Elementary Report Card Revisions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE IMPACT ON PRE-KINDERGARTEN Common Core State Standards and Assessment.
Advertisements

Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.
Grade-level and Competency Portfolios for 2014 MCAS-Alt
o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL COMMITTEE MAY 27, 2014 Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Grading and Reporting Grade PLUS 4 th and 5 th Grade.
Welcome Back To School Palmyra Elementary School.
Department of Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Kahle Charles, Director of Curriculum.
Demystifying the Common Core State Standards Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services January 28, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Upper Perkiomen School District August 2013.
Common Core State Standards Are Coming to the Elk Grove Unified School District (EGUSD)! Information for Parents July-September, 2012.
“There are three principal means of acquiring knowledge of the student: observation, reflection, and experimentation. Observation collects facts; reflection.
Building an Accurate SBPR RECORD KEEPING ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTION GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS SBPR 1.
Standards Based Report Cards North Providence School Department Parent Expo October 8, 2014.
Fremont Unified School District An Informational Session for Families August 2015 Standards-Based Report Cards.
A Standards Based Education Hortonville Area School District August 30 th, 2011.
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8.
DRIVING INSTRUCTION THROUGH DATA WITHOUT DATA IT IS JUST AN OPINION.
Unit and Lesson Planning
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Reporting to Parents’ Presentation for Primary Schools
Hiring Practices “Getting it Right” Brenda Hammons- Assistant Superintendent Dave Cox – Director of Academic Programs.
Professional Development Update February 12, 2013 Prepared by: Lisa Schwartz.
Common Core State Standards for English - Language Arts and Math.
1 Meeting Students’ Diverse Learning Needs: Full Implementation of HM Core Reading K-6 Part 2: Universal Access Time and Beyond Lodi Unified School District.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Florida Department of Education Bureau of School Improvement Office of Curriculum Support.
Piedmont K-5 Math Adoption May 29, Overview What Elementary Math Looks Like Historical Perspective District Philosophy Process and Criteria Why.
The Common Core State Standards at Robert J. Fite Elementary School Information for Parents Back to School Night, August 12, 2014 Adapted from CCSS for.
Pleasant Hill Elementary 2012 ~ 2013 Common Core Standards.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
Grading and Reporting Second Grade
English-Language Development Domain California Preschool Learning Foundations Volume 1 Published by the California Department of Education (2008) English-Language.
Common Core and Standards-based Report Cards
Blue Springs Elementary School Standards Based Report Card Parent Meeting.
Parent Information Presentation. To nurture potential in all students. To challenge those with advanced learning capabilities through differentiation.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
School Year for Parents/Guardians.  Identify the updates in the Elementary report card template.
Presented by: Shawna Howard Research Professor: Andres Garcia, Ed.D
Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include:  Report student progress toward.
K-5 Curriculum Night Curriculum Arizona Academic Standards Quarterly curriculum maps available online at Our comprehensive curriculum.
Connecting the IEP to Arizona College and Career Ready Standards Kyrene School District Special Education Advisory Council (KSEPAC) Presentation November.
Long Beach Unified School Distcit
CURRICULUM 2.0: STANDARDS-BASED GRADING AND REPORTING INFORMATION FOR PARENTS.
Spring 2012 Ohio’s Academic Content Standards - Extended for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Increasing grade-level standard accessibility.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
CCSS in the Classroom Melina Reeves EDU695: MAED Capstone Professor Shannon O'Day January 15, 2015.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Common Core State Standards in the Elementary Schools in Blue Valley.
Standards-based Grading and Reporting Information for Parents.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS and PARCC Results Spring 2015 Joyce Edwards Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning December 8, 2015.
Assessment and Reporting Without Levels February 2016
Grading and Reporting Second Grade
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS)
Understanding Your Child’s Report Card
Parent Forum – Elementary Report Card
Standards- based grading for parents- grades k-2
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Piedmont K-5 Math Adoption
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS)
Pacing Guides, Assessments and Report Cards
Curriculum 2.0: Standards-Based Grading and reporting
Minnesota’s Academic Standards
PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations Maywood School District
Presentation transcript:

Elementary Report Card Revisions Franklin Public Schools Parent Information Meetings November 2014

Agenda Context Common Core State Standards MA Frameworks Why Revise? Participants Changes Content General and Structural Changes Student Responsibilities Ratings Term progress and effort Questions

Common Core State Standards (CCSS) The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are shared expectations for knowledge and skills in English/Language Arts (ELA) and Math. They emphasize both content and skills.

