Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Advertisements

Collisions Deriving some equations for specific situations in the most general forms.
Ion beam Analysis Joele Mira from UWC and iThemba LABS Tinyiko Maluleke from US Supervisor: Dr. Alexander Kobzev Dr. Alexander Kobzev.
Ion Beam Analysis techniques:
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
Hamamatsu, November 2007 Methods and Tehniques in Surface Science Prof. Dumitru LUCA “Alexandru Ion Cuza” University, Iasi, Romania.
Chapter 29 Nuclear Physics.
Monday, Sept. 24, 2012PHYS , Fall 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #8 Monday, Sept. 24, 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Atomic Model of.
RFSS: Lecture 9 Nuclear Reactions
Study of sputtering on thin films due to ionic implantations F. C. Ceoni, M. A. Rizzutto, M. H. Tabacniks, N. Added, M. A. P. Carmignotto, C.C.P. Nunes,
Prof. Reinisch, EEAS / Simple Collision Parameters (1) There are many different types of collisions taking place in a gas. They can be grouped.
number of coulombs in a mole mass of liberated substance.
Counting Cosmic Rays through the passage of matter By Edwin Antillon.
An  particle with initial kinetic energy K = 800 MeV
Particle Interactions
Cross section measurements for analysis of D and T in thicker films Liqun Shi Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, , People’s.
Chapter 21 & 22 Electric Charge Coulomb’s Law This force of repulsion or attraction due to the charge properties of objects is called an electrostatic.
Lecture 10 Energy production. Summary We have now established three important equations: Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state:
Ion Beam Analysis of Gold Flecks in a Foam Lattice F E Gauntlett, A S Clough Physics Department, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. PHY093 Lecture 2d Linear Momentum, Impulse and Collision 1.
Chapter 7 Linear Momentum
The nucleus. Rutherford's nuclear atom (1902 ‑ 1920) Ernest Rutherford was interested in the distribution of electrons in atoms. Two of his students,
6.1 The Atomic Models of Thomson and Rutherford 6.2 Definition of Cross Section 6.2 Rutherford Scattering 6.3 Structure of the Nucleus Rutherford Scattering.
Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia CRP: Development of a Reference Database for Ion Beam Analysis Measurements of differential cross sections for.
Cross section for potential scattering
FRANK LABORATORY OF NEUTRON PHYSICS ION BEAM ANALYSIS STANCIU-OPREAN LIGIA SUPERVISOR DR. KOBZEV ALEXANDER.
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
Discovery of the Nucleus Nuclear Physics Lesson 1.
FRANK LABORTORY OF NEUTRON PHYSICS ION BEAM ANALYSIS
Cross Sections One of the most important quantities we measure in nuclear physics is the cross section. Cross sections always have units of area and in.
Chapter 17 PLANE MOTION OF RIGID BODIES: ENERGY AND MOMENTUM METHODS
Lecture 1 & 2 © 2015 Calculate the mass defect and the binding energy per nucleon for a particular isotope.Calculate the mass defect and the binding.
Artificial Radioactivity
Conception of cross section 1) Base conceptions – differential, integral cross section, total cross section, geometric interpretation of cross section.
2. RUTHERFORD BACKSCATTERING SPECTROMETRY Basic Principles.
Inelastic scattering When the scattering is not elastic (new particles are produced) the energy and direction of the scattered electron are independent.
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
© Jimoid.com 2005 Ionising Radiation There are two types of radiation; ionising and non-ionising. Radiation Ionising Non-ionising Indirectly ionising (neutral.
Monday, Sep. 20, 2010PHYS 3446, Fall 2010 Andrew Brandt 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Sep Dr. Brandt 1.Differential Cross Section of Rutherford.
Nuclear Radius Probing Matter.
Exam 2 Review 8.02 W08D1. Announcements Test Two Next Week Thursday Oct 27 7:30-9:30 Section Room Assignments on Announcements Page Test Two Topics: Circular.
Daniela Adriana LĂCĂTUŞ1 Supervisor: Alexander Pavlovich KOBZEV
Sect. 3.11: Transformation to Lab Coords Scattering so far: –Treated as 1 body problem! Assumed 1 particle scatters off a stationary “Center of Force”.
PHYS 3446, Fall 2010 Andrew Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #3 Wednesday, Sept. 3, 2008 Dr. Andrew Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #6 Monday, Sept. 15, 2008 Dr. Andrew Brandt
Basics of Ion Beam Analysis
Chapter 14 Systems of Particles.
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS)
Chapter 7 Linear Momentum. Objectives: Students will be able to: Explain that a conserved quantity is a quantity that remains numerically constant. Define.
Linear Momentum Newton’s Laws of Motion First law Second law Third law.
INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER. twCshttp:// twCs
Particle Kinematics Direction of velocity vector is parallel to path Magnitude of velocity vector is distance traveled / time Inertial frame – non accelerating,
Spring 2002 Lecture #10 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1.Term exam results 2.Linear Momentum 3.Momentum Conservation 4.Impulse and Momentum 5.What are Collisions?
Laboratory system and center of mass system
Atoms, Molecules & Ions Isotopes and % Abundance
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #3 Rutherford Scattering
CHAPTER 4: Systems of Particles
Outside the nucleus, the beta decay {image} will not occur because the neutron and electron have more total mass than the proton. This process can occur.
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #13
ION BEAM ANALYSIS.
Characterization of Thin Films
Hour 38 Scattering Cross Sections
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #13
Cross Section Much of what we have learned about the internal structure of matter comes from scattering experiments (i.e. a microscope) Beam = electron,
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Wednesday,March 7, 2012 Dr. Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #5 Monday, Feb Dr. Brandt
Ion Beam Analysis (IBA)
Presentation transcript:

Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry Elemental analysis technique where alpha particles are scattered off of targets and is used to determine elemental composition and thin-film thickness. The main points to learn are: 1. The scattering is proportional to the squares of both the charge of the incident particle and the target nucleus. 2. The number of scattered particles varies as the inverse square of the kinetic energy of the incident particle. The scattering is inversely proportional to the fourth power of sin(θ/2), where θ is the scattering angle. For thin targets, the scattering is proportional to the target thickness, t.

The Rutherford Scattering Experiment Incident particle approaches at a separation distance, b, called the impact parameter, from the target nucleus and scatters at an angle q with respect to its initial direction due to the Coulomb force. where z = 2 and Z = atomic number of target

Momentum triangle and the Impulse equations Central force means constant angular momentum: Limits of integration and the impact parameter: Relation between b and q!

The Kinematic Factor - K The kinematic factor is the ratio of the scattered alpha particle’s energy to its incident energy gives a convenient method for determining the elemental make up of the target atoms in the sample. To determine K we proceed as follows… q f He M Assuming that the collision is elastic we apply conservation of momentum and kinetic energy to the above situation to obtain:

The Kinematic Factor - K We eliminate the f dependence and the momentum of the target nucleus (since it is difficult to measure anyway) in favor of the mass of the target atom, the mass of the helium nucleus and the scattering angle q. Knowing, or calculating the kinematic factor allows you to determine the mass of the target atom and thus chemically identify the atom. Now what you need is a target and a spectrum of number of detected alpha particles versus the energy of the alpha particles. To calibrate the energy spectrum (so we know the leading edge energy in order to calculate the kinematic factor) we use a known energy alpha emitter. Our choice is 241Am whose alpha particle energies are approximately 5.4 MeV.

The RBS Experiment Start with a beam of 3.3 MeV alpha particles incident on a target of unknown composition. Determine the elemental composition of the sample based on the energies of the scattered alpha particles. Chemical identification based on the kinematics factor. Letting: M1 = mass of helium ion, M2 = mass of target species, q = scattering angle.

Chemical identification of the target elements using the kinematic factor. E0 = 2.0 MeV He E1 = 1830 keV K = 0.9150 M2 = 181amu Tantalum This is a spectrum of 2.0 MeV alpha particles incident on a thin film of “unknown composition” scattered at 170o.

Thickness determination from a thin-film. Scattered a-particle from front edge, KEo DE a Dx Al peak Incident a-particle, Eo Scattered a-particle from back edge, E and emerges with E1 KEo E1 counts Energy

Thickness determination from a thin-film. Inward: Outward: If is assumed constant along the inward and outward paths, then Here we don’t know the energy at the back edge, rather only the energy that leaves the target having been scattered from the back edge. So we can eliminate this energy E. q1 -angle between incident beam and horizontal. q2 -angle between exiting beam and horizontal.

Thickness determination from a thin-film. Solving for E and equating the two resulting expressions we find: From our diagram we see that Which give us a depth scale that is linear in the energy loss of the alpha particle. S is called the energy loss factor, which involves the stopping power of the alpha particle in the element in question and as the alpha particle travels farther it loses energy in proportion to the penetration depth in the sample. In general the stopping powers are not constant, but energy dependant. However, if the film is thin then these stopping powers will be roughly constant.

Surface Energy Approximation for S0 in Thin Films. If Dx is small then DE will be small and then we can evaluate the stopping powers on the from and back surfaces. Thus we find: So, now we have to look up S0 for a particular element and for a given q. After the elements are identified, you can use the tables provided to look up S0 for your element and from DE, you can calculate the thickness of the three films on the surface of the substrate and the thickness of the substrate. Now for Ta, we find at 2.0 MeV and q = 170o, So = 118.1 eV / A. Thus the thickness of the tantalum foil is: