9 Oct 08Feng 1 DARK MATTERS 9 October 2008 Caltech Physics Colloquium Jonathan Feng UC Irvine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SuperWIMP Dark Matter Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine UC Berkeley 11 October 2004.
Advertisements

WIMPs and superWIMPs Jonathan Feng UC Irvine MIT Particle Theory Seminar 17 March 2003.
Joe Sato (Saitama University ) Collaborators Satoru Kaneko,Takashi Shimomura, Masato Yamanaka,Oscar Vives Physical review D 78, (2008) arXiv:1002.????
Constraining Dark Matter Hai-Bo Yu University of Michigan, Ann Arbor USTC, 06/17/2011.
DARK PARTICLES: WIMPS AND BEYOND Cornell Colloquium 7 November 2011 Jonathan Feng UC Irvine 7 Nov 11Feng 1.
WIMPS AND BEYOND Princeton Colloquium 24 February 2011 Jonathan Feng
27 Oct 08Feng 1 WIMPS AND THEIR RELATIONS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 27 October 2008 MIT Nuclear and Particle Physics Colloquium.
17 Dec 09 Feng 1 LHC PROSPECTS FOR COSMOLOGY Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine Annual Theory Meeting IPPP, Durham 17 December 2009.
Dark Matter: A Mini Review Jin Min Yang Hong Kong (杨 金 民)(杨 金 民) Institute of Theoretical Physics Academia Sinica, Beijing.
11 May 07Feng 1 SUPERSYMMETRIC DARK MATTER Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 11 May 2007 Fermilab Wine & Cheese Hunt for DM Workshop.
Probing the Dark Matter Particle Spectrum with the Dark Matter Power Spectrum Kris Sigurdson Institute for Advanced Study KICP: New Views of the Universe.
SuperWIMP Dark Matter Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine University of Washington 4 March 2005.
WIMPs and superWIMPs Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SUGRA20 18 March 2003.
12 July 07Feng 1 COLLIDER PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine GRG18 and Amaldi7 Sydney, 12 July 2007.
23 September 05Feng 1 COSMOLOGY AT COLLIDERS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 23 September 2005 SoCal Strings Seminar Graphic: N. Graf.
WIMP PARADIGM: CURRENT STATUS 23 Mar 11Feng 1 FNAL Colloquium International Symposium on Experiments on the Cosmic Frontier Jonathan Feng UC Irvine 23.
SuperWIMP Cosmology and Collider Phenomenology Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine SUSY04, Tsukuba 21 June 2004.
DARK MATTER CANDIDATES AND SIGNALS SLAC Colloquium 1 June 2009 Jonathan Feng UC Irvine.
2 June 05Feng 1 DARK MATTERS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 2 June 2005 UCSC Colloquium Graphic: N. Graf.
4 Mar 08Feng 1 DARK MATTERS CaJAGWR Caltech-JPL 4 March 2008 Jonathan Feng UC Irvine.
WIMPS AND THEIR RELATIONS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine CIFAR, Mont Tremblant 7 March 2009 Work with Jose Ruiz Cembranos 1, Manoj Kaplinghat.
DARK MATTERS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine Physics Department Colloquium University of Chicago 2 December 2004.
WIMPs and superWIMPs from Extra Dimensions Jonathan Feng UC Irvine Johns Hopkins Theory Seminar 31 January 2003.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PARTICLE DARK MATTER KISS Dark Matter Workshop 15 July 2009 Jonathan Feng UC Irvine 15 Jul 09Feng 1.
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine Arlington LC Workshop January 2003.
19 Jun 099 Oct 08Feng 1 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DARK MATTER AND IMPLICATIONS FOR COLLIDERS Fermilab Wine & Cheese 19 June 2009 Jonathan Feng UC Irvine.
20 June 07Feng 1 MICROPHYSICS AND THE DARK UNIVERSE Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine CAP Congress 20 June 2007.
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine American Linear Collider Physics Group Seminar 20 February 2003.
SuperWIMP Dark Matter Jonathan Feng UC Irvine FNAL Theoretical Astrophysics Seminar 17 May 2004.
THE DARK UNIVERSE Jonathan Feng Department of Physics and Astronomy UCI Distinguished Faculty Lecture 26 October 2004.
