1 Income Tax Treaties –Treaties with about 60 countries –All major trading partners Totalization Agreements –Agreements with 24 countries Agenda for Class.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to Tax Treaties
Advertisements

The new Germany/UK Treaty - The German Perspective IFA Trilateral Meeting 3 November 2010 Jan Brinkmann.
Transfer of Employees Between U.S. and Brazilian Employers
Bus 225D – International Transactions II Instructor: Carol Rutlen, CPA
Trade mission Hungarian construction sector 19 April 2012.
Ch 7: Type of Business Ownership
Page 1 Business income and associated enterprise Prashant Khatore.
FROM PRINCIPLES TO PLANNING International Tax Treaties - Canada FROM PRINCIPLES TO PLANNING.
Ministry of Economy and Finance Public Revenues and Taxes Department Main features of the new Income Tax Law December 2009.
Global Equity Crystal Gronau & Marlene Zobayan Rutlen Associates LLC California Payroll Conference September 11 and 12,
BA 128 Agenda 1/25 Questions from lecture Review Assignment I2-5,8,9,33,34 Additional problems I2-4,20,21,30,38 GSI: Celia Poon, Office Hours:
Doing Business in Mexico (Tax Regime). June, 2010.
Chapter Objectives Be able to: n Explain sources of Canadian tax law. n Identify the two primary entities that are subject to tax. n Explain how residency.
U.S. Income Taxation of Foreign Students, Teachers and Researchers Arthur R. Kerr II Vacovec Mayotte & Singer LLP
Export Marketing and Strategy Section II. Setting Up the Business.
McGraw-Hill© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Open questions from last class Review homework Foreign tax credit (FTC) –How it works –Application of sourcing rules –Interaction with Sec 911 Agenda.
American Citizens Abroad Town Hall Seminar Daniel Hyde 23 September 2013.
Federal Income Taxes and Family Law Divorce or Separation.
9-1 Non-Corporate Forms of Business  Sole Proprietorship  Partnership  LLC  S corporation.
Johan Boersma TAXATION OF COMPANIES IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.
Chapter 16: U.S. Taxation of Foreign-Related Transactions
1 © #1 F LOTT & C O. PC - A TTORNEYS DOING BUSINESS IN THE US – TAX CONSIDERATIONS Doing Business in the U.S. Tax Considerations American-Hellenic.
Transfer Pricing & Expatriate They Could Cross! August 20, 2015 UTA Mary K. Thomas Weaver, LLP Slide 1.
The Do’s & Don’ts of International Contracts April 14, McLean, VA April 15, Norfolk, VA Presented by Vandeventer Black, in association with.
 Business is owned and run by one individual  Nearly 76% of all businesses  Owner receives all of its profits and bear all of its losses.
Inpatriate/ Nonresident Alien
DR MARIUSZ POPŁAWSKI LAW FACULTY UNIVERSITY IN BIALYSTOK Introduction to Polish Tax Law.
 Click to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level  Fifth level #12-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Preliminary Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements United Arab Emirates and Mexico SCOF: 24 June 2008.
1 Belgium-China income tax treaty Marc De Mil Fiscal Department for Foreign Investments Federal Public Service Finance.
1 STRUCTURE AND OPERATION OF (INTERNATIONAL) TAX TREATIES.
Ratification Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements Sudan DTA Agreement and Australia Protocol PCOF: 17 June 2008.
1 Taxation of Inbound Transactions Recall definition of an inbound transaction Two taxing regimes: Passive investment income 30% tax on gross income (many.
International Tax Treaties –The Basics – Puerto Rico FROM PRINCIPLES TO PLANNING.
CORPORATE EXPATRIATION IN MEXICO RICARDO LEON-SANTACRUZ Washington D. C. APRIL 16, 2009.
 Click to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level  Fifth level  Click to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third.
Cyprus: Practical application of the new developments and its impact on tax structuring Cyprus: Practical application of the new developments and its impact.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright (c) 2003 by the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc Principles of Taxation: Advanced Strategies Chapter 10 International Business Expansion.
Chapter 4 – Gross Income Cash v Accrual (pages 4-1 to 4-17) …… “exceptions to” Community Property Alimony / Child Support Annuities Prizes / Awards Group.
Kyiv-Mohyla Academy International Taxation. Taxation of cross-border transactions: Corporate Profit Tax March
TAXATION OF NON RESIDENTS ESTONIAN AND LATVIA 23. September 2015 Inga Allik Lilita Berzina.
Ratification Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements PCOF: 16 September 2008.
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
Crystal Gronau & Marlene Zobayan Rutlen Associates LLC October 9, 2015, Session 5.
Non U.S. Persons in the Estate Plan Chapter 20 Tools & Techniques of Estate Planning Copyright 2011, The National Underwriter Company1 What is it? Note:
International taxation issues. Double taxation problem 1. Conflict- two residences Persons/companies who are residents of both of the Countries. 2. Conflict-
Module 18 Where to Do Business. Menu 1. International tax treaties 2. Sources of income and allocation of deductions 3. Tax credits 4. Taxation of foreign.
COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL David Dai SPX APAC 税务负责人 新时代下的国际纳税筹划.
Personal Holding Company Chapter 45 Tools & Techniques of Estate Planning Copyright 2011, The National Underwriter Company1 A personal holding company.
3-1 ©2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
McGraw-Hill© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright (c) 2003 by the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc Principles of Taxation: Advanced Strategies Chapter 3 Employee Compensation Strategies.
Global Tax Insight Tax risks and opportunities when sending employees and directors to the UK 28 January 2016.
Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Auditing Multinational Enterprises 3 Taxation of Multinational.
U.S. Taxation of Foreign Investment
European and International Taxation
©2007 Prentice Hall, Inc..
SPEAKER: GLEN MACMILLAN; ADAMS & MILES LLP
Johan and Maria, Part II.
Advanced Income Tax Law
Forming and Operating Partnerships
Forming and Operating Partnerships
International Taxation
Chapter 7 Basics of Business Taxation
Principles of Taxation
TAX BENEFITS: Puerto Rico’s strategic location, status as a US jurisdiction and generous tax incentives make it an ideal base for entities that provide.
Preliminary Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements United Arab Emirates and Mexico PCOF: 17 June 2008.
IASA: Captive Insurance 101 VENTURE CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Developed By
Presentation transcript:

1 Income Tax Treaties –Treaties with about 60 countries –All major trading partners Totalization Agreements –Agreements with 24 countries Agenda for Class 7

2 Overview – Income Tax Treaties Purpose to mitigate international double income taxation –Through tax reductions or exemptions on certain types of income –Derived by residents of one treaty country –From sources within the other treaty country Must be considered for any inbound or outbound transaction Reciprocal agreements Reduce tax of residents of foreign countries –If no treaty, withhold at statutory rate –Does not reduce US tax of US taxpayers (US citizens, resident aliens, domestic corporations) States may not recognize treaties

3 Procedures Negotiated by team of people from each country Exchange instruments of ratification Treaty must be approved and ratified by both countries approval process before treaty is effective OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) model –Extensive commentaries on each of the model’s articles –US courts have relied on these commentaries when construing treaties between US and other OECD countries Protocols clarify treaty language

4 Basic Provisions Effective date Resident vs. national of a contracting state Permanent establishment Reduced withholding rates Patterned after US Model Income Tax Convention of November 15, 2006 –US Model Treaty –Traditional baseline negotiating position of the US –Each treaty separately negotiated and is unique

5 Interaction with Local Law In most foreign countries, treaty provision will supercede the foreign country’s domestic law “Treaty override” – legislation that conflicts with an earlier treaty Supremacy clause of US Constitution treats treaties and federal legislation equally If a treaty provision conflicts with legislation, later enactment prevails

6 Resident Tax exemptions and reductions available only to a resident of one of the treaty countries –US Model: resident is any person who, under a country’s internal laws, is subject to taxation by reason of domicile, residence, citizenship, place of management, place of incorporation –Resident taxed by virtue of a personal relationship rather than source of income Does not include someone who is subject to tax in a country only with respect to income derived from sources in that country Determined by reference to the domestic laws of a specific country –Income from a partnership or other pass-through entity is derived by a resident of a treaty country to the extent the income is taxable to a person that qualifies as a resident of that treaty country

