Propagation of HI Beams in Chamber Metal Vapor Atmosphere C. Olson, Sandia National Laboratories D. Welch, D. Rose, B. Oliver, T. Genoni, and R. Clark,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plasma Window Options and Opportunities for Inertial Fusion Applications Leslie Bromberg Ady Herskovitch* MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting.
Advertisements

Imperial College London 1 3. Beam extraction 3. Extraction of particle beams 3.1 The space charge limit and Child-Langmuirs law 3.2 External and internal.
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
Systems Analysis for Modular versus Multi-beam HIF Drivers * Wayne Meier – LLNL Grant Logan – LBNL 15th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion.
Update on Self Pinch Transport of Heavy Ion Beams for Chamber Transport D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, Mission Research Corp. S. S. Yu, Lawrence Berkeley National.
Beamline Design Issues D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation W. M. Sharp and S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update - Spot Size Model Changes* ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002 * This work.
Beam steering capability for target position uncertainty Simon Yu & Enrique Henestroza Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ARIES Meeting October 3, 2002.
Plasma Window Performance Leslie Bromberg Katie Maurer Ady Herskovitch* MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting Madison, WI April 23, 2002 *Brookhaven.
Update on Self-Pinched Transport Simulations D. V. Rose and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corp. General Atomics, 7/1/02.
Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field: 3-D Simulations D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, and S. S. Yu Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Self-Pinched Transport Modeling C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM D. R. Welch,
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update* ARIES e-Meeting October 17, 2001 * This work was performed under the auspices.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 4: Cylindrical concepts.
Design Considerations for Beam Port Insulator Rings
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
Overview of US Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi US/Japan Workshop April 6-7, 2002 Hotel Hyatt Islandia, San Diego Electronic copy:
Frictional Cooling MC Collaboration Meeting June 11-12/2003 Raphael Galea.
Advanced Energy Technology Group Mechanisms of Aerosol Generation in Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray.
Design Windows and Trade-Offs for Inertial Fusion Energy Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi ISFNT 6 April 8-12, 2002 Hotel Hyatt Islandia, San Diego Electronic.
Impact of Liquid Wall on Fusion Systems Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego NRC Fusion Science Assessment Committee November 17, 1999.
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Comparison of final focus magnetic systems for the Assisted Pinched Transport and the RPD-2002 J. Barnard,
Beam Interaction with Chamber Aerosols D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose, MRC C. L. Olson, SNL S. S. Yu, LBNL October 2-4, 2002 Presented at the ARIES Project.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory ARIES-IFE Meeting Atlanta, Georgia September 4, 2003 “Modular Solenoid with Assisted Pinch” by S. Yu,
Modeling of Assisted and Self- Pinch Transport D. V. Rose and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corporation C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories S. S. Yu.
ARIES-IFE Assessment of Operational Windows for IFE Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 16 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Towards An Analytic Model for Beam Spot Size in Ballistic Neutralized Transport Simon Yu, J. Barnard,
ARIES-IFE: An Integrated Assessment of Chamber Concepts for IFE Power Plants Mark Tillack for the ARIES Team 19th IEEE/NPSS SOFE January 22-25, 2002 Atlantic.
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics SPEED AND SELECTIVITY: CUSTOM WAVEFORMS 200 V (Slow, selective) MASK SiO 2 Si  15 mTorr, Ar/C 4 F.
Coupling of APT Transported Ion beam to Hybrid Target D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories.
