Advanced Seismic Imaging GG 6770 Tomography Inversion Project By Travis Crosby.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computer vision: models, learning and inference
Advertisements

(t,x) domain, pattern-based ground roll removal Morgan P. Brown* and Robert G. Clapp Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University.
Siddharth Choudhary.  Refines a visual reconstruction to produce jointly optimal 3D structure and viewing parameters  ‘bundle’ refers to the bundle.
Using 3D Seismic Imaging for Mine and Mineral Exploration G. Schuster University of Utah.
Computational Challenges for Finding Big Oil by Seismic Inversion.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference
Lunar Results Hybrid code. Initial condition Amplitude of dipole for the moon= 0 Lunar Radius=16.9 (unit of length) Maximum time = 200(inverse of gyro.
Sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency signals: Applications in migration velocity updating and tomography Xiao-Bi Xie University of California at Santa.
Classification and Prediction: Regression Via Gradient Descent Optimization Bamshad Mobasher DePaul University.
Modelling, calibration and correction of nonlinear illumination-dependent fixed pattern noise in logarithmic CMOS image sensors Dileepan Joseph and Steve.
Jonathan Richard Shewchuk Reading Group Presention By David Cline
Advances in Earthquake Location and Tomography William Menke Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University.
Methods For Nonlinear Least-Square Problems
Matching a 3D Active Shape Model on sparse cardiac image data, a comparison of two methods Marleen Engels Supervised by: dr. ir. H.C. van Assen Committee:
Multiscale Waveform Tomography C. Boonyasiriwat, P. Valasek *, P. Routh *, B. Macy *, W. Cao, and G. T. Schuster * ConocoPhillips.
Advanced Seismic Imaging GG 6770 Variance Analysis of Seismic Refraction Tomography Data By Travis Crosby.
Wave-equation MVA by inversion of differential image perturbations Paul Sava & Biondo Biondi Stanford University SEP.
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Analytical image perturbations for wave-equation migration velocity analysis Paul Sava & Biondo Biondi Stanford University.
1 Adaptive error estimation of the Trefftz method for solving the Cauchy problem Presenter: C.-T. Chen Co-author: K.-H. Chen, J.-F. Lee & J.-T. Chen BEM/MRM.
© 2007 Ray S. Babcock Tracks Game is played on a (nxn) set of squares. There are three possible moves (labeled A,B,C). Players alternate making a move.
Advances in Earthquake Location and Tomography William Menke Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University.
Application of Digital Signal Processing in Computed tomography (CT)
Surface wave tomography: part3: waveform inversion, adjoint tomography
1 Woodhouse and Dziewonski, 1986 Inversion (part I, history & formulation): 1. Earth is highly heterogeneous 2. The pattern can be roughly quantified.
Advanced Preconditioning for Generalized Least Squares Recall: To stabilize the inversions, we minimize the objective function J where where  is the.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
Fig. 6c: 35x35 blocs, RMS = s Fig. 6b: I25x25 blocs, noise= 0.1 s, RMS = sFig. 6a, 25x25 blocs, RMS = s Simultaneous Inversion for.
Medical Image Analysis Image Reconstruction Figures come from the textbook: Medical Image Analysis, by Atam P. Dhawan, IEEE Press, 2003.
Tile Scanning on Zeiss Microscopes Kim Peifley 2/09/15.
Optimization Section 4.7 Optimization the process of finding an optimal value – either a maximum or a minimum under strict conditions.
CS654: Digital Image Analysis Lecture 25: Hough Transform Slide credits: Guillermo Sapiro, Mubarak Shah, Derek Hoiem.
Transformations Objective: to develop an understanding of the four transformations. Starter – if 24 x 72 = 2016, find the value of: 1)2.8 x 72 = 2)2.8.
Optimization Problems Section 4.5. Find the dimensions of the rectangle with maximum area that can be inscribed in a semicircle of radius 10.
Seismological Analysis Methods Receiver FunctionsBody Wave Tomography Surface (Rayleigh) wave tomography Good for: Imaging discontinuities (Moho, sed/rock.
Optimization Problems
Optimization. First Derivative Test Method for finding maximum and minimum points on a function has many practical applications called Optimization -
Joint 3D relocation of earthquakes by surface and borehole data
G. Giorgetti, ACM MELT 2008 – San Francisco – September 19, 2008 Localization using Signal Strength: TO RANGE OR NOT TO RANGE? Gianni Giorgetti Sandeep.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter Naoshi Aoki Feb. 5,
Multiscale Waveform Tomography C. Boonyasiriwat, P. Valasek, P. Routh, B. Macy, W. Cao, and G. T. Schuster * ConocoPhillips * **
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
What is inside here?. Process of Investigation: Teams of Seismologists develop a model of earth’s interior which is to compared to one developed by teams.
NMF Demo: Lee, Seung Bryan Russell Computer Demonstration.
3.7 Optimization Problems Buffalo Bill’s Ranch, North Platte, Nebraska Greg Kelly, Hanford High School, Richland, WashingtonPhoto by Vickie Kelly, 1999.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
Any questions about the practice? Page , 11, 13, 21, 25, 27, 39, 41, 53.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference
Aim To be able to describe how a shape has been translated. Success Criteria To know what translation of a shape means. To know how to describe how a shape.
Line Fitting James Hayes.
Translations.
Steepest Descent Optimization
6.2 Proportions.
لجنة الهندسة الكهربائية
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Structure from Motion with Non-linear Least Squares
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Comparing previous simulation work with current study.
THIS IS Precalc Jeopardy. THIS IS Precalc Jeopardy.
High Resolution Velocity Analysis for Resource Plays
Solving Quadratic Equations by Factoring
Inverse Functions Inverse Functions.
Solve the equation: 6 x - 2 = 7 x + 7 Select the correct answer.
This is an Arithmagon….
Equations my dear Watson.
Adding and Subtracting Fractions With Common Denominators
Structure from Motion with Non-linear Least Squares
3.7 Optimization Problems
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Seismic Imaging GG 6770 Tomography Inversion Project By Travis Crosby

