Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 1 The Implementation of a General Higher-Order Remap Algorithm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Your Success is Our Goal SHEAR STRESS ANALYSIS IN A ROTATOR-STATOR SYSTEM IX International PHOENICS Users Conference.
Advertisements

ASME-PVP Conference - July
Workshop on Numerical Methods for Multi-material Fluid Flows, Prague, Czech Republic, September 10-14, 2007 Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated.
Lecture 1. How to model: physical grounds
Chapter 2 Introduction to Heat Transfer
Fluid Properties and Units CEE 331 April 26, 2015 CEE 331 April 26, 2015 
Navier-Stokes.
Basic Governing Differential Equations
DEBRIS FLOWS & MUD SLIDES: A Lagrangian method for two- phase flow simulation Matthias Preisig and Thomas Zimmermann, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
Design Constraints for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, M. Yoda and ARIES Team G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta,
An Analysis of Hiemenz Flow E. Kaufman and E. Gutierrez-Miravete Department of Engineering and Science Rensselaer at Hartford.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA 1 Summer Internship 2011 Peter M. Mancini Los Alamos National Laboratory,
Collaborative Comparison of High-Energy-Density Physics Codes LA-UR Bruce Fryxell Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Dept. of Atmospheric,
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 1 Ejecta source and transport modeling in the FLAG hydrocode.
A J Barlow, September 2007 Compatible Finite Element multi-material ALE Hydrodynamics Numerical methods for multi-material fluid flows 10-14th September.
Ground-Water Flow and Solute Transport for the PHAST Simulator Ken Kipp and David Parkhurst.
Equations of Continuity
Error Analysis for Material Point Method and a case study from Gas Dynamics Le-Thuy Tran and Martin Berzins Thanks to DOE for funding from
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Basic Governing Differential Equations CEE 331 June 12, 2015.
Basic Governing Differential Equations
1 MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Tutorial 6 FLUID KINETMATICS.
1 MAE 5130: VISCOUS FLOWS Momentum Equation: The Navier-Stokes Equations, Part 1 September 7, 2010 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida.
Temperature Gradient Limits for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting (June 2004) G. W. Woodruff School of.
Computations of Fluid Dynamics using the Interface Tracking Method Zhiliang Xu Department of Mathematics University of Notre.
Fluid Properties and Units CVEN 311 . Continuum ä All materials, solid or fluid, are composed of molecules discretely spread and in continuous motion.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Basic Governing Differential Equations CEE 331 July 14, 2015 CEE 331 July 14, 2015.
In the analysis of a tilting pad thrust bearing, the following dimensions were measured: h1 = 10 mm, h2 = 5mm, L = 10 cm, B = 24 cm The shaft rotates.
If the shock wave tries to move to right with velocity u 1 relative to the upstream and the gas motion upstream with velocity u 1 to the left  the shock.
STAGGERED MESH GODUNOV (SMG) SCHEMES FOR ALE HYDRODYNAMICS Gabi Luttwak 1 and Joseph Falcovitz 2 1 Rafael, P.O. Box 2250, Haifa 31021, Israel 2 Institute.
Hybrid WENO-FD and RKDG Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
ICHS4, San Francisco, September E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport
Sliding and multi-fluid velocities in Staggered Mesh Eulerian and MMALE codes Gabi Luttwak 1 1 Rafael, P.O. Box 2250, Haifa 31021, Israel.
A Hybrid Particle-Mesh Method for Viscous, Incompressible, Multiphase Flows Jie LIU, Seiichi KOSHIZUKA Yoshiaki OKA The University of Tokyo,
M. Vandenboomgaerde* and C. Aymard CEA, DAM, DIF IWPCTM12, Moscow, July /14 [1] Submitted to Phys. Fluids * Analytical.
PTT 204/3 APPLIED FLUID MECHANICS SEM 2 (2012/2013)
In-term project presentation by Kanish Jindal Modeling of chlorine contact chamber at West Lafayette treatment plant.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
A Novel Wave-Propagation Approach For Fully Conservative Eulerian Multi-Material Simulation K. Nordin-Bates Lab. for Scientific Computing, Cavendish Lab.,
A conservative FE-discretisation of the Navier-Stokes equation JASS 2005, St. Petersburg Thomas Satzger.
Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona.

Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.
Approximate Riemann Solvers for Multi-component flows Ben Thornber Academic Supervisor: D.Drikakis Industrial Mentor: D. Youngs (AWE) Aerospace Sciences.
1 Natural Strain Near Welding Interface For Different Collision Angles EPNM-2008 Lisse, Netherlands H.H. Yan; X.J. Li May 6-9, 2008 Dalian University of.
Mass Transfer Coefficient
The Governing Equations The hydrodynamic model adopted here is the one based on the hydrostatic pressure approximation and the boussinesq approximation,
Stirling-type pulse-tube refrigerator for 4 K M. Ali Etaati CASA-Day April 24 th 2008.
J.-Ph. Braeunig CEA DAM Ile-de-FrancePage 1 Jean-Philippe Braeunig CEA DAM Île-de-France, Bruyères-le-Châtel, LRC CEA-ENS Cachan
© Fluent Inc. 11/24/2015J1 Fluids Review TRN Overview of CFD Solution Methodologies.
Ale with Mixed Elements 10 – 14 September 2007 Ale with Mixed Elements Ale with Mixed Elements C. Aymard, J. Flament, J.P. Perlat.
Some Aspects of the Godunov Method Applied to Multimaterial Fluid Dynamics Igor MENSHOV 1,2 Sergey KURATOV 2 Alexander ANDRIYASH 2 1 Keldysh Institute.
CIS/ME 794Y A Case Study in Computational Science & Engineering 2-D Conservation of Mass uu dx dy vv (x,y)
ASCI/Alliances Center for Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes Helium Detonations on Neutron Stars M. Zingale, F. X. Timmes, B. Fryxell, D. Q. Lamb, K.
Governing Equations Conservation of Mass Conservation of Momentum Velocity Stress tensor Force Pressure Surface normal Computation Flowsheet Grid values.
Gas-kineitc MHD Numerical Scheme and Its Applications to Solar Magneto-convection Tian Chunlin Beijing 2010.Dec.3.
CIS/ME 794Y A Case Study in Computational Science & Engineering 2-D conservation of momentum (contd.) Or, in cartesian tensor notation, Where repeated.
A novel approach for thermomechanical analysis of stationary rolling tires within an ALE-kinematic framework A. Suwannachit and U. Nackenhorst Institute.
(*) CIMNE: International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Barcelona, Spain Innovative Finite Element Methods For Aeroelastic Analysis Presented.
A Numerical Solution to the Flow Near an Infinite Rotating Disk White, Section MAE 5130: Viscous Flows December 12, 2006 Adam Linsenbardt.
Conference on PDE Methods in Applied Mathematics and Image Processing, Sunny Beach, Bulgaria, 2004 NUMERICAL APPROACH IN SOLVING THE PDE FOR PARTICULAR.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Flux form semi-Lagrangian transport in ICON: construction and results of idealised test cases Daniel Reinert Deutscher Wetterdienst.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.
Lecture 3 & 4 : Newtonian Numerical Hydrodynamics Contents 1. The Euler equation 2. Properties of the Euler equation 3. Shock tube problem 4. The Roe scheme.
ME 7980 Cardiovascular Biofluid Mechanics
Le-Thuy Tran and Martin Berzins
Power Magnetic Devices: A Multi-Objective Design Approach
Navier - Stokes Equation
Objective Numerical methods Finite volume.
E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi
Presentation transcript:

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 1 The Implementation of a General Higher-Order Remap Algorithm Vincent P. Chiravalle LA-UR MultiMat 2011 Conference Arcachon, France

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 2 Outline Cercion code structure –Linked list data structures –Lagrangian solution –Calculation of stress tensor –Remap algorithm Test Problems –Riemann shock tube –Aluminum flyer plate –Imploding cylindrical shell Conclusions

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 3 The hydrodynamics is solved on a block structured mesh Block structured mesh –Four-sided cells –Fixed connectivity among mesh blocks –Velocities at the cell vertices A simple mesh with three structured blocks (2 zones each)

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 4 Cercion makes extensive use of cell oriented data structures Cell oriented data structures –C implementation –Fortran-type array indexing Cell_t data structure –Storage for vertex quantities such as position and velocity components –Cell-centered quantities such as density, pressure and volume –Pointer to a linked list of materials in the cell (mat_t) –Pointer to a linked list of material fluxes for the top boundary (flux_t) –Pointer to a linked list of material fluxes for the right boundary (flux_t)

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 5 Each cell has a linked list to store information about all the materials in the cell A single mat_t element for each material in the cell Ordering of the elements according to onion skin method Two pointers for each element –Basic material properties in bas_t data structure volume fraction, mass and energy density, energy density and associated derivatives parameters for interface reconstruction –Strength properties in str_t data structure stress deviator components and derivatives equivalent plastic strain cell_t headermat_ttail bas_tstr_t Material Linked List for a Cell Containing 1 Material

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 6 Each cell has two additional linked lists to store material fluxes through the top and right boundaries A flux_t element for each material crossing the boundary –volume, mass and energy fluxes –pointer to sflux_t data structure for stress energy and strain fluxes Material Flux Linked List for a Cell Boundary with 1 Material Crossing the Boundary cell_t headerflux_ttail sflux_t

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 7 A three phase approach is used to solve the hydrodynamics equations Lagrangian Phase –Uses the algorithm from HEMP (Wilkins 1963) –Spatially staggered grid with vertex velocities –Material strength included four stress deviator components yield stress correction Margolin method for calculating strain rates and flow divergence –Margolin anti-hourglass treatment Grid Relaxation Phase –Simple finite difference mesh relaxer nine point stencil Remap Phase –donor cell procedure from the SALE code (Amsden et al. 1980) for cell-centered quantities –second order correction to the remapped fluxes from the donor cell method derivatives using Barth-Jespersen slope-limited method –Mass fluxes from the density remap for the momentum remap

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 8 The Lagrangian equations of motion are solved using the HEMP approach Vertex (i,j) and surrounding cells A,B,C, and D Axial Velocity Equation Radial Velocity Equation Vertex quantities for the equations of motion

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 9 Strain rates are calculated using the Margolin method Equations for the strain rate components Cell (i,j) and its four neighboring vertices Flow divergence

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 10 Material fluxes are used to redistribute materials among cells during the remap phase Mesh relaxation moves (xp,yp) to (x,y) Total volume fluxes (Fr, Fz) for donor cell method Mass fluxes (MFr,MFz) for each material leaving the cell based on material volume fluxes and upwind densities Update of material k mass from Lagrangian value, M, to remapped value M* Donor Cell Method

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 11 A higher order correction to the donor cell method is used for cells with a single material donor cell method correction

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 12 Riemann shock tube problem was used to test the code An initial discontinuity between two ideal gas regions (  =1.4) Region 1 –density of 1 kg/m 3 –pressure of 10 5 N/m 2 Region 2 –density of 0.01 kg/m 3 –pressure of 10 3 N/m 2 A uniform box mesh with 500 (axial) by 2 (radial) zones Eulerian calculation The solution is obtained at 0.01s

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 13 The locations of the shock and contact discontinuity are captured (a) Density(b) Pressure

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 14 The velocity and sound speed spatial profiles are reasonably well represented (a) Velocity(b) Sound Speed

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 15 Cercion calculates the density as well as other numerical methods for the Riemann problem An initial discontinuity between two ideal gas regions (  =1.4) Region 1 –density of 1 kg/m 3 –pressure of 1 N/m 2 Region 2 –density of kg/m 3 –pressure of 0.1 N/m 2 A uniform box mesh with 100 axial zones Eulerian calculation The solution is obtained at 0.14s

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 16 Cercion compares well with other numerical methods in capturing the velocity profile

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 17 Flyer plate problem tests the material strength routines in the code Cylindrical geometry with 1 radial zone Aluminum target –1 cm thick with 200 axial zones Aluminum projectile –0.2 cm thick with 40 axial zones Gruneisen EOS –r0=2.707 –C0= –S1=1.339 –g0=1.97 –b=0.48 Material strength model –yield strength of Mbar –shear modulus of Mbar Lagrangian calculation Companion FLAG calculation

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 18 The temporal velocity profile at the target-vacuum interface from the code and FLAG agree fairly well

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 19 An imploding steel shell is a good test of energy conservation in converging cylindrical geometry Two steel shells each with 10 radial zones –Outer shell is 0.25 cm thick –Inner shell is 0.5 cm thick Gruneisen EOS for steel –r0=7.9 –C0=0.457 –S1=1.49 –g0=1.93 –b=0.5 Material strength model –yield strength of 0.05 Mbar –shear modulus of Mbar Ideal gas EOS for the pressure driver material (80 zones) Companion FLAG calculation with same mesh 5  s run time Initial Geometry 8.0cm 2.0cm P=0.0 Mbar  =0.001 g/cc P=0.588 Mbar  =1.84 g/cc steel z r 5.0cm

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 20 Cercion and FLAG give similar kinetic energies for the inner shell when material strength is not included Kinetic Energy Internal Energy

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 21 When material strength is included the agreement between Cercion and FLAG does not change Kinetic Energy Internal Energy The Cercion calculation is insensitive to the use of ALE

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 22 FLAG and Cercion predict virtually the same total energy for the inner steel shell With StrengthWithout Strength

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 23 Conclusions Cell-centered data structures simplify the programming of Cercion and allow for efficient memory allocation for multi-material problems Cercion uses proven numerical methods for the solution of the Langrangian equations of motion and the calculation of material strength properties A second-order accurate remap method is implemented for density, energy and momentum, enabling ALE calculations to be performed Cercion shows excellent agreement with the analytic solution for the Riemann shock tube problem In pure Langrangian mode both Cercion and FLAG give similar velocity profiles at the target-vacuum interface for the flyer plate test problem The cylindrical implosion test problem illustrates that the Cercion solution is relatively insensitive to the use of ALE in the calculation Cercion calculations with and without strength for the cylindrical implosion problem generally agree with the corresponding FLAG results

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 24 The Sedov blast wave problem tests the symmetry of the code solution in two dimensional cylindrical geometry An ideal gas (  =1.4) A uniform box mesh (6 cm by 3 cm) –300 axial zones –150 radial zones Energy source at the origin –85 kJ –4 zones (2 axial by 2 radial) Eulerian calculation The solution is obtained at 10.0  s Comparison RAGE calculation

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Slide 25 The code and RAGE give different pressures behind the blast wave and both have a lower density at the front than the self-similar solution Pressure Density