Aug. 8-9, 2006 HAPL meeting, GA 1 Advanced Chamber Concept with Magnetic Intervention: - Ion Dump Issues - Status of Blanket Study A. René Raffray UCSD.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 S.J. Pemberton 1, R.P. Abbott 1, G.T. Fukuda 1 D.R. Welch 3, S.S.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Per Peterson UC Berkeley Updated Heavy Ion Driver Parameters for Snowmass Point Design ARIES Meeting July.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Driver Model Update* ARIES IFE Meeting LLNL March 8-9, 2001 * This work was performed under the.
Advanced Design Studies: Recent Accomplishments and Plans Farrokh Najmabadi VLT PAC Meeting February 12-13, 2002 UC San Diego Electronic copy:
Status of Operational Windows for HIF Chamber Transport Modes D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, C. L. Olson, S. Neff, and S. S. Yu ARIES Project Meeting January.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
RRP:10/17/01Aries IFE 1 Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics Aries Electronic Workshop October 17, 2001 Robert R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute University.
Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose, S. S. Yu and W. Sharp Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting April.
Distribution of Advanced Design Research FY02 FY03 (Current) ARIES (IFE & MFE) System Studies1,9661,939 Socio-economic Studies UCSD/UW/RPI 1,189.
ARIES-IFE Study L. M. Waganer, June 7, 2000 Page 1 Considerations of HI Beam and Vacuum System Arrangement L. Waganer The Boeing Company 7 June 2001 ARIES.
NON-EQUILIBRIUM HEAVY GASES PLASMA MHD-STABILIZATION IN AXISYMMETRIC MIRROR MAGNETIC TRAP A.V. Sidorov 2, P.A. Bagryansky 1, A.D. Beklemishev 1, I.V. Izotov.
Carbon Injector for FFAG
1 Gas-Filled Capillary Discharge Waveguides Simon Hooker, Tony Gonsalves & Tom Rowlands-Rees Collaborations Alpha-X Basic Technology programme (Dino Jaroszynski.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Analytical and Numerical Studies of Ion Beam Plasma Interaction for Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Fusion Igor.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering University.
Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory.
PWFA Experiments in Static Fill Argon Some numbers issues and mysteries Ken Marsh 5/30/2013.
Robust Heavy Ion Fusion Target Shigeo KAWATA Utsunomiya Univ. Japan U.S.-J. Workshop on HIF December 18-19, 2008 at LBNL & LLNL.
Aerosol Limits for Target Tracking Ronald Petzoldt ARIES IFE Meeting, Madison, WI April 22-23, 2002.
Magnetic Deflection of Ionized Target Ions D. V. Rose, A. E. Robson, J. D. Sethian, D. R. Welch, and R. E. Clark March 3, 2005 HAPL Meeting, NRL.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 12: Diagnostics / heating.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Neutralized Transport Experiment (NTX) P. K. Roy, S. S. Yu, S. Eylon, E. Henestroza, A. Anders, F. M.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 1 PRoy LINAC06 Neutralized Drift Compression and Related Experiments* P. K. Roy 1, W. L. Waldron.
Collective Focusing of a Neutralized Intense Ion Beam Propagating Along a Weak Solenodial Magnetic Field M. Dorf (LLNL) In collaboration with I. Kaganovich,
Slide 1 The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Why heavy ions? Target requires: 3.5 – 6 MJ in ~ 10 ns  500 TW Range ~ 0.02 – 0.20 g/cm.
THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS Outline Motivation The role of MME-CCS DB and MB transfer lines Main beam Main beam quadrupoles Other issues conclusions CLIC.
Simulation of Heavy Ion Beam Propagation D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation, Albuquerque NM C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories.
PS-ESS and LEBT State of the art Lorenzo Neri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Liquid Walls Town Meeting May 5, 2003, Livermore, CA Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.
SPES Target Group Data…… INFN-CISAS-CNR collaboration The Ablation Ion Source for refractory metal ion beams A preliminary design.
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Overview of US Power Plant Studies
Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update*
University of California, San Diego
D. V. Rose, T. C. Genoni, and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corp.
Presentation transcript:

Propagation of HI Beams in Chamber Metal Vapor Atmosphere C. Olson, Sandia National Laboratories D. Welch, D. Rose, B. Oliver, T. Genoni, and R. Clark, Mission Research Corporation S. Yu, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories ARIES Electronic Project Meeting

Outline ARIES - HIF propagation modes vs. chamber wall type Wetted-wall power plant studies (HIBALL HI, OSIRIS-HIB, PROMETHEUS-H) Neutralized ballistic transport (concept/issues, LSP examples) Assisted pinch transport (concept/issues, LSP examples) Self-pinched transport (concept/issues, LSP examples) ARIES - HIF propagation modes vs. chamber wall types

Wetted-Wall HIF Power Plant Studies HIBALL HI Reactor Study (1981): First wall: HT-9 ferritic steel INPORT tubes: SiC with PbLi flow Pressure:  Torr Pb Ballistic transport (in vacuum) OSIRIS-HIB Design (1992): First wall: three-layer carbon cloth blanket Flibe coolant bleeding through cloth Pressure:  2x10 -4 Torr Neutralized ballistic transport with co-moving electrons PROMETHEUS-H Reactor Design Study (1992): First wall: SiC porous thin film of liquid Pb Pressure:  100 mTorr Self-pinched transport

Neutralized Ballistic Transport Neutralization by: preformed plasma, gas, photoionization Key Issues: handling beams stripped to Z  1, transport lengths beyond 3 meters Plasma Plug (externally injected plasma) Low pressure chamber (~ Torr). Final focus magnet Target Volume plasma (from photoionization of hot target) Converging ion beam Chamber Wall

Driver Scale Beam Simulations: Vacuum Photo Plasma C L Beam Conducting Boundaries CL emission Beam Focal Point 300 cm 3.0 cm Pb +1 ion beam  GeV,  = mm-mrad emittance I b = 4 kA K = (1.5x10 -4 )Z need K net  (3x10 -6 )/Z With and without Photo-ionized plasma (peak 5x10 13 cm -3 ) W. Sharp

Photo plasma crucial to good spot Stripped ions deflected by un-neutralized charge at beam edge Plasma provides > 99% neutralization, focus at 265 cm No PlasmaPlasma Pb +2 Pb +3 Pb +4 Pb +5 Pb +2 Pb +3 Pb +4 Pb +5 Log Pb density mean charge state

Plasma simulation spot slightly better than ballistic case Residual net current results in premature but tight focus (pinching near target) Net Current (A) within r 14 ns 28 ns 42 ns 52 ns 90% of beam within 3 mm

IPROP is used to model beam/plasma interaction with initial discharge conditions IPROP is a quasi 3D EM hybrid code 2 T fluid model for the plasma, PIC beam ions Ohm’s Law, J e =  (  p e /n e -v i m + E + v  B) Spitzer, e-neutral resistivity Ionization X-section falls as 1/Z 2 Moliere scattering, Bethe slowing down 50-kA discharge 5-Torr, 3 eV ambient Xe 0.5 torr reduced density within discharge Initial Discharge Conditions

87% energy transport, 3.5-mm RMS radius calculated for APT 10 m ballistic transport Pb cm 4-GeV, 6 MA Pb +72 ions, 1-mrad divergence 10-m ballistic transport to discharge Calculated  m = 5  s limits net current growth to 30 kA over 8-ns pulse halo grows from self-field interaction Discharge radius halo B  fields 80 ns

3D IPROP simulation shows negligible hose growth IPROP with m=0,1 Fourier modes Constant, specified  radial profile In both cases, offsets remain < 1 mm Low  m simulation shows much less growth than theory –result of betatron detuning from 300-kA net current?  m =80ns  m =5  s

Self-Pinched Transport Target Chamber Wall 3-cm radius beams are focused outside of chamber down to ~3-mm radius. Many-beam SPT chamber mode (N > 10) Small-radius openings in chamber wall Final Focus Section I b = 4 kA, highly stripped Issues: beam front erosion, aiming/tracking, multiple beam effects, and beam/plasma stability (ARIES-IFE studies are continuing)

Self-pinched transport is predicted to occur at an intermediate gas pressure Maximum pinch force occurs when beam-impact ionizes a plasma density roughly that of the beam on time-scale of beam density rise time, L/v b Optimized for normalized trumpet length: R =L  n g /4Z =1 * Trumpet shape and non- local secondary ionization supply neutralization without v e = v b * D.R. Welch and C.L. Olson, Fus. Eng. and Des , 477 (1996). - + Beam - + E E B B lab frame c Electron orbits are mainly ExB L

LSP calculates maximum I net near normalized trumpet length of unity LSP simulations of 10-kA, 4-GeV Pb + beam Beam trumpet 7 mm to 0.35 mm in 2 ns or 12 cm

1-m propagation demonstrates pinched equilibrium for R = 0.14 Transient evaporation of current due to mismatch 10 ns 20 ns Tightly pinched beam core with 6-kA net current 65-kA, 4-GeV Pb +65 beam 8-ns pulse  = 0.5 ns, mm radius 50-mTorr Xe gas fill Only 61% transport within 6 mm radius after 1-m Tolerable ss erosion rate  10 -3

Transport Conclusions No show stoppers discovered for any of the transport schemes State of theory for NBT is the most mature - plasma via photo-ionization greatly improves transport for 3 m length APT results are sensitive to gas conductivity - present modeling calculates decay length sufficient to suppress deleterious self-field effects. SPT calculations have identified propagation window in mTorr Xe - pinched equilibrium simulated. Efficiency of energy transport and 3D stability issues need to be addressed.