With Derivation Heat balance on arbitrary FIXED area in domain Net rate of heat in = rate of increase in area  density c specific heat divergence = Fixed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partial Differential Equations
Advertisements

Chapter 8 Elliptic Equation.
Parabolic Partial Differential Equations
Homework 3: Use the Fixed Grid --Volume of Fluid Method with Structured Cartesian CVFEM mesh To track Filling Front h=1 h = 0 2 r = 1 3 Hand in 1. Code.
1D, transient, homogeneous, isotropic, confined, no sink/source term Explicit solution Implicit solution Governing Eqn. for Reservoir Problem.
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 12 – MULTI- DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL MODELS.
Numerical Integration CSE245 Lecture Notes. Content Introduction Linear Multistep Formulae Local Error and The Order of Integration Time Domain Solution.
CE An Intro Problem—will lead to first homework Fluid is contained in along square duct, see cross section below, three faces of the duct are kept.
CE A Mathematical Approach for Discretization In the previous set of notes we saw how we could numerically solve With boundary conditions Using.
Lecture 34 - Ordinary Differential Equations - BVP CVEN 302 November 28, 2001.
MECH300H Introduction to Finite Element Methods Lecture 10 Time-Dependent Problems.
T=1 T=0 At an internal node Heat Balance gives Grid advection Note sign And volume continuity gives Deforming 2-D grid for One-Phase Stefan Problem—Compare.
Parabolic PDEs Generally involve change of quantity in space and time Equivalent to our previous example - heat conduction.
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 11 – ONE DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL MODELS.
H=1 h=0 At an internal node vol. Balance gives vel of volume sides And continuity gives hence i.e., At each point in time we solve A steady state problem.
I i row1 row2 row3 row4 col1 col2 col3 col4 a. Grid b. Mesh c. Cloud A control volume solution based on an unstructured mesh (Linear Triangular Elements)
Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equation
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Tutorial 5: Numerical methods - buildings Q1. Identify three principal differences between a response function method and a numerical method when both.
Introduction to Numerical Methods for ODEs and PDEs Methods of Approximation Lecture 3: finite differences Lecture 4: finite elements.
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 4 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
Lecture Objectives: Analyze the unsteady-state heat transfer Conduction Introduce numerical calculation methods Explicit – Implicit methods.
1 Spring 2003 Prof. Tim Warburton MA557/MA578/CS557 Lecture 8.
Elliptic PDEs and the Finite Difference Method
MECH593 Introduction to Finite Element Methods Eigenvalue Problems and Time-dependent Problems.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Part 8 - Chapter 29.
Transient Conduction: Finite-Difference Equations and Solutions Chapter 5 Section 5.9  
OPERATIONS WITH DERIVATIVES. The derivative of a constant times a function Justification.
Finite Difference Methods Definitions. Finite Difference Methods Approximate derivatives ** difference between exact derivative and its approximation.
An Introduction to Heat Transfer Morteza Heydari.
HW2 Due date Next Tuesday (October 14). Lecture Objectives: Unsteady-state heat transfer - conduction Solve unsteady state heat transfer equation for.
Finite Deference Method
Circuits Theory Examples Newton-Raphson Method. Formula for one-dimensional case: Series of successive solutions: If the iteration process is converged,
Heat flux through the wall
FALL 2015 Esra Sorgüven Öner
Discretization Methods Chapter 2. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Discretization Methods Topics Equations and The Goal Brief overview.
Elliptic PDEs and Solvers
Finite-Difference Solutions Part 2
14 - finite element method
1 Spring 2003 Prof. Tim Warburton MA557/MA578/CS557 Lecture 25.
ERT 216 HEAT & MASS TRANSFER Sem 2/ Dr Akmal Hadi Ma’ Radzi School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis.
1 Spring 2003 Prof. Tim Warburton MA557/MA578/CS557 Lecture 32.
Lecture Objectives: - Numerics. Finite Volume Method - Conservation of  for the finite volume w e w e l h n s P E W xx xx xx - Finite volume.
Integration by parts formula
Implementing Finite Volume Methods 1.  Continue on Finite Volume Methods for Elliptic Equations  Finite Volumes in Two-Dimensions  Poisson’s Equation.
TH EDITION LIAL HORNSBY SCHNEIDER COLLEGE ALGEBRA.
1 Variational and Weighted Residual Methods. 2 Introduction The Finite Element method can be used to solve various problems, including: Steady-state field.
FINITE DIFFERENCE In numerical analysis, two different approaches are commonly used: The finite difference and the finite element methods. In heat transfer.
Part 8 - Chapter 29.
Convection-Dominated Problems
Poisson Equation Finite-Difference
Chapter 30.
14 - finite element method
Explicit Approximation
Applications of Lattice Methods
Lecture 19 MA471 Fall 2003.
HW2 Example MatLab Code is posted on the course website
Linear Functions SOL 8.14, SOL 8.16, SOL 8.17.
Objective Numerical methods.
Finite Volume Method for Unsteady Flows
Thermal-ADI: a Linear-Time Chip-Level Dynamic Thermal Simulation Algorithm Based on Alternating-Direction-Implicit(ADI) Method Good afternoon! The topic.
Implicit Differentiation
Lecture Objectives: Answer questions related to HW 2
Lecture Objectives: Analysis of unsteady state heat transfer HW3.
Objective Numerical methods Finite volume.
MATH-321 In One Slide MATH-321 & MATLAB Command.
topic4: Implicit method, Stability, ADI method
6th Lecture : Numerical Methods
Balanced scales and equations
Presentation transcript:

With Derivation Heat balance on arbitrary FIXED area in domain Net rate of heat in = rate of increase in area  density c specific heat divergence = Fixed area A transient problem With scaling And noting arbitrary nature of area

Control Volume Solution—Start from the balance on area A Associate A with a control volume USE scalings A Mid point Rule (Area A =  2 ) Approximate with finite difference 3 possibilities are Backward in time (explicit) Forward in time (implicit) Central difference in time Crank Nicolson Where “new” indicates evaluation at time t = current +  t Node i

Consider implicit scheme Data structure + physics (same as steady state problem) Or rearranging in a form suitable for an iterative solution Old time OR So with previous steady state code on modifying the a i coeff and source b i We can arrive at a solution fro the value of the nodal T’s at time t+  t based on the known T’s at time t MATLAB CODE data coefficient—modified fro tran terms and new boundary conditions (Set  t And nodal T’s=0) for jtim=1:100 solve (For Tnew initial setting Tnew=T) (store Thist(itim) at 61) (set T=Tnew) end plot Thist HOMEWORK BY NEXT CLASS Do this I just need the plot handed in

Now Consider the Explicit Case Or rearranging in a form suitable for an iterative solution NO EQUATION TO SOLVE--EXPLICIT But must choose Such that Solution strategy **Calculate the coefficients using the steady state code ** choose time step and calculate **Set T = 0 for i = 1:500 for i = 1:n %nodes % solve Eq(1)—essentially similar code to one it of solve code T=Tnew store Thist end Code this also And compare Temp hist at Mid point With imp sol