TM Office Comes to CA. - 20081 Shootout at the ICANN Corral: Domainers vs. Trademark Owners vs.com ®

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Snowe Bill / Industry Development Environment June 19, 2008.
Advertisements

Legal Aid in the 21 st Century Protecting our clients and their rights online…
Chapter 11: Domain Names and Other Trademark Issues on the Internet By: Adrian Lui.
Tradition innovation Online Branding Kate Legg Solicitor.
Use of Trademarks in Domain Names & Domain Name Disputes.
CYBERSQUATTING: PREVENTION AND REMEDIATION STRATEGIES NET2002 – Washington, DC April 18, 2002 Scott Bearby NCAA Associate General Counsel Copyright Scott.
Governmental Advisory Committee New gTLD Program Briefing 19 June 2010.
Google Confidential and Proprietary Trademarks on the Internet: Problems and Solutions Terri Chen September 2012.
© 2011 Dean A. Pelletier Protecting Economic Drivers Because All Roads Lead To The U.S. January 14, 2011 The NAMM Show Anaheim,
Margie Milam Senior Policy Counselor ICANN 1 ( All views expressed are my own)
Got ®? Ted Landwehr Landwehr Law Offices th Street NE Columbia Heights, MN
™ May 8, 2015 Copyright
NewTLDs: Implications for Trademark Owners Mike Rodenbaugh Online Brand Management in the World of New gTLDs MelbourneIT Strategy Seminar November 21,
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 11, 2008 Trademark – Domain Names.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School April 9, 2008 Domain Names.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 1, 2009 Trademark – Domain Names.
Merchandising; Cybersquatting Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Merchandising; Cybersquatting Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Johannes Christian Wichard Deputy Director WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO and ccTLDs ccTLD Best Practices: Latest and Future developments Luxembourg,
1 Domain Name Disputes Rami Olwan Bibliotheca Alexandrina IP and the Digital Age Workshop December 2008.
Domain Disputes Overview of UDRP Procedures 6/5/2015.
Dublin, May 2, 2003 Corporate Domain Names Management Dublin, May 2, 2003 Etienne Wéry, Attorney - Brussels and Paris bars Teacher at « Université Paris.
ICANN & UDRP Update Mike Rodenbaugh Practicing Law Institute Advanced Seminar on Trademark Law July 16, 2008.
INTRODUCTION TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW Professor Fischer Class 1: Introduction August 20, 2009.
«ccTLD.RU: regulation» Pavel Khramtsov Moscow-2008.
Resolving Domain Name Disputes Sean M. Mead Mead, Mead & Clark, P.C. Salem, Indiana.
Chapter 5 E- Commerce and Dispute Resolution. 2 Chapter Objectives 1. Describe how the courts are dealing with jurisdictional issues with respect to cyberspace.
Domain Names Ferenc Suba LLM, MA Chairman of the Board, CERT-Hungary, Theodore Puskás Foundation Vice-Chair of the Management Board, European Network and.
Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT) Proposal Comments Sue Todd, Director, Product Management Monday 11 May 2009, San Francisco.
Trademarks and the World Wide Web IM 350: Intellectual Property Law and New Media Spring, 2015.
The Case Against Cybersquatting A Discussion of Domain Name Trademark Protection By Matt Poole.
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE Trade Marks & Domain Names Chapter 8, Forder & Quirk.
Innovation Network Protecting Your Business for Future Success [Trademarks. Patents. Brands]
Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process. Genesis USG White Paper, June 5, 1998: –“The U.S. Government will seek international support to call.
Amber Bennett Cybersquatting. Introduction What is cybersquatting? Cyber: Internet Squatting: to live in a building or on land without the owner’s permission.
NewTLDs: Implications for Trademark Owners Mike Rodenbaugh Managing IP Webinar Internet Liberalization: Opportunities and Challenges for IP Owners August.
Real and Virtual Identities Francis Gurry Assistant Director General World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Sam Funnell Managing Principal Solicitor Commercial & Property Branch Government Branding.
Trademarks IV Domain Names & Trademarks Class 23 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
Chapter 17 E-Commerce and Digital Law
Domain Name Registration Sanjay Gupta August 29, 2008.
CYBERLAW CLASS 14 Regulating Domain Name Disputes – ICANN and the International System Oct. 15, 2002.
ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS Issues Covered in Chapter –Jurisdiction –Infringement and Cybersquatting –Internet Privacy and Database Protection –E-Commerce.
Commerce Done by: Sadoun AL-Suwaida Turki AL-Anazi.
OECD - HCOPIL - ICC Conference on Building Trust in the Online Environment The Hague, December 11-12, 2000 THE ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION EXPERIENCE OF.
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar
Prepared by Douglas Peterson, University of Alberta 15-1 Part 3 – The Law of Contract Chapter 15 Electronic Business Law and Data Protection.
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar
Trademarks IV Domain Names & Trademarks Class Notes: April 9, 2003 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Chapter 5 Trademark and the Internet. Trademarks and the Internet Concerns Cybersquatting Cybergriping Keyword advertising-courts disagree on what is.
On the Internet, No-one Knows You're a … Cat! Absurdity and the UDRP David HELLAM GA ČR S.
1 Proposed Wait Listing Service (WLS) Presented by Chuck Gomes VeriSign Global Registry Services (VGRS)
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 INTERNET LAW AND E-COMMERCE © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall CHAPTER.
1 Trademark Infringement and Dilution Steve Baron March 6, 2003.
Essentials Of Business Law Chapter 25 Intellectual Property McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Name Tasting and Class II Names December, 2006 Presented by Paul Stahura at ICANN, Sao Paulo.
International Intellectual Property Profs. Atik and Manheim Fall, 2006 Cybersquatting [slides by David Steele]
1 Overview of WLS. 2 Proposed Wait Listing Service (WLS) Presented by Chuck Gomes VeriSign Global Registry Services (VGRS) Potential registrants subscribe,
Trademark Law1  Nov. 20, 2006  Week 12 Chapter 11 – Trademarks and the Internet.
Margie Milam, Senior Director 27 March 2014 Privacy/Proxy Accreditation Survey Results.
Use of Trademarks in Domain Names & Domain Name Disputes
Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
NCUC Africa Members First Regional Webinar Ines Hfaiedh
Trademark and the Internet
Rights Protection Mechanism Report to the ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee
Billy Fuccillo, known for 'huge' radio spots for his car dealerships, locked in cyberpiracy battle
Trademark Law Meets The Internet
Overview & Guideline for Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Chapter 3: Trademarks in E-Commerce.
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

