality criteria and standards. Currently, Tier II streams are identified according to fish and benthic indices of biotic integrity.

New York Healthy Watershed Criteria: The Waterbody Inventory/Priority Waterbodies List (WI/PWL) is an inventory of the state's surface water quality. The category of "No Known Impact" represents "segments where monitoring data and information indicate that there are no use restrictions or other water quality impacts/issues.“ (Source: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation)

West Virginia Healthy Watershed Criteria: West Virginia does not have a state defined "healthy watersheds" program or definition. West Virginia's anti- degradation rule can be applied to help define this category of streams. West Virginia's Tier 3 waters, are known as "outstanding national resource waters." These include waters in Federal Wilderness Areas, specifically designated federal waters, and high quality waters or naturally reproducing trout streams in state parks, national parks, and national forests. (Source: West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection)