1 / 26 Political Engagement Through Tools for Argumentation Dan Cartwright and Katie Atkinson Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Organizational Environment for Knowledge Management
Advertisements

Visualization Tools, Argumentation Schemes and Expert Opinion Evidence in Law Douglas Walton University of Winnipeg, Canada Thomas F. Gordon Fraunhofer.
Identifying Arguments for Evaluation using an Argument Explorer Jodi Schneider 1, Adam Wyner 2, Katie Atkinson 2, Trevor Bench-Capon 2 1 Digital Enterprise.
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
Using Mathematical Practices to Promote Productive Disposition
GCE SOCIOLOGY AS/A LEVEL New Specification. KEY CHANGES Qualification Requirements AS and A level Sociology: now has different qualification weightings.
Project Proposal.
Theory and Practice in AI and Law: A Response to Branting Katie Atkinson and Trevor Bench-Capon Department of Computer Science The University of Liverpool.
Identity Management Based on P3P Authors: Oliver Berthold and Marit Kohntopp P3P = Platform for Privacy Preferences Project.
Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence Henry Prakken Lissabon, Portugal December 11, 2009.
A Student’s Guide to Methodology Justifying Enquiry 3 rd edition P ETER C LOUGH AND C ATHY N UTBROWN.
Deanery of Business & Computer Sciences Research Methods Week 1 Collecting, Processing and Analyzing Data.
An Application-led Approach for Security-related Research in Ubicomp Philip Robinson TecO, Karlsruhe University 11 May 2005.
1 / 26 Supporting Argument in e-Democracy Dan Cartwright, Katie Atkinson, and Trevor Bench-Capon Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool,
PDDL: A Language with a Purpose? Lee McCluskey Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, The University of Huddersfield.
School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences
Analytical Thinking.
Symposium on E-democracy: new opportunities for enhancing civic participation Strasbourg, April 2007 Theme II: Beneath the hype: overcoming barriers.
Research Papers. Critical Thinking Observations: From a series of observations we can establish facts. You have all experienced some sort of interactive.
Managing Large RDF Graphs (Infinite Graph) Vaibhav Khadilkar Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas FEARLESS engineering.
1 A proposed skills framework for all 11- to 19-year-olds.
Workforce Engagement Survey Accessing your survey results and focussing on key messages in the survey data.
Session 4 - Combating Discrimination Online (Part 2)
Is PeerMark a useful tool for formative assessment of literature review? A trial in the School of Veterinary Science Duret, D & Durrani,
Chapter 8 Architecture Analysis. 8 – Architecture Analysis 8.1 Analysis Techniques 8.2 Quantitative Analysis  Performance Views  Performance.
Skills for evidence-informed practice: Interactive workshop Cambridge 30 April 2009.
Teachers in Action Using “Wikispace” for teaching Sound in Science Created by Tracy Templeman and Marsha Pittman Grade 4 Teachers June 2013.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
5 th World Water Forum Building the Programme for the Next Forum Partnership WWC-Turkey-International Stakeholder Kick-off Meeting Istanbul– March 19,
Comparative Extension Projects: Denmark About the project The starting point for this project is the argument that the development of the agenda of different.
©2015 Paul Read 5.5 Writing Opinion Essays in Part Two /sizes/z/in/photostream/
Using Human Component Mapping TO ANALYSE & INTEGRATE HUMAN FACTORS ISSUES & RECORDS WITH RAILWAY HAZARD LOGS 1 Dr. Amanda C. Elliott, Simon Macmull & Harry.
Report from informal members’ meeting ”Platform for Intercultural Europe” 11th of November in Stockholm Helena Faxgård Communication Manager Swedish Performing.
Saffron Karlsen 1, James Nazroo 2 1 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London 2 Sociology, School of Social Sciences, University.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
Structuring E-Participation in Policy Making Through Argumentation Trevor Bench-Capon Department of Computer Science Liverpool UK.
Effective Engagement with Parliament. A service from the Houses of Parliament Politically neutral Aim is to increase knowledge and engagement with work.
A grassroots demonstration by Nokwanda Mbusi. Features  A method of communication with students.  Allows interaction between lecturer and students and.
1 Legislative monitor Legislative footprint and use of legislation LJUBLJANA, 1 OCTOBER 2015 Transparency International Slovenia Supported [in part] by.
Developing online activities for postgraduate students in computing Centre for Open Learning of Mathematics, Science, Computing and Technology (COLMSCT)
Skills for evidence-informed practice: Interactive workshop Dartington Hall, Devon 2 April 2009.
1. Individual research into a chosen issue from the Modern Studies course. 2. Presentation of your findings in an appropriate way.
English Language Services
Information Handling Higher Modern Studies CfE. Detecting Objectivity.
Thoughtful research: Moving beyond the topic!. Research is a real-life skill Research projects are training grounds for adult problem-solving and decision-making.
The Fox Hunting Debate1 Discussion Purpose: to present arguments and information from differing viewpoints. Should fox hunting be banned?
Research Methods Technical Writing Thesis Conference/Journal Papers
Developing a Metric for Evaluating Discussion Boards Dr. Robin Kay University of Ontario Institute of Technology 2 November 2004.
An Imperfect Model for Democratic Decision Making Gemma Stacey, Philip Houghton & James Shutt Representing Critical Values Based Practice Network
A research and policy informed discussion of cross-curricular approaches to the teaching of mathematics and science with a focus on how scientific enquiry.
What is the Prevent Duty? Part of the 2015 Counter Terrorism and Security Act. A duty to protect ‘people from being drawn into terrorism’ by “extremists.”
Research methods revision The next couple of lessons will be focused on recapping and practicing exam questions on the following parts of the specification:
Investigate Plan Design Create Evaluate (Test it to objective evaluation at each stage of the design cycle) state – describe - explain the problem some.
Allison Wurgler, Erin Steinberg, and Anna Kvidt.  Digital storytelling is the practice of combining narrative with digital content, including images,
Advocacy Advocacy involves strategies aimed at influencing the creation and implementation of laws and policy. In addition to using their voting power,
Literature review Methods
The functions of parties
Session 2 Challenges and benefits of teaching controversial issues
Research Ethics and Integrity Officer
Interim Assessment Training NEISD Testing Services
Style You need to demonstrate knowledge and understanding beyond undergraduate level and should also reach a level of scope and depth beyond that taught.
Connecting words Vocabulary And But So Voting Then Election Because
Workforce Engagement Survey
Value Based Reasoning and the Actions of Others
Biography Eddie is an Assistant Professor in the Security Systems and Law Enforcement Technology Department in the School of Engineering Technology at.
Lesson Starter Explain, in two sentences or less, the difference between PLURALITY electoral systems and PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION electoral systems.
Norms and Extended Argumentation Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

1 / 26 Political Engagement Through Tools for Argumentation Dan Cartwright and Katie Atkinson Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, UK Presentation to COMMA 2008

2 / 26 Overview Background of e-Democracy and current trends Overview of Parmenides Tools to support and extend Parmenides Discussion of future work and concluding remarks

3 / 26 e-Democracy Focuses on the use of computing technologies in enhancing democratic processes Availability of computers & internet access Mobilisation of electorate Driven by: Exploitation of technology

4 / 26 e-Consultation systems (Macintosh et al., 2006) Current Trends Highland Youth Voice Ur’say Support and encourage political participation of young people in Scotland Online policy-debating forum Online voting system Single-themed discussion forum Debate is analysed and report produced

5 / 26 Current Trends e-Petitions allow users to create and “sign” petitions over the internet Example below based on fox hunting UK government introduced an e-Petitions website in 2004

6 / 26 e-Petitions suffer from similar problems to paper- based counterparts We do not know which part(s) of the petition the signatory agrees or disagrees with Signatories have to agree with “all or nothing” Current Trends

7 / 26 Current Trends Structured tools Tools for argument visualisation Example: Araucaria (Reed & Rowe, 2003) Tools for decision support Example: Zeno (Gordon & Karacapilidis, 1997) Issues with ease of use by laypersons Visualise textual arguments

8 / 26 Parmenides – Overview An online discussion forum (K. Atkinson et al., 2004) Intended as an e-Democracy application Government presents policy proposals to public together with a justification Users submit their critique of the proposal Based on an argument scheme for reasoning about action selection and associated set of critical questions Aims to provide structure to debate whilst remaining easy to use

9 / 26 Parmenides – Argument Scheme Parmenides is based on an argument scheme for persuasive argument about action selection AS1 argument scheme: “ In the current circumstances R, we should perform action A, which will result in new circumstances S, which will realise goal G, which will promote some value V ” Argument schemes represent stereotypical patterns of reasoning

10 / 26 Parmenides – Critical Questions Challenge the presumptions in instantiations of the argument scheme Used to determine which parts of the initial position the user disagrees with Examples: Are the circumstances as described? Does the goal promote the value?

11 / 26 Parmenides – Latest Developments Parmenides was first implemented to model the Iraq War Debate Since extended to model further debates, such as the Fox Hunting Debate Tools to analyse debate data Tools for demographic profiling Tools for dynamic debate creation

12 / 26 Parmenides – Critique The Critique section of the website allows the user to critique each element of the initial position Achieved by systematically considering Critical Questions User is not aware that they are using critical questions or being lead through a particular path: they can respond with “yes/no” answers Underlying structure hidden from user to prevent confusion

13 / 26 Parmenides – Critique (2) The above is an instantiation of a Critical Question associated with the argument scheme This CQ asks whether the user believes that the Circumstances stated in the initial position are true

14 / 26 Parmenides – Alternative Position Users can submit an alternative position to the debate User does this by instantiating an instance of the AS1 argument scheme Circumstances: The ban is not enforced correctly Action: Improve policing of the ban Goals: Prevent public contravention of the ban Values: Animal welfare, Law enforcement Example alternative position from the fox hunting debate:

15 / 26 Parmenides – Alternative Position (2) The user must choose elements of their position from a drop-down menu Allows easy analysis of results and prevents abuse However, it does restrict users’ expressiveness To overcome this: some free text input

16 / 26 Parmenides Java Application (1) Consists of 2 tools Critique statistics tool Displays the results in the form of an Argument Framework, showing arguments and attacks between them Analyses user critiques of the argument’s initial position Alternative position analysis tool Displays results as a Value-based Argument Framework Analyses alternative positions submitted by users

17 / 26 Critique statistics tool Parmenides Java Application (2)

18 / 26 Critique Statistics Analysis Each statement is broken down into its constituent elements Each branch consists of a statement and a counterstatement The numbers above each node represent the number of users who agree with the element

19 / 26 Critique Statistics Analysis Textual summary is also available Agreement shown as percentages

20 / 26 Parmenides Java Application (3) Second tool: Alternative position analysis tool Displays a Value-based Argumentation Framework (Bench- Capon, 2003) From this, we can determine justifiable arguments VAFs are an extension to Dung’s AFs, in which we represent the social values promoted by each argument Determine which attacks succeed by applying a preference ordering over the values

21 / 26 Parmenides Java Application (4) Alternative position analysis tool

22 / 26 Parmenides Debate Creator Easy to add new debates Little technical knowledge required Consistent appearance System tested with a small number of new debates e.g. Speed Camera Debate, Fox Hunting Debate

23 / 26 Parmenides Profiler Allows demographic profiling of users Users can submit information about themselves Users optionally log into profiler before participating in debate Profiler Debate

24 / 26 Issues Analysis of demographic profile data Enhance free-text input and analysis Security Manipulation of results

25 / 26 Conclusion and Future Work Implement other Argument Schemes in Parmenides Field trials Parmenides aims to provide a balance between structure and ease of use We have described Parmenides and a number of tools to enhance the original system Future work:

26 / 26 Thankyou for your attention The Parmenides system can be used at For further information on the topics discussed: Questions?