TM Office Comes to CA Shootout at the ICANN Corral: Domainers vs. Trademark Owners vs.com ®

TM Office Comes to CA Mike Rodenbaugh Mike Rodenbaugh was formerly Yahoo!’s primary attorney in charge of intellectual property enforcement. In 2007, Mike started his own firm assisting intellectual property owners.

TM Office Comes to CA David J. Steele David J. Steele specializes in Internet law at Christie, Parker & Hale in Newport Beach. Mr. Steele also teaches Trademark and Internet Law at Loyola Law School. An expert on Internet law and technology, Mr. Steele has successfully handled hundreds of Internet cases, typically for famous trademark owners. Mr. Steele holds a B.S., Electrical and Computer Eng., CS Polytechnic University, Pomona, and a J.D. from Loyola Law School

TM Office Comes to CA John Berryhill John Berryhill has represented domain name registrants and trademark claimants in numerous UDRP proceedings and federal court proceedings under the ACPA. John has been a longtime advocate for the rights of domain registrants in ICANN working groups and task forces relating to intellectual property and other domain policy issues, and is a former treasurer of the Registrar Constituency. UDRPICANN UDRPICANN

TM Office Comes to CA Outline of Presentation The Big Picture The Big Picture Domain Tasting, Kiting and Front-running Domain Tasting, Kiting and Front-running UDRP UDRP Cases of Note Cases of Note Related Issues of Note (i.e. rule changes) Related Issues of Note (i.e. rule changes) Practice Pointers Practice Pointers ACPA ACPA Cases of Note Cases of Note ICANN policy developments ICANN policy developments Q&A Q&A

