Gateway to Space AJ - 1 Mechanical System Design & the StarLight Project Andy Jarski Mechanical Systems Engineer Ball Aerospace & Technologies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit 3, Chapter 9, Lesson 9: Space Systems Engineering 1 The Systems-engineering Process Trading Requirements We use the requirements loopa necessary and.
Advertisements

LightSail.
Towards Low-cost Swedish Planetary Missions S. Barabash 1, O. Norberg 2, J.-E. Wahlund 3, M. Yamauchi 1, S. Grahn 4, S. Persson 4, and L. Blomberg 5 1.
Understanding the Systems Engineering Process
Aug.19, 1999 George T. Roach Integration Mission Design Center NASA- GSFC Code 543 Greenbelt, MD FAX
Delta II –7920 Fitup Study Model TMA-56 f10 optics In-Line configuration Delta II Launch Vehicle 7920 H 10L Composite Fairing.
NEO Surveyor Thomas M. Randolph Jet Propulsion Laboratory
SATELLITES What They Do and How They Work Michael J. Mackowski Aerospace Engineer October 2013 With Updates from Shawn Shepherd.
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
AAE450 Spring 2009 Mass Savings and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Preparation for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) 100 gram Case Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold]
14/06/20151 MORE Requirements seen from ESA Pedro Pablos 1 st MORE Team Meeting 27 Febrero 2007.
MAXIM Power Subsystem Diane Yun Vickie Moran NASA/GSFC Code (IMDC) 8/19/99.
Instrument, Spacecraft, and Launch Overview Joan Howard Ball Aerospace.
Constellation Orion Visible Light Constellation Orion Infrared Light.
Amsterdam October 2003 M. Sedita VLVnT Installation and Maintenance of the submarine network The Maintenance aspect present some difficult as their.
S/C System Design Overview Robert G. Melton Department of Aerospace Engineering.
April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Satellite Structure Subsystem Structural and Vibrational Stress Analysis Presented By: Chris Matthews.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Solar array design Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 J. Teza Carnegie.
Final Version Wes Ousley Dan Nguyen May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Thermal.
0 衛星結構設計 (II) 祝飛鴻 6/17/  What you should learn from this course?  低軌道小衛星發展趨勢  Why spacecraft structure fails?
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
S1.6 Requirements: KnightSat C&DH RequirementSourceVerification Source Document Test/Analysis Number S1.6-1Provide reliable, real-time access and control.
1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center 2005/4/14 LRO/CRaTER Technical Interchange Meeting LRO Mechanical Systems Giulio Rosanova / /
1 祝飛鴻 衛星結構設計 5/31/ What are key constraints for the spacecraft structure design? 2.How the structure design is affected by other subsystems?
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, 2012
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
1 衛星結構設計 祝飛鴻 10/13/  Design Considerations  Environmental Loads  Configuration Design  Structure Analysis  Design Verification  Contest Problem.
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 6.0 Subsystem Verif. Test Plan 1 GLAST Large Area.
STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission STEREO STEREO Science Team Meeting May 2, 2005 Presented by Edward Reynolds APL STEREO Project.
Space-Qualified Hardware for the CALIPSO Lidar
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
Contractor 3. I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
1 Structure (STR) Subsystem Overview Jonah White – STR Co-Lead.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Support structure for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
1 衛星結構設計 祝飛鴻 10/26/ Pre-Class Assignment: 1.What are the main functions of spacecraft structure? 2.What factors need to be considered for spacecraft.
Spacecraft Interface/Handling Ring Robert Besuner 12 August 2004.
Problem Statement Overview of tasks Requirements for selection test.
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
1 The slides in this collection are all related and should be useful in preparing a presentation on SIM PlanetQuest. Note, however, that there is some.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
1 衛星結構設計 祝飛鴻 5/25/  What are the main functions of structure subsystem?  Provide support all other subsystems and attach the spacecraft to launch.
1 System Architecture Mark Herring (Stephen Merkowitz Presenting)
SWT Overview 1 UCB, Nov15/16, 2006 THEMIS SCIENCE WORKING TEAM MEETING Mission Overview Peter R. Harvey Project Manager University of California - Berkeley.
PTAR Presentation Jonathan DeLaRosa, Jessica Nelson, Ivan Morin, JJ Rodenburg, & Tim Stelly Team Cronus.
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
AAE 450 – Spacecraft Design 1 Attitude Determination Methods Brienne Bogenberger January 18, 2004 Dynamics & Control Group Lead, Attitude Determination.
EXTP Accomodation Study Hong Bin, Zhang Long Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering. CAST Oct 27th, 2015.
JWST ISIM Primary Structure and Kinematic Mount Configuration Jonathan Kuhn, Tim Carnahan NASA/GSFC Code 542 Andrew Bartoszyk, Steve Hendricks, Charles.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Ares V an Enabling Capability for Future Space Science Missions H. Philip Stahl, Ph.D. NASA MSFC.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Drawing of the Space Infrared Telescope for Cosmology and Astrophysics (SPICA)
1 YamSat Bus Structures Analysis Tsai Ming-Hsien 蔡明憲 2005/03/24 YamSat.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) SRR/Mechanical System August 16-18, 2005
Telescope - Mechanical
Overview 3 2 Introduction Design Analysis Fabrication Testing
Spacecraft Structures
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Systems Engineering Management
System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure
SPICA / FPI Mechanical /Optical Issues
THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM
The Lunar Lion By: Hannah Flick.
Presentation transcript:

Gateway to Space AJ - 1 Mechanical System Design & the StarLight Project Andy Jarski Mechanical Systems Engineer Ball Aerospace & Technologies

