Reporting Results for Pesticide Programs Robin Powell, EM Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Environmental Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GPRA Government Performance and Results Act
Advertisements

1 Department of State Program Evaluation Policy Overview Spring 2013.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Service Provider Support of Audit Readiness Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) March 14, 2011.
SMART: Developing Effective Goals and Objectives Presented by Barry Nagle Evaluation and Action Research Associates (EARA) Fairfax, VA March 2009.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
New and Emerging GEAR UP Evaluators
P e r f o r m a n c e Measuring Results of Organizational Performance Lesson 1 Strategic Planning/ Performance Management Abstract.
A brief overview What is program evaluation? How is an evaluation conducted? When should it be used? When can it be used? Used with Permission of: John.
Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Program Federal Monitoring Update James Gray Program Specialist.
Project Change Management
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
WM Software Process & Quality Generic Processes - Slide #1  P. Sorenson SPiCE Reference Model - how to read Chapter 5 Capability Levels (process.
Copyright © 2013 Nelson Education Ltd.
Funding and Measures from a Region 8 Perspective Western Regions Pesticide Meeting Linda Himmelbauer, USEPA R8 May 16, 2006.
Program Performance Reporting and Evaluation in Australia Mark Nizette Department of Finance and Administration October 2001.
Budgeting According to hotel management consultant Kirby Payne, ‘Managing expenses is among the most important things a manager does. (I never say it.
Introduction to Cost management
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Budgets. On completing this chapter, we will be able to: Understand why financial planning is important. Analyse the advantage of setting budgets- or.
Choosing Your Primary Research Method What do you need to find out that your literature did not provide?
Environmental Results and Grants National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Las Vegas, Nevada June 4, 2008.
Workshop on State and EPA Tools and Strategies for Implementing Performance-based Programs “Using Performance Partnership Agreements and Grants to Institutionalize.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Environmental Management Systems in Massachusetts April, 2003.
Program Performance Accountability & Measurable Results Kevin Keaney, Chief Pesticide Worker Safety Programs U. S. EPA 2005.
Improving Government Effectiveness Tracy Gallo – State of Vermont June Sweeney - Office of the State Auditor.
1 Mgmt 371 Chapter Twenty Basic Elements of Control Much of the slide content was created by Dr, Charlie Cook, Houghton Mifflin, Co.©
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
1 PROJECT EVALUATION IT’S ALL ABOUT STUDENTS. 2 In partnership, we help America’s students stay in school and graduate by: Reducing gaps in college access.
SEPA Compliance Assessment Scheme. Aims and Benefits 1.Proportionate 2.Consistent, fair and legally correct 3.Transparent and accountable 4.Targeted,
Audit of predetermined objectives Presentation: Portfolio Committee on Economic Development March 2013.
The Value of Data The Vital Importance of Accountability American Institutes for Research February 2005.
The Multilateral Fund and its Management Structure UNFCCC Workshop on the Adaptation Fund 3-5 May 2006 Alberta, Canada Maria Nolan Chief Officer - Multilateral.
Annual Report. Submission of UCEDD Annual Report DD Act: required each center to submit annual report to the Secretary (ADD) DD Act: required each center.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?
Page 1 Higher Education and Disability: Improved Federal Enforcement Needed to Better Protect Students’ Rights to Accommodations Presentation to 2012 AHEAD.
Using OMB Section 508 reporting in addressing your agency's program maturity. How to Measure Your Agency's 508 Program.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Agricultural Marketing Service USDA Oversight of Beef Checkoff Program Agricultural Marketing Service.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Inspector General Oversight of EPA FIFRA Implementation June 2, 2015 SFIREG Meeting.
Guidance on Section 106 Grants to Indian Tribes Lena Ferris, US EPA Office of Wastewater Management November 2007.
Audit of predetermined objectives PFMA Reputation promise/mission The Auditor-General of South Africa has a constitutional mandate and, as the.
1 What Program Requirements Drive Data Needs James Hanlon, Director Office of Wastewater Management Office of Water US EPA Expanded Steering Committee.
Chapter 14 Managing the Control Process Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.20–1.
1 Performance Auditing ICAS & IRAS Officers NAAA 21 Jan 2016.
BasicsBenefitsData Wild Card Compliance.
1 PERFORMANCE MEASURES: So WHY should I care? Remarks by Sherry Sterling Senior Advisor, OPP PREP Course 13 June 2005.
Title US Department of the Interior Indian Affairs Tribal Interior Budget Council Meeting Fund Distribution and Payment July 22-23, 2014 Billings, MT.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Data Collection & Management: Observational Data Plan (ODP) & Data Management Plan (DMP) Sarai Piazza Craig Conzelmann.
OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention (CBCAP) and Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) Grantees Meeting.
Performance Indicators
© 2010 South-Western, Cengage Learning, Inc. All rights reserved.
Country Level Programs
Audit of predetermined objectives
Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs
14th CAS meeting Performance reporting Presentation by SAI-SA
Performance Management System
Strength Through Science
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
IFMIS ROLE IN BUDGET PROCESS
Accountability and Internal Controls – Best Practices
Laws Relating to Accreditation, the use of NGABs, and Enforcement
Problem DC 10-2, Page 547 What is K? The confidence factor
It’s about more than just tracking numbers
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
International Standards for Compilation of Statistics: The Gap between Standards Adoption and Standards Implementation Katherine K. Wallman Chief Statistician.
Presentation transcript:

Reporting Results for Pesticide Programs Robin Powell, EM Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Environmental Department

Background General Performance Reporting Act (GPRA) Requirements General Performance Reporting Act (GPRA) Requirements Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) General Accountability Office (GAO)-investigative arm of Congress charged with examining matters relating to the receipt and payment of public funds. General Accountability Office (GAO)-investigative arm of Congress charged with examining matters relating to the receipt and payment of public funds. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

Passed in 1993 Passed in 1993 Phased implementation Phased implementation Focusing on ALL Federal programs Focusing on ALL Federal programs Goals & Purpose: Goals & Purpose: Improve program efficiency and effectiveness by focusing on results Improve program efficiency and effectiveness by focusing on results Holding federal agencies accountable and improving the confidence of the American people Holding federal agencies accountable and improving the confidence of the American people Improve Congressional rulemaking with accurate information Improve Congressional rulemaking with accurate information GPRA

GPRA As of 1997, all programs are required to submit an annual strategic plan, annual report with results, and a performance report to OMB As of 1997, all programs are required to submit an annual strategic plan, annual report with results, and a performance report to OMB I.e., EPA Strategic Plan and Goals I.e., EPA Strategic Plan and Goals Establish performance indicators Establish performance indicators Verification and validation of results Verification and validation of results

Outcome Measure “An assessment of the results of a program activity compared to its intended purpose”

Output Measure “The tabulation, calculation, or recording of activity or effort and can be expressed in a quantitative or qualitative manner”

Performance Goal “A performance goal means a target level of performance expressed as a tangible, measurable objective, against which actual achievement can be compared, including a goal expressed as a quantitative standard, value, or rate”

Performance Measure “A way to measure the activities of a program in relation to the performance goal set forth by the program.”

Performance Indicator “A performance indicator means a particular value or characteristic used to measure output or outcome”

PART “A systematic, consistent process for developing program performance ratings and then using that information to make budget decisions”

PART According to Bill Diamond/EPA: According to Bill Diamond/EPA: PART was “developed to assess and improve program performance so that the Federal government can achieve better results.” In 2004, Pesticide Field Programs (ES; Worker Protection; WQ; SAI) were assessed and received a score of 36 (results not demonstrated) Poor score was largely attributable to lack of performance outcome measures and quantifiable data on contribution of field program activities to strategic agency goals.

