UC San Diego Financial Perspective How do we look to resource providers? Customer Perspective How do customers see us? Internal Process Perspective Are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OUR STRATEGIC PLANNING JOURNEY. Our Workplan Step One: Preparation May / June Start-up and planning meetings R&R; milestones; calendar; processes Training.
Advertisements

OUR STRATEGIC PLANNING JOURNEY. The Department of Medicine Strategic Plan  Our roadmap for the future  It will shape and guide what the Department of.
BALANCED SCORECARD Annual Report - FY2013 Using Performance Measurement to Align Goals, Strategy, and Budget Decisions “Value gained & value expected”
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
John Supra & Nathan Strong October 2012 Using HR Metrics to Support Strategic Planning/Employee Development.
Balanced Scorecard Metrics Workshop UC Berkeley Business and Administrative Services March, 2001.
System Office Performance Management
Balanced Scorecard MBA © Rajiv D. Banker Do not reproduce without permission MBA.
Creating a Continuous Improvement Program: A Balanced Scorecard Approach A Presentation AACSB Continuous Improvement Conference September 15, 2003 Presented.
CISB444 - Strategic Information Systems Planning
LBNL / UCSD LBNL/UCSD Discussion June 29, 2005 Business Architecture and the Balanced Scorecard.
The Balanced Scorecard The California State University Quality Improvement Programs Presented To John Sanders Presented By Finance and Administrative Services.
DEPAUL UNIVERSITY SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS AND PERFORMANCE METRICS Marge Hayes Ashton Hayes Group January 31, 2000.
© John Wiley & Sons, 2005 Chapter 16: Strategic Performance Measurement Eldenburg & Wolcott’s Cost Management, 1eSlide # 1 Cost Management Measuring, Monitoring,
UC San Diego EH&S Staff Meeting Project 2010 Jan00 meeting notes.doc May 5, 2004 Update on the New Business Architecture EH&S Staff Meeting.
Performance Summit November 4, 2004 Steve Relyea Implementing a Performance Management System in Higher Education College and University Performance Summit.
1 Implementing the New Business Architecture University of California, San Diego January 18, 2006.
University of California New Business Architecture Project 2010 Jan00 meeting notes.doc April 15, 2004 Accelerating the New Business Architecture UC Employment.
THE BALANCED SCORECARD
FAS and the Balanced Scorecard Building a Data-Driven and Strategy-Focused Organization.
Core Performance Measures FY 2015
The Library Balanced Scorecard: The Results Please! Joe Matthews American Library Association June 2007.
BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC)
P e r f o r m a n c e Measuring Results of Organizational Performance Lesson 4 Performance Methodology: The Balanced Scorecard.
Copyright © by Houghton Miffin Company. All rights reserved.1 Financial & Managerial Accounting 2002e Belverd E. Needles, Jr. Marian Powers Susan Crosson.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Core Performance Measures FY 2005
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU 1 Linking Quality to Strategy: Benefits of Balanced Scorecards.
Attracting appropriate user funding in the context of declining public funding.
The Adapted Balanced Scorecard. Kaplan’s Adaptation of the Balanced Scorecard Framework to Nonprofit Organizations Financial Perspective If we succeed,
DAS: State Controller's Division1January 2010 Department of Administrative Services State Controller’s Division Updated January, 2010.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Collaborative Assessment: Using Balanced Scorecard to Measure Performance and Show Value Liz Mengel, Johns Hopkins University Vivian Lewis, McMaster University.
Build a Better HR Scorecard Colorado SHRM Human Resources Conference 1.
OCTA Strategic Planning March 8, 2011 STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED MANAGEMENT.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
STRATEGIC DIRECTION UPDATE JANUARY THE VISION AND MISSION THE VISION: ENRICHING LIVES AND CREATING SUCCESSFUL FUTURES. THE MISSION: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE.
Sharing Session on Organizational Performance Jakarta, 3 September 2013.
AFM The Balanced Scorecard By Isuru Manawadu B.Sc in Accounting Sp. (USJP), ACA.
Quality and San Juan College Dr. Carol Spencer. About San Juan College.
The Balanced Score Card
Healthcare Leadership Institute Ray Reilly September 12, 2003.
Measurement Systems. Development of Information Information is necessary for both control and improvement Information derives from analysis of data Data,
The Need for a Balanced Measurement System Using Different Perspectives to Create Meaningful Measures Bill Rabung and Brad Sickles U.S. Department of Labor.
Building Balanced Scorecards Thompson Leadership Team May 20, 2010 Annette Overton, Quality Performance Department.
C H A P T E R 10 Continuous Improvement in Management Accounting Continuous Improvement in Management Accounting.
The Balanced Scorecard
Information, Analysis, and Knowledge Management in the Baldrige Criteria Examines how an organization selects, gathers, analyzes, manages, and improves.
Au: Our Aspirations and Perspirations By Rev. Bro. Bancha Saenghiran, Ph.D. April 6, 2005 Mission Hill, Nakornratchasima.
Needs for changes and adjusting to them in the management of statistical systems Panel discussion Prospects and Risks for the Future: How to manage uncertainties.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Brandon, Gerald, Ryan, Courtney, Brett, William, Kara, Scott.
IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Presenter: Kendell Rice, Ph.D. July 11, 2007.
Business and Finance Strategic Planning Agenda Introduction Overview: B&F Strategic Plan Discussion: B&F as one B&F Values with Behaviors.
Balanced Scorecard René Ewing Governor’s Special Assistant for Management and Quality Improvement Balanced Scorecard René Ewing Governor’s Special Assistant.
Balanced Scorecard The University of Texas at El Paso Division of the Vice President for Business Affairs.
Redmond Police Functional Plan Update Council Study Session January 14, 2014.
1 Balanced Scorecard Philosophy, Basics, Fundamentals, and Functions.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
The Adapted Balanced Scorecard. Kaplan’s Adaptation of the Balanced Scorecard Framework to Nonprofit Organizations Financial Perspective If we succeed,
BALANCED SCORECARD ANALYSIS. What Is a Balanced Scorecard? A Measurement System? A Management System? A Management Philosophy?
Human Resource Management 1 Performance Management Process.
Balanced Scorecard “Puyallup Public Library, as an innovative information center, provides excellent service to all in their pursuit of information, knowledge,
The Balanced Scorecard
Contents A GENERIC IT BALANCED SCORECARD
Balanced Scorecards in
Service Development at Aalto University Key Enabler for Aalto's Academic Mission Mari Svahn.
Integrated Budget & Planning Cycle
The Siliwangi University Post Graduate Programs
Presentation transcript:

UC San Diego Financial Perspective How do we look to resource providers? Customer Perspective How do customers see us? Internal Process Perspective Are we productive and effective? Innovation & Learning Perspective How do our employees feel? The Balanced Scorecard Source: Kaplan and Norton

UCSD Mission Excellence in Teaching, Research & Patience Care Financial Perspective If we succeed, how will we look to our financial stakeholders UCSD Business Framework Customer Perspective To achieve our vision, how must we look to our customers Process Perspective To satisfy our customers, financial stakeholders, and mission, what business processes must we excel at? People Perspective To achieve our vision, how must our people learn, communicate, and work together? Source: Kaplan and Norton UC San Diego

Strategic Game Plan Within limited resources, maintain the most critical support services that will sustain the excellence of the University’s academic and clinical programs. Simplify procedures and reduce workload for academic and clinical departments. Provide our customers with intuitive and flexible tools so they can be successful.

UC San Diego Reduce cycle time and improve the performance of our essential support services to students, faculty, and staff. Provide appropriate development opportunities for University staff. Enhance the University’s system of financial controls so we maintain the public trust of our stewardship of campus resources. Strategic Game Plan

UC San Diego Disseminate, promote, and put into action UC San Diego’s Principles of Community. Enhance methods of communicating with our key customers. In the area of technology, migrate the campus to a set of standard protocols and tools that will allow for improved customer support in the future. Strategic Game Plan

Strategic Initiatives What we need to do Personal Objectives What managers and staff need to do Strategic Outcomes Strategy Our game plan Balanced Scorecard Implementation & focus A Framework For Translating Mission into Outcomes DelightedCustomers MotivatedWorkforce EffectiveProcessesEffectiveProcesses SatisfiedStakeholdersSatisfiedStakeholders Source: Kaplan & Norton Mission, Values, And Vision UC San Diego

1995/961994/951993/941992/93 Business Unit 1 Excess Revenues as a Percent of Net Revenues Excess Revenue$42,463$71,844($4,544)($15,180) Net Revenue$918,285$848,649$686,223$674,541 Percentage4.62%8.47%-0.66%-2.25% Accumulated Earnings$46,144$4,260($53,601)($47,726) Total Assets Turnover Net Revenue$918,285$848,649$686,223$674,541 Total Assets$157,420$57,151$56,980$71,689 Ratio Business Unit 2 Excess Revenues as a Percent of Net Revenues Excess Revenue$35,262$51,162$93,827$14,578 Net Revenue$928,400$852,679$700,137$808,994 Percentage3.80%6.00%13.40%1.80% Accumulated Earnings$366,354$308,429$229,592$136,625 Total Assets Turnover Net Revenue$928,400$852,679$700,167$808,994 Total Assets$473,300$401,305$323,886$210,410 Ratio The Balanced Scorecard: Financial Perspective

UC San Diego Benefits Top/Bottom 2-Box Ratio 99': ': ': Percentage Evaluating: 1999 = = = 53 N = 354 for for for 1994 Extremely Very Somewhat Not Very Not At All Satisfaction Mean Score UCSD CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY: Overall % Box Ratio OverallRating AttributesAttributes