Gateway to Space AJ - 2 Overview Brief Intro to Mechanical Design process StarLight as an example Some designs I’m working on Conclusions

Gateway to Space AJ - 3 Quick Look at the Design Process Identify the requirements –Mission –Launch Environments –Instrument / Payload Accommodations Create Preliminary Configurations –Subsystem requirements (size, location, FOV) –Accessibility –Producibility –Structural Characteristics (load paths, stiffness) Design Options –Materials (strength, stiffness, weight, CTE, corrosion resistance, cost, etc.) –General shape / layout Validation of Requirements –Test Criteria –Design Criteria Iterations –Until requirements are met Detailed design goes to production

Gateway to Space AJ - 4 StarLight is the 1st of it’s Kind Demonstrate 2 key technologies of particular importance for Terrestrial Planet Finder: –Autonomous Formation Flying –Separated-Spacecraft Interferometry Mission uses 2 spacecraft, launched together which then separate to m to simulate the performance of a single large telescope JPL provides interferometer instruments and formation flying sensors Ball provides 2 spacecraft, integration and test, and operations for the spacecraft Heliocentric, earth trailing orbit to eliminate gravity field perturbations Two spacecraft formation-flying to 2 cm accuracy Low-jitter spacecraft to permit interferometer to lock on fringes

Gateway to Space AJ - 5 Black Magic of Interferometry

Gateway to Space AJ - 6 Formation Flying, in the Dark 26º Half Cones of Shadow (all components are shaded) 42º Starlight View Range Intra Instrument Line of Sight 52º Starlight View Range Collector Optics Combiner Instrument X Collector S/C Combiner S/C

Gateway to Space AJ - 7 Who’s Driving our Configuration? Fit both spacecraft within the 3m, 3 stage, Delta II Fairing Envelope –Interface to the standard Delta 37” clamp band –Keep the CG within launch vehicle limitations Accommodation of Interferometer instruments and Formation Flying Sensors Provide unobstructed fields of view for –StarLight interferometer –intra-interferometer starlight link –Formation Flying sensors –Star Trackers –Antennas –Thrusters –Sun sensors –Solar arrays Maintain CG balance after fuel depletion

Gateway to Space AJ - 8 Launch & Cruise Configurations Delta II 3m-3 Stage Fairing Combiner S/C Collector S/C 37’’ Interface Ring 108” 100” Star 48B 3rd Stage Motor

Gateway to Space AJ - 9 These Spacecraft are Nicely Equipped High Accuracy Formation Flying Sensors Low Impulse Cold Gas thrusters (x16) Star Trackers (x2) Sun Sensors (x14) UHF antennas (Inter s/c comm) Solar Panel 106 in./270 cm dia. Deployable Sunshade 134 in./340 cm dia. Interferometer

Gateway to Space AJ - 10 Interferometer Main Bus Assembly 2-Piece Solar Array Hatch Propulsion Module Modular Designs Reduce Risk Formation Flying Sensor Module Modularity reduces I&T complexity and time required Modularity improves accessibility S/C bus components housed in Main Bus Assembly Instrument is it’s own entity

Gateway to Space AJ - 11 StarLight uses nearly identical composite structures to –closely match the characteristics of the interferometer optical benches –minimize mass Commonality helps to –Reduce I&T complexity –Reduce risk –Lower cost Commonality is Important Relay Box Reaction Wheels (x4) Telecom “gear” X-Band Transponder SCU (Computer) IMU Battery Propulsion “gear” Transceiver Star Trackers (x2) Hatch

Gateway to Space AJ - 12 Structural Requirements Minimum natural frequency of the launch stack –15 Hz Lateral –35 Hz Axial –35 Hz Secondary –Applied to all components except the fixed sun shade Max Axial Load: 9.5 g axial combined with 0.1 g lateral Max Lateral Load: 2.8 g axial combined with 3.0 g lateral Minimum factor of safety –Yield: 1.25 –Ultimate: 1.50 Other requirements (acoustic, random, etc.) not expected to be critical Alignments

Gateway to Space AJ - 13 Launch Configuration Collector Spacecraft Combiner Spacecraft StarLight FEM Finite element models –of Launch Configuration for structural modes analysis –of separated s/c to analyze on-orbit disturbances

Gateway to Space AJ - 14 Modes Analysis 1st Lateral Mode of 15.3 Hz 1st Axial Mode of 38 Hz

Gateway to Space AJ - 15 Connector Separation Spring Separation Nut Separation Plane Deployable is a Dangerous Word Inter-Satellite Separation Mechanisms –Tolerance analysis –Separation dynamics –ABSOLUTELY MUST WORK! Sunshade –Material selection crucial RF transparent Visibly opaque –Stiffness –ABSOLUTELY MUST WORK!

Gateway to Space AJ - 16 Some Other Thoughts Some basic engineering principles I think are important –When you start a design, just get something down on paper –If you leave something as a placeholder, document it as such and make sure to go back and fix it –Allocate lots of time for test, this is where everything comes together, and that is the point, isn’t it? –Test early, test often, test it again –Never compromise your ethics If the design isn’t working, is behind schedule or over budget, say so, don’t mislead anyone, they may be able to help If you see a problem, speak up Getting involved is the best way to learn –Space Grant provided opportunities I couldn’t get anywhere else Great exposure to industry Opportunities you don’t always get in industry –Learning in a classroom is one thing, but applying your skills in a “real world” environment with real accountability and responsibility is where the challenge and fun are.

Gateway to Space AJ - 17 Questions?