1. Design Windows and Trade-Offs for Inertial Fusion Energy Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi ISFNT 6 April 8-12, 2002 Hotel Hyatt Islandia, San Diego Electronic copy: http://aries.ucsd.edu/najmabadi/TALKS ARIES Web Site: http://aries.ucsd.edu/ARIES

2. Approach:  Six classes of target were identified. Advanced target designs from NRL (laser-driven direct drive) and LLNL (Heavy-ion-driven indirect-drive) are used as references.  To make progress, we divided the activity based on three classes of chambers: Dry wall chambers; Solid wall chambers protected with a “sacrificial zone” (such as liquid films); Thick liquid walls.  We research these classes of chambers in series with the entire team focusing on each. ARIES Integrated IFE Chamber Analysis and Assessment Research Is An Exploration Study Objectives:  Analyze & assess integrated and self-consistent IFE chamber concepts  Understand trade-offs and identify design windows for promising concepts. The research is not aimed at developing a point design.

3. NRL Advanced Direct-Drive Targets DT Vapor 0.3 mg/cc DT Fuel CH Foam + DT 1  m CH +300 Å Au.195 cm.150 cm.169 cm CH foam  = 20 mg/cc DT Vapor 0.3 mg/cc DT Fuel CH Foam + DT 5  CH. 122 cm.144 cm.162 cm CH foam  = 75 mg/cc NRL Direct Drive Target Gain Calculations (1-D) have been corroborated by LLNL and UW. LLNL/LBNL HIF Target Reference Direct and Indirect Target Designs

4.  Analysis of design window for successful injection of direct and indirect drive targets in a gas-filled chamber (e.g., Xe) is completed. No major constraints for indirect-drive targets (Indirect-drive target is well insulated by hohlraum materials) Narrow design window for direct-drive targets: Target injection Design Window Naturally Leads to Certain Research Directions  (Pressure < ~50 mTorr, Wall temperature < ~700 o C).

5.  Little energy in the X-ray channel for NRL direct-drive target NRL Direct Drive Target (MJ) HI Indirect Drive Target (MJ) X-rays 2.14 (1%) 115 (25%) Neutrons 109 (71%) 316 (69%) Gammas0.0046 (0.003%) 0.36 (0.1%) Burn product fast ions 18.1 (12%) 8.43 (2%) Debris ions kinetic energy 24.9 (16%) 18.1 (4%) Residual thermal energy 0.0130.57 Total154458 Detailed target spectrum available on ARIES Web site http://aries.ucsd.edu/ARIES/ X-ray and Ion Spectra from Reference Direct and Indirect-Drive Targets Are Computed

6. Ion power on chamber wall (6.5-m radius chamber in vacuum)  Photon and ion energy deposition falls by 1-2 orders of magnitude within 0.1 mm of surface  Most of heat flux due to fusion fuel and fusion products (for direct-drive).  Time of flight of ions spread the temporal profile of energy flux on the wall over several  s (resulting heat fluxes are much lower than predicted previously). Details of Target Spectra Has Strong Impact on the Thermal Response of the Wall Energy Deposition (W/m 2 ) in C and W Slabs (NRL 154MJ Direct Drive Target)

7. An Unprotected Solid Wall Should Survive IFE Thermal Loads (for NRL Direct-Drive Targets)  Temperature variation mainly in thin (0.1-0.2 mm) region.  Margin for design optimization (a conservative limit for tungsten is to avoid reaching the melting point at 3,410°C).  Similar margin for C slab. Coolant at 500°C 3-mm thick W Chamber Wall Energy Front Evaporation heat flux B.C at incident wall Convection B.C. at coolant wall: h= 10 kW/m 2 -K  Thermal response of a W flat wall to NRL direct-drive target (6.5-m chamber with no gas protection): 200 600 1000 1400 1800 2200 2600 3000 0.0x10 0 1.0x10 -6 2.0x10 -6 3.0x10 -6 4.0x10 -6 5.0x10 -6 6.0x10 -6 7.0x10 -6 8.0x10 -6 9.0x10 -6 1.0x10 -5 Surface 1 micron 5 microns 10 microns 100 microns Time (s) - Wall Temperature ( o C)

