1.  www.21stcenturyschoolteacher. com www.21stcenturyschoolteacher. com  And click on the “ASCD Presentations” tab  Tamalpais August 8-9 Day Two.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
Advertisements

The 21st Century Context for
Understanding by Design Day 3 Roosevelt Complex Secondary Science Training.
Understanding by Design Day 2 Roosevelt Complex Secondary Science Training.
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Session 3 The evidence should be credible & helpful. Implications: the assessments should – ◦ Be grounded in real-world applications, supplemented as.
Department of Mathematics and Science
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Patchogue- Medford UbD Curriculum Group Understanding by Design Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe What is backward design?
Ackward esign. Teachers are designers. The effectiveness of their designs corresponds to whether they have accomplished their goals for the end users.
Adapted from Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe. Identify desired results Determine acceptable evidence Plan learning experiences and instruction
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
MODULE 3 1st 2nd 3rd. The Backward Design Learning Objectives What is the purpose of doing an assessment? How to determine what kind of evidences to.
Authentic Performance Tasks
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
A School Approach to Designing for Learning Learning Intentions : To know that purposefully designing for learning that is contextually appropriate, strengthens.
Types and Purposes of Assessment Mathematics Assessment and Intervention.
Dr. Robert Mayes University of Wyoming Science and Mathematics Teaching Center
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
Understanding by Design
DLM Early Childhood Express Assessment in Early Childhood Dr. Rafael Lara-Alecio Dr. Beverly J. Irby
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
Understanding by Design: Unit Development Presented by: Judi Allen, Director of Curriculum, K-12; Social Studies, Digital Learning, Technology Specialists/Library,
York Public Schools Curriculum Design September 1, 2010 Toby Boss ESU 6.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Assessment: What? Why? How? Barb Wilkins and Julie Phelps eLearning Community of Practice April 18, 2012.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 3: Quality Instructional Design.
Stages 1 and 2 Wednesday, August 4th, Stage 1: Step 5 National and State Standards.
Professional Certification Professional Certification October 11, 2007 Standard: Effective Teaching Criteria 1(b) Using a variety of assessment strategies.
Using Understanding by Design
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
Coppell ISD Coppell, Texas October 8, 2012 Download slides and files at: Thomasrye.weebly.com Thomas Rye ASCD / Ferris High School Spokane, WA.
Adapted from Understanding by Design Academy, Seattle, WA, July 2001 presented by Jay McTighe, ASCD. Think “Scrapbook” versus “Snapshot ”
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Understanding by Design From the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe The 3 Stages of UBD Developing a Common Language - What is a Unit.
Assessment Whittney Smith, Ed.D.. “Physical vs. Autopsy” Formative: Ongoing, varied assessment used as a tool for learning and diagnosing Summative:
The Backward Design Process
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Understanding by Design a.k.a. Backward Design
Curriculum Instruction Assessment Aligning Manitoba Physical Education Supervisors Association Linda Thorlakson Manitoba Education February 17, 2010.
York Public Schools Curriculum Design December 1, 2010 Toby Boss ESU 6.
Whatever It Takes Differentiated Assessment Session One.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher in Residence  Sign in and take any graded homework from your folders.  Turn in your TWS – Teaching Context and Unit Overview  Please.
Understanding By Design
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
3 Stages of Backward Design 1. Identify desired results. 2. Determine acceptable evidence. 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction.
Backwards Design. Activity-Oriented Teaching Many teachers engage in “activity-oriented” teaching.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
Identifying Assessments
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Understanding by Design: Unit Development Presented by: Judi Allen, Director of History/Social Studies Diane Perito, Director of Science Jane Skelton,
Understanding by Design Stage 2: Determining Acceptable Evidence Summer UBD Workshop, Day 2 August 13, 2014.
Lenape School District Understanding by Design Day 2 June 26, 2012 Day 2 June 26, 2012.
T-527 Fall 2005 Developing Curriculum for Deep Learning How is learning assessed? Ongoing assessment and educative evaluation 10 November 2005.
A quick review… Brainstorm and Pass “What have your thoughts been about UbD since we last met?”
+ Priory Curriculum & Instruction Faculty Inservice, August 2014.
Evidence of Understanding
Formative/Summative Conceptual/Procedural
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design “Backwards Design”
Mapping the Assessment and Evaluation in a Unit
Understanding by Design
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Instructional Program Alignment
Presentation transcript:

1

 com com  And click on the “ASCD Presentations” tab  Tamalpais August 8-9 Day Two

 Today’s Plan Review yesterday’s work Stage One work time (continued) Stage Two Assessment Collection of Evidence Peer Review Stage Three AMT ASCD Tamalpais Powell, Herold3

1. Identify desired results 2. Determine acceptable evidence 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction 4

◦ The purpose of assessment is to provide reliable and authentic evidence of understanding. ◦ Assessment not only measures student performance, it motivates it. ◦ If you value the desired result, learners deserve accessible opportunities to demonstrate learning. 5

 The photo album versus the snapshot. 6

“Evaluation is a complex, multi-faceted process. Different tests provide different information, and no single test can give a complete picture of a student’s academic development. -- from CTB/McGraw-Hill Terra Nova Test Manual 7 7

8 Stage 2 - Assessment Evidence Transfer Task(s):Other Evidence: Performance task Products / Performances Academic Prompts -All other forms of assessment Quizzes, tests, prompts, work samples Observations Student self-assessment 8

9 Stage 2 - Assessment Evidence Transfer Task(s):Other Evidence: Determine types of assessment (Formative) Summative Determine types of assessment Diagnostic Formative Summative 9

Worth being familiar with Important to know & do Big ideas & Enduring Understandings “Big ideas” worth exploring and understanding in depth Foundational knowledge & skill Nice to know Traditional quizzes & tests Paper/pencil Selected- response Constructed response Performance tasks & projects Complex Open ended Authentic 10 Collecting sufficient evidence (p , )

Goal Role Audience Situation Product/Performance Standards GRASPS related tools (p , ) GRASPSGRASPS 11

 Connected to the classroom — demonstration / extension of what was learned  Connected to the real world — work that professionals in the field would do  Connected to student’s life —  Connected to capacity — students have clarity on what is expected from them and the necessary skills / knowledge to be successful 12

 Assess before teaching  Offer appropriate choices  Provide feedback early and often  Encourage self-assessment and goal setting  Allow new evidence of achievement to replace old evidence 13

In the following video, look for ways in which EQs and EUs guide the learning and inform the performance task. ASCD Tamalpais Powell, Herold14

 Brainstorm possible transfer tasks for your unit.  Consider the transfer goals from stage 1 Performance task samples (p ) 15

16

 Task:  To what extent do your assessments… ◦ assess the enduring understandings? ◦ assess the knowledge and skills?  Check for gaps and points of emphasis. Alignment of Assessments: 17

 Design a transfer task for your unit.  Create the ACTUAL student instructions for the task.  Self assessment

 Definitions ◦ Analytic ◦ Holistic ◦ Gradual Release of Responsibility  Most importantly: ◦ Tied to Stage one Rubrics: 19

4321 Understanding Knowledge & Skill 20

 Begin by delineating the 2 and 3.  Then progress to the 4 and the 1. Writing Rubrics 21

Begin writing rubric criteria for your transfer task/understandings. Task: 22

 Is there a range of assessments as opposed to a single task/test (photo album vs. snapshot)?  Could a student be successful on the assessment package without truly understanding?  Could the student understand and not be successful on the assessment package? Review Standards—Stage Two: 23

 3 units per group (max of 6 people)  Author shares overview of unit (5 minutes)  Reviewers discuss unit (5 minutes) ◦ Author listens, takes notes, does not engage  Conversation (5 minutes) ◦ Clarifications, suggestions, next steps Task: Peer Review Protocol: 24

 Acquisition  Meaning Making  Transfer ASCD Tamalpais Powell, Herold25

Understanding by Design (Wiggins and McTighe) Understanding by Design Professional Development Workbook (Wiggins and McTighe) Assessment for 21 st Century Learning—DVD 1,2 &3 Moving Forward with Understanding by Design—DVD Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design (Tomlinson and McTighe) Schooling by Design (Wiggins and McTighe) For more information: 26

Below is a link to ASCD’s online Professional Development Feedback Survey. We encourage all participants to complete the online evaluation within the next ten (10) days. All responses will be anonymously reported to ASCD. D=98K2mpl Thank you for taking the time to honestly evaluate the program. The results we receive help us to improve the quality of services you receive

 Erik Powell   Donna Herold  ASCD Tamalpais Powell, Herold Smith, Herold29