Research in Hazardous Materials Transportation – New Cooperative Research Program John Allen, Battelle FHWA Talking Freight Series October 19, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Advertisements

TRB TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. ACADEMY COMPLEX NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE NATIONAL RESEARCH.
FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION POLICY STUDIES AT THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES Freight Capacity for the 21 st Century Federal Role in the Marine Transportation System.
Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
MARYLAND’S FREIGHT STAKEHOLDER ADVISORY COMMITTEE Federal Highway Administration, Office of Freight Management and Operations Talking Freight Seminar Series.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
EISWG The Environmental Information Services Working Group of the NOAA Science Advisory Board Raymond J. Ban April 22, 2009.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Visual 3.1 Unified Command Unit 3: Unified Command.
Congress and Contractor Personal Conflicts of Interest May 21, 2008 Jon Etherton Etherton and Associates, Inc.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Transportation Management Plan Overview. TMP Overview2 Is that the impression people have?
TELLEFSEN AND COMPANY, L.L.C. SEC Regulation SCI and Automation Review Policy Compliance March 2013 Proprietary and Confidential.
Randy Wade TRB Intercity Passenger Rail Committee Tuesday January 25, 2011 Washington, DC.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
The National Incident Management System. Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 To prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks,
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration San Bruno – Lessons Learned Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate.
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
Maryland Health Benefit Exchange: An Update October 5, 2011 Charles Milligan DHMH Deputy Secretary, Health Care Financing.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
Federal Highway Administration,, US DOT Freight Modeling Research, Funding, and Collaboration Tianjia Tang, Ph.D., PE Office of Freight Management and.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Transportation Planning Applications Committee (ADB50) presented by Sarah Sun Federal Highway Administration.
Incident Command System (ICS)
October 27, 2005 Contra Costa Operational Area Homeland Security Strategic and Tactical Planning and Hazardous Materials Response Assessment Project Overview.
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
ETF Conference, Building & Financing European Transport Infrastructure, Brussels, 23rd Oct Building & Financing European Transport Infrastructures.
Professional Science Master’s Programs: Federal Budget Strategy April 4, 2008 Council of Graduate Schools.
Cooperative Research Programs Transportation Research Board 1 Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Rail Research Program AASHTO Standing.
Alliance for Uniform Hazardous Materials Transportation Procedures Alan Martin Deputy Director, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration HM-ACCESS.
Cooperative Research Programs Transportation Research Board 1 Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Rail Research Program AASHTO Standing.
Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Research Programs RAC 101 July 26, 2010 Kansas City.
Dr. David Mowat June 22, 2005 Federal, Provincial & Local Roles Surveillance of Risk Factors and Determinants of Chronic Diseases.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
Think Regionally - Act Locally The Development and Evolution of the I-95 Corridor Coalition: Think Regionally - Act Locally John Baniak Executive Director,
House Concurrent Resolution 171 (2010) Levee District Oversight Planning Study Report to the Senate and House Committees on Transportation, Highways, and.
Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis
1 Federal Lab Technology Transfer, Annual Reporting, and Gauging Performance Mark Boroush Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Technology Policy, Technology.
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
1 Hazardous Materials Background and Data Overview Talking Freight Seminar Washington D.C. October 18, 2006 Ron Duych Research and Innovative Technology.
Transportation Research Board Agency Update Barbara Hilger DeLucia August 6, 2002.
Adoption of TRB Special Report Recommendations by Congress and Federal Agencies Illustrative Examples, Transportation Research Board of the National.
Federal Transit Administration Office of Safety and Security TRANSIT BUS SAFETY AND SECURITY PROGRAM Mike Flanigon Federal Transit Administration U.S./
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
Module 2-1 The Foundation For Road Safety Management Policy History and Institutional Structures of Road Safety Management Think about it …
TRB’s Cooperative Research Programs Crawford Jencks Manager, National Cooperative Highway Research Program ECTRI/TRB International Research.
The NEKIA Business Development Initiative Overview Annual Retreat Scottsdale, Arizona November 19-21, 2003.
Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships (VAP3) Adopted Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) enabling legislation in 1995 Public-Private Education.
Swedish Risk Management System Internal management and control Aiming to Transport Administration with reasonable certainty to.
Washington Traffic Records Committee Creating & Coordinating a Shared Vision for Traffic Records 2006 Traffic Records Forum August 1, 2006.
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
An Overview on Risk Management
Data Impacts of Transportation Reauthorization: Data Community’s Plans and Strategies Pat Hu Chair, TRB National Transportation Data Requirements and Programs.
Border Crossing Best Practices Guidebook
What Is TCRP? The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) was established in 1992 to provide an ongoing medium for applied research to transit issues.
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Research Programs
Cooperative Rail Research at TRB
What Is TCRP? The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) was established in 1992 to provide an ongoing medium for applied research to transit issues.
Stimulating Innovation and the U.S. Economy through the U.S. DOT’s
Stimulating Innovation and the U.S. Economy through the U.S. DOT’s
Presentation transcript:

Research in Hazardous Materials Transportation – New Cooperative Research Program John Allen, Battelle FHWA Talking Freight Series October 19, 2006

Topics for Discussion TRB Special Report #283 “Cooperative Research for Hazardous Materials Transportation, Defining the Needs and Converging on Solutions” Congressional Legislation – Section 7131 of SAFETEA-LU Early Program Development and Status

TRB Special Report 283 Cooperative Research for Hazardous Materials Transportation Defining the Need, Converging on Solutions

Sponsors: RSPA, FMCSA, FRA, USCG Charge: –Assess need for a national cooperative research program for hazmat transportation –Examine options for program finance, governance, and management commensurate with need and character of hazmat sector –Offer practical advice on whether and how to pursue a cooperative research program for hazmat transportation.

Process NRC appointed 14-member study committee with expertise in: –Hazmat shipping, transportation, research management, risk analysis, enforcement, emergency planning and response Met 3 times from April to September 2004 Stakeholder workshop to identify shared research needs and program options: –>60 participants from public and private sectors, state, local, federal agencies

Structure of Report Overview of Hazmat Sector Current Federal Research Related to Hazmat Transportation Identification of Shared Research Needs (public- private, interagency, and inter-jurisdictional) enterprise Insights from Other Cooperative Research Programs Options for Program Finance, Governance, Management Envisioned Program and Recommended Next Steps

Findings Hazmat concerns becoming more varied and complex –safety, environment, and security –traffic growth, changing traffic patterns and transport environment –public is less tolerant of risk Risk management is public and private effort –Involves carriers from all modes, shippers from all industries –state and local gov’t, emergency responders –>dozen federal agencies –all have need for good information to coordinate decisions Few means available for entities to work together to find solutions to shared and related problems –federal agency research is “mission-specific” –gaps in solving problems that cut across missions

Conclusion There is a Growing Need for Cooperative Research Research to support consistent and effective policymaking and regulation Research to support planning and preparing for emergencies Research to support first response

Report Availability Cooperative Research for Hazardous Materials Transportation: Defining the Need, Converging on Solutions Trb.org. Go to: Recently Released TRB Publications Subjects: Freight TRB Publication: TRB Special Report #283 Recently Released TRB PublicationsFreightTRB Special ReportRecently Released TRB PublicationsFreightTRB Special Report Staff Contact: Tom Menzies TRB, National Academies

Congressional Legislation – SAFETEA-LU SEC HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESEARCH PROJECTS. (a) IN GENERAL.-The Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration shall enter into a contract with the National Academy of Sciences to carry out the 9 research projects called for in the 2005 Special Report 283 of the Transportation Research Board entitled ''Cooperative Research for Hazardous Materials Transportation: Defining the Need, Converging on Solutions''. In carrying out the research projects, the National Academy of Sciences shall consult with the Administrator. (b) REPORT.-Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the need to establish a cooperative research program on hazardous materials transportation. (c) FUNDING.-Of the amounts made available by section 5101(a)(1) of this Act, $1,250,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2009 shall be available to carry out this section. (c) FUNDING.-Of the amounts made available by section 5101(a)(1) of this Act, $1,250,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2009 shall be available to carry out this section.

Result of Legislation Congress essentially established an HM Studies Program, not a full-fledged CRP TRB named to administer the HM Studies Program DOT called to make report to Congress on the need for an HMCRP $1.25 million authorized for four years to complete the HM Studies HM Studies Program consists of the 9 studies named in SR 283 and the legislation

#1 Assessment of Opportunities to Integrate Safety and Security Measures for Hazmat Transportation Objectives: 1.Identify areas where safety and security measures are compatible and may complement each other 2.Identify areas where safety and security measures may conflict with each other 3.Determine differences in responding to a traditional incident vs. a terrorist event 4.Outline comprehensive approach to hazmat transportation Estimated Cost/Schedule: $500k-$1 million/18-36 months Estimated Cost/Schedule: $500k-$1 million/18-36 months

#2 Data on Traffic and Highway Geometric Characteristics in Large Truck Crashes for Use in Risk Analysis Objectives: 1.Compile existing data on relationship between large truck crashes and highway features 2.Determine usefulness of these data in performing risk analysis 3.Propose centralized large truck crash data base Estimated Cost/Schedule: $500k/24 months Estimated Cost/Schedule: $500k/24 months

#3 Recommendations for Development of Conditional Release Probablities for Bulk Containers In Accidents Objectives: 1.Provide documented recommendations on possible design and funding alternatives for nationwide system to collect and analyze performance data of intermodal bulk containers. 2.Develop conditional release probabilities for various container design specifications Estimated Cost/Schedule: $75-100k/12 months Estimated Cost/Schedule: $75-100k/12 months

#4 Development of Correlation Between Incident Risks and Consequences to Aid in Decision-Making Models Objectives: 1.Determine components of a model to validate risk and consequence analysis of highway hazmat transport 2.Make adaptable to routing and regulatory analyses Estimated Cost/Schedule: $250k/18 months Estimated Cost/Schedule: $250k/18 months

#5 Development of an Environmental Hazard Assessment System for Hazmat Transportation Objectives: 1.Identify the key parameters that should be used to determine the environmental hazards of a given material 2.Develop a methodology for an environmental hazard index that provides an accurate estimation of relative hazards Estimated Cost/Schedule: $1 million/36 months Estimated Cost/Schedule: $1 million/36 months

#6 Recommendations for Commercial Transportation Incident and Commodity Flow Studies Objectives: 1.Provide accurate data for the evaluation of hazmat transport incident rates and release probabilities 2.Prepare documented recommendations for collection of nationwide commercial transport accident frequencies and traffic volumes for improved risk assessment Estimated Cost/Schedule: $500k/24 months Estimated Cost/Schedule: $500k/24 months

#7 Detailed Information for Conducting Hazardous Materials Commodity Flow Studies Objectives: 1.Provide information for state and local agencies on methods and information systems that can be used to estimate hazmat commodity flows in their jurisdiction Estimated Cost/Schedule: $300k/18 months

#8 National Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Capability Assessment Objectives: 1.Determine location and quality of response coverage for hazmat incidents 2.Identify geographic locations where coverage is inadequate 3.Develop cost-effective strategies for improving response to acceptable levels 4.Create a more systematic and efficient approach for allocation government funding to response needs Estimated Cost/Schedule: $500k/24 months

#9 Transportation Emergency Response Guidelines for Hazardous Materials Objectives: 1.Provide a consistent guideline document for use by emergency responders and handlers for managing hazmat incidents in transportation 2.Define roles and responsibilities of carriers and shippers in the event of an incident 3.Provide procedures that are consistent across all modes Estimated Cost/Schedule: $ k/24 months

Early Program Planning for HM Studies Program TRB has received the contract and the funding from DOT for FY06 – after administrative costs, approximately $900k to be available for research projects. TRB is now organizing the Oversight Panel consisting of key stakeholder organizations – 12 person panel First Oversight panel meeting to be held in late November –Will decide on priorities among the nine studies and further define scope of the studies First RFPs planned for Jan/Feb, 07 – TRB will be forming Technical Review Panels for each project

Participation in TRB HM Studies Program HM Studies Program, FY06-09 –Possible memberships in Technical Project Panels for the 9 specific projects to be funded –Bid on RFP opportunities to be released by TRB If the HM Studies Program grows into a full-fledged, annually funded CRP - –Annual solicitation for research ideas in hazmat transportation – similar to annual call for research in NCHRP and TCRP programs.