8. Depth (mm): 00.0213 Typical T Swing (°C):~1000~300~10~1 Coolant ~ 0.2 mm Armor 3-5 mm Structural Material  Most of neutrons deposited in the back where blanket and coolant temperature will be at quasi steady state due to thermal capacity effect  Focus IFE effort on armor design and material issues; Blanket design can be adapted from MFE blankets  Photon and ion energy deposition falls by 1-2 orders of magnitude within 0.1- 0.2 mm of surface.  Beyond the first 0.1-0.2 mm of the surface. First wall experiences a much more uniform q’’ and quasi steady-state temperature (heat fluxes similar to MFE).  Use an Armor Armor optimized to handle particle and heat flux. First wall is optimized for efficient heat removal. All the Action Takes Place within 0.1-0.2 mm of Surface -- Use an Armor

9. Use of an Armor Allows Adaptation of Efficient MFE Blankets for IFE Applications  Simple, low pressure design with SiC structure and LiPb coolant and breeder.  Innovative design leads to high LiPb outlet temperature (~1100 o C) while keeping SiC structure temperature below 1000 o C leading to a high thermal efficiency of ~ 55%.  Plausible manufacturing technique.  Very low afterheat.  Class C waste by a wide margin. Outboard blanket & first wall  As an example, we considered a variation of ARIES-AT blanket as shown:

10. Candidate Dry Chamber Armor Materials  Carbon (and CFC composites) Key tritium retention issue (in particular co-deposition) Erosion Oxidation, Safety  Tungsten & Other Refractories Fabrication/bonding and integrity “Engineered Surfaces” An example is a C fibrous carpet.  Others?  Lifetime is the key issue for the armor Even erosion of one atomic layer per shot results in ~ cm erosion per year Need to better understand molecular surface processes Need to evolve in-situ repair process

11. IFE Armor Conditions are similar to those for MFE PFCs (ELM, VDE, Disruption)  IFE research should make the most of existing R&D in MFE area (and other areas) since conditions can be similar (ELM’s vs IFE)

12. Design Windows for Direct-Drive Dry-wall Chambers Thermal design window Detailed target emissions Transport in the chamber including time-of-flight spreading Transient thermal analysis of chamber wall No gas is necessary Laser propagation design window(?) Experiments on NIKE Target injection design window Heating of target by radiation and friction Constraints:  Limited rise in temperature  Acceptable stresses in DT ice

13.  Gas pressures of  0.1-0.2 torr is needed (due to large power in X-ray channel). Similar results for W  No major constraint from injection/tracking.  Operation at high gas pressure may be needed to stop all of the debris ions and recycle the target material.  Heavy-ion stand-off issues: Pressure too high for neutralized ballistic transport (mainline of heavy-ion program). We are studying neutralized ballistic transport with plasma generator and pinch transport (self or pre-formed pinch). Graphite Wall, 6.5m radius Direct-drive Indirect-drive Thermal Design Window Design Window for Indirect-Drive Dry-Wall Chambers

14. Major Issues for Wetted Wall Chambers Wall protection:  Armor film loss: Energy deposition by photon/ion Evaporation  Armor film re-establishment: Recondensation Coverage: hot spots, film flow instability, geometry effects Fresh injection: supply method & location Key processes:  Condensation  Aerosol formation and behavior  Film dynamics Chamber clearing requirements: Vapor pressure and temperature Aerosol concentration and size Condensation trap in pumping line Injection from the back Condensation Evaporation PgTgPgTg Film flow Photons Ions In-flight condensation

15. Condensation is Fast but Slows Down Considerably as Vapor Pressure Approaches Saturation  Above a “threshold” (>10 Pa for assumed conditions), the condensation characteristic time does not change appreciably with vapor pressure and is much lower than the IFE time between shots  Condensation rate would then be more dependent on the effectiveness of heat transfer from the film to the coolant in the back.                    0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 1x10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Vapor pressure (Pa)     Vapor Temp. 10,000 K 5000 K 2000 K 1200 K Response of a Pb-film protected 5-m chamber to an indirect drive target Film temperature = 1000k Film P sat = 1.1 Pa Typical rep rate: 5-10 Hz Only Condensation on the Wall is considered here

