ESPON 2.2.2 Selected Results of Final Report Luxembourg, 17-18 May 2005 Sabine Zillmer, IRS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development.
Advertisements

The political framework
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Smart Institutions for Territorial Development (SMART-IST) 1/3 Purpose: Identification of common institutional prerequisites that are deemed essential.
Parallel Workshop Session 2: Workshop 5 Research, Innovation and Competitiveness Advanced Monitoring and Coordination of EU R&D Policies at Regional Level.
1 OVERVIEW OF STRUCTURAL FUNDS IN IRELAND
Cyprus Project Management Society
NIS in Poland current situation and recommendations for the future I. Kijenska Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology/PRESAFE.
Improving the added value of EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, November 2005 Rural Development.
Location Effects, Economic Geography and Regional Policy Jan Fidrmuc Brunel University.
Role and potential small and medium-sized urban areas Latvia’s case
Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds ESPON FINAL REPORT Presentation at the ESPON seminar May 2005 Consortium: Nordregio/Stockholm,
Result Oriented Cohesion Policy – Regional Perspective Evidence Based Cohesion Policy Conference Gdansk, July 7th 2011 Mieczysław Struk The Marshal of.
Adam Tyson, European Commission DG HE, Dublin, 22 April 2013
The role, specific situation and potentials of urban areas as nodes in a polycentric development ESPON Project Lead partner Nordregio Third interim.
Ministry of local Government and Regional Development Polycentric settlement structures (Odd Godal, Adviser, Vilnius, )
Part-financed by the European Union Priority 2 of the BSR Programme External and internal accessibility of the BSR Ryszard Toczek, City of Gdynia.
The cohesion policy of the European Union Pelle Anita University of Szeged Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
11 th AER SUMMER SCHOOL Baia Mare, Maramures, Romania 27 th August – 2 nd September 2006 The Maze of EU funding.
ALPINE SPACE II - SWOT analysis slide 1 Preparation of the Alpine Space II programme First results of the SWOT analysis Alpine Space Summit –
Smart specialisation, integrated strategies and territorial cohesion: tension or synergies 27 September Brussels ESPON 2013 Programme: The territorial.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Innovation, Knowledge economy and regional competitiveness Role of structural funds in the New Period GUY.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – Regional Policy Why change? Cohesion Policy has been changing already for a long time! ✦ EU has been changing:
27-28 March Belgrade, April 2012 PROMITHEAS-4 D6: Prioritization of research gaps and needs Part I: Overview of EU & international funding.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
European Social Fund Cohesion Policy EU cohesion policy & social economy Dominique Bé, European Commission Worker ownership: the synthesis between.
NORTH SEA INTERREG PROGRAMME – Jon Jordan UK Contact Point for the North Sea INTERREG Programme europeanpolicysolutions.
Espoo, ESPON project Identification of Spatially Relevant Aspects of the Information Society TPG.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Cohesion policy investments Reka Rozsavolgyi Policy Analyst Regional.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Transnacionalno teritorialno sodelovanje Program Jugovzhodna Evropa Margarita Jančič, MOP,DEZI Novo mesto,17. april 2008.
Baltic Sea - & Nordic and Northern Peripheries Region Dense web of co- operative relationships and interlocking institutions with various memberships,
ESPOO meeting, November 2006 workshop 2: Innovation and competitiveness ESPON 2006 Programme ESPOO meeting, November 2006 workshop 2: Innovation.
Strategic project Call and themes for the Seventh Call How to Apply Seminar 16 th February 2011 – Copenhagen Christopher Parker.
Indicators on Territorial Cohesion – The ESPON INTERCO project 1 Open Days | European Week of Regions and Cities Regional and Local Economies in a Changing.
Regional Policy as a Tool of Regional Development Support Chapter IV. Pavol Schwarcz Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra.
IRS Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning Sabine Zillmer ESPON Pre-accession aid impact analysis - Third Interim Report - ESPON.
March 2007, Smolyan Angelos SANOPOULOS, Euroconsultants SA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION Bulgaria-Greece Experiences, Framework and New Operational.
Regional development in Estonia Conference on the Norwegian/EEA Financial Mechanisms, Tallinn
EU FUNDING INSTRUMENTS – GENERAL REVIEW. EU's funding structure and the associated instruments and programmes  Pre-Accession Assistance:
ESPON 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy Final Revised Report Prepared for the Espoo Seminar November 2006 Ove Langeland, Norwegian.
© BBR Bonn 2003 Hamburg, May 2007Wilfried Görmar, BBR The “Territorial Agenda” for the European Union – Effects on the Baltic Sea Region Baltic Sea.
ESPON 1.1.3: Enlargement of the European Union and its Polycentric Spatial Structure Lisa Van Well KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm ESPON.
ESPON Workshop at the Open Days 2012 “Creating Results informed by Territorial Evidence” Brussels, 10 October 2012 Introduction to ESPON Piera Petruzzi,
Welcomeurope © RUSE Project Krakow, 2005 November 29 “The European Structural Funds” RUSE Project coordinated by Energie-Cités Seminar hosted by Polish.
CLUSTERING PROJECT Oto Hudec Faculty of Economics Technical University of Košice.
The political functions of cohesion policy Prof. Daniel Tarschys Stockholm University & Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies (SIEPS)
INTERCO Workshop Investigating storylines on territorial cohesion MC meeting Liege ESPON Seminar , Liege ESPON Seminar ,
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
European Community European Regional Development Fund Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme Area 2000 – 2006.
Progress by the ESPON 2013 Programme in relation to the First Action Plan (Actions 4.1 and 4.2 plus) Meeting of General Directors on Territorial Cohesion.
The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies ISMERI EUROPA Ex post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes Work Package 1: Coordination,
Developing coherence mechanisms (ERDF/EARDF) in Poland Andrzej Hałasiewicz, PhD Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun Foundation of Assistance Programmes.
Territorial and urban dimension 1Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague.
ESPON project Identification of Spatially Relevant Aspects of the Information Society TPG TPG: Department of Social Geography and Regional Development,
Regional Research-driven clusters as a tool for strenghthening regional economic development: the FP7 Regions of Knowledge Programme and its synergies.
dr Paweł Wais Deputy Directort Department for Regional Development
Tailor made reports with the latest news from
Nijmegen, 11 October 2004 Potentials for polycentric development in Europe (ESPON project 1.1.1) Director Hallgeir Aalbu.
ESPON 2013 Programme Working Party / Meeting
Lecture 7 Sedef Akgüngör
Future of Cohesion Policy