TM Office Comes to CA The Big Picture What’s going on - from a TM owner’s point of view What’s going on - from a TM owner’s point of view Increased cybersquatting (due to tasting and kiting) Increased cybersquatting (due to tasting and kiting) By more sophisticated and nefarious squatters By more sophisticated and nefarious squatters Falsifying WHOIS or moving overseas to avoid ACPA Falsifying WHOIS or moving overseas to avoid ACPA What’s going on - from a Domainer’s point of view What’s going on - from a Domainer’s point of view Over-reaching TM owners Over-reaching TM owners Claims against generic domain names Claims against generic domain names Questionable ethics in prosecuting complaints Questionable ethics in prosecuting complaints

TM Office Comes to CA Domain Name “Tasting” Register and “taste” name for 5 days Register and “taste” name for 5 days Return domain names for full refund Return domain names for full refund Measure traffic via Pay Per Click ads Measure traffic via Pay Per Click ads Keep profitable domain names Keep profitable domain names Monetize domain names Monetize domain names Misdirect customer Misdirect customer Get paid by advertisers (e.g., Google’s AdSense) Get paid by advertisers (e.g., Google’s AdSense)

TM Office Comes to CA

9 Domain Tasting - Scope March 2005 – Nearly 43 million.com and net domain names registered. March 2005 – Nearly 43 million.com and net domain names registered. Only 2.5 million names were deleted that same month. Only 2.5 million names were deleted that same month. In April of 2006, 35 million names registered. In April of 2006, 35 million names registered. Of those names 32.7 million were deleted within the 5-day Add Grace Period Of those names 32.7 million were deleted within the 5-day Add Grace Period

TM Office Comes to CA

TM Office Comes to CA Domain Name Kiting Repetitive Tasting Repetitive Tasting Registrars and registrants taste (monetize) domain names in bulk and delete them Registrars and registrants taste (monetize) domain names in bulk and delete them Then, using an automated process, they automatically re-register them... again and again. Then, using an automated process, they automatically re-register them... again and again. Often through affiliated entities, in effort to evade detection Often through affiliated entities, in effort to evade detection

TM Office Comes to CA Front-running Aka Domain Name Spying Aka Domain Name Spying Registrar obtains information that a domain name is of interest to a consumer Registrar obtains information that a domain name is of interest to a consumer They monitor the WHOIS queries They monitor the WHOIS queries Then the Registrar “registers” the domain name if the consumer doesn’t immediately register it Then the Registrar “registers” the domain name if the consumer doesn’t immediately register it This prevents the consumer from registering the domain name at another registrar This prevents the consumer from registering the domain name at another registrar Also prevents cybersquatters from registering Also prevents cybersquatters from registering

TM Office Comes to CA Domain Registrants’ view TM Owners believe they have monopolies in “dictionary words” or phrases TM Owners believe they have monopolies in “dictionary words” or phrases TM Attorneys engage in unethical tactics to attempt to entrap domain registrants TM Attorneys engage in unethical tactics to attempt to entrap domain registrants Internet Service Providers and others are competing for advertising revenue Internet Service Providers and others are competing for advertising revenue

ISP Use of Non-registered Domains TM Office Comes to CA

TM Office Comes to CA Review of Available Domain Name Remedies Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Arbitration procedure mandated by ICANN via domain name registration agreement Arbitration procedure mandated by ICANN via domain name registration agreement Rapid Time Scale – No Monetary Damages Rapid Time Scale – No Monetary Damages Anti-cybersquatter Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) – 15 USC 1125(d) Anti-cybersquatter Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) – 15 USC 1125(d) in personam in personam in rem in rem

Jurisdictional Issues Many cybersquatters are either overseas or lie about being overseas… Many cybersquatters are either overseas or lie about being overseas… hard to track down hard to track down Creates jurisdictional issues under US law Creates jurisdictional issues under US law US Courts will not enforce foreign marks US Courts will not enforce foreign marks