16. Droplet Formation and Growth Is a Key Unresolved Issue 1.0x10 -11 1.0x10 -10 1.0x10 -9 1.0x10 -8 1.0x10 -7 1.0x10 -6 1101001000 Pb Vapor Temp. (K) 1500 2000 3000 5000 8000 10,000 Saturation Ratio (P interface /P infinity ) 1x10 12 1x10 15 1x10 18 1x10 21 1x10 24 1x10 27 1101001000 Saturation Ratio (P interface /P infinity ) 1500 2000 3000 5000 8000 10 4 Pb Vapor Pressure = 10 2 Pa Pb Vapor Temp. (K)  Critical droplet size and rate of droplet formation strongly depend on vapor temperature and saturation ratio.  Droplet growth could be a problem for high Pb pressure (10 4 Pa), low vapor temperature (< 2000K) and high saturation ratio. But:  Droplets may be formed following ejection of material from the wall when saturation ratio is very high  Critical droplet size may depend strongly on presence of ionized species in the chamber.  Impact of pre-shot aerosol size distribution and number density on target and driver being studied to derive chamber relaxation requirements

17. Analysis & Experiments of Liquid Film Dynamics Are On-going  Re-establishment of the Thin Liquid Film Is the Key Requirement. Recondensation Fresh injection: supply method (method, location) Coverage: hot spots, film flow instability, geometry effects.  2-D & 3-D Simulations of liquid lead injection normal to the chamber first wall using an immersed-boundary method. Objectives: Onset of the first droplet formation Whether the film "drips" before the next fusion event Parameters Lead film thickness of 0.1 - 0.5 mm; Injection velocity of 0.01 - 1 cm/s; Inverted surfaces inclined from 0 to 45° with respect to the horizontal  Experiments on high-speed water films on downward-facing surfaces, representing liquid injection tangential to the first wall Objective: Reattachment of liquid films around cylindrical penetrations typical of beam and injection port.

18.  Accurate target output spectrum has been produced.  Time of flight of ions reduces heat flux on the wall significantly.  Use of an armor separates energy/particle accommodation function from structural and efficient heat removal function: Armor optimized to handle particle and heat flux. First wall is optimized for efficient heat removal.  There is considerable synergy and similarity with MFE in-vessel components.  Design windows for many components have been identified and a set of self- consistent system parameters have been developed.  Ballistic neutralized transport with plasma generators appear feasible for heavy- ion drivers. Research in other transport scheme are in progress.  Analysis of walls protected by thin liquid film is on going. Analyses are focused on condensation, aerosol production and transport; and film dynamics. Dry-wall chambers are credible and attractive options for both lasers and heavy ion drivers.

19. Backup Slides

20. Beam Transport Option for Heavy-Ion Driver ARIES-funded research shows that neutralized ballistic transport is feasible for 6-m chambers ARIES has funded research on pinch transport

21. Neutralized Ballistic Transport Plasma Plug (externally injected plasma) Low pressure chamber (~ 10 -3 Torr). Final focus magnet Target Volume plasma (from photoionization of hot target) Converging ion beam Chamber Wall Slide from D. Welch (MRC) presentation at Jan. 2002 ARIES Meeting

22. Plasma neutralization crucial to good spot No PlasmaPlasma Pb +2 Pb +3 Pb +4 Pb +5 Pb +2 Pb +3 Pb +4 Pb +5 Log n Pb mean charge state Stripped ions deflected by un-neutralized charge at beam edge * Plasma provides > 99% neutralization, focus at 265 cm * D. A. Callahan, Fusion Eng. Design 32-33, 441 (1996) Slide from D. Welch (MRC) presentation at Jan. 2002 ARIES Meeting

23. Conclusions Photo ionization plasma assists main pulse transport - but not available for foot pulse Without local plasma at chamber, beam transport efficiency is < 50% within 2 mm for “foot” pulse Electron neutralization from plasma improves efficiency to 85% - plasma plug greatly improves foot pulse transport Lower chamber pressure should help beam transport for both foot and main pulses given plasma at chamber wall 6-m NBT transport with good vacuum looks feasible for dry wall chamber design System code: “Alpha” factor for neutralization roughly 1 in vacuum, increases with increasing pressure and propagation distance Slide from D. Welch (MRC) presentation at Jan. 2002 ARIES Meeting

24. Effect on Non-Condensable Gas and of Vaporized Layer Characteristics on Recondensation The presence of non-condensable gas can slow down condensation but effect important at P g higher than anticipated for IFE  Approximate range of interest

25. Effect on Non-Condensable Gas and of Vaporized Layer Characteristics on Recondensation The presence of non-condensable gas can slow down condensation but effect important at P g higher than anticipated for IFE Based on condensation, it seems better to have a shorter penetration depth (softer spectrum) resulting in less vapor at a higher temperature  Approximate range of interest