Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VETO Analysis Update Michael Wood University of Massachusetts, Amherst Outline Introduction and basics Reconstruction packages Efficiencies Simulation.
Advertisements

COSMIC RAY MUON DETECTION USING SCINTILLATION COUNTER AND WAVELENGTH SHIFTING FIBERS ARUNODAYA BHATTACHARYA VSRP-2009,TIFR,MUMBAI 6/7/09.
The Angra Neutrino Detector Detector, VETO and electronics conceptual design Laudo Barbosa (May 18th, 2006) Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF)
TOF0 calibration The resolution in a given pixel can be measured before the absolute time calibration (see the plot) The expected total resolution of the.
DAQ WS02 Feb 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Hardware Architecture o General Architecture o Tracker Baseline o TOF Baseline & Options o EmCal Baseline.
M. Bonesini - VC TOF status M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 21 September, 2009.
Linda R. Coney – 24th September 2009 MOM Update End of Sept Run Linda R. Coney 05 October, 2009.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
1 Analysis of TOF data Yordan Karadzhov St.Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia.
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
Y. Karadzhov MICE MICO First EMR Plots 1.EMR detector has been successfully incorporated in the MICE DAQ system. 2.First 3 days of data taking in MICE.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Software parallel session summary MICE collaboration meeting INFN, Frascati 27/6-05.
How We Became Experimentalists Suzanne Levine Saba Zuberi Len Zheleznyak REU 2002.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting July 18, 2007.
5 May 2009MICE Analysis - MR1 The December Shifts: Beam Characterization by the Time of Flight System Mark Rayner.
Luminosity Monitors MICE Video Conference 7 May 2009 Paul Soler.
MICE CM17 Feb 07Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Status o Since CM16 o Detector DAQ software o Front End Electronics o Schedule Milestones o.
Progress and plans on PID simulation and reconstruction Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university St. Kliment Ohridski.
TOF calibration Y. Karadzhov. Y. Karadzhov, MICE CM26 24 March Slide 2 TOF Calibration - Trigger TOF1 TOF 0 TOF 1 TOF 2 The blue line encloses the calibrated.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
27 Jun 2005S. Kahn -- Tof/Ckov Status1 Status of TOF and Ckov Sub- packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn 27 June 2005.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
1 M. Bonesini - CM 25 RAL 5/11/09 PID status report M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
FLC Group Test-beam Studies of the Laser-Wire Detector 13 September 2006 Maximilian Micheler Supervisor: Freddy Poirier.
DE/dx measurement with Phobos Si-pad detectors - very first impressions (H.P Oct )
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
Jin Huang M.I.T. Hall A Analysis Workshop Dec 14, JLab.
1 ALICE T0 detector W.H.Trzaska (on behalf of T0 Group) LHCC Comprehensive Review, March 2003.
Analysis of Endstation A setup Josef Uher. Quartz bar Start counter.
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Tracker Timing and ISIS RF Edward Overton 1. At CM32… 2 Had done some preliminary checks on the ISIS RF. Was beginning to think about how to handle the.
January 31, MICE DAQ MICE and ISIS Introduction MICE Detector Front End Electronics Software and MICE DAQ Architecture MICE Triggers Status and Schedule.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
HES HKS collaboration meeting 3/11/2010 T.Gogami.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
M. Bonesini – CM 291 PID detectors summary M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
APEX DAQ rate capability April 19 th 2015 Alexandre Camsonne.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
M. Bonesini - CM 22 RAL October 081 TOF0 status M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
TOF Emittance Pion Emittance Measurement with the TOFs? Mark Rayner 11 December 2008.
1 Chapter No. 17 Radiation Detection and Measurements, Glenn T. Knoll, Third edition (2000), John Willey. Measurement of Timing Properties.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November The TOF detectors: Beyond particle identification Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
TOF Emittance Emittance measurements with the TOFs Mark Rayner 4 December 2008.
Results with the RPC system of OPERA and perspectives
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva
MDT and analog FEE mass production:
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
HEPD BTF and Trento Facility Calorimeter preliminary results
Luminosity Monitor Status
MICE Collaboration Meeting
FPGA-based Time to Digital Converter and Data Acquisition system for High Energy Tagger of KLOE-2 experiment L. Iafolla1,4, A. Balla1, M. Beretta1, P.
Sergey Abrahamyan Yerevan Physics Institute APEX collaboration
SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies
Presentation transcript:

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition three TDC boards are used. The transit time of the signal through the PMT and the delays introduced by the cable bringing it to the control room and the discriminating electronics for a given channel is not known and it has to be measured. The digital values recorded by the TDCs correspond to the absolute time since the last reset of each TDC board. The board clocks are not synchronized, but the first channel (Ch0) of each board receives a copy of the Particle Trigger signal and this signal is used as a reference for all the PMTs of the TOF stations.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 2 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup (con’t) The Particle Trigger signal is generated by hardware logic units in the DAQ racks. It is given by the first twofold coincidence of the PMTs connected to the same slab. The recorded TDC value can only make sense if referred to the Particle Trigger time. The PMT (channel) which is delivering the trigger depends on the position on the hit, therefore the delay of the Particle Trigger signal depends on the position of the hit to.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 3 Absolute Time Calibration Method Calibration constants : –40 t0 i ij constants (one per PMT/channel) for TOF0 : the difference between the delay in channel i (delays in the slab material, PMT, cables, …) and the delay of the channel which delivers the trigger when pixel ij is hit. –100 Relative trigger delays Δ T tr ij (one per pixel) for TOF0 : the difference between trigger delay (the delay in the channel which is delivering the trigger) from pixel ij and the trigger delay for a pixel used as a reference. –28 t0 m constants (one per PMT/channel) for TOF1 : the delay in channel m of TOF1. –40 additional t0 k constants (one per PMT/channel) will be needed for TOF2. More detailed explanation of the method is available in the MICE Note :

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 4 Time walk correction The adoption of leading edge discriminators introduces a dependence of the discrimination crossing time on the collected charge (time walk). To calculate the time walk correction the difference of the time measured by the PMT and a reference time is measured. The dependence of this time difference on the maximum of the signal of the PMT measured by the FADC is fitted with some function (see the formula). The precision in the calculation of the time walk correction is limited by the very poor statistics of events with maximum of the signal of the PMT under 1000 or above 3000 ADC counts. The reference time is given by a PMT in the other plane of the station and the time walk effect in the measurement of the reference time is suppressed by an offline constraint on the variation of the ADC pulse height in the PMT used as a reference.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 5 Time walk correction The effect of the time walk correction for a typical pixel. The difference between the time measured by slab 5 in plane 0 and slab 4 in plane 1 of TOF0, before and after the time walk correction

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 6 Obtained results The calculation was done by the method described above, using the data from runs 849, 886, 890 and 891 (300 MeV/c pions). This amount of data is sufficient for calibration of only 9 pixels in TOF0 and 2 pixels in TOF1. TOF0 TOF1

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 7 The effect of the time calibration and time- walk correction The plots show overall distribution of the time difference between the vertical and horizontal slabs for all the counters in TOF0 without (top) and with (bottom) the time corrections. The measurements from the calibrated pixels (the peak at zero) and from the still uncalibrated pixels are clearly distinguishable.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 8 TOF0 time resolution The time difference between the vertical and horizontal slabs in the same station can be used also to measure the time resolution obtained after the calibration. The resolution on the difference in the calibrated pixels in TOF0 is ~ 102 ps. This translates into ~ 51 ps resolution for the full detector with crossed horizontal and vertical planes.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 9 TOF1 time resolution The resolution on the difference in the calibrated pixels in TOF1 is ~ 124ps. This translates into ~ 62ps resolution for the full detector with crossed horizontal and vertical planes.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 10 Time of flight spectrum Time of flight between TOF0 and TOF1 for the so called positron (red) and pion (blue) beams in normal (left) and logarithmic (right) scale. The first peak which is present in both distributions is considered as the time of flight of the positrons and is used to determine the absolute value of the time in TOF1.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 11 Time of flight spectrum A natural interpretation of the other two peaks in the time of flight spectrum from the so called pion beam is that they are due to forward flying muons from pion decay and pions themselves, but the calculated time of flight of nominal 300 MeV/c pions is ~ 29.4 ns instead of ~ 30.0 ns, where the third peak maximum is positioned. This difference may be partly explained by the energy loss inside the TOF0 and the two upstream Cerenkovs, that amounts to ~ 17 MeV.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 12 Conclusions Even with the small collected amount of data, we’ve been able to obtain resolutions in the time measurement in TOF0 and TOF1 that are in agreement with (TOF0), or very close to (TOF1) the desired values. There is an area for improvement in the time walk correction but we need significantly larger amount of data for this. A detailed and well understood simulation of the MICE beam channel in order to understand fully the obtained TOF spectrum for the so called 300 MeV/c pion beam is urgently needed.