Making Climate Science Relevant to Decisionmaking Richard H. Moss, Ph.D. Climate Change Science Program Office (Director) and Joint Global Change Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prioritized New Research Initiative on Climate Change in Japan - under a new phase of the Science and Technology Basic Plan – Hiroki Kondo Special Advisor.
Advertisements

CMIP5: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
U.S. Climate Change Science Program Current Activities and Future Directions: From Planning to Implementation Committee on Climate Analysis, Monitoring.
Global Warming and Climate Sensitivity Professor Dennis L. Hartmann Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Seattle, Washington.
Britta Bierwagen 1, Roxanne Thomas 2, Kathryn Mengerink 2 & Austin Kane 2 1 Global Change Research Program National Center for Environmental Assessment.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
The Ocean’s Role in Climate Change. Responding to the Kyoto Protocol Climate Change Action Fund (CCAF) Initiatives Reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Reduce.
NOAA Climate Program – An Update NOAA Science Advisory Board March 19, 2003 NOAA Science Advisory Board March 19, 2003 Mary M. Glackin NOAA Assistant Administrator.
Climate Change Impacts in the United States Third National Climate Assessment [Name] [Date] Decision Support: Connecting Science, Risk Perception, and.
What role does the Ocean play in Global Climate Change?
IPCC Synthesis Report Part I Overview How to address the issue of “dangerous anthropogenic perturbation” to the climate system The relationship between.
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
Basic Climate Change Science, Human Response and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Prepared for the National Workshop.
The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Dr. James R. Mahoney Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere Director, Climate Change Science Program.
Climate Futures and Oregon’s Coastal Communities A Survey and Strategy to Address the Effects of Climate Change on the Oregon Coast.
The National Climate Assessment: Overview Glynis C. Lough, Ph.D. National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program National Coordination Office.
US CLIVAR Themes. Guided by a set of questions that will be addressed/assessed as a concluding theme action by US CLIVAR Concern a broad topical area.
IWRM as a Tool for Adaptation to Climate Change
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
NOAA Climate Service V. Ramaswamy and Chet Koblinski WCRP JSC-31 Antalya Turkey February 16, 2010.
Update on the U.S. Climate Change Science Program UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Subsidiary Body Meeting June 21, 2004 Linda V. Moodie Senior.
US Climate Change Science Program Incorporating the US Global Change Research Program and the Climate Change Research Initiative U.S. Climate Change Science.
The National Climate Assessment Kathy Jacobs, Assistant Director for Climate Assessment and Adaptation Office of Science and Technology Policy North American.
ADVANCED KNOWLEDGE IS POWER Protect Life and Property Promote Economic Vitality Environmental Stewardship Promote Fundamental Understanding.
U.S. Climate Change Science Program: Strategic Planning to Implementation DOE Office of Science BERAC Meeting November 13, 2003 James R. Mahoney, Ph.D.
Adaptation knowledge needs and response under the UNFCCC process Adaptation Knowledge Day V Session 1: Knowledge Gaps Bonn, Germany 09 June 2014 Rojina.
Report on March Crystal City Workshop to Identify Grand Challenges in Climate Change Science By its cochair- Robert Dickinson For the 5 Sept
Rising to the Challenge of Climate Change in the South East Local Presenter & Organisation Partner’s Logo.
PROSPERIDAD J. ABONETE JULY 3, 2003 Understanding Climate Change.
24 Global Ecology. Figure 24.2 A Record of Coral Reef Decline.
Identifying Grand Challenges in Climate Change Research: Guiding DOE’s Strategic Planning: Report on the DOE/BERAC workshop March Crystal City For.
Planning for Climate Change Climate science in the public interest Lara Whitely Binder Climate Impacts Group Center for Science in the Earth System Joint.
Global Climate Alteration: A Survey of the Science and Policy Implications D. Warner North (presenter), replacing Stephen H. Schneider, Stanford University,
Modern Climate Change Darryn Waugh OES Summer Course, July 2015.
USDA Role in Supporting Decisions on Climate Change William Hohenstein Global Change Program Office January 10, 2005.
SECTION IV: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STEPS TAKEN OR ENVISAGED BY NON-ANNEX I PARTY TO IMPLEMENT THE CONVENTION Workshop on the Use of the Guidelines for.
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research DOE Workshop on Community Modeling and Long-term Predictions of the Integrated Water.
Innovative Program of Climate Change Projection for the 21st century (KAKUSHIN Program) Innovative Program of Climate Change Projection for the 21st century.
Projection of Global Climate Change. Review of last lecture Rapid increase of greenhouse gases (CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O) since 1750: far exceed pre-industrial.
1 The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Peter Schultz, Ph.D. Director Climate Change Science Program Office Peter Schultz, Ph.D. Director Climate Change.
How SEARCH Fits into the Larger Scheme of U.S. Climate Change Science SEARCH Open Science Meeting October 29, 2003 James R. Mahoney, Ph.D. Assistant Secretary.
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
Stanley J. Kabala, Ph.D. Center for Environmental Research & Education Duquesne University Pittsburgh, Pa. U.S.A.
Opportunities for Research in the Dynamics of Water Processes in the Environment at NSF Pam Stephens Directorate of Geosciences, NSF Directorate of Geosciences,
Science Advisory Board Public Session 1 1 Peter Schultz, Ph.D. Associate Director for Science Integration Climate Change Science Program Office CCSP Update.
Chapter 6 1 U.S. Climate Change Science Workshop December 04, 2002 Climate Variability and Change Draft Strategic Plan.
UNCLASS1 Dr. Gene Whitney Assistant Director for Environment Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office of the President WISP Meeting - July.
The Impacts of Climate Change: An Overview MS&E 290 Public Policy Analysis March 2, 2004.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Jerry Elwood Director, Climate Change Research Division, Office.
Climate Change – Defra’s Strategy & Priorities Dr Steven Hill Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs 22 nd May 2007 FLOODING DESTRUCTION AT.
U.S. Climate Change Science Program & Climate Change Technology Program Updates NOAA Science Advisory Board Meeting July 14, 2004 James R. Mahoney, Ph.D.
Integrated Assessment and IPCC: Links between climate change and sub-global environmental issues presentation at Task Force Integrated Assessment Modelling,
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) The IPCC is the leading international body for the assessment of climate change. It was established by.
US Climate Change Science Program Incorporating the US Global Change Research Program and the Climate Change Research Initiative U.S. Climate Change Science.
Climate Change Information Seminar Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) – the relevance to FAO’s activities Claudia.
NOAA Climate Program Office Richard D. Rosen Senior Advisor for Climate Research CICS Science Meeting College Park, MD September 9, 2010.
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
Chapter Meeting Ecological Challenges Key Questions: 1)How does the average ecological footprint in America compare to the world’s average?
International Task Force Meeting on Sustainable Tourism Climate Change and Tourism United Nations Environment Programme Division of Technology, Industry.
Claudia Borchert, City of Santa Fe Claudia Borchert, City of Santa Fe 2012 New Mexico Water Dialogue Thursday, January 12, 2012 Meeting Water Challenges.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
Craig Nicolson, UMass-Amherst
GFDL Climate Model Status and Plans for Product Generation
Unidata Policy Committee Meeting
Basics of Climate Change Decision Making
Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology
Presentation transcript:

Making Climate Science Relevant to Decisionmaking Richard H. Moss, Ph.D. Climate Change Science Program Office (Director) and Joint Global Change Research Institute

Overview of This Presentation Definitions and motivation for CCSP “decision support” Key science-related “policy” issues: –What is the current state of the climate system? –How are human activities affecting climate? –How might climate evolve in the future? –What impacts might we expect from climate change? How are climate research and technology development supported in the United States? CCSP decision support structure and challenges

Decision Support: Definition of Key Terms Decision support resources –Analyses, methods, models/data, operational services, and other tools that provide useful information to address policy, resource management, and other issues Policy decisions –Decisions made in government settings that result in laws, regulations, and other public actions Adaptive management decisions –Operational decisions for infrastructure, resources, and response mechanisms (e.g., health alerts) Scenario –A coherent statement of a potential future situation that can serve as an input to more detailed analysis or modeling

Motivation for Decision Support The Global Change Research Act (1990) directs the USGCRP to “produce information readily usable by policymakers attempting to formulate effective strategies for preventing, mitigating, and adapting to the effects of global change,” and to undertake periodic assessments President Bush, citing the NRC’s 2001 study (“An Analysis of Key Questions”), called for development of decision support resources in June 2001 –“…the National Academy of Sciences study also recommends, ‘research that couples physical, chemical, biological and human systems; improved capability of integrating scientific knowledge, including its uncertainty, into effective decision support systems; and an ability to conduct research at the regional or sectoral level that promotes analysis of the response of human and natural systems to multiple stresses.’” White House document accompanying the President’s June 11, 2001 Statement on Climate Change CCRI, which is managed with USGCRP under CCSP, included emphasis on decision support

What are some of the key science-related “policy” issues defined by the Administration?

1. What is the Current State of the Climate System? The climate system is complex and is regulated by interactions and “feedbacks” across many different components.

Climate Change Has Been Observed Global mean temperature increased by 0.6 ± 0.2°C. 1990’s warmest decade, 1998 warmest year in the instrumental record ( ) Degree of confidence higher today but: Natural variability Model limitations Proxy record “errors” Inconsistent records

2. How Are Human Activities Affecting the Climate System ? Humans have changed concentrations of GHGs Atmospheric CO 2 has increased by 30% since 1750 Methane has increased by 150% Increase due to combustion of fossil fuels, land-use changes, and agriculture Humans also contribute to aerosols concentrations (sulfate and black carbon)

Can Climate Change Be Attributed to Human Activities? Compare observed changes to historically- force model simulations Models simulate past changes most closely when forcing includes natural and human factors (e.g., GHG and aerosol emissions)