DARK PARTICLES Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine APS April Meeting Garden Grove, California 3 May 2011.
8 Oct 07Feng 1 THE SEARCH FOR DARK MATTER Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 8 October 2007 CSULB Colloquium Graphic: N. Graf.
20 June 06Feng 1 DARK MATTER AND SUPERGRAVITY Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 20 June 2006 Strings 2006, Beijing.
DARK MATTER PHENOMENOLOGY CIPANP Jonathan Feng San Diego
The Dark Universe Progress, Problems, and Prospects Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine APS April Meeting, Denver 1 May 2004.
30 Jul – 1 Aug 07Feng 1 SUPERSYMETRY FOR ASTROPHYSICISTS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 29 Jul – 1 Aug 2007 SLAC Summer Institute Graphic:
5 Feb 07Feng 1 ILC AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN COSMOLOGY Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine BILCW07 5 February 2007 Graphic: N. Graf.
Feng 1 LHC PROSPECTS FOR COSMOLOGY Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine COSMO 09, CERN 7 September 2009.
DARK MATTERS Hawaii Colloquium 9 September 2010 Jonathan Feng UC Irvine 9 Sep 10Feng 1.
12 Apr 06Feng 1 RECENT PROGRESS IN SUSY DARK MATTER Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 12 April 2006 Texas A&M Mitchell Symposium Graphic:
19 Mar 099 Oct 08Feng 1 DARK MATTER CANDIDATES AND SIGNALS 19 March 2009 UCSC Physics Colloquium Jonathan Feng UC Irvine.
WIMP AND RELATED MIRACLES Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine Manoj Kaplinghat, Jason Kumar, Huitzu Tu, Haibo Yu Inaugural Workshop, Center for Particle Cosmology.
DARK MATTER MEETS THE SUSY FLAVOR PROBLEM Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine SLAC NAL 18 March 2009 Work with Manoj Kaplinghat, Jason Kumar,
Quintessino model and neutralino annihilation to diffuse gamma rays X.J. Bi (IHEP)
The Dark Side of the Universe What is dark matter? Who cares?
24 Sep 2013 DaMaSC 2 Feng 1 DARK MATTER AND ITS PARTICLE PROPERTIES Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine Dark Matter in Southern California (DaMaSC 2) Keck Institute.
24 April 14 Feng 1 DARK MATTER AND THE LHC 24 April 2014 Technion Colloquium UC Irvine Jonathan Feng.
DARK MATTER CANDIDATES Cody Carr, Minh Nguyen December 9 th, 2014.
The Linear Collider and the Rest of the Universe Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine ALCPG Victoria Meeting 28 July 2004.
Cosmology Perspectives Professor George F. Smoot Chaire Blaise Pascal Paris Center for Cosmological Physics (PCCP) Université Sorbonne Paris Cité - Université.
Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003.
Detecting metastable staus and gravitinos at the ILC Hans-Ulrich Martyn RWTH Aachen & DESY.
DARK MATTER FROM THE EARLY UNIVERSE AND PARTICLE PHYSICS CANDIDATES Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine Dark Matter Universe: On the Threshold of Discovery NAS Sackler.
STAU CLIC Ilkay Turk Cakir Turkish Atomic Energy Authority with co-authors O. Cakir, J. Ellis, Z. Kirca with the contributions from A. De Roeck,
Phys. Lett. B646 (2007) 34, (hep-ph/ ) Non-perturbative effect on thermal relic abundance of dark matter Masato Senami (University of Tokyo, ICRR)
19 May 14 Feng 1 WIMPS: AN OVERVIEW, CURRENT CONSTRAINTS, AND WIMP-LIKE EXTENSIONS Debates on the Nature of Dark Matter The 8 th Harvard-Smithsonian Conference.
Lecture II: Dark Matter Candidates and WIMPs
DARK MATTER Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine SLAC 50th Anniversary Celebration
Dark Matter: A Mini Review
DARK MATTER AND THE LHC 7 July 2014 Munich Physics Colloquium
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
PARTICLE DARK MATTER CANDIDATES
DARK MATTER AND INDIRECT DETECTION IN COSMIC RAYS
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Testing the Standard Model and Beyond
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

