StaFF: Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision Proposed experiment conducted within framework of StaFF (Stabilization of Final Focus for ILC). Funded.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Advertisements

MONALISA: Interferometric Position Monitor at the Nanometre Scale David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
Metrology and pre-alignment of the components of CLIC in the PACMAN project S. W. Kamugasa, V. Vlachakis CLIC Workshop January 2015 CERN, Geneva,
Development of a mover having one nanometer precision and 4mm moving range Y. Morita, S. Yamashita ICEPP, University of Tokyo Y. Higashi, M. Masuzawa,
WP 4.2 review meeting Status of the ESA work... Wednesday, 13 September 2006, UCL,
ILC roles Interferometry Results 2009 / 2010 Mon 20 Apr :00 JST (01:00 UTC) MDI TILC09 – Tsukuba OXFORD MONALISA 1.
Accelerator and Beam Delivery The LC-ABD (Linear Collider: Accelerator and Beam Delivery) consortium is a group of UK institutes aiming to develop new.
Initial Calibration and Stability Results from the LiCAS RTRS FSI System John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IWAA February 2008.
Final Doublet Stability and in-detector Interferometry MONALISA David Urner Oxford University.
Sta bilization of the F inal F ocus : Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision.
MONALISA David Urner, Armin Reichold, Paul Coe, Matthew Warden, Geoff Rayner Monitoring Alignment and Stabilisation with high Accuracy (Previously known.
IPBPM piezo-mover system and plans for in situ monitoring of calibration and stability Current status and plan for ATF2 Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
Integration and Alignment of Optical Subsystem Roy W. Esplin Dave McLain.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
B. Caron, G. Balik, L. Brunetti LAViSta Team LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France & SYMME-POLYTECH Annecy-Chambéry, Université de Savoie,
1 ATF2 - IP Chamber Design and manufacturing of Chamber with high precision piezo actuators for high resolution BPMs Status / progress report – 26 June.
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
Alignment and Beam Stability
1 StaFF Progress Report David Urner University of Oxford.
12/12/04 1 Stewart Boogert (UCL) Second Mini-workshop Nano project at ATF UK plans for Energy spectrometer studies University College London Stewart Boogert.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
ATF2 ILC Final Focus Test Beam Line at KEK-ATF References : ATF2 Proposal, KEK Report ATF2 Proposal Vol.2, KEK Report ホームページ:
LASER AND ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
1 Plans for KEK/ATF 1. Introduction 2. Related Instrumentations at ATF 3. Experimental Plans for Fast Kicker R&D at ATF Junji Urakawa (KEK) at ILC Damping.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
ATF2 meeting LAPP; David Urner 1 David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Geoffrey Rayner MPhys alumnus MONALISA Monitoring, Alignment.
January 8, 2005Mike Hildreth – ILC-MDI Workshop A BPM-Based Energy Spectrometer Technical Considerations & Plans for the End Station A Test Beam Mike Hildreth.
1 LAPP in ATF2 Extraced from ANR bid A.Jeremie. 2 LAPP in ATF2 Current activities related to accelerators: The LAPP-Annecy team is currently developing.
MONALISA an Update David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
Stabilization of Focus at ATF2 David Urner University of Oxford.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
Project Management Mark Palmer Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters First installations fall 2006 First results spring A B.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
Welcome to MONALISA A brief introduction. Who we are... David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Electronics support from CEG Central Electronics.
Proposal to use electromagnetic correction coils for RT trajectory correction.
CARE / ELAN / EUROTeV Feedback Loop on a large scale quadrupole prototype Laurent Brunetti* Jacques Lottin**
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
The stabilisation of the final focus (StaFF) system Sun 12 th March 2006 MDI – LCWS06 at I I Sc Bangalore David Urner, Paul Coe, Armin Reichold.
LASER FRAME: Straightness monitor (Tentative results of resolution test) Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF May 30-31,2005 KEK Nano BPM Group Y.Higashi,
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
09:40 – 10:00 (JST) Wed 5 Mar 2008 MONALISA : JAI Oxford MDI ATF2 TILC08 Sendai Japan 1 / 26 MONALISA Laser based alignment and stability monitoring.
1 ATF 2 Nanobpm (Q BPM) Electronics. Mark Slater: Cambridge Yury Kolomensky, Toyoko Orimoto: UCB Stewart Boogert, Steve Malton, Alexi Liapine: UCL Mike.
ATF2: Summary of Scheduling Strategy Session Grahame Blair Feedback and Feedforward systems Fast Kicker for ILC bunch train structure Laser-wire Shintake.
MONALISA Update David Urner ATF2 Meeting Dec
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
May 31, 2005Mike Hildreth – ATF 2005 Energy Spectrometry and ATF Components of the nano-BPM Test Program and Plans for Future Tests Mike Hildreth University.
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
FP7: EuCARD after a year of preparation… A.Jeremie.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
May 31, 2005Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF (M. Ross) Plans for nanometer cavity BPM studies Energy Spectrometer evaluation (Hildreth) Integration.
Taikan SUEHARA, Joint Meeting of PRPPC in Honolulu, Hawaii, 2006/10/30 Laser Fringe Stabilization of 35nm IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake monitor) for ATF2/ILC.
BRAINSTORMING ON LASER BASED SOLUTIONS FOR CLIC PRE-ALIGNMENT INTRODUCTION Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, BE/ABP/SU, 09/02/2010 Status of the study CLIC pre-alignment.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team Status on CLIC pre-alignment studies.
EuroTeV WP7 activities at DESY Group Members: R. Amirikas, A. Bertolini, W. Bialowons, H. Ehrlichmann Total Man Power: 1.5 reaching 2 (maximum)
Summary FD Support System
LCABD WP 4.2 – Spectrometer and BPM Studies
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
EuroTeV WP7 activities in DESY
Topics on Vibration Issues
David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
IP configuration session
David Urner, Armin Reichold , Paul Coe, Matthew Warden, Geoff Rayner
Presentation transcript:

