An Introduction to MSU Technologies Presentation to the College of Engineering Oct. 7 th, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Advertisements

The Division of Research and Economic Development Welcome New Faculty! Select this icon throughout the presentation to hear a few words from Dr. Harold.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
CONFIDENTIAL © 2012 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
Principal Patent Analyst
North Carolina State University © 2014 Technology Transfer Outcomes February 27, 2014 Research Retreat Kelly B. Sexton, Ph.D. Director Office of Technology.
University Technology Transfer Presentation to Legislative Biotechnology Task Force 29 September 2005 Gene A. Merrell Assistant Vice President - Research.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
EXPRESS LICENSE AGREEMENTS Ted Hagelin Crandall Melvin Professor of Law Kauffman Professor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Director, NY Science & Technology.
The Catholic University of America Office of Technology Transfer Office of Technology Transfer Commercialization of CUA-Developed Technologies February.
Industry – University Transactions: Protecting Competitive Corporate Advantage Varda N. Main Director, Technology Licensing Rochester Institute of Technology.
Technology Transfer at UIC © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Presentation to the Software Commercialization Symposium April.
Dr. J. David McDonald Associate Provost for Research and Director of the Office of Research Administration Dr. Tim Pett Director, Center for Entrepreneurship.
1 Technology Assessment Committees – Choosing the Optimal Structure Varda N. Main Director, Technology Licensing Office LES 2004 Annual Meeting Boston,
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
Commercialization of University Technology Innovation, Technology Transfer and Licensing Jack Turner, Associate Director M.I.T. Technology Licensing Office.
Title here Taking Discoveries from Lab Bench to the Marketplace Technology Transfer 101:
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) and the Office of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (OIPTT) Kenneth Kirkland, Executive.
RESEARCH PRODUCTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OGADA T. and MBAYAKI A. CAMPUS BASED RESEARCH WORKSHOPS TOWN CAMPUS 3 May 2006.
Sustainable Smart Cities Symposium April 3, 2013 Richard B. Marchase Vice President for Research and Economic Development.
Wyoming Research Products Center Intellectual Property and Licensing Services Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 12, 2008 Davona K. Douglass, Acting.
Technology Transfer at Rice
The Catholic University of America Office of Technology Transfer Discovery, Patenting and Commercialization of CUA- Developed Technologies January 9, 2003.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
James Nichols Kennedy Space Center August 14, 2014 SE Federal Lab Consortium Partnering with Rollins College Center for Advanced Entrepreneurship.
Page 1 New Models for Commercialization Federal Partners in Technology Transfer June 18, 2009 A presentation by: Tom Corr Chief Executive Officer Accelerator.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
The Research Disclosure Process at the James R. Zanewicz, J.D. Director Office of Technology Development.
PROMOTING TECHNOLOGY TO INDUSTRY Technology transfer objectives: enhance commercial value of invention promote technology to partner / investor identify.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
+ Faculty Orientation UAMS BioVentures September 23, 2015 Christopher A. Fasel Associate Director of Licensing Patent Attorney UAMS BioVentures.
© PEP 2005 All rights reserved “Connecting the Dots… from Researcher to Market” Harvesting the value of innovation Courtney Price, Ph.D.
Product Title : Session Date : 27,28, 29th Feb 2012.
Invention Disclosure Analysis / Triage. Overview Decision making Components of an invention disclosure Review process Qualitative factors – art vs. science.
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
Working with Inventors to Enhance Marketing Efforts Cathy Cohn Marketing Specialist.
University Technology Transfer: Issues and Opportunities Mark Crowell Research Administration for Scientists (T. Quigg) 7 December 2001.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
2 nd RD51 Collaboration Meeting October, 2008 WG6: Production DSU/TT - Emir Sirage,
Office of Technology Commercialization Chuck Rancourt Director.
Office of Technology Development Case No. ________ CONFIDENTIAL Intellectual Property Committee Presentation Inventor(s) Invention Title Presentation Guidelines:
Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP). What Is the Program Mission Why Is It Important Who Is It Designed to Assist How Will It Encourage TT.
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
Evices Software Research Tools Therapeutics Diagnostics Medical Devices Software Research Tools Therapeutics Diagnostics Medic s Startup Technology Transfer.
TRL and Technology Commercialization Theresa Baus Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport, RI.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration N A S A G o d d a r d S p a c e F l i g h t C e n t e r 1 p r e s e n t e d a t.
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
Realize. A better world through research November 10, 2015 Flash of Genius The First steps after an Invention Divyesh Patel.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
Wayne Huebner Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO presentation to: F 3 August 15, 2006 Research UMR: Serving the needs.
University Licensing Dominique Kleyn 27 th June 2003.
Vermont's 21st Century Economy: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Dr. Corine Farewell Director, Office of Technology Commercialization University of.
INSTRUCTIONS YOU HAVE UNTIL MAY 31 TH 2013 TO SEND THIS DOCUMENT BACK TO ✚ FILL THIS DOCUMENT and help yourself with the evaluation.
Research Administration Forum May 2005 Tom Hagerty Office of Technology Management.
University of Iowa Research Foundation We help you identify, protect and commercialize your discoveries. We can help you start a company. We will help.
Peter McLeod Innovation Manger Introduction to ProspectIP.
Taking Discoveries from Lab to the Market
Office of Technology Commercialization (OTC)
NSE Technology screening week – November 03, 2008
Cleantech to Market Technology Transfer at Berkeley Lab
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Taking Discoveries from Lab to Marketplace
Presentation transcript:

An Introduction to MSU Technologies Presentation to the College of Engineering Oct. 7 th, 2008

Why operate a technology management office? Transfers innovations into the market that enhance quality of life (public good) Supports existing research activities and helps to attract new research funding Helps recruit and retain best and brightest faculty Adheres to federal Bayh-Dole Act requirements Generates new revenue streams Creates new companies and jobs Improves image of the university Assists university’s economic development efforts in the community and throughout Michigan 6/25/2015 2

3

4 Technology Commercialization Process Goals –Efficient and effective process –Data / information driven decision making –Maximum technology potential = best business environment US Patenting US, Foreign Patenting Screening Evaluation In-Depth Commercial Assessment MarketingLicensing License Compliance Return to Inventor Disclosures

6/25/2015 Screening Analysis and Criteria (2 hours – industry expert) Commercialization –Type of Technology (obsolete to revolutionary) –Technology Readiness Level (concept to ready for production) –Ease of Adoption by Industry (switching costs) Market – Range of Applicability (single to many industries) –Market Size (niche to very large sales per year) –Market Growth/Potential (declining to rapid growth) –Market Maturity (passed to emerging) IP landscape – Potential for or current coverage –Breadth of coverage 5

6/25/2015 Screening Rankings High(H): most findings are favorable for commercialization and the technology should move to assessment. Medium High(MH): technology looks promising but some aspects are not compelling or incomplete. If resources are available, assessment is warranted. Medium Low(ML): there is limited market potential or some commercialization barriers. Limited additional resource expenditure is recommended. Low(L): little or no market potential and significant barriers. Expenditure of further resources to commercialize the technology is not recommended. 6

6/25/2015 Next Steps After Screening 1.Assessment 2.Patent or other IP protection 3.Potential future development 4.Return and release 7

6/25/2015 Assessment (40 hours – industry expert) Technology Overview –Disclosing Description –Benefits –Applications Invention Status –Protection Status –Ownership Status –Licensing Status –Urgent Actions 8 Recommendation – Action –Pursue –Post –Monitor –Release –Other

6/25/2015 Assessment, continued Inventor Interview –Expert Interviews Chart (Company / Name / Division and/or Title / Contact Info / Comment) Summaries –Market Information Value Chain (Level / Comment / Players) IP Summary –Potential Licensees Company / Name / Contact Info / Comment / Expressed Interest –License/Venture Capital Ready 9 Start Up Company Potential –Analysis Summary Factor / Rank (1-10) / Comments IP Protection Market & Timing Level of Development Ease of Implementation

6/25/2015 Please visit our new website at technologies.msu.edu for MSUT staff contact information, answers to common questions, forms, and other useful information. 10