9 Oct 08Feng 1 DARK MATTERS 9 October 2008 Caltech Physics Colloquium Jonathan Feng UC Irvine

9 Oct 08Feng 2 Remarkable agreement Dark Matter: 23% ± 4% Dark Energy: 73% ± 4% Baryons: 4% ± 0.4% Neutrinos: 0.2% (  m /0.1eV) Remarkable precision Remarkable results COSMOLOGY NOW

9 Oct 08Feng 3 OPEN QUESTIONS DARK MATTER –Is it a fundamental particle? –What are its mass and spin? –How does it interact? –Is it absolutely stable? –What is the symmetry origin of the dark matter particle? –Is dark matter composed of one particle species or many? –How and when was it produced? –Why does  DM have the observed value? –What was its role in structure formation? –How is dark matter distributed now? DARK ENERGY –What is it? –Why not   ~ ? –Why not   = 0? –Does it evolve? BARYONS –Why not  B ≈ 0? –Related to neutrinos, leptonic CP violation? –Where are all the baryons?

9 Oct 08Feng 4 THE DARK UNIVERSE DARK MATTER The problems appear to be completely different No known particles contribute Probably tied to M weak ~ 100 GeV Several compelling solutions DARK ENERGY All known particles contribute Probably tied to M Planck ~ GeV No compelling solutions

9 Oct 08Feng 5 Known DM properties DARK MATTER Not baryonic Unambiguous evidence for new physics Not hot Not short-lived Gravitationally interacting

9 Oct 08Feng 6 DARK MATTER CANDIDATES The observational constraints are no match for the creativity of theorists Masses and interaction strengths span many, many orders of magnitude, but not all candidates are equally motivated HEPAP/AAAC DMSAG Subpanel (2007)

9 Oct 08Feng 7 NEW PARTICLES AND NATURALNESS m h ~ 100 GeV,  ~ GeV  cancellation of 1 part in At ~ 100 GeV we expect new particles: supersymmetry, extra dimensions, something! Classical =+ = − Quantum e + Quantum new particle −

9 Oct 08Feng 8 THE “WIMP MIRACLE” (1)Assume a new (heavy) particle  is initially in thermal equilibrium:  ↔  f f (2) Universe cools:   f f (3)  s “freeze out”:  f f (1) (2) (3) → ← / → ← / / Zeldovich et al. (1960s)

9 Oct 08Feng 9 The amount of dark matter left over is inversely proportional to the annihilation cross section:  DM ~  What is the constant of proportionality? Impose a natural relation:     k  2 /m 2, so  DM  m 2 Remarkable “coincidence”:  DM ~ 0.1 for m ~ 100 GeV – 1 TeV HEPAP LHC/ILC Subpanel (2006) [band width from k = 0.5 – 2, S and P wave]

9 Oct 08Feng 10 STABILITY This all assumes the new particle is stable. Why should it be? Problems ↕ Discrete symmetry ↕ Stability In many theories, dark matter is easier to explain than no dark matter New Particle States Standard Model Particles Stable

9 Oct 08Feng 11 WIMPs from Supersymmetry The classic WIMP: neutralinos predicted by supersymmetry Goldberg (1983); Ellis et al. (1983) Supersymmetry: extends rotations/boosts/translations, string theory, unification of forces,… For every known particle X, predicts a partner particle X̃ Neutralino   (  ̃, Z̃, H̃u, H̃d ) Particle physics alone   is lightest supersymmetric particle, stable, mass ~ 100 GeV. All the right properties for WIMP dark matter!

9 Oct 08Feng 12  DM = 23% ± 4% stringently constrains models Feng, Matchev, Wilczek (2003) Focus point region Co-annihilation region Bulk region Yellow: pre-WMAP Red: post-WMAP Too much dark matter Cosmology excludes many possibilities, favors certain regions

9 Oct 08Feng 13 WIMP DETECTION Correct relic density  Efficient annihilation then  qq Efficient annihilation now (Indirect detection) Efficient scattering now (Direct detection) Efficient production now (Particle colliders)

9 Oct 08Feng 14 Dark Matter annihilates in to a place, which are detected by. some particles an experiment June 2006 INDIRECT DETECTION the halo positrons PAMELA Cirelli, Strumia (2008)

9 Oct 08Feng 15 DIRECT DETECTION WIMP properties: v ~ c Kinetic energy ~ 100 keV Local density ~ 1 / liter Detected by recoils off ultra- sensitive underground detectors DAMA has reported a signal in annual modulation Theory predictions vary, but many models  cm

9 Oct 08Feng 16 DIRECT DETECTION: DAMA 8  signal for annual modulation with T ~ 1 year, max ~ June 2 DAMA Collaboration (2008) Hooper, Petriello, Zurek, Kamionkowski (2008) Feng, Kumar, Learned, Strigari (2008); many others

9 Oct 08Feng 17 PARTICLE COLLIDERS LHC: E COM = 14 TeV, top quarks/yr [Tevatron: E COM = 2 TeV, top quarks/yr]

9 Oct 08Feng 18 WHAT THEN? What LHC actually sees: – E.g., q̃q̃ pair production – Each q̃  neutralino  – 2  ’s escape detector – missing momentum This is not the discovery of dark matter –Lifetime > s  s?

9 Oct 08Feng 19 THE EXAMPLE OF BBN Nuclear physics  light element abundance predictions Compare to light element abundance observations Agreement  we understand the universe back to T ~ 1 MeV t ~ 1 sec

9 Oct 08Feng 20 DARK MATTER ANALOGUE (1) (2) (3) Particle physics  dark matter abundance prediction Compare to dark matter abundance observation How well can we do?

