AIDC safety benefits & limitations AIDC Implementation Seminar 28 th – 31 st October 2014 Adam Watkin Airservices Australia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Primary Radar in ATC ITU Radar Seminar Poul Erik Jørgensen DAS ATS HMI Manager 24. September 2005.
Advertisements

INDIA AIDC IMPLEMENTATION STATUS AND ISSUES
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.
SOCM-2 Seminar Data Link Benefits Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA
49 h Conference of Directors General of Civil Aviation, Asia and Pacific Regions, New Delhi, 8 – 12 October 2012 APANPIRG ACTIVITIES – OUTCOME OF APANPIRG/23.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Pan regional ICD for AIDC structure and status (SP/09)
Data-link Elements and Role of Stakeholders – Reflections of an ANSP
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-40/PIA-4 Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application.
ICAO EUR/NAT Office Celso Figueiredo – Regional Officer ANS - ATM
Development of AIDC ICD in APAC Region
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 WP02: Timing Errors in Oakland OCA.
P ETE A. G ONZALEZ J R. Route Coordinator Pharr – San Juan - Alamo ISD. Transportation Automation.
Traffic Processing Sequence — Tactical and Strategic Investigation of all the facts pertaining to the Air Traffic Services tactical and strategic traffic.
Applications from packages I to III
(Global) PAN AIDC ICD AIDC Implementation Seminar 28 th – 31 st October 2014 Adam Watkin Airservices Australia.
2 July 2015 © Thales Australia Limited. This document and the information it contains is commercial-in-confidence and shall remain the property of Thales.
APAC SIP on ASBU B0-FICE AIDC Implementation Seminar Basic SYSCO Principles and Standard OLDI Communication EUR Environment ICAO EUR/NAT Office Celso Figueiredo.
DARP.
LOA template AIDC Implementation Seminar 28 th – 31 st October 2014 Adam Watkin Airservices Australia.
Flight State Transition diagram
AIDC Top priority in APAC Special Implementation Project AIDC Bangkok, Oct Prepared by F.Lecat 1.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-25/PIA-2 Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through.
12/01/2011 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AIR TRAFFIC ORGANIZATION 1 Execution of Flow Strategies (XFS) (aka Go Button)
Chapter 3 Automating Business Processes with Workflow.
CPDLC / ADS Operations 4/22/2017 2:35 PM
NORTH ATLANTIC ADS WAYPOINT REPORTING TRIALS. John Coulson NATS Infrastructure Services.
Situational Awareness Numerous aircraft and operational displays, when combined with effective and efficient communications and facilities, provide Air.
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Canadian Implementation Presentation to Air Transport Association of Canada 9 November 2010.
FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment.
INDIA AIDC IMPLEMENTATION STATUS AND ISSUES Presented by Airports Authority of India SIP AIDC Seminar October 2014.
Air Systems Division GROUND ASAS EQUIPMENT Michel Procoudine Gorsky ASAS TN2 – Workshop 5 Toulouse 17th-20th September 2007.
28-31 October RASMAG STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF AIDC AND APANPIRG CONCLUSIONS Secretariat - APAC OFFICE 28 October 2014 SIP AIDC Seminar in Bangkok SP/01.
STORE AND FORWARD & CUT THROUGH FORWARD Switches can use different forwarding techniques— two of these are store-and-forward switching and cut-through.
Switching Topic 6 Rapid spanning tree protocol. Agenda RSTP features – Port states – Port roles – BPDU format – Edge ports and link types – Proposals.
CY Segment 1 Phase 1 Tower Services Initial En Route Services Departure Clearances (DCL) Transfer of Communications Initial Check-In.
City College of New York 1 John (Jizhong) Xiao Department of Electrical Engineering City College of New York Mobile Robot Control G3300:
Lecture 11: Flight Management System (FMS)
Improving our Safety Culture
COPYRIGHT © 2013 BOEING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Identifying potential service enhancements to increase operator participation DCIT May 2013 Brad Cornell.
AIDC Implementation Seminar 28th – 31st October 2014
ICAO EUR/NAT Office Celso Figueiredo – Regional Officer ANS - ATM
INDIA AIDC IMPLEMENTATION STATUS AND ISSUES
ICAO EUR/NAT Office Celso Figueiredo – Regional Officer ANS - ATM
AIDC Implementation Seminar 28th – 31st October 2014
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
FF-ICE A CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE ATM SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE
FILING OF VFR FLIGHT PLANS
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
AIDC status October 2014 © Thales Australia Limited. This document and the information it contains is commercial-in-confidence and shall remain the.
RASMAG STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF AIDC AND APANPIRG CONCLUSIONS
New Automation System Delivers FANS-1/A Benefits
APANPIRG ACTIVITIES – OUTCOME OF APANPIRG/23 DP/3/1
INDIA AIDC IMPLEMENTATION STATUS AND ISSUES
FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
AEROTHAI AIDC Implementation Status
Flight State Transition diagram
FPAW 2016 Summer Meeting 3 August 2016 Louis Bailey.
Data Link Advanced Operations
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
AIDC safety benefits & limitations
ICAO Air Navigation Bureau
Oceanic and International Operations
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
VDL Mode 4 Performance Simulator (DLS enhancements) presented by EUROCONTROL Montreal, 26 October 2004.
Objectives of the meeting
VDL Mode 4 Performance Simulator (DLS enhancements) presented by EUROCONTROL Montreal, 26 October 2004.
Presentation transcript:

AIDC safety benefits & limitations AIDC Implementation Seminar 28 th – 31 st October 2014 Adam Watkin Airservices Australia

Introduction  Implementation of AIDC  Safety benefits  Data adaptation issues to consider  Limitations Presentation title

Safety benefits  Coordination errors - reduced  Coordinated data should be extracted automatically from flight data processing system  Coordination should occur automatically  Controller workload - reduced  Less reliance on intercom/phone lines  More time available to complete other tasks  Efficiency - increased  Controller can manage increased traffic levels  Support DARPs etc

Considerations – Adaptation data  What AIDC messages to send?  ABI, EST/ACP; or  ABI, CPL/ACP  What about ICD V3 messages such as TRU, FAN, FCN etc  Coordinating changes  CDN; or  Voice  Will AIDC hand offs be used?

Considerations – Adaptation data  When are AIDC messages sent?  Timing parameters  When does automation send AIDC messages?

Considerations – Adaptation data  Format of Field 14 (Estimate data) supported by neighbouring ATS Units  Block levels  Weather deviations and offsets  Mach Number Technique  Needs to be configurable per FIR

Considerations – Adaptation data  Content of Field 15 (Route) required by neighbouring ATS Units  full flight planned route; or  route information to commence at the waypoint preceding the coordination point  Should be configurable per FIR

Limitations  A benefit of AIDC is it’s automation. However, this can also be a disadvantage!  Controller is “out of the loop”  What information was coordinated?  Unintentional changes to profile (e.g. level) after coordination has occurred  Automatic updates to profile (e.g. estimates) without controller awareness (e.g. ADS-C estimate updates)

Limitations  Processing AIDC messaging for short term FIR transits ATSU 2 ATSU 1 MINNY DONLD  Problems occur when ATSU2 attempts to send AIDC messages to ATSU1 for the entry to ATSU1’s FIR at DONLD, while aircraft is still under the control of ATSU 1

Limitations  Duplicate & unknown waypoints, duplicate ATS routes  Cause problems for flight data processing systems  All waypoints and routes within the area of responsibility should be known and unambiguous  Truncation  A means to truncate (delete) unknown route information and allow downstream units to still accurately process AIDC messaging  Must be completed correctly  Don’t just delete unknown/duplicate waypoints or routes!

More information Adam Watkin Air Traffic Controller Brisbane Centre