UC San Diego The Balanced Scorecard: Internal Process Perspective UCSD SimilarCampuses NationalCohortsNationalCohorts

UC San Diego The Balanced Scorecard: Innovation & Learning Perspective WorkplaceCharacteristics MeanScoresMeanScores

UC San Diego JUNE - JULY Report Benchmarking and Customer Service Survey Data JULY - SEPTEMBER Develop Strategic Plan and Organization Goals AUGUST - SEPTEMBER - Performance Reviews - Identify Individual Goals - Make Merit Increase Decisions SEPTEMBER - OCTOBER - Implement Merit Increase - Develop Departmental Action Plans to Achieve Goals OCTOBER -DECEMBER Implement Employee Recognition Program NOVEMBER -DECEMBER Develop and Forward Annual Report To Vice Chancellor DECEMBER - JANUARY Develop Benchmarking Data FEBRUARY - APRIL - Submit Benchmarking Data - Conduct Customer Satisfaction Survey APRIL - MAY Collect Results of Benchmarking and Customer Satisfaction Survey The BSC Becomes a Foundation of Strategy

Implement New Technology Strategy Map: Benefits Unit Source: Kaplan and Norton UC San Diego Learning & Growth Customer Perspective Resource Issues Internal Processes Team Building Program Leadership Development Redesign Organizational Structure Enhance Skills Of Staff Change Telephone Triage System Invest in Additional Staffing Improve Perception of Responsiveness Improve Perception of Quality Of Advice Benefits Service Delivery Strategy Deliver cost effective benefits Services that are valued by our customers Evaluate Methods To Reduce Cycle Time

UC San Diego CustomerPerspective Innovation & Learning FinancialPerspectiveFinancialPerspective ProcessPerspectiveProcessPerspective StrategicComponents OpportunityAssessment ChangeChange NumericGoals Actuals & Ratings Ratings

UC San Diego What Have Been the Results? Increased Productivity Reduction in Costs Understanding Customer Needs

UC San Diego Million Dollar Challenge Program Background –T–Target - Generate $1,000,000 Increased non-student revenue Reduced costs Over a period of 5 years Outcome –$–$891,189 within 2 years –E–Exceeded goal 3rd year

UC San Diego Carpet Procurement Program Background Direct purchase Direct contracting of installation Team project Outcome 5-year savings : $1,121,000

UC San Diego Custodial - Conditions in 1994 Low Productivity High Cleaning Costs Low Customer Satisfaction Costs/sq ft.94 cents Customer Satisfaction

UC San Diego Custodial - Results in 2002 Productivity Increases Reduced Cleaning Costs - $560,000 Increased Customer Satisfaction Customer Satisfaction Costs/sq ft.84 cents

UC San Diego Travel Reimbursement High Level of Errors Average Cycle Time Over 20 Days Low Customer Satisfaction Customer Satisfaction

UC San Diego Travel Reimbursement Error Level Reduced Cycle Time Down From 20 to 3 Days Customer Satisfaction Improved Customer Satisfaction

UC San Diego Payroll -- Conditions in 1995 Paper-Based Update Process Paper-Based Time Reporting Process 50% Transaction Error Rate Inadequate Communication with Customers

UC San Diego Payroll -- Results in 2002 Distributed Processes Implemented Error Rate Reduced from 50% to <5% Work Teams Established Phone Triage Process Implemented Customer Satisfaction Excellent

UC San Diego Finance -- Conditions in 1995 Difficult Data Extraction Process Paper-Based Financial Reporting Process Inadequate Functional Training Inadequate Communication with Customers

UC San Diego Finance -- Results in 2002 Financial Link Implemented Financial Link Improved New Phone Triage Process Implemented Revised and Improved Training Delivered Customer Satisfaction Ratings Excellent

UC San Diego Community Stakeholders Source: Kaplan and Norton

UC San Diego Why Consider this Approach in a Non-Profit Organization? It keeps an organization’s focus on what is important It is sustainable over the long-run It is explainable to your people It provides a context for decision making

UC San Diego Efforts and planning are aligned with customer priorities It is a great way to evaluate changes to key processes It builds habits of balance, continuous improvement, and accountability to constituents Why Consider this Approach in a Non-Profit Organization?

UC San Diego Lessons Learned: Things That Can Go Wrong Poor Data Quality Quality Lack of Participation in Measurement in MeasurementDevelopment A Culture that Values Complexity No Linkage to Mission & Strategy No Linkage to Mission & Strategy One-Size-Fits-AllApproachOne-Size-Fits-AllApproach

UC San Diego Lessons Learned: Critical for Success LeadershipCommitmentLeadershipCommitment Assessment Will InfluenceBehavior Results Influence Rewards Results Form Context for Planning Results Form Context for Planning CommunicateResultsCommunicateResults