Interferometric Extraction of SSP from Passive Seismic Data Yanwei Xue Feb. 7, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time-reversal acoustics, virtual source imaging, and seismic interferometry Haijiang Zhang University of Science and Technology of China.
Advertisements

Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Houston, TX | May 2, 2012 Finding blind faults using ground roll reflection Craig Hyslop Robert Stewart.
3D Super-virtual Refraction Interferometry Kai Lu King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
Seismic Reflection: Processing and Interpretation Katie Wooddell UW Madison.
Locating Trapped Miners Using Time Reversal Mirrors Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping CaoKim McCarter Gerard T. Schuster November 12, 2008.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Local Reverse Time Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Function Xiang Xiao UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Local Reverse Time Migration with VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao UTAM, Univ. of Utah May 1, 2008 PhD Defense 99 pages.
Surface Wave Prediction and Subtraction by Interferometry + Deconvolution Yanwei Xue Feb. 7, 2008.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D OBS Data Weiping Cao, University of Utah Oct
SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION YANWEI XUE University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
IntroductionUofU TestTime ShiftSuper-stackTucson TestSuper-resolution Locating Trapped Miners Using Time Reversal Mirrors Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping CaoKim.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Advanced Seismic Imaging GG 6770 Variance Analysis of Seismic Refraction Tomography Data By Travis Crosby.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
1 Interferometric Interpolation and Extrapolation of Sparse OBS and SSP Data Shuqian Dong and G.T.Schuster.
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
Wavelet Extraction using Seismic Interferometry C. Boonyasiriwat and S. Dong November 15, 2007.
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
Local Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao and Gerard Schuster Univ. of Utah.
1 Fast 3D Target-Oriented Reverse Time Datuming Shuqian Dong University of Utah 2 Oct
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
Interferometric Multiple Migration of UPRC Data
Theory of acoustic daylight imaging revisited
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: P-to-S Converted Wave Case Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Demonstration of Super-Resolution and Super-Stacking Properties of Time Reversal Mirrors in Locating Seismic Sources Weiping Cao, Gerard T. Schuster, Ge.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
Seeing the Invisible with Seismic Interferometry: Datuming and Migration Gerard T. Schuster, Jianhua Yu, Xiao Xiang and Jianming Sheng University of Utah.
Seismic Radar using Time Reversal Mirrors Sherif M. Hanafy.
1 OBS->OBS Extrapolation Interferometry Shuqian Dong and Sherif Hanafy Coarse OBS Virtual SWP.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: Salt Flank Imaging by PS Waves Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney 1 1 Schlumberger UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 8, 2008.
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2015 Matching Filter to match Transition Zone Airgun Source Wavelet.
Green function retrieval versus Interferometric imaging Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Delft University of Technology 2005 Joint Assembly May 25, 2005 New.
Data QC and filtering Bryce HutchinsonSumit Verma Objective: Consider the frequency range of different seismic features Look for low frequency and high.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D SSP Data Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping Cao Gerard T. Schuster October 2009.
Reverse Time Migration of Prism Waves for Salt Flank Delineation
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Hydro-frac Source Estimation by Time Reversal Mirrors Weiping Cao and Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat Feb 7, 2008.
Seismic interferometry: a comparison of approaches Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Joost van der Neut Jan Thorbecke Delft University of Technology.
Controlled Noise Seismology Sherif M. Hanafy 2015 SEG Annual Meeting New Orleans, October 2015.
Does It Matter What Kind of Vibroseis Deconvolution is Used? Larry Mewhort* Husky Energy Mike Jones Schlumberger Sandor Bezdan Geo-X Systems.
1.1 Seismic Interferometry Optical interferometry.
. Lakeside Drive and Manzanita Lane to the north corner of Jasper Lane and Manzanita Lane.
The Earth’s Near Surface as a Vibroseis Signal Generator Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah.
Shuqian Dong and Sherif M. Hanafy February 2009 Interpolation and Extrapolation of 2D OBS Data Using Interferometry.
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
Fang Liu and Arthur Weglein Houston, Texas May 12th, 2006
ABSTRACT –Basic Principles and applications
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Two New Applications of Time Reversal Mirrors: Seismic Radio and Seismic Radar Sherif M. Hanafy September 2010.
Processing of KAUST Golf Data
Interferometric Least Squares Migration
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
Seismic Interferometry
Wavelet estimation from towed-streamer pressure measurement and its application to free surface multiple attenuation Zhiqiang Guo (UH, PGS) Arthur Weglein.
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
Seismic Interferometry and 3x3 Classification Matrix
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Seismic Radar Sherif M. Hanafy.
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Interferometric Extraction of SSP from Passive Seismic Data Yanwei Xue Feb. 7, 2008

OUTLINE  Motivation  Theory  Field data test  Conclusions and the way ahead

Motivation   No individual experiment required   Can get Green’s function between two randomly selected receivers Why? How?   Interferometric Transform

OUTLINE  Motivation  Theory  Field data test  Conclusions and the way ahead

Random Sources =δ(x-x’)S(ω) =δ(x-x’)S(ω) P(B) = P(B) = ∫ G(B|x)N(x)d x 2 S src Im[G(A|B)] = k Im[G(A|B)] = k = k = k ∫ G(B|x)G(A|x)*d x2 S src A B..S0 S src x x’ z

Random Scatterers

Workflow Input data d Truncate d in time into several data panels Truncate d in time into several data panels Crosscorrelate each trace with a given trace at x Crosscorrelate each trace with a given trace at x Sum and average the crosscorrelation panels Sum and average the crosscorrelation panels Output

OUTLINE  Motivation  Theory  Field data test  Conclusion and the way ahead

Data Introduction 8 receiver lines 779 receivers Receiver interval: m X (m) Y (m) Receiver position

Amplitude Time (s)0960 Trace Example

Virtual Shot Gather Receiver line 6 90 receivers Frequency used to do the interferometry is Hz Event velocity 1450 m/s Time (s) X (m)

Time (s) X (m) Receiver line 6 90 receivers Frequency used: 1 – 9 Hz Event velocity 1450 m/s Virtual Shot Gather

Time (s) X (m) Receiver line 8 95 receivers Frequency used: Hz Event velocity 1455 m/s

Time (s) X (m) Virtual Shot Gather Receiver line 2 90 receivers Frequency used: Hz

Receiver line 2 90 receivers Frequency used: Hz Left-going events removed Time (s) X (m) Virtual Shot Gather

OUTLINE  Introduction  Theory  Field data test  Conclusions and the way ahead

Conclusions  Field data test gives continuous events  Low frequency results have a velocity of 1450 m/s  High frequency ( Hz) results look like reflections  We need records with longer time to get better results

Road Ahead  Test the data with longer time records  Velocity analysis of the virtual gathers  Migrate the virtual data

Thanks!