7 Tie-Breaker Rules Because each country has its own unique definition of residency, a person may qualify as a resident in more than one country Hierarchical in nature Model Treaty – Article 4(3)

8 Savings Clause Treaty country saves the right to tax its own citizens as though the treaty did not exist Model Treaty – Article 1(4)

9 Permanent Establishment Taxation is key issue for any company exporting goods or services to another country Most countries assert jurisdiction over all income derived from sources within its borders, regardless of the residence or citizenship of the entity receiving the income Administrative cost of collecting the tax on these activities may exceed the related tax revenues Seen as imposing unreasonable compliance cost on foreign companies

10 Permanent Establishment (Model Treaty) Under a PE provision, the business profits of a resident of one treaty country are exempt from taxation by the other treaty country unless profits are attributed to PE within the host country A fixed place of business does not constitute a PE if that facility is used for –Auxiliary function – purchasing, storing, displaying, or delivering inventory –Activities of a preparatory nature – collecting information about potential customers –A building or construction site is a PE if it continues for > 12 months

11 Permanent Establishment (Model Treaty) Article 5(5) – PE exists if employees conclude sales in the host country in the taxpayer’s name Employees, who limit activities to auxiliary or preparatory functions, with sales concluded in the home country, will not create a PE Article 5(6) – Marketing products through independent brokers or distributors do not create a PE, regardless of whether these independent agents conclude sales contracts in the exporter’s name Article 5(7) – The mere presence in the importing country of a locally incorporated subsidiary does not create PE for a parent company incorporated in another country

12 Permanent Establishment (Model Treaty) Article 7(1) – If PE, then importing country may tax taxpayer’s business profits, but only to the extent profits attributable to the PE Article 7(2) – PE profit is based on arm’s length transactions, separate and distinct entity More functions performed and greater risk assumed should generate more profits Differentiation between US trade or business and PE

13 Income from Employment (Article 14) Similar to PE concept Threshold of activity for host country taxation Usually income derived from services in treaty country is taxed Exempt under treaty if –The employee is present in the host country for 183 days or less, In the taxable year or 12 months concerned Referred to as 183 day rule –The employee compensation is paid by or on behalf of an employer which is not a resident of the host country, and –The compensation is not borne by a PE or fixed base which the employer has in the host country

14 OECD Model – Who is the Employer? Who bears the responsibility or risk for the results produced by the individual’s work? Who has the authority to instruct the individual? Who controls and has responsibility for the place at which the work is performed? Who bears, in an economic sense, the cost of the remuneration paid to the individual? Who puts the tools and materials necessary for the work at the individual’s disposal? Who determines the number and qualifications of the individuals performing the work?

15 Pension, Social Security Pension (Article 17(1)) –Periodic payment or lump sum vs. periodic payments in certain treaties –Taxable in resident country –Only if not taxed in other country previous to distribution Social security (Article 17(2)) –Only taxed in country paid from –85% of the social security benefits received by NRA are subject to 30% withholding tax §871(a)(3)

16 Annuities, Alimony, Child Support Annuities (Article 17(3)) – taxable in country of residence Alimony (Article 17(4)) –Taxable to recipient in country of residence –Many treaties have “taxable in country of payor” Child support (Article 17(5)) – exempt from tax in both countries

17 Participant in Pension Plans (Article 18) Contributions deductible or excludible Benefits accrued not taxable Income earned not taxable until distributed Distributions can be rolled over and won’t be taxed Application –Contributions before arrived in new country –Competent authority agrees that pension plan corresponds to pension plan under local law –Limited to benefits of qualified plan under local law Not in many treaties – overrides taxation for US purposes

18 Relief from Double Taxation Provision for foreign tax credits – Article 23 Re-sourcing –Source rules apply regardless of any contrary US treaty obligation, unless the treaty specifically expresses an intent to override the rules –§904(g)(10)(A) – treaty treats income as foreign source, Code treats as US source, taxpayer can treat as foreign source

19 Dividends, Interest, Royalties Most countries impose flat withholding tax received by offshore investors Treaties provide for a reduced withholding tax as long as income not attributed to PE Dividends –5% for 10% or more shareholder (Article 10(2)(a)) –15% for all other shareholders (Article 10(2)(b)) –0% for subsidiary to parent – Australia, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, UK

