SKA AA-low: LPD antenna (SKALA) & path towards AAVS0 at Cambridge Eloy de Lera Acedo University of Cambridge 1 AAVP 2011: Taking the AA programme into.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CNR IEIIT – Applied Electromagnetics Group AAVP, Dwingeloo, December AAVS0 Results, Dual-Polarized Vivaldi Antenna G. Virone, R. Tascone, A.
Advertisements

Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate DS4-T4 Wideband Integrated Antennas DS4-T4 Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate ASTRON.
Update on Measurements and Simulations at Cambridge: SKALA element + LNA Eloy de Lera Acedo Nima Razavi Ghods Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge.
1 A Low Power CMOS Low Noise Amplifier for Ultra-wideband Wireless Applications 指導教授 : 林志明 學生 : 黃世一
Schediwy: Advantages and Disadvantages of Sparse Aperture Arrays Fermilab: October 2009.
ASTRON / Photonics p1. Photonics and AA station design Peter Maat – ASTRON Photonics and AA station design Peter Maat – ASTRON.
AAVS receiver Federico Perini AAVP December, ASTRON, Dwingeloo.
System designAA Consortium - BolognaOctober 2012 AA Consortium AA System configuration options 23 October 2012.
08/16/01. Link Budgets for Cellular Networks Presented by Eric Johnson.
BDT Radio – 1b – CMV 2009/09/04 Basic Detection Techniques 1b (2009/09/04): Single pixel feeds Theory: Brightness function Beam properties Sensitivity,
08/16/01.
Prototype SKA Technologies at Molonglo: 2. Antenna and Front End G.B. Warr 1,2, J.D. Bunton 3, D. Campbell-Wilson 1, R.G. Davison 1, R.W. Hunstead 1, D.A.
Sascha D-PAD Sparse Aperture Array.
Signal Processing for Aperture Arrays. AAVS1 256 antenna elements distributed over –4 stations –64 elements each.
ATA Antennas Feeds and Systems NSF Review 8/05/08 Jack Welch.
Performance of station array configurations Sparse vs. Dense, Regular vs Random Jaap D. Bregman AAVP Workshop,Cambridge,
Dec 2010 AAVP Cambridge workshop AAVP AAVS1/2-low demonstrators Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate.
Cambridge, Dec 2010Considerations for AA-lo LNA Dr Saswata Bhaumik PDRA of: Dr Danielle George The University of Manchester.
Array Antenna Designs for the SKA-AAlo Eloy de Lera Acedo 1 AAVP 2010, Cambridge, UK. 10/12/10.
AA-mid demonstrator Dion Kant AAVP – 10 December 2010, Cambridge, UK.
LOFAR Antenna Systems Dion Kant, Wim van Cappellen AAVP – 10 December 2010, Cambridge, UK.
CSIRO. Paul Roberts Digital Receivers SKANZ 2012 Digital Receivers for Radio Astronomy Paul Roberts CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science Engineering Development.
Name1 title 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 Progress in Active Antenna Design and Developement - FIDA3 Timothy Finn FG-IGN
Name1 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects: building a system Laurens Bakker.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
AAVP meeting Cambridge December 2010 Technology Trade –offs: Mid band Array and Elements Prof. A. K. Brown 1 1 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering.
SKA-Japan Industry Forum [SKA-Japan Workshop 2010] EMC & Microwave Systems November 05, 2010.
Georgina Harris1 2-PAD 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October Polarisations All Digital Dr Georgina Harris / Prof Tony Brown SKADS System Design.
AA-Low Technical Progress Meeting, October 2012, Medicina, Italy AAVS0 & AAVS0.5: System Design and Test Plan Nima Razavi-Ghods Eloy de Lera Acedo.
SKA AA-Low Station Configurations and Trade-off Analysis Nima Razavi-Ghods, Ahmed El-Makadema AAVP 2011, ASTRON, Dwingeloo Dec
Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,
SKA Introduction Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate Andrew Faulkner, Andre Gunst, Peter Hall.
Analysis of Low Frequency Phased Array Stations Dr. Nima Razavi-Ghods Dr. Eloy de Lera Acedo Cambridge AAVP 2010, 09/12/10 1.
Gerardo E. Cornejo M. Bonner Denton Scott Tilden Roger Sperline Denton Research Lab Department of Chemistry University of Arizona
Widefield Astronomy and Technologies for the SKA November 2009 at Limelette, Belgium The SKA AA-lo array; E.M. simulation and design Eloy de Lera.
Rosie Bolton1 SKADS Costing work 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 SKADS Costing work: Spreadsheets to scalable designs Rosie Bolton Dominic.
18/10/20151 Calibration of Input-Matching and its Center Frequency for an Inductively Degenerated Low Noise Amplifier Laboratory of Electronics and Information.
1 Cosmic Vision Instrumentation ASIC R. Jansen TEC-EDM 19 January 2010.
Rosie Bolton SKADS Workshop April 10th 2008 SKADS Costing work: beyond the benchmark scenario Rosie Bolton Paul Alexander, Andy Faulkner and SKADS Costing.
Departement Elektriese en Elektroniese Ingenieurswese  Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Ultra Wideband Reflector Antenna Feeds Dirk.
Integrated receivers for mid-band SKA Suzy Jackson Engineer, Australia Telescope National Facility SKADS FP6 Meeting – Chateau de Limelette – 4-6 November,
Electromagnetic Design of Broadband Antenna Feed Systems for the Northern Cross Radio Telescope (Bologna, Italy) Designed Broad Band Antenna Feed Systems.
LOGO A Multi Unsymmetrical Beam Tapered Slot Ya-gi Antenna with λ/4 for PMMW Imaging  Presenter: Ya Chung Yu.
Ariadne’s Thread Kristian Zarb Adami. Simulator Aims ۞ Provide the system architect a tool to visualise trade-offs in designs ۞ Provide the scientist.
System designAA Consortium - BolognaOctober 2012 AA Consortium The path to AAVS1 22 October 2012.
AAVS processing: Uniboard implementation. UNIBOARD Jive led FP7 project UniBoard, high integration density >> processing / m3
O. García-Pérez (FG-IGN) 1FIDA3 Wide Field Astronomy and Technologies for the SKA, Limelette, 4-6 November 2009 FIDA3: A Novel Active Array for the Mid-SKA.
EMBRACE receiver 8th SKADS Board Meeting Château de Limelette, Belgium, 3 November 2009 DS5 EMBRACE IRA&ASTRON DS5 Eng. Group Presentation by Jader Monari.
A System View on SKA Bandwidth Usage G.W. (Dion) Kant AAVP Dwingeloo, 14 December 2011.
K-Band Focal Plane Array Project Engineering Overview Matt Morgan National Radio Astronomy Observatory 2/27/2008.
3-Stage Low Noise Amplifier Design at 12Ghz
Rosie Bolton 2 nd SKADS Workshop October 2007 SKADS System Design and Costing: Update and next steps Rosie Bolton University of Cambridge.
Broadcasting devices. Broadcasting devices overview USB Power Monitor, type channel, 4-line display, USB, Digital out, Opto out WEB Power Monitor,
DESIGN PARAMETRES AT BASE STATION Prittu Ann Thomas Roll no :14.
DESIGN OF TOOTHED LOG PERIODIC ANTENNA
Nicolas Fagnoni – Cosmology on Safari – 14th February 2017
Communication 40 GHz Anurag Nigam.
Digital Receivers for Radio Astronomy
Noise Figure Measurement using Natural Noise Sources
Lets Design an LNA! Anurag Nigam.
Sensitivity, the Challenges
AAVS1 Calibration Aperture Array Design & Construction Consortium
Phased Array Feeds SKANZ 2012 John O’Sullivan
Signal Processing for Aperture Arrays
Variable Gain CMOS LNA MOREIRA E SILVA, Paulo Marcio, DE SOUSA, Fernando Rangel Introduction Simulation.
ANITA antennas Frequency range: MHz Dual polarization needed
LHCb calorimeter main features
5.8GHz CMOS 射頻前端接收電路 晶片設計實作 5.8GHz CMOS Front-End Circuit Design
Aperture Array Station Processing
Technical Foundations & Enabling Technologies – DS4
Presentation transcript:

SKA AA-low: LPD antenna (SKALA) & path towards AAVS0 at Cambridge Eloy de Lera Acedo University of Cambridge 1 AAVP 2011: Taking the AA programme into SKA Pre-Construction December, ASTRON, Dwingeloo

Overview Introduction Current status of SKALA (LPD antenna) Low Noise Amplifier for SKALA SKALA tests and AAVS0 (16-element array) Important numbers Summary and conclusions

Introduction ParameterSpecificationRemarks Low frequencyMHz70Lowest frequency expected for the EoR Nyquist frequencyMHz100Frequency with element spacing is λ/2, defines max A­ eff High frequencyMHz450Freq where sky noise is low, overlaps with AA-hi and/or dishes Frequency coveragecontiguousThere are no gaps between low and high frequency Bandwidth, maxMHz380Individual beams can operate over the full frequency range Polarisations2Orthogonal Station diameterm180Determined from SKA 2. Uses 250 arrays for expected SKA 2 sensitivity Geometric aream2m2 ~25,000 No. of element types1A single wide-band element type e.g. bow-tie or conical spiral No. of elements~10kEach element is low gain, dual polarisation Scan angle rangedeg±45Will operate at larger scan angles, but sensitivity not defined 100 MHzm 2 /K17 Single array, sensitivity varies over the band. Assumes T sky = 1000K, 70% for appodisation. Frequency channelkHz250 Assumes 2048 channels splitting the full sample rate, further channelization will be required at correlator Output data rateTb/s16 Defines the survey performance of the array. Can be used flexibly for frequency, bandwidth and number of beams