Outline Experiment parameters Results of unregularized tomography experiment - Various Ray orientations - Various stopping criteria - Noise added (±0.05% max traveltime) Results of regularized tomography experiment - Different lambdas Jackson’s Principle determination of lambda

Tomography Experiment Parameters Real velocity model shown to the left units/s homogeneous starting model. Straight rays from left to right and top to bottom. Solve by least square steepest descent (s = [L’L] –1 L’d ), regularized and unregularized. Ratio of knowns (441 rays) to unknowns (400 grid units) is Noise added was random and 0.05% of maximum traveltime. No preconditioning used. Real Velocity Model

Unregularized Tomography Experiment 1 Rays Left to Right Rays

Unregularized Tomography Experiment 2 Rays Top to Bottom Rays

Unregularized Tomography Experiment 3 Rays Left to Right & Top to Bottom Rays

Unregularized Tomography Experiment 4 10% change stopping criteria Rays

Unregularized Tomography Experiment 5 1% change stopping criteria Rays

Unregularized Tomography Experiment 6 0.1% change stopping criteria Rays

Unregularized Tomography Experiment % change stopping criteria Rays

Unregularized Tomography Experiment % Noise Added - 0.1% change stopping criteria Rays

Regularized Tomography Experiment Lambda Rays Unregularized

Regularized Tomography Experiment Lambda Rays Unregularized

Jackson’s Principle – Determination of Lambda 0.05% Noise Added Original Data

Jackson’s Principle – Determination of Lambda Original Data Residual 1.35e-8 Optimal lambda = or 0.05*max(LtL) = 0.005

Acknowledgements Much Thanks to Ruiqing He