Massachusetts Frameworks (MA Frameworks) The MA Frameworks are based on the Common Core. Approximately 85-90% of MA Frameworks are based on CCSS – meaning MA added 10-15% additional standards. Massachusetts teachers are mandated to teach to the MA Frameworks.

Why Revise Report Cards? Need to align teaching and learning Based on 2011 ELA and Math Massachusetts Frameworks Based on the Common Core State Standards Will be more straightforward and more accurate to grade with alignment Better for children and families

Participants Committee members – a team of teachers and administrators across school and grade levels All teachers and administrators across the district School Committee Parents

Changes: Literacy Elementary report cards now align with the 2011 Frameworks Standards that are currently taught Language and sequence from the Frameworks Not all standards represented on report card All standards are taught but not all standards are graded Most important standards at each grade level are reflected on the report card Grade level expectations for mastery of the standards

Changes: Math Elementary report cards now align with the 2011 Frameworks Standards that are currently taught Language from the standards Arranged by domain (math topics)

Science and Social Studies No changes were made to these content areas at this time, except for moving states and capitals from grade 3 to grade 4. Topics continue as in prior years Will look at future changes to Science & Social Studies Will need to align with new Science Frameworks

Changes: General and Structural Revisions were made to: Students Responsibilities Ratings Term effort and progress Standards Specialists Comment Bank

Changes: Student Responsibilities More positive language and approach Based on the Responsive Classroom Approach that develops students’ social competency and the ability to monitor their own behavior. Consistency K-5

Expectations for Student Responsibilities grow as students progress through the grades. Kindergarten Grade 2 Grade 5

Changes: Ratings

Changes: Ratings Mastery (M) is the expected end-of-the year mastery of the standard. However, student may achieve mastery earlier than the final report card, even as early as the first term. If a student displays mastery based on multiple data points earlier in the year, then displays regression at a later point, a grade can change from an M to a P or a B.

Standard Ratings “I” and “N” The “I” rating means that the concepts and skills are newly introduced and have not been assessed at the time of the report card. The “N” rating means that the concepts and skills have not yet been taught at this point in the school year.

Standard Ratings “I” and “N” Many ratings of “N” and “I” should be expected on the first term report card. This is a reflection of the trajectory of the curriculum. Curriculum trajectories may vary from building to building.

Standards Rating “B” B is used to designate that the student is still at the beginning stages of understanding of a standard. The student requires additional re-teaching, reinforcement, or use of supports in the learning of the concepts and skills represented in the standard. This re-teaching is above and beyond what the typical learner needs for success. On the previous report card the B may have been used to indicate the standard was newly introduced. This is no longer the case with the newly developed report card.

Standards Rating “P” The P represents grade level progress towards mastery of the standard. A rating of P for two consecutive terms does not mean that no growth has occurred, rather, it often represents progression of academic expectations (i.e. Increased complexity of content and skills). A P is used in the first and second term when a student is on track for the M at the end of the year, showing the typical grade level progress at the time that grading occurs.

Term Progress

Term Progress The term progress represents progress towards the year end mastery as identified by benchmarks and other assessments. The term progress for each subject is included with the report card to denote progress towards the holistic mastery of all standards taught that term.

Term Progress Holistic mastery means that more than one assessment is used to determine student progress. A multitude of data points are used to ensure a holistic approach to grading. Holistic grading may include data obtained from assessments, conferencing notes, observational notes, exit ticket etc.

Comment Page The standards on the new report card offer far more details than what was used on the previous report cards. The comment page on the new report card will, therefore, only be used to note a specific, significant change in student performance, either a regression or significant growth. This page will likely be blank.

Changes: Specialists Report Card Assess concept knowledge and skill development Physical Education and Health are now graded separately

Committee Members Chair: Joyce Edwards, Director of Instructional Services Teachers: Janet Bessette, Jolene Cronin, Anna Grinley, Meaghan O’Neil, Jennifer Zeilor, Tricia Tobin, Ann Bliss, Katie Patten, Kristine Richards and Cheryl Bartholomew With help from: Franklin Math and Literacy Specialists Administrators: Sarah Klim and all elementary principals and assistant principals

Questions