SUSY at LHC Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University SUSY Theory at the LHC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC1 Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC.
Advertisements

Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Phenomenology of new neutral.
Joe Sato (Saitama University ) Collaborators Satoru Kaneko,Takashi Shimomura, Masato Yamanaka,Oscar Vives Physical review D 78, (2008) arXiv:1002.????
Intro to neutralino dark matter Pearl Sandick University of Minnesota.
Comprehensive Analysis on the Light Higgs Scenario in the Framework of Non-Universal Higgs Mass Model M. Asano (Tohoku Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto Univ.) H.
Highly-Ionizing Particles in Supersymmetric Models John Ellis King’s College London & CERN.
Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D.Toback Phys.Lett.B639:46,2006, hep-ph/
Measurement of Dark Matter Content at the LHC Bhaskar Dutta Collaborators: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D. Toback Texas A&M University.
June 8, 2007LPC Early CMS Physics1 Relic Density in MET+Jets+Taus Sample at the LHC Teruki Kamon Texas A&M University [1] Physics Case in MET+Jets+Taus.
Precision Cosmology at the LHC Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Precision Cosmology at the LHC125 th August ’ 08 Cosmo 2008, Madison, Wisconsin.
Dark Matter at the LHC Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University
Susy05, Durham 21 st July1 Split SUSY at Colliders Peter Richardson Durham University Work done in collaboration with W. Kilian, T. Plehn and E. Schmidt,
1 the LHC Jet & MET Searches Adam Avakian PY898 - Special Topics in LHC Physics 3/23/2009.
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine Arlington LC Workshop January 2003.
Jan 17, 2007 Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ P T Slope 1 Measuring Mass Difference at LHC using soft τ P T Slope Alfredo Gurrola in collaboration.
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine American Linear Collider Physics Group Seminar 20 February 2003.
June 8, 2007DSU 2007, Minnesota Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D. Toback Phys.
B. Dutta Texas A&M University Phys.Rev.Lett.99:261301, 2007; To appear Inflation, Dark Matter and Neutrino Masses Collaborators: Rouzbeh Allahverdi, Anupam.
Mia Schelke, Ph.D. Student The University of Stockholm, Sweden Cosmo 03.
March 25, 2009Probing SUGRA Models at the LHC1 Teruki Kamon and Bhaskar Dutta (full list of collaborators in the next page) on (1) Coannihilation, (2)
12/17/07 Cosmological Connection at the LHC: Stau Neutralino Coannihilation Case1 Cosmological Connection at the LHC : Stau Neutralino Co-annhilation Case.
Higgs and SUSY at the LHC Alan Barr on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations ICHEP-17 Aug 2004, Beijing ATLAS.
REHEATING TEMPERATURE IN GAUGE MEDIATION MODELS AND COMPRESSED PARTICLE SPECTRUM Olechowski, SP, Turzynski, Wells (ABOUT RECONCILING SUPERSYMMETRIC DARK.
EuroGDR, 13 th December 2003 Dan Tovey CERN, 18/03/2004 G. Bélanger 1 Uncertainties in the relic density calculations in mSUGRA B. Allanach, G. Bélanger,
1Alan Barr PASCOS 09 PASCOS 2009 DESY 9 July 2009 …AT THE LHC DARK MATTER … Alan Barr University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations.
Quintessino model and neutralino annihilation to diffuse gamma rays X.J. Bi (IHEP)
SUSY Dark Matter Collider – direct – indirect search bridge. Sabine Kraml Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Grenoble, France ● 43. Rencontres.
Direct and Indirect Dark Matter Detection in Models with a Well-Tempered Neutralino Eun-Kyung Park Florida State University in collaboration with H. Baer.
Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry in collaboration with M. Quiros (IFAE) and P. Ullio (SISSA/ISAS) Alessio Provenza (SISSA/ISAS) Newport Beach.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Inclusive analysis of supersymmetry in EGRET-point with one-lepton events: pp → 1ℓ + 4j + E Tmiss + Х V.A. Bednyakov, S.N. Karpov, E.V. Khramov and A.F.
ATLAS Dan Tovey 1 Measurement of the LSP Mass Dan Tovey University of Sheffield On Behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Martin White – Cambridge ATLAS UK ATLAS Physics Meeting, May 2004.
SUSY in the sky: supersymmetric dark matter David G. Cerdeño Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology Based on works with S.Baek, K.Y.Choi, C.Hugonie,
22 December 2006Masters Defense Texas A&M University1 Adam Aurisano In Collaboration with Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon, Nikolay Kolev*,
Neutralino relic density in the CPVMSSM and the ILC G. Bélanger LAPTH G. B, O. Kittel, S. Kraml, H. Martyn, A. Pukhov, hep-ph/ , Phys.Rev.D Motivation.
A Linear Collider Run Scenario Choose a physics scenario that is CONSERVATIVE in the sense that it has many particles and thresholds to explore. Assume.
SUSY Studies with ATLAS Experiment 2006 Texas Section of the APS Joint Fall Meeting October 5-7, 2006 Arlington, Texas Nurcan Ozturk University of Texas.
Long-lived superpartners in the MSSM Alexey GLADYSHEV (JINR, Dubna / ITEP, Moscow) PROTVINO, December 25, 2008 PHYSICS OF FUNDAMENTAL INTERACTIONS PHYSICS.
Latest New Phenomena Results from Alexey Popov (IHEP, Protvino) For the DO Collaboration ITEP, Moscow
Supersymmetry Basics: Lecture II J. HewettSSI 2012 J. Hewett.
The Search For Supersymmetry Liam Malone and Matthew French.
Era of Discovery with CMS Detector TAMU Group Teruki Kamon, Alexei Safonov, David Toback Special Colloquium, LHC… Alexei Safonov 09/17/08 (Next Wednesday)
Dave Toback Texas A&M University HCP 2004 June 17 th Run II Searches for Supersymmetry Dave Toback Texas A&M University June 17 th 2004 HCP2004.
Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Z’production at LHC in an extended.
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
WIN 05, Delphi, Greece, June 2005Filip Moortgat, CERN WIN 05 Inclusive signatures: discovery, fast but not unambiguous Exclusive final states & long term.
STAU CLIC Ilkay Turk Cakir Turkish Atomic Energy Authority with co-authors O. Cakir, J. Ellis, Z. Kirca with the contributions from A. De Roeck,
SPS5 SUSY STUDIES AT ATLAS Iris Borjanovic Institute of Physics, Belgrade.
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
BSM YETI Meeting 10 th Jan SUSY Decays Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham.
Dark Matter in SUGRA Models with Universal and Nonuniversal Gaugino Masses D. P. Roy Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education Tata Institute of Fundamental.
Interpreting a CMS lljjP T Excess With the Golden Cascade of the MSSM October 1st, 2014 Journal Club Ben Allanach, Are R. Raklev, and Anders Kvellestad.
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
Phenomenlogical Aspects of Mirage Mediation Yeong Gyun Kim (Sejong U. & KAIST) Neutralino Dark Matter in Mirage Mediation (thermal relic density, direct.
ONE-PARAMETER MODEL FOR THE SUPERWORLD
Dark Matter in SUGRA Models and the LHC
Dark Matter Phenomenology of the GUT-less CMSSM
Focus-Point studies at LHC
Search for BSM at LHC Fayet Fest Paris November 9, 2016 Dirk Zerwas
Collider Phenomenology of SUSY Cosmic Connections &
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Evidence for WIMP Dark Matter
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
mSUGRA SUSY Searches at the LHC
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Relic density : dependence on MSSM parameters
Particle Physics and Cosmology in the Co-Annihilation Region
Presentation transcript:

SUSY at LHC Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University SUSY Theory at the LHC

Discovery Time… We are about to enter into an era of major discovery Dark Matter: we need new particles to explain the content of the universe Standard Model: we need new physics Supersymmetry solves both problems! The super-particles are distributed around the weak scale Our best chance to observe SUSY is at the LHC LHC: The only experiment which directly probes TeV scale Future results from Planck, direct and indirect detection in tandem with LHC will confirm a model Model SUSY Theory at the LHC

Collision of 2 Galaxy Clusters splitting normal matter and dark matter apart – Another Clear Evidence of Dark Matter – (8/21/06) 1 Ordinary Matter (NASA’s Chandra X Observatory) time 2 3 4 Approximately the same size as the Milky Way Dark Matter (Gravitational Lensing) SUSY Theory at the LHC 3

SUSY at the LHC The signal : jets + leptons + missing ET High PT jet [mass difference is large] DM The pT of jets and leptons depend on the sparticle masses which are given by models Colored particles get produced and decay into weakly interacting stable particles R-parity conserving DM (or l+l-, t+t-) High PT jet The signal : jets + leptons + missing ET SUSY Theory at the LHC

Kinematical Cuts, Event Selection - 4 jets +ETmiss Example Analysis Kinematical Cuts, Event Selection - 4 jets +ETmiss PTj1 > 100 GeV, PTj2,3,4 > 50 GeV Meff > 400 GeV (Meff  PTj1+PTj2+PTj3+PTj4+ ETmiss) ETmiss > Max [100, 0.2 Meff] Paige, Hinchliffe et al. , Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5520 SUSY Theory at the LHC

Background Typical SUSY events are 105 events for 10 fb-1, while BG rate is 109-8 for W, Z, t tbar production. The cuts need to be optimized Large amount of missing energy, high pT jets, large numbers of jets and leptons are good handles on signal SUSY Theory at the LHC

SUSY Models Minimal Model: minimal supergravity (mSUGRA)/CMSSM MSSM has more than 100 parameters The number of parameters can be reduced in different models Minimal Model: minimal supergravity (mSUGRA)/CMSSM Nonuniversal SUGRA model, Anomaly mediated, NMSSM, Compressed- SUSY Mixed Moduli, Gauge Mediated, non-critical string model, Split SUSY, Long lived NLSP models, GUT less models, Planck scale SU(5), SO(10) models etc.. Once SUSY is discovered, models will be searched based on typical signals These models also will be simultaneously tested at the underground , satellite experiments from their characteristic features. SUSY Theory at the LHC Let LHC Decide

Minimal Supergravity (mSUGRA) Let us use the simplest model to describe the reach of LHC 4 parameters + 1 sign m1/2 Common gaugino mass at MG m0 Common scalar mass at MG A0 Trilinear couping at MG tanb <Hu>/<Hd> at the electroweak scale sign(m) Sign of Higgs mixing parameter (W(2) = m Hu Hd) Experimental Constraints MHiggs > 114 GeV Mchargino > 104 GeV 2.2x10-4 < Br (b  s g) < 4.5x10-4 (g-2)m SUSY Theory at the LHC

Sensitivity only weakly dependent on A0, tan(b) and sign(m). Reach at the LHC Use Jets + leptons + ETmiss discovery channel. 5s 5s ATLAS ATLAS Sensitivity only weakly dependent on A0, tan(b) and sign(m). Tovey’02 M. Tytgat (SUSY’07) SUSY Theory at the LHC

Measurement of Masses We need to measure the masses of the particles. Model parameters need to be determined to check the cosmological status. [Allanach, Belanger, Boudjema and Pukhov’04] If we observe missing energy, then we have a possible dark matter candidate . [ LHC experiments sensitive only to LSP lifetimes <1 ms (≪ tU ~ 13.7 Gyr) ] Using the model parameters we need to calculate relic density +… SUSY Theory at the LHC

Dilepton Edge Measurement Deacy of results into dilepton invariant mass edge sensitive to combination of masses of sparticles. Can perform SM & SUSY background subtraction using distribution e+e- + m+m- - e+m- - m+e- Position of edge measured with precision ~ 0.5% (30 fb-1). m0 = 100 GeV m1/2 = 300 GeV A0 = -300 GeV tan(b) = 6 sgn(m) = +1 e+e- + m+m- Point 5 ATLAS 30 fb-1 atlfast Physics TDR SUSY Theory at the LHC

Measurements with Squarks Use Dilepton edge for reconstruction of decay chain. Make invariant mass combinations of leptons and jets. multiple constraints on combinations of four masses. Measurement of individual sparticle masses. ~ c02 c01 l qL q ~ c02 c01 b h qL q llq edge 1% error (100 fb-1) lq edge 1% error (100 fb-1) bbq edge llq threshold 1% error (100 fb-1) 2% error (100 fb-1) TDR, Point 5 TDR, Point 5 TDR, Point 5 TDR, Point 5 ATLAS ATLAS ATLAS ATLAS Point m0 m1/2 A0 tan(b) sign(m) LHC Point 5 100 300 300 2 +1 SUSY Theory at the LHC

