Colin Cobbing Health effects of noise and EIA September 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Screening.
Advertisements

Towards Standard International Energy Classification Vladimir Markhonko United Nations Statistics Division.
 Works in both parts of the island  Member of NYCI & as a member of the European Alliance of YMCAs also members of European Youth Forum  We work with.
The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) 764/2008 Rita L’ABBATE 6th MARS Group meeting Bratislava, 2 October 2008.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
Towards Action Planning Linda Story Air Noise and Nuisance Team.
Planning Permission Process and Procedures
Fermilab Environmental Management System (EMS)
Air Quality Significance Criteria Dr Claire Holman LLP Director.
Secretariat to the Espoo Convention and its Protocol on SEA
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Consultation on Good Environmental Status Descriptor 7 – Hydrographical Conditions Dr Alejandro Gallego Marine Scotland.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Quiet Please: The Future of EU Noise Policies Brussels, 25 May 2011 Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise Dr Rokho Kim WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Environmental Impact Assessment and Noise
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
The SEA Directive – Implications, Obligations, Strengths and Weaknesses Workshop SEA in Practice Malta, 11 November 2011 Louis Meuleman Unit Cohesion Policy.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Environmental Risk Analysis
A victim’s view of HS2 noise
Auditing Internal Control over Financial Reporting
1 Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına Yönelik Teknik Yardım Technical Assistance.
1 Managing noise in the EU: current and upcoming challenges Colin Nugent The Future of EU Noise Policies 25 May 2011 Brussels.
Occupational Health & Industrial Hygiene Programs.
EIA: A framework for ESDM. EIA: A Framework for ESDM. Visit Defining EIA Environmentally Impact Assessment is A formal process for.
June 2008 Proposal for a Regulation to replace Directive 91/414/EEC July 2008 T Lyall.
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
Canada Health Canada Santé Canada Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau National Guidelines for Environmental Assessment: Health Impacts of.
The Contaminated Land Regulations – Consolidated Review 21 September 2005 Craig Edwards.
Presentation to: 2006 Transportation Research Board Noise & Vibration Conference Williamsburg, VA Supplemental Tools for Environmental Noise Analysis Roger.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 1 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of EIA F modify and improve design F ensure efficient resource use F enhance social aspects.
25 June 2009, London Impact significance in air quality assessment Application of EPUK criteria to road schemes?
Case study: SEA for land-use plan amendments of Krasna Hora municipality.
Cognitive Impact on Children from Airplane Noise 2008.
SECTION IV: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STEPS TAKEN OR ENVISAGED BY NON-ANNEX I PARTY TO IMPLEMENT THE CONVENTION Workshop on the Use of the Guidelines for.
Implementing legislation for Integrated Permitting Monika Pribylova 1 October 2013 года Air Quality Governance in the ENPI East Countries.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
New plant health Regulation: main elements of the upcoming Commission proposal Yannis Karamitsios European Commission DG SANCO (E.2)
Environmental Impact Assessment of public and private projects EIA Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by 97/11/EC and 2003/35/EC Recent developments Laura.
AC312 Week 7 4Auditor’s Report 4Truth and Fairness.
Compliance Audit Subcommittee Reporting Work Plan Copenhagen, Denmark 6th of May 2010.
Slide 1 Recognition of Professional Qualifications in the European Single Market for Services Henri Olivier FEE Secretary General FEE (Fédération des Experts.
Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application.
Richard Moules A Look into the Future for Contaminated Land.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Convention 100 Equal Remuneration, 1951 Basic principle: gender should not be the basis upon which remuneration is calculated or paid - either directly.
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Consultation on Good Environmental Status How the Impact Assessment was developed Kevin Brady Marine Analytical Unit,
ISO Registration Common Areas of Nonconformances.
SMP and dominance Pál Belényesi Verona 29 November November 2006.
HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT: WHAT WE SHOULD DO IN MEXICO JULIETA PISANTY-LEVY.
INTERNATIONAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAW OCTOBER 29, 2012.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
Regulatory framework Julie Swan Associate Director, Regulatory Policy and Vocational Qualification Policy.
IPSAS I9: Provisions, contingent assets and contingent liabilities Presented by: George Osina Date: August 2015 A closer look 1.
Noise Control of Buildings
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Strategic Environmental Assessment Patrick White and Nelly Isyagi.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
I II Review areas Review criteria Weighted Rating Description of
EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE
INTRODUCTION TO Compliance audit METHODOLGY and CAM
Forum for Air quality Modelling FAIRMODE ew. eea
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
9th Noise Expert Group Centre Borschette, Brussels, Belgium.
Towards WHO Guidelines on Environmental Noise
* 100% = 15 Member States.
Presentation transcript:

Colin Cobbing Health effects of noise and EIA September

EIA Directives EIA is required to determine likely significant effects of major projects such as a new railway. EIA Regulations require the identification of likely significant effects (both positive and negative), and the description of the measures envisaged in order to avoid, reduce and, if possible, remedy significant adverse effects

Health effects of noise and EIA Some confusion as to whether EIA should include the health effects of noise Any confusion which may have prevailed is now reconciled by the 2014 EIA Directive i.e. the effects on human health are now included in the information that must be assessed and reported.

Health effects of noise The health effects of noise will depend upon definition. WHO definition of health is the most widely accepted i.e. complete state of physical, mental and social well-being. The health effects of noise will include annoyance, sleep disturbance, cognitive impairment, interference with communication, cardiovascular effects and mental health effects.

Babish model for health effects

EIA and noise policy The 2014 EIA Directive strengthens the link between EIA and National Noise Policy. Point 5 of Annex IV is reproduced “The description of the likely significant effects on the factors specified in Article 3(1) should cover the direct effects and any indirect, secondary, cumulative, transboundary, short-term, medium-term and long-term, permanent and temporary, positive and negative effects of the project. This description should take into account the environmental protection objectives established at Union or Member State level which are relevant to the project.”

Noise and health There is increasing recognition and importance of noise and health and quality of life Noise Policy Statement for England 2010

Scoping Scoping should include identifying potential effects on human beings and aspects of human health that may be affected Important to recognise that noise exposure is only a proxy for effects on humans

Methodology Methodology be developed to address the effects on quality of life and health Different effects may need to be considered separately to reflect the differences in response e.g. sleep disturbance be considered separately from annoyance and that different methods/ descriptors be used for different effects, Scientific evidence on the effects of noise be used to inform the methodology The methodology must deal with uncertainty and limitations.

HS2 impact criteria- residential Direct long term operational sound impacts identified where: An absolute sound level at or above 50 dB LpAeq,16hr (day) and 40 dB LpAeq,8hr (night) and the magnitude of the impact and its effect on a receptor is indicated by the change in the equivalent continuous sound level as defined in Table 33.

Long term Impact Classification Short term Impact Classification Sound level change dB L pAeq,T (positive or negative) T = either 16hr day or 8hr night Negligible ≥ 0 dB and < 1 dB Minor≥ 1 dB and < 3 dB MinorModerate≥ 3 dB and < 5 dB ModerateMajor≥ 5 dB and < 10 dB Major≥ 10 dB SMR Table 33 Airborne sound from operational train or road movements - impact criteria

Significant effects- residential Significant effects determined taking account factors: Type of effect being considered; The number and grouping of receptors subject to impacts; The magnitude of the impacts and available dose-response information; The existing sound environment in terms of the absolute level and the character of the existing soundscape; Any unique features which may require secondary acoustic indicators / criteria); The potential combined impacts of sound and vibration

HS2 effects criteria for residential- 2 Operational noise significant adverse effect identified where absolute free-field sound level at or above 65 dB LpAeq,16hr (day) At night an absolute free-field sound level at or above 55 dB LpAeq,8hr; or 85 dB LpAFmax (outside) (where the number of events exceeding this value is less than or equal to 20); or A level above 80 dB LpAFmax at the façade (outside) of a residential receptor (where the number of events exceeding this value is greater than 20).