3. How Might Climate Evolve in the Future? Climate Change Projections Depend on … Human driving forces—emissions and land use/cover change (population, economics, …) Emissions to concentrations— role of carbon cycle uncertainties Concentrations to radiative forcing—aerosol uncertainties Radiative forcing to climate response—uncertainty in climate sensitivity

Current Projections Show… Increase in global average surface temperatures ( º C by 2100) Rise of sea level (9-88 cm higher in 2100) Projected changes for the 21st century are larger than those that have already occurred Further changes will take place to reach equilibrium Figure depicts additional changes and level of certainty

Modeling Challenges Uncertainties in modeling key feedback processes (clouds, water vapor, ice, aerosols) Improve skill at regional climate forecasting Improve modeling of extreme events Assess potential for abrupt changes, which are seen in paleo records (i.e. ocean thermohaline circulation)

4. What Impacts Might We Expect from Climate Change? Impacts will depend on the magnitude, rate, and regional distribution of change Assessing impacts of climate change is difficult: –the lack of reliable local or regional detail in climate projections, especially for extreme events; –uncertain interactions of multiple stresses (e.g., land- use change and local pollution) –uncertainty in how much ingenuity and commitment societies show in responding to potential impacts –balancing “positive” and “negative” effects –choice of “numeraire” for counting impacts

Observed Changes in Regional Climates Have Already Affected Terrestrial and Marine Ecosystems Average growing season longer Ranges of some species of plants, insects, birds, and fish shifted poleward and upward in elevation Earlier flowering in some plants Increased frequency of coral bleaching

Potential Impacts for North America Ecosystems are especially vulnerable Widespread water concerns arise Food supply is secure Near-term forest growth increases Increased damage occurs in coastal and permafrost areas Adaptation determines health outcomes Uncertainties remain and surprises are expected Source: US Climate Action Report**

How Are Climate Research and Technology Development Supported in the U.S.? 13 Federal Agencies/ Departments coordinate their activities through the Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) Close coordination with energy technology programs

Strategic Plan based on: Comments during workshop (1300 participants) 270 sets of comments during an open comment period Review by the NRC Government review Strategic Plan for the U.S. Climate Change Science Program

Vision for the CCSP A nation and the global community empowered with the science-based knowledge to manage the risks and opportunities of change in the climate and related environmental systems

CCSP Mission Facilitate the creation and application of knowledge of the Earth’s global environment through research, observations, decision support, and communication

CCSP Strategy Includes: Five goals with long-term research foci and short- term products Basic research in 7 core science elements, with accelerated focus on key uncertainties (aerosols, feedbacks, carbon) Observations (accelerate additional observations and protect threatened series) Decision support (1. reports; 2. support for adaptive management; and 3. national policy— e.g., energy options) Communications (transparency, accountability, and new products)

Improve capabilities to forecast seasonal to interannual cycles of variability Increase confidence in understanding how and why climate has changed Better understanding of long term natural cycles in climate Understand climate extremes Expand observations/data capabilities

Reduce uncertainty in sources and sinks of GHG’s, aerosols Monitor ozone layer recovery and climate-ozone interactions Understand interactions among pollutant emissions, atmospheric transport, and air quality Improve quantification of net emissions of GHG’s Improve capabilities for conducting “If…,then…” analysis

Characterization of circulation of oceans and atmosphere Improve understanding of key “feedbacks” (i.e. water vapor) Understand conditions that give rise to abrupt or discontinuous changes Incorporate best knowledge of climate processes and feedbacks into models Improve capacity to develop and apply models

Improve knowledge of sensitivity of ecosystems Provide scientific input for evaluating adaptation options Improve understanding of how changes in ecosystems and human infrastructure interact over long periods of time

Prepare scientific syntheses and assessments Develop and evaluate methods to support policymaking and demonstrate these methods with case studies Develop resources to support adaptive management and planning, and transition these resources from research to application

Guidelines for Preparation of Synthesis and Assessment Products Government documents; mixture of external and Federal actors involved in preparation Lead agencies take responsibility Transparency in all steps of production –Framing: define product and customer; community input; draft prospectus for comment –Drafting: open to LA nominations and input of materials –Review: open, transparent, and traceable –Production: consistent format Draft guidelines will be available for public comment (Fed. Register and CCSP website)

Implementation Concerns CCSP is promising “final” answers to questions that require long-term research –NO. Long-term nature is acknowledged. Products will provide updates on important and/or rapidly evolving scientific issues CCSP is competing with IPCC or other processes –CCSP products will focus on key sub-issues in phase 1 or follow-up with greater detail in phase 2 than is possible in the international assessments CCSP “approval” of science –Transparency of process and use of structure that includes technical documents and policy summaries

Framework for Supporting “Adaptive Management”

Conclusions Research has progressed Important uncertainties remain and are being addressed Applied research is already informing policy makers and resource managers Deciding when we know “enough” is a value judgment not a scientific issue CCSP is at the center of controversy; the outcome of debate has meaning beyond the immediate climate science and policy issues

For Further Information Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – US Global Change Research Program –Our Changing Planet annual report – Climate Change Science Program – ov Global Change Research Information Office –