Eric J. Tomasi – Project Manager Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Northeast Energy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Advertisements

Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
NARUC/NIGERIA REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP Peer Review Presented by Elijah Abinah Assistant Director Public Utilities Division Arizona Corporation Commission.
The BC Oil & Gas Commission Proactively Participating in Project Decision Making Processes James O’Hanley Deputy Commissioner.
Conservation Commissions and the Kinder Morgan Proposed Gas Pipeline PRESENTATION TO NORTHEAST MUNICIPAL GAS PIPELINE COALITION SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 MASSACHUSETTS.
LNG USA 2005 IQPC Houston, Texas November 9, 2005 Bruce F. Kiely Baker Botts L.L.P. Washington, D.C.
The FERC Review Process and Interaction with State Authorities Council of State Governments July 27, 2005 Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory.
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
Conference on Environmental Assessments in Federations A Montana Perspective September 14, 2009 Tom Livers, Deputy Director Montana Department of Environmental.
FERC Office of Energy Projects 1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission EPAct of 2005 Effect on Review of LNG Facilities & Working with FERC CSO Annual meeting.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission GITA Seminar on: New Construction Project Lifecycle JW Marriott Houston, TX September 20, 2004 Lonnie Lister, Chief.
George Godding Director DMC Office of Market Oversight and Investigations Federal Energy Regulatory Commission USEA/USAID Energy Partnership Program Brasilia,
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
FERC and the Development of an Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Robert J. Cupina, Deputy Director Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Natural Gas Transmission Networks: So You Want To Build A Pipeline?
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
© Copyright 2013 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines: Regulatory and Policy Developments University of Pittsburgh School.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Douglas A. Sipe Outreach Manager Outreach Manager Division of Gas-Environment and Engineering Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects.
Douglas A. Sipe Outreach Manager Outreach Manager Division of Gas-Environment and Engineering Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects.
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
Environmental Assessment in Newfoundland & Labrador Environmental Assessment in Federations: Current Dynamics and Emerging Issues Conference Current Dynamics.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
Challenges in Transmission. 2 Environmental and Public Affairs Consulting for the Energy Industry Energy Sectors  Oil & Gas  Pipeline  Storage  LNG.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Buckhorn Mountain EIS Project August Buckhorn Mountain Exploration Project Echo Bay Exploration is seeking federal and state authorization for.
IRSDA Conference What Do the Amendments to Indiana Code Section Mean to You? Kristina Kern Wheeler, General Counsel Ja-Deen L. Johnson, Consumer.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Jim Luce, EFSEC Chair Port Of Vancouver Presentation Vancouver, WA June 27, 2013 EFSEC These Slides.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The FERC Regulatory Process Dennis H. Melvin, Esq. Director – Legal Division (OAL) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Alternative Energy on the Outer Continental Shelf Robert P. LaBelle Deputy Associate Director Offshore Energy and Minerals Management Minerals Management.
ODOE Presentations and EFSC Standards Presented by Max Woods and Sarah Esterson September 18, 2015.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
Myersville Citizens for a Rural Community 1 Myersville Citizens for a Rural Community March 11 th and 14th Note: It is critical to reference the new Docket.
Douglas A. Sipe Outreach Manager Outreach Manager Division of Gas-Environment and Engineering Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects.
FERC Office of Energy Projects 1 Hydroelectric Licensing Regulations Final Rule July 23, 2003 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects.
1 Overview of Minerals Management Service’s Alternative Energy Program Ocean Law Conference May 22, 2008 Seattle, WA Walter D. Cruickshank Deputy Director.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
Participation and Intervention before the FERC October 2007.
1.What is the standard relicensing process in the U.S. and what is the ALP (Alternative Licensing Process) ? 2.How did we convince FERC to agree to an.
FERC eFiling v7.0 Quick Comment Training. Training will consist of: Introduction to FERC The FERC Web site How to file an electronic Quick.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
April 2006 Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process April 25, 2006
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Shasta County Board of Supervisors March 4, 2008.
FERC Office of Energy Projects 1 Richard Hoffmann, Director Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Policies Affecting.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
California Energy Commission 1 LNG Permitting and Environmental Review: the View from California DOE LNG Forum Los Angeles June 1, 2006 Kevin Kennedy,
LNG Permitting: You Want it When? Lauren H. O’Donnell Deputy Director, DG2E Office of Energy Projects.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 1 Overview of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Roland W. Wentworth Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates.
Energy Policy Act – 2005 West-Wide Energy Corridors.
INTERSTATE PIPELINE FORUM Presented by: Rebecca F. Zachas, Esq.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, Associate Professor.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
AEMCPresentation to GWCFPAGE 1 AEMC and Rule changes Presentation to AEMO Gas Wholesale Consultative Forum Kamlesh Khelawan Director This presentation.
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
NRC’s Decision Process: Judging The Safety Of A Proposed Repository
Two Energy Facility Permitting Reforms: New Hampshire’s Site Evaluation Committee, and the Federal FAST-41 Tom Burack, Esq., Sheehan Phinney New England.
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Environmental Assessment PUC Application Process
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Presentation transcript:

Eric J. Tomasi – Project Manager Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Northeast Energy Direct Project March 12 and 19, 2015 FERC Introduction Meeting

Who is FERC?  FERC is an independent federal regulatory agency that: Regulates the interstate transmission of natural gas (siting & rates); electricity and oil (rates only); Regulates the interstate transmission of natural gas (siting & rates); electricity and oil (rates only); Reviews proposals to build interstate natural gas pipelines and liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals, and natural gas storage fields (National Enviro. Policy Act) Reviews proposals to build interstate natural gas pipelines and liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals, and natural gas storage fields (National Enviro. Policy Act) Licenses and inspects non-federal hydropower projects Licenses and inspects non-federal hydropower projects Office of Energy Projects FERC

FERC Organization Chart FERC Office of Energy Projects Chairman Cheryl LaFleur Commissioner Norman Bay Commissioner Philip D. Moeller Commissioner Tony Clark Commissioner Colette D. Honorable Energy Projects Electric Reliability External Affairs Energy Market Regulation Enforcement Energy Policy & Innovation Administrative Litigation Administrative Law Judges Executive Director General Counsel Secretary

FERC’s Siting Authority  Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act – Determination of public convenience and necessity  Energy Policy Act of 2005 – Assigns FERC exclusive siting authority—does not preempt other required federal authorizations – Optional use of Pre-Filing Process for pipeline projects – Names FERC lead agency for NEPA review and coordinator of all federal authorizations FERC Office of Energy Projects

State and Local Permits  FERC encourages cooperation between interstate pipelines and local authorities.  Goal is to work with agencies to identify and minimize conflicting requirements  If the Commission approves a project, state or local permits must be consistent with the conditions of any FERC certificate FERC Office of Energy Projects

FERC Role  FERC is the lead for NEPA review; coordinator of federal authorizations Other agencies urged to participate in process Other agencies urged to participate in process  FERC establishes a schedule for all Federal authorizations Ensures expeditious processing of all natural gas project permits and authorizations Ensures expeditious processing of all natural gas project permits and authorizations Federal authorization decisions to be issued within 90 days of FERC’s Final NEPA document Federal authorization decisions to be issued within 90 days of FERC’s Final NEPA document  FERC to maintain complete consolidated record Provides for swifter judicial review Provides for swifter judicial review FERC Office of Energy Projects

Division of Gas (Environment and Engineering)  Evaluate applications and conduct environmental reviews/siting for jurisdictional gas facilities: Import/Export, Storage, Interstate Transmission, Abandonment, LNG Import/Export, Storage, Interstate Transmission, Abandonment, LNG  Conduct inspections of jurisdictional facilities LNG facilities and pipeline construction/restoration LNG facilities and pipeline construction/restoration FERC Office of Energy Projects

Phases of Project Review  Marketing and Preliminary Project Design The applicant working on its own The applicant working on its own  Pre-Filing - CURRENT FERC staff working with the applicant and stakeholders before the filing of an application FERC staff working with the applicant and stakeholders before the filing of an application  Application Review FERC preparing NEPA document that is reviewed by cooperating agencies prior to public issuance for comment FERC preparing NEPA document that is reviewed by cooperating agencies prior to public issuance for comment  Post-Authorization FERC staff working to ensure compliance with conditions to the FERC approval FERC staff working to ensure compliance with conditions to the FERC approval FERCFERC Office of Energy Projects

Certificate Process FERC Parallel Processing Paths IssueOrder Non-Environmental Review and Analysis Engineering – GQI, storage, hydraulic flow Tariff – rates, terms & conditions of service Policy – precedents, rules, regulations Accounting Preparation of EIS Project description/ purpose and need Water resources Ecology – fish, wildlife, vegetation Cultural resources – historic preservation Land use/socioeconomics – recreation, aesthetics Soils and geology Air and noise Alternatives FileApplication

The Pre-Filing Process  More interactive NEPA/permitting process, no shortcuts  Be more proactive and explore ways to Outreach  Earlier, more direct interaction between FERC, other agencies, stakeholders, and the applicant  Transparency in the Pre-Filing Review Process  Goal is to resolve problems and have “no surprises”  Encourages cooperation with federal, state, and local authorities FERC staff is an advocate for the process, not the project FERC Office of Energy Projects

