COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of Levees in the National Flood Risk Management Program Pete Rabbon June 19, 2008 Hazards Caucus Alliance.
Advertisements

Economic Guidance Summary The Basis for Benefit-Cost Analysis in the Corps.
Flood Risk Management Pete Rabbon Association of State
F4B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Damage Reduction Module F4: Reformulation – Optimization, Incremental Analysis and Selection of the NED Plan.
May 22, 2012 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Flood Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction Plan ASFPM 2012 Annual Conference Timothy J. Trautman, P.E., CFM Flood Mitigation.
Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Update on Use of Hazus for FEMA Risk MAP Flood Risk Products Shane Parson – RAMPP PTS (URS)
Flood Risk Management Program Ed Hecker, Chief, Office of Homeland Security National Levee Summit February 2008 St Louis, MO.
Tracie Billington, P.E. Chief Financial Assistance Branch Department of Water Resources.
NFIP ESA ComplianceImplementing a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative – FEMA Region 10 ESA and the National Flood Insurance Program Implementing a salmon.
Hydraulic Screening and Analysis Needed for USACE Review
A HISTORY OF WATER RESOURCES POLICIES AND GUIDANCE Overview Briefing for Planning Associates Class of 2011 by John C. Furry 3 March 2011.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Missouri River Flood Task Force (MRFTF) Concept Briefing
Stephane Larocque – Consulting Practice Leader, Impact Infrastructure A DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 1 ST INTERNATIONAL.
1 Building Strong! THE ECONOMIST’S ROLE Ken Claseman Senior Policy Advisor for Economics Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Ecosystem Restoration Module ER4: Cost Effectiveness/Incremental Cost Analysis and the NER Plan BU ILDING STRONG SM.
Implementing HAZUS-MH in Pre-Disaster Mitigation
NED COSTS And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Regional Flood Plain Management Council April 15, 2015 H-GAC December 2nd.
N AVIGATING THE T URN : F LOOD R ISK A SSOCIATED WITH L EVEES Sam Riley Medlock, J.D., CFM Association of State Floodplain Managers May 2011.
Beargrass Creek Case Study Description of the Study Area Hydrology & Hydraulics Economic Analysis Project Planning Assessment of the Risk Based Analysis.
An update from the National Committee on Levee Safety Presented to the TWCA by Karin M. Jacoby, PE, Esq. June 17, of 14An Involved Public and Reliable.
BUILDING STRONG SM Plan Formulation: General Module G-1: What is plan formulation?
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Roles of Economists and New Analytical Requirements
HAZUS-MH is a multi-hazard risk assessment and loss estimation software program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (animate on.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® STEP FIVE: COMPARE ALTERNATIVE PLANS Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable 1 Addressing the Flood Risk Challenge.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions 1 What is Engineering Risk and Reliability? Why We Use It? Robert C.
Hazard Mitigation Planning and Project Funding. Agenda Objectives Overview of Hazard Mitigation Hazard Mitigation Planning Mitigation Project Funding.
1 Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Ch 2 Mod 5 Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines
Developing a National Levee Safety Program Mike Stankiewicz - NCLS Arizona Floodplain Management Association November 3, Update on the National.
Welcome To: PCC4: Economic Analysis In Planning U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Planners Core Curriculum.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Our Mission MITIGATIONS. MEANING OF MITIGATION MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF THE RISK OF DISASTER MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF.
The Status of NFIP Reform and Floodplain Mapping Mayors’ Water Summit December 8, 2010.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority June 8, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act of 2006 March 2007.
Benefit Cost Analysis for Flood Hazard Mitigation: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Method (selected excerpts from FEMA EMI Training Course)
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
4 Accounts and the Role of RED & OSE Economic Analysis -- Water Resources Planning March 23, 2009.
“Non-Typical” Economic, Environmental, and Other Flood Risk Management Benefits.
1 December 19, 2007 North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage Project Overview State of California Department of Water Resources U.S. Department of the Interior.
1 An Approach to Levee Assessment and Contingency Planning Presentation to the National Waterways Conference 7 September 2006 Portland, Oregon By Rob Vining.
Catharine Cyr Ransom Principal The Accord Group. Stafford Act Structured approach to disasters Partnership between local, state, Federal governments Authority.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Overview of Risk Approach to Manage USACE Dam and Levee Safety Program The Reality of Risk: Dam Safety in.
Preliminaries Federal/Corps Planning Process PA Program Plan Formulation Supplement - FY 08.
David Moser USACE Chief Economist
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 4C Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Department of Water Resources Delta Levees Program Presentation for Delta Stewardship Council.
March Urban Flood Risk Management. March Objectives Understand the Nature of Flooding & Flood Damage Alleviation Understand the Nature of.
Water Conservation and Recycling Roundtable Interim Federal Action Plan for the California Bay-Delta April 8, 2010.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Step 6: Selection Of The Recommended Plan Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 1 The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Application and Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) Training.
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines 1 Ch 2 Mod 5
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
PRINCIPLES & GUIDELINES
Presentation transcript:

COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006

Comprehensive Floodplain Management Workshop Flood Management Economic Analysis

Workshop Modules Comprehensive FPM Comprehensive FPM NFIP Overview NFIP Overview FPM No Adverse Impact Strategies FPM No Adverse Impact Strategies Natural Floodplain Functions and Societal Values Natural Floodplain Functions and Societal Values Flood Management Economic Analysis Ecosystem Evaluation Methods Flood Management Economic Analysis Ecosystem Evaluation Methods Case Study Case Study Technical and Financial Assistance Technical and Financial Assistance

Flood Management Economic Analysis Role of economic analysis in water resources planning Role of economic analysis in water resources planning Federal water resources planning guidance Federal water resources planning guidance Flood damage analysis Flood damage analysis Flood damage analysis models Flood damage analysis models Multi-objective analysis Multi-objective analysis

Flood Management Economic Analysis Role of economic analysis in water resources planning Role of economic analysis in water resources planning Federal water resources planning guidance Federal water resources planning guidance Flood damage analysis Flood damage analysis Flood damage analysis models Flood damage analysis models Multi-objective analysis Multi-objective analysis

Role of Economic Analysis Objective of an economic analysis--determine if a project represents the best use of resources over its life expectancy Objective of an economic analysis--determine if a project represents the best use of resources over its life expectancy Economic justification--total benefits > total costs based upon comparison of without and with project conditions Economic justification--total benefits > total costs based upon comparison of without and with project conditions Key element of planning process: Key element of planning process:  Plan formulation  Evaluate feasibility of plans  Assist in decision-making

Role of Economic Analysis Economic analysis answers these questions: Economic analysis answers these questions:  Should the project be built at all?  Should it be built now?  Should it be built to a different configuration or size?  Will it have a net positive social value?

Role of Economic Analysis Financial analysis answers questions Financial analysis answers questions  Who should pay?  Do they have the ability to pay? It’s possible to have a project that is economically feasible and financially infeasible or vice versa It’s possible to have a project that is economically feasible and financially infeasible or vice versa

Role of Economic Analysis Economic analysis methods: Economic analysis methods:  Benefit-cost analysis: benefits and costs of proposed projects are measured over the life of the project  Cost-effectiveness analysis: determines the most cost-effective approach of achieving a given objective ($/unit)  Socioeconomic impact analysis: measures changes in regional population and economic activity

Flood Management Economic Analysis Role of economic analysis in water resources planning Role of economic analysis in water resources planning Federal water resources planning guidance Federal water resources planning guidance Flood damage analysis Flood damage analysis Flood damage analysis models Flood damage analysis models Multi-objective analysis Multi-objective analysis

Federal Water Resources Planning Guidance Federal agencies involved in water resources planning must follow Federal agencies involved in water resources planning must follow Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies (US Water Resources Council, March 1983)  US Army Corps of Engineers  US Bureau of Reclamation  Natural Resources and Conservation Service  Tennessee Valley Authority

Federal Water Resources Planning Guidance Federal objective: Federal objective: “..to contribute to national economic development (NED) consistent with protecting the nation’s environment, pursuant to national environmental statues, applicable executive orders, and other federal planning requirements.”

Federal Water Resources Planning Guidance P&G establish four accounts: P&G establish four accounts:  National Economic Development (NED)  Environmental Quality (EQ)  Regional Economic Development (RED)  Other Social Effects (OSE)

Federal Water Resources Planning Guidance National Economic Development (NED)-- economic value of the national output of goods and services National Economic Development (NED)-- economic value of the national output of goods and services  Water supply  Flood damage reduction  Navigation  Hydropower  Recreation  Commercial fishing

Federal Water Resources Planning Guidance Environmental Quality (EQ)-- effects on significant natural and cultural resources Environmental Quality (EQ)-- effects on significant natural and cultural resources  Ecosystem restoration  Preservation of historical resources  Preservation of aesthetic resources

Federal Water Resources Planning Guidance Regional Economic Development (RED)-- effects on regional economic activity Regional Economic Development (RED)-- effects on regional economic activity  Income  Employment  Population

Federal Water Resources Planning Guidance Other Social Effects (OSE)—all other “relevant” effects Other Social Effects (OSE)—all other “relevant” effects  Urban and community impacts  Life, health and safety  Displacement  Long-term productivity  Energy requirements

Federal Water Resources Planning Guidance NED account is required NED account is required Other information that is required by law or which will have a “material bearing on decision-making” should be included in the other accounts Other information that is required by law or which will have a “material bearing on decision-making” should be included in the other accounts Agencies can establish their own specific guidance based on P&G Agencies can establish their own specific guidance based on P&G