Model Independent Masses Measurements from edges from different jet/lepton combinations to obtain ‘model-independent’ mass measurements. ~ c01 ~ lR ATLAS ATLAS Mass (GeV) Mass (GeV) ~ ~ c02 qL Sparticle Expected precision (100 fb-1) qL  3% 02  6% lR  9% 01  12% ~ ATLAS ATLAS LHC Point 5 Mass (GeV) Mass (GeV) Accuracies using many of such observables: 2% (m0), 0.6% (m1/2), 9% (tanb), 16% (A0) Similar analysis, P. Beatle (SUSY 07); M. Rauch (SUSY 07) SUSY Theory at the LHC

Shapes looks different, 2 scenarios can be distinguished Higgsino vs Gaugino … 02 ~ 01 ~ and : Higgsinos, three gaugino masses are very close Kitano, Nomura’06 02 ~ 01  02 ~ 01 ~ l+l- With M( )-M( ) <MZ Mslepton > Mz Gaugino Like and The spectrum terminates at m(l+l-)max 02 ~ 01 ~ Using other observables like Mllq Mlq, MT, it is Possible to measure squark and the neutralino mass with An accuracy of 2% and 10% Higgsino Shapes looks different, 2 scenarios can be distinguished SUSY Theory at the LHC

Dark Matter Allowed Regions We choose mSUGRA model. However, the results can be generalized. [Focus point region] the lightest neutralino has a larger higgsino component [A-annihilation funnel region] This appears for large values of m1/2 [Neutralino-stau coannihilation region] Bulk region-almost ruled out SUSY Theory at the LHC

Focus Point : Jets+leptons Typical mSUGRA point: m0=2910; A0=0; m1/2=350; m>0; tanb=30; Large sfermion mass, smaller gaugino masses comparatively LHC events characterized by high jet, b-jet, isol. lepton multiplicity Baer, Barger, Shaughnessy, Summy, Wang ‘07 _ _ Gluino decays into t t c0, t b c+- (mostly) ] Higher jet, b-jet, lepton multiplicity requirement increase the signal over background rate SUSY Theory at the LHC

Focus Point : Jets+leptons… Require cuts: n(j) ≥ 7, n(b) ≥ 2, AT ≥ 1400 GeV ETmiss+SETjet+SETlepton Gluino mass can be measured with an accuracy 8% Baer, Barger, Shaughnessy, Summy, Wang ‘07 SUSY Theory at the LHC

Focus Point: Leptons Large m0  sfermions are heavy m0=3550 GeV; m1/2=300 GeV; A0=0; tanß=10 ; μ>0 Direct three-body decays c0n → c01 +2 leptons Edges give m(c0n)-m(c01) ~ ~ ~ ~ Tovey, PPC’07 Z0 → ll 300 fb-1 c02 → c01 ll ~ c03 → c01 ll Preliminary ATLAS Parameter Without cuts Exp. value M1 68±92 103.35 M2-M1 57.7±1.0 57.03 M3-M1 77.6±1.0 76.41 Similar analysis: Error (M2-M1)~ 0.5 GeV G. Moortgat-Pick (SUSY 07) SUSY Theory at the LHC

Bulk Region The most part of this region in mSUGRA is experimentally (Higgs mass limit, bs g) ruled out Relic density is satisfied by t channel selectron, stau and sneutrino exchange Perform the end point analysis to determine the masses End pts value error mll 81.2 0.09 Mlq((max) 365 2.1 Mlq(min) 266.9 1.6 Mllq(max) 425 2.5 Mllq(min) 207 1.9 Mtt(max) 62.2 5.0 sparticle mass 97.2 398 189 607 533 mSUGRA point: 01 ~ m0=70; A0=-300 m1/2=250; m>0; tanb=10; 02 ~ l ~ g ~ uL ~ Nojiri, Polsello, Tovey’05 The error of relic density: 0.108 ± 0.01(stat + sys) ~ Includes: (+0.00,−0.002 )M(A); (+0.001, −0.011) tan β; (+0.002,−0.005) m(t2) [With a luminosity 300 fb-1, tt edge controlled to 1 GeV] SUSY Theory at the LHC

