1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Advertisements

2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
1 Accreditation and the First-Year Experience Kay H. Smith, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for the Academic Experience College of Charleston.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Academic Vision, Whitworth College. Five Strategic Objectives Improve on excellence in teaching, learning, and scholarship. Advance the intercultural.
Intro Tour of the Male Student Mind In American Higher Education European Access Network National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland June 28, 2007 Tom.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
Lessons from the National Survey of Student Engagement Dan BureauMahauganee Shaw Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Increasing Student Academic Success Through Interactive Learning Presented by: Dr. Barbara M. Montgomery Colorado State University-Pueblo Colorado, USA.
NOW WHAT? Charting Your Course through Using NSSE Data Regional NSSE Users Workshop October 19-20, 2006.
Shimon Sarraf Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University Bloomington Using NSSE to Answer Assessment Questions Regional User’s Workshop October.
Student Engagement: Promoting Better Learning Rick Vaz Associate Dean Interdisciplinary and Global Studies Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester, Massachusetts,
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2002.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
National Research Agenda to Support Transformation National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Focus Session June, 2003 Copyright Jillian Kinzie, 2003.
Using the National Survey of Student Engagement to Enhance Student Academic Success: Best Practices on Canadian Campuses Debra Dawson Ryerson University.
1 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2013 Tiffany Franks Assistant Director, Office of Planning & Analysis October 25, 2013.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
1 NSSE Columbus State University Program Overview  What do you know about college student engagement?  Why is student engagement important?
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Results from The College at Brockport 2014 NSSE Survey Presentation to President’s Advisory Council– 3/4/15.
IUPUI Council on Retention and Graduation – October 13, 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement Understanding IUPUI Students: National Survey of Student.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
Student Clark Atlanta University Opening Session Thursday, August 13, 2009 Division of Enrollment Services & Student Affairs Randy Gunter,
Notes to Users of this NSSE PowerPoint Template  This sample presentation is designed to serve as a customizable template to present NSSE, BCSSE, and/or.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
Primary Factors of Student Engagement at UTBTSC in 2002 Deborah Suzzane, Ph.D., Director Institutional Research & Planning.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement and Learning Tips from Award Winning Faculty Teaching and Learning Technology Conference MO S&T - March 13, 2014 Margaret Cohen, Ph.D.,
Results of the 2003 NSSE and FSSE: Implications for Student Affairs Bowling Green State University.
1 Presentation of Results NSSE 2005 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
NSSE at Gallaudet AY Report prepared by OAQ/Retention; JLD/LB/PH; 06/2015.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
Using National Studies of Student Engagement to Support Institutional Change Nathan Marti, CCSSE Todd Chamberlain, NSSE FAIR Conference June 23, 2004.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
State University of New York An Emerging Model for Online Learning MERLOT International Conference – August A Systemic Approach to Online Learning.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
Mentoring and Teaching Pat Rogers, Associate Vice President: Teaching and Learning Wilfrid Laurier University Annual Academic Administrators Workshop Balsillie.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
Closing the Experience Gap March 30, 2017
NSSE Results for Faculty
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Jeanne Butler, Director Office of Assessment
Presentation transcript:

1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback for the purpose of improving learning and student performance Summative Assessment – Culminating evaluation of Student performance against a Set of predetermined standards Content-based Assessment – The testing of a student’s understanding of a predetermined body of knowledge Outcomes-based Assessment – The testing of a student’s ability to use knowledge and skills to create a complex and multifaceted product or by completing a complex task

2 How might we do assessment? Possible Units of Analysis  Institution  College  Program  Course  Individual student Possible Targets  Institution-wide learning outcomes  College-wide goals  Program goals  Course goals  Student goals

3 Working ideas of how to assess  Institution level  Program level  Course level  Individual level NSSE Benchmarks Program-wide Learning Outcomes & Maps Project or Synthesis Exercise Course student evaluations Faculty e-portfolio Student e-portfolio

4 UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO NSSE 2005 Jane Baillargeon Institutional Research and Assessment

5 Program Overview  What do you know about college student engagement?  What is NSSE?  NSSE 2005  University of Idaho data  Using NSSE data  Questions and discussion

6 What Really Matters in College Student Engagement The research is unequivocal- Impact of college is largely determined by individual effort. Students are not passive recipients of institutional efforts to “educate” or “change” them. Important to focus on ways in which an institution can shape its academic, interpersonal, and extracurricular offerings to encourage student engagement. Pascarella & Terenzini. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research

7 What is NSSE? (pronounced “nessie”)  Evaluates the extent to which first-year and senior students engage in educational practices associated with high levels of learning and development  Supported by grants from Lumina Foundation for Education and the Center of Inquiry in the Liberal Arts at Wabash College  Co-sponsored by The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and the Pew Forum on Undergraduate Learning

8 Why A National Survey?  Refocus conversations about undergraduate quality to what matters most  Enhance institutional improvement efforts  Foster comparative and consortium activity  Inform accountability  Provide systematic national data on “good educational practices”

9 Effective Educational Practices  Student-faculty contact  Active learning  Prompt feedback  Time on task  High expectations  Cooperation among students  Respect for diverse talents and ways of learning Chickering and Gamson. (1987). Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education.

10 NSSE Project Scope  Almost 1000 different colleges and universities  50 states, Puerto Rico, and Canada  Data from more than 880,000 students  Institutions include Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Hispanic Serving Institutions, Tribal Colleges, and all female and all male colleges YearColleges/ Universities

11 Use and Validity of Self-Reports Validity of Self-Reporting Improves When…  Requested information is known to respondents  Questions are clear and unambiguous  Respondents take questions seriously and thoughtfully  Answering does not threaten, embarrass, or violate privacy or compel a socially desirable response National assessment experts designed the NSSE survey, The College Student Report, to meet these conditions

12 What Does The College Student Report Cover? Student Behaviors in College Institutional Actions And Requirements Institutional Actions And Requirements Student Reactions to College Student Background Information Student Background Information Student Learning & Development

13 Survey Administration  Administered to random sample of first-year & senior students  Paper & Web-based survey  Flexible to accommodate consortium questions  Multiple follow-ups to increase response rates

14 NSSE 2005 Institutions by Carnegie Classification

15 NSSE 2005 Respondents Race and Ethnicity Percentage of Respondents

16 NSSE 2005 Response Rates  University of Idaho’s response rate = 44%  39% overall for all NSSE 2005 institutions  35% for Paper mode institutions  42% for Web-only institutions  39% for Web+ institutions  Response rates ranged from 9% to 89%

17 External Campus Uses  Assess status vis-à-vis peers, competitors  Identify, develop, market distinctive competencies  Encourage collaboration in consortia (e.g., state-wide NSSE conference)  Provide evidence of accountability for good processes (while awaiting improvement in outcomes) Public Accountability Fund Raising Governing Boards Prospective Students Alumni State Policy Makers Performance Indicators Focus on Right Things Accrediting Bodies Media Parents

18 Internal Campus Uses  Gauge status of campus priorities  Examine changes in student engagement between first and senior years  Assess campus progress over time  Encourage dialogue about good practice  Link with other data to test hypotheses, evaluate programs  Improve curricula, instruction, services Institutional Improvement Learning Communities 1 ST Year and Senior Experience Academic Affair Learning Assessment Faculty Development Academic Advising Peer Comparison Student Affair Institutional Research Enrollment Management

19 Using NSSE Data  Discover current levels of engagement (institution, major field, year in school)  Determine if current levels are satisfactory (criterion reference, normative, or peer comparison)  Target areas for improvement  Modify programs and policies accordingly  Teach students what is required to succeed  Monitor student & institutional performance Areas of Effective Educational Practice Areas for Institutional Improvement

20 NSSE Benchmarks of Effective Practice  Level of Academic Challenge  Active and Collaborative Learning  Student-Faculty Interaction  Enriching Educational Experiences  Supportive Campus Environment

21 University of Idaho  Benchmark description and survey items  Comparison of UI to selected peers  Comparison of UI to all NSSE schools  First-Year to Senior comparison  What does it mean for us?

22 How Do I Find Out More? NSSE Website Jane Baillargeon