Federal Water Resources Planning Guidance Benefit-cost analysis is required for formal economic analysis of federal programs or projects Benefit-cost analysis is required for formal economic analysis of federal programs or projects Criteria: Criteria:  Maximum net benefits—Maximize the present value of benefits minus the present value of costs  B/C Ratio—the ratio of the present value of benefits to the present value of costs; must be greater than 1.00

Federal Water Resources Planning Guidance Corps planning criteria: Corps planning criteria:  Completeness—an alternative must not rely on other activities to function  Effectiveness—an alternative must contribute to at least one of the project’s planning objectives  Efficiency—an alternative must be cost-effective  Acceptability—an alternative must be considered by the general public to be a satisfactory way of addressing identified problems

Federal Water Resources Planning Guidance Corps plans: Corps plans:  National Economic Development—single purpose plan such as flood damage reduction, water supply, navigation, etc.  Ecosystem Restoration—single purpose ecosystem restoration plan  Combined Plan—combines NED and ER purposes  Locally Preferred Plan—recommended by local agencies; may require additional funds from local agency

Flood Management Economic Analysis Role of economic analysis in water resources planning Role of economic analysis in water resources planning Federal water resources planning guidance Federal water resources planning guidance Flood damage analysis Flood damage analysis Flood damage analysis models Flood damage analysis models Multi-objective analysis Multi-objective analysis

Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Types of flood damage : Types of flood damage :  Physical damage (structures, utilities, autos, crops, etc.)  Income loss  Emergency costs  Lost value of public agency services (police & fire protection, hospitals, etc.)  Lost taxes (property and sales)  Injuries and loss of life  Social disruption

Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Flood damage can be expressed Flood damage can be expressed  Event damage: the damage expected to occur from specific flood events (examples: 10-, 50-, 100-year events); used for emergency planning  Expected annual damage: the “average annual” damage for all events that could be expected to occur in any given year; used for project B/C analyses

Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Example: Event and Expected Annual Damage EventFrequency Estimated W/O Project Damage ($Mill) 50 YR 0.02$ YR 0.01$ YR 0.005$ YR 0.002$327 Expected Annual $12 Source: USACE, Lower Cache Creek Feasibility Study, 2003

Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Damage ($) Frequency Expected Annual Damage

Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Models Corps HEC-FDA Corps HEC-FDA  Expected annual damage used in benefit-cost analysis  Project performance statistics used in risk analysis and levee certification  Incorporates uncertainty using “Monte Carlo” procedures

Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Models HEC–FDA Project Performance Statistics HEC–FDA Project Performance Statistics  Expected annual exceedance  Long-term risk  Conditional non-exceedance

Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Models Expected annual exceedance Expected annual exceedance  The annual probability of flooding taking into account all different types of events  Example: 0.10 or 10% chance of flooding in any given year

Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Models Long-term risk Long-term risk  The probability of flooding over a long period of time  Example: 0.30 or 30% over a 25 year period

Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Models Conditional non-exceedance Conditional non-exceedance  The probability of passing a specified flood event  Example: 90% probability of passing a 100 year event  Used in certifying levees

Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Models FEMA HAZUS FEMA HAZUS  GIS-based program  Can be used to asses flooding, hurricane and earthquake hazards  Default hydraulic and structural inventories for communities included in its databases   FEMA Riverine B/C Software FEMA Riverine B/C Software  Spreadsheet-based program  Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs  

Flood Management Economic Analysis Role of economic analysis in water resources planning Role of economic analysis in water resources planning Federal water resources planning guidance Federal water resources planning guidance Flood damage analysis Flood damage analysis Flood damage analysis models Flood damage analysis models Multi-objective analysis Multi-objective analysis

Multi-Objective Analysis Agencies, ASFPM are advocating MOM projects Achieve multiple benefits at lower costs Greater support from diverse groups of stakeholders More likely sources of financial support

Multi-Objective Analysis Monetary values can be assigned to most water management benefits (water supply, flood damage reduction, hydropower, etc.) Multi-objective projects often include ecosystem restoration Problem—how do we evaluate ecosystem benefits?

Multi-Objective Analysis Three approaches for including ecosystem benefits in economic analysis:   Cost-effectiveness ($/unit)   Tradeoff analyses (assign “points” to unit and $ benefits)   Benefit-cost analysis ($’s)

To Monetize or Not to Monetize Ecosystem Benefits? Decision depends upon:   Agency guidance   Available data (quantity/quality environmental outputs)   Identify/quantify environmental outputs and link with human services (water supply, flood damage reduction, recreation, etc.)   Comfort level (what’s a bunny worth??) No approach is perfect!

To Summarize… This module has discussed This module has discussed  Role of economic analysis in water resources planning  Federal water resources planning guidance  Flood damage analysis and models  Intro to multi-objective analysis More info on Federal and state (DWR) economics guidance can be found at: More info on Federal and state (DWR) economics guidance can be found at:

What’s Next? Ecosystem Valuation Methods Ecosystem Valuation Methods