TM Office Comes to CA UDRP Elements Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which Complainant has rights Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which Complainant has rights Respondent has no legitimate rights in the Domain Name Respondent has no legitimate rights in the Domain Name bona fide use or preparation to use prior to notice of a dispute bona fide use or preparation to use prior to notice of a dispute Domain Name was registered and used in bad faith Domain Name was registered and used in bad faith demonstrated specific intent demonstrated specific intent

TM Office Comes to CA Recent UDRP Cases of Note Reseller makes bona fide offering and thus legitimate use? Reseller makes bona fide offering and thus legitimate use? NASCARtours.com – Respondent prevails because he offers ‘only tours of NASCAR events’ and provides prominent disclaimer NASCARtours.com – Respondent prevails because he offers ‘only tours of NASCAR events’ and provides prominent disclaimer GE-Merlin.com – Complainant prevails because of likely initial interest confusion, despite sale only of Merlins, and prominent disclaimers GE-Merlin.com – Complainant prevails because of likely initial interest confusion, despite sale only of Merlins, and prominent disclaimers

Recent UDRP Cases of Note MySpace.co.uk (Nominet) – Complainant prevails though domain registered six years before MySpace existed, but was used only for PPC ad site MySpace.co.uk (Nominet) – Complainant prevails though domain registered six years before MySpace existed, but was used only for PPC ad site TheEconomist.com – Respondent prevails as he swears he had never heard of the magazine when he registered the domain, and showed a picture of “Alan Greenspan – The Economist of the Century” at site TheEconomist.com – Respondent prevails as he swears he had never heard of the magazine when he registered the domain, and showed a picture of “Alan Greenspan – The Economist of the Century” at site TM Office Comes to CA

TM Office Comes to CA UDRP Related Issues of Note Each UDRP Provider implements its own procedural rules Each UDRP Provider implements its own procedural rules Naming Respondents Naming Respondents If “privacy service” is listed as the registrant, registrar will change the owner when a UDRP complaint is filed –requiring an amendment to the Complaint. Supplemental Filings Supplemental Filings

TM Office Comes to CA UDRP Practice Pointers Always request transfer; never cancel Always request transfer; never cancel Treat the Complaint like a motion for summary judgment Treat the Complaint like a motion for summary judgment Follow up to make sure the name is transferred and that it doesn’t resolve to the old website Follow up to make sure the name is transferred and that it doesn’t resolve to the old website The registrar is responsible for transferring the domain name The registrar is responsible for transferring the domain name

TM Office Comes to CA ACPA Cases of Note Vulcan Golf et al. vs. Google et al. (USDC N.D. IL,; Case No. 07-Civ-3371) Vulcan Golf et al. vs. Google et al. (USDC N.D. IL,; Case No. 07-Civ-3371) Class action against registrants, parking companies, and advertisers Class action against registrants, parking companies, and advertisers Motion to dismiss denied in part (RICO and some state claims dismissed; federal TM claims remain) Motion to dismiss denied in part (RICO and some state claims dismissed; federal TM claims remain) Dell and Yahoo! et al v. BelgiumDomains et al (USDC S.D. FL; Case No. 07-Civ-22674) Dell and Yahoo! et al v. BelgiumDomains et al (USDC S.D. FL; Case No. 07-Civ-22674) Civil case for cybersquatting, counterfeiting, TM infringement Civil case for cybersquatting, counterfeiting, TM infringement Federal seizure raid conducted with US Marshals Federal seizure raid conducted with US Marshals Pre-judgment asset freeze (+1 million domain names and millions of dollars) Pre-judgment asset freeze (+1 million domain names and millions of dollars)

TM Office Comes to CA Policy and Legislative Developments Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse (CADNA) Internet Commerce Association (ICA) ICANN Registries (not VeriSign) – deterring tasting / kiting Registries (not VeriSign) – deterring tasting / kiting ICANN – “taxing” tasting / kiting through registration fees ICANN – “taxing” tasting / kiting through registration fees ICANN – studying “front-running” ICANN – studying “front-running”

TM Office Comes to CA Questions?

TM Office Comes to CA Contact Info Mike Rodenbaugh Mike Rodenbaugh David Steele David Steele John Berryhill John