ESPON, the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network
// Alps 2050 ESPON seminar Iași “The role of functional areas for territorial cohesion”
Presentation transcript:

ESPON Selected Results of Final Report Luxembourg, May 2005 Sabine Zillmer, IRS

Limits of the Undertaken Research Quantitative Impact Assessment  low level of pre-accession aid interventions  limited allocation of pre-accession aid to regional level  other than primarily territorial objectives of pre-accession aid  time lags of impacts Qualitative Impact Assessment  many unfinished projects vs. lack of contact persons  limited comparability of case studies (different foci: time, themes, levels)  varying quality of case studies Ex-ante Analysis – no regionalised information  Recommendations are not based on proved quantitative relations but are deducted from different methodological steps and causal relations

Policy Package Options MEGAs: infrastructure linkages at different levels; innovation; sector & business structure Western Border Regions: human resources; innovation; cross-border integration Old Industrial Regions: business restructuring; human resources; infrastructure modernisation; environment Eastern Peripheral & Rural Regions: economic diversification (SMEs); institution building; human resources…

Policy Package Options on Basis of Cluster Analysis Labour market: HCI, Active population density, unemployment rate Innovation potential: Share of R&D employment in active population Regional market & geographic position: GDP per capita in PPS, Multimodal accessibility potential Urbanisation & localisation advantages: share of agricultural and of tertiary employment in total employment, settlement structure Institutional potential: Bertelsmann Statusindex

Policy Recommendations Related to the Macro Level Aiming at macro level cohesion – Balanced support to prosperous regions in new Member States to enhance productivity (& snowball effects in long run) while realising investment related transfers to avoid desillusion of peripheral regions MEGAs  strengthen them to become stronger (weak/potential)  are of major importance for convergence and competitiveness  macro level accessibility also including hinterland for snowball effects (transport & telecommunication)  'high road' economic restructuring, e.g. business & innovation centres, investment support schemes  support to international R&D (networking)

Macro Level – Past Performance in Relation to Pre- Accession Aid Spending

Policy Recommendations Related to the Meso Level Institutional Conditions – strengthening of institutional capacities for optimal utilisation of interventions in terms of territorial impacts, especially with regard to coordination and partnership building & increasing absorption capacity Coordination of Sector Policies – as many reveal strong territorial dimension, which could be conflicting with each other & especially with structural policies (setting of clear spatial priorities) Western Border, Centrally Located Rural & Old Industrial Regions – build upon existing links to neighbouring agglomerations and past positions  human resource development in regional centres  spatial integration measures …

Meso Level – Ex-ante Assessment for Selected Types of Regions …

Support to Policy Option Selection Policy Options "Checklist" – Questions with regard to the following themes:  Institutional capacity  Territorial development objectives  Spatial levels addressed  Identification of needs of relevant spatial levels  Thematic scope of interventions

Gaps and Further Research Issues Gaps  Data, data, data…  limited extend of analysis of the 'Acquis' Further Research Issues  Continuation of impact assessment  Adoption of Structural Funds in the new Member States  Flow analysis for transnational and cross-border impact assessment  Future development perspectives of the CEECs, Malta and Cyprus in the light of the Lisbon strategy  Further development and specification of territorial objectives in particular with regard to CEECs  …