Evolution: from BLU to SKALA BLU Impedance Dual polarisation Sky coverage Cost Toothed log periodic Impedance Dual polarisation Sky coverage Cost SKALA Impedance Dual polarisation Sky coverage Cost w-SKALA Impedance Dual polarisation Sky coverage Cost

SKALA: SKA Log-periodic Antenna 1.6 m 1.3 m * GND mesh is 1.5 x 1.5 m.

Current status of SKALA

Mass production of SKALA and LNA

Some numbers: – Cost of antennas for AAVS1 is around 150€/element. – Cost of antenna for AAVS2 is targeted at 75€/element (this is for the 2 polarisations and includes the electronics). – Weight of each arm would be 1.56 kg if made of steel wire.

First prototype

Performance

Low Noise Amplifier for SKALA Frequency range 70 to 450MHz Gain > 20dB Gain flatness, as flat as possible consistent with meeting other spec. parameters Noise temperature < 30K at 450MHz P1dB, high enough to allow astronomical observations to be made at Lords Bridge Power consumption < 100mW Unconditionally stable at both input and output ports Differential source (antenna), single-ended load High Level of Common Mode Signal Rejection

Concept

Dual Matched Low Noise RF FETs Required

Schematic AVAGO MGA-16516

Board layout

Picture

LNA & antenna performance

LNA+antenna simulated performance (includes a 20dB gain second stage on chip)

Simulated A/T for SKA 1 (with log-periodic antenna) η (radiation efficiency) = 90% D (directivity) Tsky (sky noise temperature) following Tsky = 1.691*(freq[GHz].^-2.751) K Tamb (ambient temperature) = 295 K Trec (receiver noise temperature) -> Assuming ideal amplifier with: Zopt (optimum noise impedance) = 100 Ω Rn (noise resistor) = 10 Ω Fmin (minimum noise figure) = 0.3 dB -> 21 K - A/T shown is A/T of 1 antenna x N (number of antennas in a 180 m station with elements spaced 1.5 m apart) x 50 stations.

* Peak is at 2452 m^2/K

* Peak is at 3468 m^2/K

Effect of Soil/GND – (Soil B – 5% humidity) Even a bigger pitch may be possible!

X-pol

SKALA tests and AAVS0 16 dual-polarised SKALA elements. Aim: – Test realistic SKA AA-low front-end technology in an array environment: Effect of cables. Effect of ground mesh/soil. Effect of mutual coupling on noise and pattern. – Challenges: Measure the pattern in an array environment. Options: – Use of known field source: NF, FF. – Use data from interferometry experiment. – Cost: Estimated total cost is 5-10 K€ depending on tools and equipment needed for the tests. e/o Analogue ADC: 1GS/s Data Control Sync m all optical

Lord’s Bridge Observatory SKALA-AAVS0

Upcoming tests: December 2011: – Impedance test with “dummy” board. January 2011: – Single element pattern measurement in outdoor test range, Perth? – Single element pattern measurement in outdoor test range, UK. – Noise matching with integrated LNA in reverberation chamber, UK. – Impedance tests on AAVS0. February-March 2011: (with Roach back-end) – Noise tests on AAVS0: pointing the array to hot and cold patches of the sky. – Pattern tests on AAVS0: (compare with analytical/EM models - UCL) Interferometry experiment: full correlation/correlation with high gain antenna Known source: Near field source (no back-end needed), minicopter? – More tests... Any suggestion? Plug into other back-ends?

Important numbers Noise: – < MHz. Sky coverage – A/T: – Meets DRM specifications down to +/- 45 o at all frequencies. Frequency band: – Potential to go down to 50 MHz (lower arm). Foot-print: 1x1 m possible (lower arm). Cost: – Targeted to 75 € including LNA and ground mesh.

Single-Dual band Low-band: high gain element, OK. High-band: low gain element? Not so easy... Getting down to 30 K with a low gain antenna in a 3:1 band is not that easy. You will probably need a high gain element anyway and rather large.

Summary and conclusions Antenna+LNA pair meets DRM requirements. In early 2012 noise and pattern tests for AAVS0. Mass production prototypes are in their way (75€/element).

Thank you! Any questions? SKALA1 (Cambridge) SKALA2 (ICRAR) SKALA3 (Cambridge) SKALA4 (ASTRON) SKALA0 miniSKALA (Cambridge)