StaFF: Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision Proposed experiment conducted within framework of StaFF (Stabilization of Final Focus for ILC). Funded by EuroTEV. Development of active feedback systems to monitor and stabilize for example final focus quadrupoles or beam position monitors in the energy chicane. –Develop laser interferometric methods to monitor relative position of two objects at Nanometer scale resolution. For separations of order 10m. Frequency range 100Hz – 0.01 Hz –Develop and implement algorithms for active stabilization. StaFF at KEK: Stabilize Nano-BPM systems relative to each other. KEK: Integrated spectrum of vertical motion

Why StaFF at KEK Benefits for StaFF –Test of distance meters in accelerator environment. –Measurement of 6-D coordinates trough intermediate object (triangle), similar method is needed to project out position and orientation of accelerator component at ILC. –Related objects are BPMs: Allows cross check of achieved resolutions. Benefits for nano-BPM –Unfold nano-BPM resolution and broadening caused by mechanical relative motion between the two BPM setups. –Each setup uses 3 BPM’s also establishing beam angles. Two sets can in principle measure relative displacements Each beam bunch differs in position and angle → over-constrained system needed. 2-platform stability important for energy chicane –BPMs measure beam position, proposed experiment measure relative position motion.

Measurement of Relative Motion Typical situation: –Need straightness monitor to measure relative motion. (Leave for development later). –Need distance meter to project out. (Develop first). Quadrupole ~10m Reference Structure Reference Structure Vertical & angular position measurement of ref. structure Straightness monitor to measure relative vertical movement between ref. structures

A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters Accuracy few tens of nanometer for vertical displacement between KEK and SLAC BPM. KEK BPM SLAC BPM Floor node

A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters Project 6-D coordinates from one BPM via middle triangle to the other BPM. KEK BPM SLAC BPM Floor node

A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters KEK BPM SLAC BPM Floor node Red lines: Michelson interferometer displacement meter nm resolution. Multilateration requires absolute distance meter with  m resolution: FSI. Both systems with same setup!

Spider web Design with Opto- Geometrical Simulation: Simulgeo Resolution of distancemeter: 1nm Mount precision of distancemeter: 1nm Angle precision of distancemeter holder: 10  rad. SLAC BPM: reference KEK BPM variable (6D): Position: x:32 y:19 z:2 nm Angle: x:0.01 y:0.01 z:0.1  rad ~1  m absolute distance resolution needed to determine constants required to solve geometry.

Stabilization Actively stabilize setup using input from interferometers: –Both Nano-BPM setups are mounted on actuators. –Use movers on SLAC setup for coarse angle adjustment. –Use piezo movers on KEK setup for small adjustments. We measure the relative motion of the two reference frames of the SLAC and KEK BPM’s –Closed loop feedback system relates the KEK reference bar to the KEK nano-BPM’s. –Closed loop feedback system relates the SLAC carbon fibre frame to the SLAC nano-BPM’s. –Overall feedback loop has to integrate 3 measurements! Hz (or preferably even slower) is unusual frequency range for feedback system and might require some fundamental study. Collaboration with EuroTEV partners developing closed loop feedback circuits expected.