Reporting Results: Why? Will be necessary to remain “aggressive” in budget allocation process Will be necessary to remain “aggressive” in budget allocation process Regionally and nationally Regionally and nationally Maintain funding levels Maintain funding levels Improve ability to defend the need for additional funding Improve ability to defend the need for additional funding

Reporting Results: How? No single output or outcome can measure an entire program No single output or outcome can measure an entire program Integrated approach Integrated approach All outputs and outcomes All outputs and outcomes Quantitative/Qualitative Quantitative/Qualitative Statistical Statistical Narrative Narrative Aggregated and disaggregated Aggregated and disaggregated

Reporting Results: What? Outputs Outputs Any numerical data & statistical analyses Any numerical data & statistical analyses Outcomes Outcomes Did the X # of inspections prevent X# of unlicensed applicators applying RUPs? Did the X # of inspections prevent X# of unlicensed applicators applying RUPs? Narrative Narrative Qualitative and Quantitative Qualitative and Quantitative

Pesticides: General Can be data rich or deficient depending on program Can be data rich or deficient depending on program Assessment results Assessment results Number of spray events Number of spray events Comparison of applied GUPs & RUPs Comparison of applied GUPs & RUPs Quantity of pesticides used on tribal lands Quantity of pesticides used on tribal lands Analyses of any gathered sampling data Analyses of any gathered sampling data NOT raw data NOT raw data

Pesticides: C&T Number of C&T events Number of C&T events Number of attendees at each event Number of attendees at each event Comparison of C&T attendees Comparison of C&T attendees Pass vs. Fail Pass vs. Fail

Pesticides: Enforcement Number of spray violations Number of spray violations Compliance Assistance activities (limited) Compliance Assistance activities (limited) Number of inspections performed vs. number of violations Number of inspections performed vs. number of violations Number of licensed off-reservation applicators who apply on tribal lands Number of licensed off-reservation applicators who apply on tribal lands Number of cases initiated Number of cases initiated

Pesticides: WPS Number of violation events Number of violation events Number of citations Number of citations Comparison of violation types Comparison of violation types Number of inspections Number of inspections

Pesticides: Limitations Difficult to measure compliance Difficult to measure compliance Very limited outputs and performance indicators Very limited outputs and performance indicators Very difficult to assess the progress in achieving environmental goals Very difficult to assess the progress in achieving environmental goals Environmental Educational indicators Environmental Educational indicators Difficulty in assessing the compliance assistance outcomes Difficulty in assessing the compliance assistance outcomes Goal of EPA Goal of EPA How to measure the pollution reduction through these activities How to measure the pollution reduction through these activities

Pesticides: Possibilities Can improve strategic planning Can improve strategic planning Forecast needs Forecast needs Identify needs and goals Identify needs and goals Budgetary process Budgetary process Defensible requests for additional funding Defensible requests for additional funding Provides guidelines on funding needs Provides guidelines on funding needs Forecasting future funding requirements to maintain program integrity Forecasting future funding requirements to maintain program integrity

Reporting Results Example: Pesticides

Overall Report Example: Pesticides

Other Media: Grants Management Demonstrate program capacity building Demonstrate program capacity building Demonstrates the need for additional support for programs that are deficit in funding Demonstrates the need for additional support for programs that are deficit in funding Enables the program and EPA to identify tribal needs for additional programs Enables the program and EPA to identify tribal needs for additional programs Can forecast needs Can forecast needs

Reporting Results Example: Grants Management

Overall Report Example: Grants Mgmt

Not Recommended It is not needed to include full documents or reports with the results or progress report It is not needed to include full documents or reports with the results or progress report Do not have more than 3 pages of narrative per project or program Do not have more than 3 pages of narrative per project or program It is not recommended to include ordinances or codes within the report. It is not recommended to include ordinances or codes within the report. Reference within the report the documents Reference within the report the documents You can have a good results report while keeping it simple!!!

Conclusion It has been stated repeatedly that if programs are not producing verifiable “results” through illustration of outputs and/or outcomes, those programs will NOT be funded in the future

Thank You. Robin Powell, Environmental Manager Environmental Department Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe x12