Coannihilation Signatures Mass of another sparticle comes close to the neutralino: both of them are thermally available. This region appears for small m0 and m1/2 values and therefore will be accessible within a short time For smal tanb this region has e,m,t in the signals For large tanb this region has t in the signals Griest, Seckel ’91 SUSY Theory at the LHC

Coann. Signatures (tanb=10) Small slepton-neutralino mass difference gives soft leptons Low electron/muon/tau energy thresholds crucial. Study point chosen within region: m0=70 GeV; m1/2=350 GeV; A0=0; tanß=10 ; μ>0; Decays of c02 to both lL and lR kinematically allowed. Double dilepton invariant mass edge structure; Edges expected at 57 / 101 GeV Preliminary ATLAS 100 fb-1 ETmiss>300 GeV 2 OSSF leptons PT>10 GeV >1 jet with PT>150 GeV OSSF-OSOF subtraction applied Tovey, PPC’07 SUSY Theory at the LHC

Coannihilation Region (tanb=40) Can we measure DM at colliders? tanb = 40, m > 0, A0 = 0 Can we measure DM at colliders? SUSY Theory at the LHC

Coann. Signatures (tanb=40) In Coannihilation Region of SUSY Parameter Space: Soft t p Hard t Soft t Soft t Final state: 3/4 ts+jets +missing energy Use hadronically decaying t SUSY Theory at the LHC

Four Observables Sort τ’s by ET (ET1 > ET2 > …) and use OS-LS method to extract t pairs from the decays NOS-LS ditau invariant mass (Mtt) PT of the low energy t to estimate the mass difference DM jet-t-t invariant mass: Mjtt D. Toback’s talk, parallel session Arnowitt, B.D., Kamon, Toback, Kolev,’06; Arnowitt, Arusano,B.D., Kamon, Toback,Simeon,’06; Arnowitt,B.D., Gurrola, Kamon, Krislock, Toback, to appear; D. Toback, talk [this conf] SUSY Theory at the LHC

SUSY Parameters Since we are using 4 variables, we can measure DM, Mgluino and the universality relation of the gaugino masses i.e. Mgluino measured from the Meff method may not be accurate for this parameter space since the tau jets may pass as jets in the Meff observable. The accuracy of measuring these parameters are important for calculating relic density. EVENTS WITH CORRECT FINAL STATE : 2t + 2j + ETmiss APPLY CUTS TO REDUCE SM BACKGROUND (W+jets, t-tbar,…) ETmiss > 180 GeV, ETj1 > 100 GeV, ETj2 > 100 GeV, ETmiss + ETj1 + ETj2 > 600 GeV ORDER TAUS BY PT & APPLY CUTS ON TAUS: WE EXPECT A SOFT t AND A HARD t PTall > 20 GeV, PTt1 > 40 GeV SUSY Theory at the LHC

Mttvis in ISAJET ETt > 20 GeV is essential! Version 7.69 (m1/2 = 347.88, m0 = 201.1)  Mgluino = 831 Chose di-t pairs from neutralino decays with (a) |h| < 2.5 (b) t = hadronically-decaying tau Number of Counts / 1 GeV ETvis(true) > 20, 20 GeV ETvis(true) > 40, 20 GeV ETvis(true) > 40, 40 GeV ETt > 20 GeV is essential! SUSY Theory at the LHC

We determine dm0/m0 ~ 1.2% and dm1/2/m1/2 ~2 % Determination of m0 , m1/2 DM and Mgluino  m0 , m1/2, (for fixed A0 and tanb) We determine dm0/m0 ~ 1.2% and dm1/2/m1/2 ~2 % dWh2/Wh2 ~ 7% (10 fb-1) (for A0=0, tanb=40) SUSY Theory at the LHC