20 Dividends, Interest, Royalties Interest –Usually 15% or less –Model Treaty – exempt from withholding (Article 11(1)) Royalties –Usually 10% or less –Rates vary whether the payment is an industrial royalty (patent, trade secret, formula), motion picture or television royalty, or some other type of royalty –Model Treaty – exempt from withholding (Article 12(1))

21 Gain from Disposition of Property Generally taxed only by the country in which the property resides (Article 13(1)) Disposition of personal property attributed to PE – gain taxed in country where PE located (Article 13(3))

22 Income from Real Property (Article 6) Home and host country maintain the right to tax real property income Article 6(5) – if real property income taxed in other treaty country, taxpayer can elect to have income taxed on net basis at graduated tax rates rather than taxed on gross basis through flat withholding taxes –§871(d) – election to treat real property as effectively connected income

23 Anti-Treaty Shopping Provisions Strategically located holding companies can take advantage of lower treaty withholding rates Netherlands – –Extensive treaty network and exemption for foreign source dividends –Dutch holding company has been historically popular –1993 Dutch US treaty contains anti-treaty shopping provision which restricts the availability of treaty shopping Limitation on Benefits (LOB) – Article 22 of Model Treaty Judicial decisions have supported IRS assertion of substance over form such as back-to-back loan arrangements §7701(l) gives IRS authority to disregard the existence of an intermediary with respect to treaty shopping

24 Non-Discrimination US can’t tax a foreign national at a greater rate than a US taxpayer Article 24 of Model Treaty BFR test available to resident aliens that are nationals of appropriate treaty countries

25 Competent Authority (Article 25) Competent authority – administers treaties Treaties provide a procedure by which a resident of a treaty country can request assistance from competent authority of that county in obtaining relief when one or more treaty countries take action inconsistent with the treaty Competent authority empowered to resolve case by mutual agreement with competent authority of other treaty country Potential problems –Request for competent authority can be declined –Competent authorities may be unable to reach an agreement –Timing may be outside statute of limitations

26 Exchange of Information (Article 26) Enhance compliance with respect to international compliance Competent authority receiving request obtains information in the same way as if the information was need for its own purposes, i.e., audits Examples –Share information about taxpayer both countries are auditing –Stock option income for employees –Recipients of dividend, interest, or royalties resident within other treaty country

27 Disclosure Claiming treaty benefit on tax return that conflicts with IRC must be disclosed “Conflict” – US tax liability different Disclosure process –Attaching a statement to the return –Filing Form 8833

28 Miscellaneous US – USSR treaty remains in effect for independent countries US – China treaty doesn’t apply to HK

29 Totalization Agreements Default position – social security tax is imposed where a person works Purpose –To provide continued coverage of the home-country system and exemption from a host country’s social security system, i.e., to stop the imposition of social tax on the same income by two countries –Determine the qualification requirements and level of benefits available to those who have contributed to more than one country’s social security system Income tax treaty = host country has the prior right to taxation Totalization agreement = individual remains covered under home-country system

30 Detached Worker Rule Temporary work assignment in a country other than the individual’s home country – employee takes along his home-country coverage for the duration of the assignment Requirements –The employee must be working in a position that is covered by his home country’s social security law before the transfer. –The employee must have been employed by the transferring employer before the transfer. –The work at the temporary assignment location must be performed for the employer that transferred the employee –The assignment must be temporary as defined in the totalization agreement Temporary usually means 5 years or less Extension beyond 5 years is up to the host country’s social security authorities

31 Procedures Employer must provide continued coverage in the home-country system Apply for a certificate of coverage online Employer retains the certificate in the home and host payroll department –Copies of totalization agreements on the website –Complete application on line

32 Totalization of Benefits An employee may not be able to qualify to stay in their home country social system and are included in the host country system The employee may not meet the minimum period of coverage required for qualification of benefits Provides a method an employee may receive partial coverage by including period of coverage in other country Apply to any office of Social Security Administration in US or other country

33 Miscellaneous Not all benefits are covered by the agreement, e.g., France –Health insurance –Unemployment insurance –Workers’ compensation –Family allowances –Cash sickness benefits –Maternity benefits May receive retroactive coverage Self employed person – coverage follows residency and generally no time limit.