9 Oct 08Feng 21 Contributions to Neutralino WIMP Annihilation Jungman, Kamionkowski, Griest (1995)

9 Oct 08Feng 22 PRECISION LHC Masses can be measured by reconstructing the decay chains Weiglein et al. (2004)

9 Oct 08Feng 23 WMAP (current) Planck (~2010) LHC (“best case scenario”) ILC LCC1 RELIC DENSITY DETERMINATIONS % level comparison of predicted  collider with observed  cosmo ALCPG Cosmology Subgroup

9 Oct 08Feng 24 IDENTIFYING DARK MATTER Are  collider and  cosmo identical? Congratulations! You’ve discovered the identity of dark matter and extended our understanding of the Universe to T=10 GeV, t=1 ns (Cf. BBN at T=1 MeV, t=1 s) Yes Calculate the new  hep Can you discover another particle that contributes to DM? Which is bigger? No  collider  cosmo Does it account for the rest of DM? Yes No Did you make a mistake? Does it decay? Can you identify a source of entropy production? No Yes No Yes Can this be resolved with some non- standard cosmology? Yes No Are you sure? Yes Think about dark energy No

9 Oct 08Feng 25 TAKING STOCK WIMPs are astrophysically identical –Weakly-interacting –Cold –Stable Is this true of all DM candidates? No. But is this true of all DM candidates independently motivated by particle physics and the “WIMP miracle”? No! SuperWIMPs: identical motivations, but qualitatively different implications

9 Oct 08Feng 26 SUPERWIMPS: BASIC IDEA G̃ not LSP Assumption of most of literature SM LSP G̃G̃ G̃ LSP Completely different cosmology and particle physics SM NLSP G̃G̃ Supersymmetry: Graviton  Gravitino G̃ Mass ~ 100 GeV; Interactions: only gravitational (superweak) Feng, Rajaraman, Takayama (2003)

9 Oct 08Feng 27 Suppose gravitinos G̃ are the LSP WIMPs freeze out as usual But then all WIMPs decay to gravitinos after M Pl 2 /M W 3 ~ seconds to months SUPERWIMP RELICS Gravitinos naturally inherit the right density, but interact only gravitationally – they are superWIMPs (also KK gravitons, quintessinos, axinos, etc.) G̃G̃ WIMP ≈ Feng, Rajaraman, Takayama (2003); Bi, Li, Zhang (2003); Ellis, Olive, Santoso, Spanos (2003); Wang, Yang (2004); Feng, Su, Takayama (2004); Buchmuller, Hamaguchi, Ratz, Yanagida (2004); Roszkowski, Ruiz de Austri, Choi (2004); Brandeburg, Covi, Hamaguchi, Roszkowski, Steffen (2005); …

9 Oct 08Feng 28 Charged Particle Trapping SuperWIMPs are produced by decays of metastable particles. These can be charged. Charged metastable particles will be obvious at colliders, can be trapped and moved to a quiet environment to study their decays. Can catch 1000 per year in a 1m thick water tank Feng, Smith (2004) Hamaguchi, Kuno, Nakawa, Nojiri (2004) De Roeck et al. (2005) Charged particle trap Reservoir

9 Oct 08Feng 29 IMPLICATIONS FROM CHARGED PARTICLE DECAYS Measurement of  m l ̃ and E l  m G̃ and G N –Probes gravity in a particle physics experiment! –Measurement of G N on fundamental particle scale –Precise test of supergravity: gravitino is graviton partner –Determines  G̃ : SuperWIMP contribution to dark matter –Determines F : supersymmetry breaking scale, contribution of SUSY breaking to dark energy, cosmological constant Hamaguchi et al. (2004); Takayama et al. (2004)

9 Oct 08Feng 30 SUPERWIMP COSMOLOGY Late decays can modify CMB black body spectrum (  distortions) Fields, Sarkar, PDG (2002) Late decays can modify BBN (Resolve 6,7 Li problems?) Fixsen et al. (1996)

9 Oct 08Feng 31 SuperWIMPs are produced in late decays with large velocity (0.1c – c) Suppresses small scale structure, as determined by FS, Q Warm DM with cold DM pedigree SMALL SCALE STRUCTURE Dalcanton, Hogan (2000) Lin, Huang, Zhang, Brandenberger (2001) Sigurdson, Kamionkowski (2003) Profumo, Sigurdson, Ullio, Kamionkowski (2004) Kaplinghat (2005) Cembranos, Feng, Rajaraman, Takayama (2005) Strigari, Kaplinghat, Bullock (2006) Bringmann, Borzumati, Ullio (2006) Kaplinghat (2005) Sterile Dodelson, Widrow (1993) SuperWIMP

9 Oct 08Feng 32 CONCLUSIONS Particle Dark Matter –Central topic at the interface of cosmology and particles –Both cosmology and particle physics  weak scale ~ 100 GeV Candidates –WIMPs: Many well-motivated candidates –SuperWIMPs: Qualitatively new possibilities (warm, only gravitationally interacting) –Many others LHC collisions begin in 2009, direct and indirect detection are improving rapidly – this field will be transformed soon