Higgs non-universality The most common extension of mSUGRA Case 2. Case 1. Drees’00; Baer Belyaev, Mustafayev, Profumo, Tata’05 Ellis, Olive, Santoso’03 LHC signal: A, H and H+- will be relatively light, and more accessible to direct LHC searches ~ There can be light uR, cR squarks, small m: leads to light and oi +i SUSY Theory at the LHC

Moduli-Mediation KKLT model: type IIB string compactification with fluxes MSSM soft terms have been calculated, Choi, Falkowski, Nilles, Olechowski, Pokorski Ratio of the modular mediated and anomaly mediated is given by a phenomenological parameter a Choi, Jeong, Okumura, Falkowski, Lebedev, Mambrini,Kitano, Nomura SUSY Theory at the LHC Baer, Park, Tata, Wang’06,07

GUT-less and Moduli Mediation Ellis, Olive, Sandick’07 m is smaller in the GUT - less case for this Example. MM-AMSB GUT-less SUSY Theory at the LHC

Other Examples… 02 ~ 01 01 Bino-wino Coannihilation, Mixed Wino coannihilation In these cases, the lightest chargino and the second lightest neutralino are very close to the lightest neutralino 02 ~ 01  g : decay opens up along with other three body decay modes Baer et. al.’05 Gravitino LSP (mass around 100 GeV…) and sleptons NLSP Long-lived charged particles: One can find that the sleptons to decay after a long time Feng, Su, Takayama, ’04 Stop NLSP: stop charm+ 01 ~ Gladyshev, Kazakov, Paucar’05’07 NMSSM: This model can have extra Z’, sneutrino as dark matter candidate, In the context of of intersecting Brane Models [ Kumar, Wells’ 06] Higgs signal at the LHC Dermisek, Gunion’05 Moretti et al ‘06 SUSY Theory at the LHC

Other Examples… “Compressed” MSSM: Martin,’07; Baer et al,’07 “Compressed” MSSM: − m2Hu = 1.92 M 23 + 0.16 M2 M3 − 0.21 M 22 − 0.33 M3 At − 0.074 M2 At +… Naturalness argument : M3 is small, use M3<(M2,M1) at the GUT scale Relic density is satisfied by neutralino annihilation via t –t bar production, stop coannihilation etc. The GUT scale parameters are M1,2,3= 500, 750, 250, A0 = -500, m0 = 342GeV A typical sample of ``compressed" mass spectrum with W h2 = 0.11 Reduction of leptons in the signal. Inflation and MSSM : Flat directions LLE, UDD etc. Smaller sparticle masses are needed once the constraints from ns, dH are included Allahverdi, Dutta, Mazumdar,07 Little Hierarchy : Smaller stop mass is needed Ratazzi et al’06, Dutta, Mimura’07 SUSY Theory at the LHC

CMS tri-lepton discovery potential of this region EGRET-SUSY EGRET excess of diffuse galactic gamma rays is explained as a signal of supersymmetric dark matter annihilation Fitted SUSY parameters m0=1400 GeV tanβ=50 m1/2=180 GeV A0=0.5m0 De Boer, Sander, Zhukov Gladyshev, Kazakov’05,’06 ATLAS Gluino decays have a clear signature (4μ + 4jets + PT + up to 4 secondary vertices). Expected # of events for ATLAS after 1year of running with LHC luminosity 1034 cm-2s-1 is around 150 CMS tri-lepton discovery potential of this region DeBoer, Zhukov, Nigel ,Sander,’06, ‘07 Bednyakov, Budagov, Gladyshev, Kazakov, Khoriauli, Khramov, Khubua’06’07 SUSY Theory at the LHC

Conclusion LHC is a great machine to discover supersymmetry which would solve problems in particle physics and cosmology Signature contains missing energy (R parity conserving) many jets and leptons : Discovering SUSY should not be a problem! Once SUSY is discovered, attempts will be made to connect particle physics to cosmology The masses and parameters will be measured, models will be investigated Four different cosmological motivated regions of the minimal SUGRA model have distinct signatures Based on these measurement, the dark matter content of the universe will be calculated to compare with WMAP/PLANCK data. SUSY Theory at the LHC

Conclusion… I hope not… SUSY Theory at the LHC                                                                                               The search for Weapons of Mass Destruction SUSY Theory at the LHC