Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Shufang Su • U. of Arizona

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Shufang Su • U. of Arizona"— Presentation transcript:

1 Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
SuperWIMP Dark matter in SUSY with a Gravitino LSP Shufang Su • U. of Arizona J. Feng, F. Takayama, S. Su hep-ph/ ,

2 Why gravitino not considered as CDM usually?
- thG  v-1  (gravitional coupling)-2 (comparig to WIMP of weak coupling strength) v too small thG too big, overclose the Universe ~ However, gravitino can get relic density by other means SuperWIMP S. Su SWIMP

3 WIMP  SWIMP + SM particle
- FRT hep-ph/ , WIMP 104 s  t  108 s SWIMP SM  Gravitino LSP  LKK graviton 106 S. Su SWIMP

4 Outline SWIMP dark matter and gravitino LSP Constraints
- SWIMP dark matter and gravitino LSP Constraints Late time energy injection and BBN NLSP  gravitino +SM particle slepton, sneutrino, neutralino - approach I: fix SWIMP=0.23 - approach II: SWIMP=(mSWIMP/mNLSP) thNLSP Collider phenomenology Conclusion S. Su SWIMP

5 SWIMP and SUSY WIMP SWIMP: G (LSP) WIMP: NLSP mG » mNLSP ~ SUSY case
- SWIMP: G (LSP) WIMP: NLSP mG » mNLSP ~ SUSY case ~ Ellis et. al., hep-ph/ ; Wang and Yang, hep-ph/ 104 s  t  108 s NLSP  G + SM particles ~ neutralino/chargino NLSP slepton/sneutrino NLSP BBN EM had Brhad  O(0.01) Brhad  O(10-3) S. Su SWIMP

6 Constraints ~ NLSP  G + SM particles  Dark matter density G · 0.23
- ~ NLSP  G + SM particles /10-10 = 6.1 0.4 Fields, Sarkar, PDG (2002)  Dark matter density G · 0.23 ~  CMB photon energy distribution || · 9 £ 10-5 Fixsen et. al., astro-ph/ Hagiwara et. al., PDG  Big bang nucleosynthesis Late time EM/had injection could change the BBN prediction of light elements abundances S. Su SWIMP

7 BBN constraints on EM/had injection
- Decay lifetime NLSP EM/had energy release EM,had=EM,had BrEM,had YNLSP Cyburt, Ellis, Fields and Olive, PRD 67, (2003) EM EM (GeV) » mNLSP-mG Kawasaki, Kohri and Moroi, astro-ph/ had had (GeV) EM S. Su SWIMP

8 YNLSP: approach I approach I: fix G = 0.23 ~ slepton and sneutrino
- approach I: fix G = 0.23 ~ slepton and sneutrino 200 GeV ·  m · 400 » 1500 GeV mG ¸ 200 GeV ~  m · 80 » 300 GeV apply CMB and BBN constraints on (NLSP, EM/had )  viable parameter space NLSP, EM,had=EM,had BEM,had YNLSP S. Su SWIMP

9 Approach II: right-handed slepton
G = (mG/mNLSP) thNLSP ~ S. Su SWIMP

10 Approach II: sneutrino
- G = (mG/mNLSP) thNLSP ~ S. Su SWIMP

11 Distinguish from stau NLSP and gravitino LSP in GMSB
Collider Phenomenology - SWIMP Dark Matter no signals in direct / indirect dark matter searches SUSY NLSP: rich collider phenomenology NLSP in SWIMP: long lifetime  stable inside the detector Charged slepton highly ionizing track, almost background free Distinguish from stau NLSP and gravitino LSP in GMSB GMSB: gravitino m » keV warm not cold DM collider searches: other sparticle (mass) (GMSB) ¿ (SWIMP): distinguish experimentally Feng, Murayama and Smith, in preparation. S. Su SWIMP

12 Sneutrino and neutralino NLSP
- sneutrino and neutralino NLSP missing energy signal: energetic jets/leptons + missing energy  Is the lightest SM superpartner sneutrino or neutralino? angular distribution of events (LC) vs.  Does it decay into gravitino or not? sneutrino case: most likely gravitino is LSP neutralino case: most likely neutralino LSP direct/indirect dark matter search positive detection  disfavor gravitino LSP precision determination of SUSY parameter: th, ~ ~ ,  0.23  favor gravitino LSP ~ S. Su SWIMP

13 Conclusions SuperWIMP is possible candidate for dark matter
- SuperWIMP is possible candidate for dark matter SUSY models SWIMP: gravitino LSP WIMP: slepton/sneutrino/neutralino Constraints from BBN: EM injection and hadronic injection need updated studies of BBN constraints on hadronic/EM injection Favored mass region Approach I: fix G=0.23 Approach II: G = (mG/mNLSP) thNLSP Rich collider phenomenology (no direct/indirect DM signal) charged slepton: highly ionizing track distinguish from GMSB sneutrino/neutralino: missing energy stable or not? ~ ~ ~ S. Su SWIMP

14 SM energy distribution
Decay life time  Mpl SM energy distribution  mG  SUSY breaking scale SM NLSP ~ G SM NLSP ~ SM NLSP ~ G ~ G NLSP SM SM NLSP ~ G ~ G S. Su SWIMP


Download ppt "Shufang Su • U. of Arizona"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google