PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES. n Historic development of pavement condition indices n The basic functions of condition indices in PMS n Different types of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry
Advertisements

Pavement Management Engineer
Comparative Analysis of Emulsion and Hot Asphalt Cement Chip Seal Performance Douglas D. Gransberg, P.E., C.C.E. University of Oklahoma.
“Practical Pavement Management with Micro PAVER”
Lecture 12 Lecture 1L PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES.
1 PAVEMENT DATA ITEMS. 2 Climate_Shapes (4 LTPP zones) Soil_Shapes Metadata Estimates Section level data HPMS Pavement Data Summary level data.
FDOT Aviation Pavement Inspection Training Module 2 – Pavement Fundamentals – Overview Florida Department of Transportation Statewide Pavement Management.
Transportation Engineering II
Flooding & Drainage Committee March 30, 2010 Pavement Condition Assessments Mobile Data Collection Unit.
Introduction Surface Engineering & Aggregates and Pavement Management 1.
Simple.. convenient.. inexpensive Prepared by Mohammed ALMannaa & Abdullah Asharef & Abdulrhman min Mahmoud.
Probabilistic & Statistical Techniques Eng. Tamer Eshtawi First Semester Eng. Tamer Eshtawi First Semester
Pavement Ride Quality Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation.
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Basic types of condition surveys n Different.
Data Collection for Determining Pavement Condition
PERFORMANCE MODELS Lecture 16. Understand use of performance models Identify common modeling approaches Understand methods for evaluating reliability.
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
Development of GIS integrated Pavement Management System (PMS) for small cities. Golam Mohammad Moinuddin.
Pavement Preservation
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
Flexible Pavement Thickness Design / AASHTO Method
HDM-4 Calibration. 2 How well the available data represent the real conditions to HDM How well the model’s predictions fit the real behaviour and respond.
1 Chapter 10 Correlation and Regression We deal with two variables, x and y. Main goal: Investigate how x and y are related, or correlated; how much they.
Chapter 9. Highway Design for Rideability
Assessment Statements  The Internal Assessment (IA) Rubric IS the assessment statement.
Nondestructive Testing and Data Analysis Module 2-3.
N ORTHWEST GIS U SERS G ROUP C ONFERENCE – O CTOBER 20, 2011 Dynamic GIS-based Pavement Condition Tracking.
NETWORK LEVEL EXAMPLES OF PMS İNŞ.YÜK. MÜH. VEYSEL ARLI.
Influence of Pavement Condition on Project Selection
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1:
REMAINING SERVICE LIFE Lecture 14. n Concept of remaining service life n How remaining service life is used and its importance n How remaining life is.
1 Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener EMIS 7370 STAT 5340 Probability and Statistics for Scientists and Engineers Department of Engineering Management, Information.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1: Part 1: Pavement Preservation Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
2-1 Information Needs Data Collection Instrumentation Data Processing Report Generation Sampling Design Forward Links Backward Links Steps in the Survey.
Portorož, Slovenia Alex WrightAlex Wright TRL Infrastructure DivisionTRL Infrastructure Division Group manager, Technology DevelopmentGroup manager, Technology.
Ministry of Transportation Ministère des Transports Road Profiler User Group (RPUG) Stateline, Nevada September 28, 2011 Li Ningyuan Ministry of Transportation.
User perceptions of highway roughness Kevan Shafizadeh and Fred Mannering.
PERFORMANCE MODELS. Understand use of performance models Identify common modeling approaches Understand methods for evaluating reliability Describe requirements.
Use of Probe Vehicles to Measure Road Ride Quality
Addressing Localized Roughness at the Project Level by Gary Higgins.
Using LTPP Data in Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pavement Smoothness.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Pavement Health Track Analysis Tool for Determining the Health of Pavement Networks Sponsored by FHWA Contractor: Battelle/ARA Team.
2003 Warranty Presentations Caltrans WARRANTED HMA PAVEMENTS PAVEMENTS.
MnDOT Pavement Surface Smoothness Specification 23 rd Annual RPUG Meeting September 29, 2011.
User perceptions of highway roughness
National Highway Institute 4-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 PROFILE INDICES BLOCK 4.
ROAD PROFILING-ROUGHNESS Presentation by Niranjan Santhirasegaram
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
FUZZY APPROACH FOR ESTABLISHING THE PAVEMENT CONDITION QUALITY INDEX Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng Institute of Technology Management and Institute of Traffic and.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
1 VU TRINH, FDOT Statewide Airport Engineering Manager/ Instructor Florida Department of Transportation AVIATION OFFICE Florida Department of Transportation.
“Analysis of Pavement Condition along Ramon Magsaysay Boulevard by Pavement Distress Approach” Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Major in Transportation.
2012 Pavement Management Update June 12, 2012 BoCC Work Session.
Portorož, Slovenia Pavement Surface Defects: Classification and Quantification over a Road Network Alejandro Amírola SanzAlejandro Amírola Sanz AEPO, S.A.
Construction and Performance Evaluation of Roller Compacted Concrete under Accelerated Pavement Testing TRB Paper No: Moinul Mahdi Zhong Wu, PhD.,
2016 RAC Annual Meeting Sweet Sixteen
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
Chapter 9. Highway Design for Rideability
Pavement condition index calculation
X AND R CHART EXAMPLE IN-CLASS EXERCISE
Which slope is different?
PASER Ratings for TwinCATS Planning Area
STEM Fair Graphs.
Pavement Overlay Design
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Correlation and Prediction
Presentation transcript:

PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES

n Historic development of pavement condition indices n The basic functions of condition indices in PMS n Different types of condition indices n Development of a pavement condition index Instructional Objectives

Condition Surveys Ride Quality, Surface Distress, Rutting Pavement Indices Pavement Wheel Path ProfileRide Quality Index IRI Pavement Surface DistressesSurface Distress Index RuttingAverage Pavement Rut Depth Structural Capacity Deflections Structural Capacity Index Converts collected data to single value (over the pavement section)

Need for Condition Surveys Ride Quality Index  Measure Pavement Wheel Path Profile(s) to assess Pavement Ride Quality  Convert Pavement Wheel Path Profile (L&R) to Pavement Ride Quality Indices (IRI) 0.1 mile IRI

n Trigger treatments n Calculating life-cycle costs n Evaluate network conditions n Compare roads with different distresses Need for Pavement Distress Indices

n Transform pavement condition data into pavement condition indices n Deduct values developed for various levels of distress severity and extent n Two basic approaches - Expert opinion - Engineering criteria Pavement Condition Indices Development

Present Serviceability Rating Based on Verbal Description of Distresses and Ride Quality

PSI = 5.02-log(1+SV)-1.38(RD) (C+P) 1/2 Where: PSI = Statistical estimate of the Mean PSR SV = Slope variance (roughness) RD = Rut Depth C = Cracking(ft 2 / 1000 ft 2 ) P = Patching (ft 2 / 1000 ft 2 ) Present Serviceability Index

Computed using a very simple deduct based formula: n PCI = PCI max - ΣDeduct Value n Example = 60 Pavement Condition Indices Development

Deduct Value Table From Expert Opinion

Deduct Value Graph From Expert Opinion

n Scales used for condition index n Scales chosen to meet agency needs and perceptions n Typical scales are 0-100, 0-10, 0-5 Engineering Criteria Approach: Index Scale

n Index value representing unacceptable pavement condition n Typically taken as middle of an index scale, such as 50 (0-100 scale) or 2.5 (0-5 scale) n May be set to represent a range such as 40 to 60 (0-100 scale) or 2 to 3 (0-5 scale) Engineering Criteria Approach: Threshold/Trigger Value

n Pavement distress level (severity, extent), considered unacceptable n Amount of distress for each severity level where action should be taken to correct distress n May be numerically different for various types of distress Engineering Criteria Approach: Engineering Criteria

n Use a 100 to 0 Scale n Set Threshold/Trigger Condition Value at 50 n Set Engineering Criteria 90% Low Severity Cracking 25% Medium Severity Cracking 15% High Severity Cracking Engineering Criteria Example

n Develop Plot of Deduct Values - All three severities start at 0 and pass through the threshold value of 50 at the engineering criteria selected - In this example they pass through the threshold value of 50 at 15%, 25%, and 90% for low, medium and high severity cracking Engineering Criteria Example

Development of Deduct Values

n Develop Final Deduct Values from relationships shown on plot n The Deduct Values may be developed as set of continuous functions which may be shown:  as a plot of a chart  as a formula  as a set of deduct tables Engineering Criteria Example

Example Deduct Value Table (Straight Line approach)

Pavement Deduct Values ASTM D5340 “Paver” “Based on Engineering Experience”

Pavement Deduct Values Using Log-Log Chart

n Distress info - most variation - field procedure - distress definitions n Little opportunity to exchange information n Approximately. 80% of agencies use - distress index - serviceability index/rating - priority rating n No evident trends in development n 67% use composite indices Current Practices

NJDOT Practice Pavement Roughness Index – IRI Pavement Distress Indices –Non-Load Associated Distress Index (NDI) –Load Associated Distress Index (LDI) –Surface Distress Index Modified (SDIm)

NJDOT Practice 0.1 mile (528 ft) pavement section iNWP a WP L NWP b WP R NWP c ft ft

NJDOT Practice 0.1 mile (528 ft) pavement section 12 ft 1,75 ft2.5 ft 3.5 ft1,75 ft Wheelpath

NJDOT Practice NDI Distress Weights RCNDI Patching100 Shoulder Condition10 Cracks100 Long Jt Cond145 Trans Jt Cond145 Total500 BC/CONDI Patching60 Shoulder Condition10 Longitudinal Cracks140 Multiple Cracks150 Transverse Cracks140 Total500

DistressDistress Weights LMC300 Rut200 NJDOT Practice LDI Distress Weights

NJDOT Practice Distress Severity-Extent Weights

Rut Depth Weight

NJDOT Practice Surface Distress Indices SDIm = 0.8 NDI LDI LDI =

Questions?