NEPA Pre-Filing Review  Project is in the preliminary planning phase  Formal application has not been filed  Purpose of the Pre-Filing Process encourage involvement by interested stakeholders in a manner that allows for the early identification and resolution of issues encourage involvement by interested stakeholders in a manner that allows for the early identification and resolution of issues identify and attempt to address environmental issues prior to the time when an application is filed identify and attempt to address environmental issues prior to the time when an application is filed Review and comment on draft resource reports Review and comment on draft resource reports FERC Office of Energy Projects

FERC Pre-Filing Activities FERC Office of Energy Projects  Issue scoping notice  Examine alternatives  Arrange and attend site visits and meetings  Initiate preparation of preliminary NEPA document  Review draft resource reports  Identify affected parties: landowners landowners agencies agencies other stakeholders other stakeholders  Facilitate identification of issues  Identify study needs  Facilitate resolution of issues

Resource Reports FERC Office of Energy Projects 8. Land Use, Recreation & Visual Impacts 9. Air Quality & Noise 10. Alternatives 11. Reliability & Safety 12. PCB Contamination (for pipelines only) 13. LNG Engineering & Design Details 1. General Project Description 2. Water Use & Quality 3. Fish, Wildlife & Vegetation 4. Cultural Resources 5. Socioeconomics 6. Geological Resources 7. Soils

Agency Involvement  Cooperating Can review working draft NEPA document during application stage Can review working draft NEPA document during application stage Not subject to ex parte rules Not subject to ex parte rules  Participating Same as cooperating agency during pre-filing stage Same as cooperating agency during pre-filing stage Limits to communication and review during application stage Limits to communication and review during application stage  Intervenor Must file a formal motion to intervene Must file a formal motion to intervene Submissions must be served on the applicant and all other parties to the proceeding Submissions must be served on the applicant and all other parties to the proceeding May seek rehearing of the FERC decision and possibly judicial review at the Court of Appeals. May seek rehearing of the FERC decision and possibly judicial review at the Court of Appeals. FERC Office of Energy Projects

FERC/Agency Actions During Pre-Filing  Review route, identify study needs, and examine alternatives  Connect with affected stakeholders  Participate in applicant open houses, hold interagency meetings, inform local elected officials, and meet with landowners  Facilitate identification and resolution of issues  Analyze draft resource reports and initiate preparation of NEPA document FERC Office of Energy Projects

Applicant’s Responsibilities  Route development, infrastructure assessment, engineering design, and environmental surveys  Recognize and address stakeholders’ concerns and develop public participation plan  Invite the public to open houses  Prepare FERC and other permit applications  Engage in proactive planning and communication FERC Office of Energy Projects

Applicant’s Responsibilities at Filing Time  Identify and address agency and stakeholder concerns  Provide consistent information to agencies and stakeholders  Submit complete FERC application  Provide FERC its proposed schedule of Federal applications and anticipated receipt dates  File for all Federal authorizations before or concurrent with FERC application filing FERC Office of Energy Projects

FERC/Coop. Agency Actions During Application Review  Develop and issue data requests, if needed  Prepare/review draft EIS  FERC issues draft EIS  Attend comment meeting on draft EIS  Address comments and issues final EIS FERC Office of Energy Projects

Identifies Stakeholders EIS Pre-Filing Environmental Review Process Public Input Opportunities Public Input Opportunities Public Input Opportunities Applicant Process Studies potential site locations Participates in Applicant’s open house Issues Notice of Intent for Preparation of an EIS opening the scoping period to seek public comments. Issues Notice of Intent for Preparation of an EIS opening the scoping period to seek public comments. Issues Notice of Application Analyzes data and prepares Draft EIS Issues Draft EIS and opens comment period Issues Draft EIS and opens comment period Holds public comment meetings on the Draft EIS in the project area Responds to comments and revises the Draft EIS Responds to comments and revises the Draft EIS Issues Notice to Proceed with construction. Issues Notice to Proceed with construction. FERC Process Conducts route studies and field surveys. Develops application. Commission Issues Order Submits outstanding information to satisfy conditions of Commission Order Requests use of FERC’s Pre-Filing Process Requests use of FERC’s Pre-Filing Process Assesses market need and considers project feasibility Assesses market need and considers project feasibility Receives Applicant’s request to conduct its review of the project within FERC’s NEPA Pre-Filing Process Parties can request FERC to rehear decision Parties can request FERC to rehear decision Issues Final EIS Holds public scoping meeting(s) and site visits in the project area. Consults with interested stakeholders. Holds public scoping meeting(s) and site visits in the project area. Consults with interested stakeholders. Formally Approves Pre-Filing Process and issues PF Docket No. to Applicant Holds open house to discuss project Files formal application with the FERC

Contact Information Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC FERC Eric J. Tomasi