Environmental Health Issues and Priorities in the Pacific Northwest Robert Duff Director Office of Environmental Health Assessments Washington State Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Consumer Exposure Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A ccomplishments and Opportunities for Global Collaboration Thomas Brennan.
Advertisements

Health Effects of Methylmercury and North Carolinas Advice on Eating Fish Luanne K. Williams, Pharm.D. Toxicologist NC Department of Health and Human Services.
The TSCA is a United States law, passed by the United States Congress in 1976, that regulates the introduction of new or already existing chemicals. The.
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Toxicity Values Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting March 27, 2014 C. Mark Smith Ph.D., M.S. Deputy Director Office.
Risk Assessment.
Paracelsus “The dose makes the poison ”. MSDS Environmental Hazards and Human Health Chapter 17.
PBT Initiative and PCBs Spokane River Regional Toxics Task Force Holly Davies, Ph.D. April 24 th, 2013.
Creative DedicatedExperts PCBs: Real World Considerations Exposure and Toxicity Diane M. Silverman, PhD.
Something Fishy…Do Now
Chemical Screening Programs Ted Smith Dale Phenicie.
What is Bioaccumulation?
Excess Mercury Levels Increasing; Survey Shows Fifth of Women of Childbearing Age Are Affected The study, which was commissioned by an environmental advocacy.
ELIZABETH WILLIAMS, MD FELLOW IN VACCINOLOGY AND VACCINE SAFETY VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY AUGUST 30 TH, 2012 Thimerosal and Vaccine Safety.
The Safety of Fresh Water Fish The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service.
Mark Richards Virginia Department of Environmental Quality What’s in Your Water? A Discussion of Threats to Virginia’s Water Quality William & Mary School.
A Small Dose of Pollutant – 12/04/10 An Introduction To The Health Effects of Persistent Chemical Pollutants A Small Dose of Pollutant.
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems  Amphibians are valuable indicators of environmental health because they’re sensitive to chemical changes.
Effects of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
A Public Health Response to Mercury in Fish Suzanne K. Condon, Assistant Commissioner Bureau of Environmental Health Assessment.
Emerging Contaminants in the Environment Jennifer Davis, MPH, LEHP Environmental Toxicologist Illinois Department of Public Health.
Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification of Toxicants Pat Ellsworth, ITEP Robert K. Hall U.S. EPA Region IX & Sherry Glick U.S. EPA U.S. EPA Office of Pesticide.
Alex Stone Chemist, WA Dept. of Ecology EPA Prioritization Workshop April 6-7,
Communicating Contaminant Information to Inuit: The Northern Contaminants Program Sound Management of Chemicals Working Group: Tucson Inuit Tapiriit.
Washington State’s Chemical Action Plans Washington State’s Chemical Action Plans Janice Adair Washington State Department of Ecology Robert Duff Washington.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
Assessing the Public Health Impacts of Contaminated Sites Rick Kreutzer, M.D. California Department of Health Services.
Biological Magnification Biological Magnification: The process of a chemical buildup, increasing in concentration, as it moves up trophic levels of a food.
Seafood Advisories: Seafood Industry Response Bob Collette, National Fisheries Institute Presented at Seafood: Assessing the Benefits and Risks Cook College,
Protecting Ourselves from Mercury Created by: Mercury-Free Minnesota BE SAFE MN Preventing Harm MN
A project of the Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: Breast Cancer Fund, Healthy Building Network, People For Puget Sound, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility,
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 8: Environmental Health Progress Review February 2, 2007.
Quantifying the Role of Ecological Uncertainty in a Public Health Policy Decision Annual Meeting American Association for the Advancement of Science Seattle,
Phasing Out PFOS and PBDEs: Voluntary and Regulatory Steps Kenneth Moss Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, EPA HQ October.
Pesticides SNC1D. Pest Pests are living organisms that are not wanted around us. Examples of pests include unwanted dandelions growing in the lawn; rodents.
Fishing Advisories and Fish Contaminants EEES 4730 Amanda Wendzicki.
Washington State Children’s Safe Product Act
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Meeting Agenda Monday, September 27, :30 pmMeet and.
NorCal SETAC 2001 Seafood Contamination and Consumption.
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
June 8, 2004Seafood: Assessing the Benefits and Risks1 of 17 Assessing and Managing the Risks Associated With Eating Seafood Don Schaffner, Ph.D. Professor.
Environmental Hazards and Human Health, Part 1. CHEMICAL HAZARDS A hazardous chemical can harm humans or other animals because it may: –Be flammable –Be.
Use of GIS to Evaluate Health Risks for Contaminated Water Diving in U.S. Waterways Kristen M. Stanley MGIS Capstone Project – Peer Review July 1, 2008.
Risk Assessment 1 Thanks to Paul R. Harp, Ph.D., NH Department of Health & Human Services, US EPA Air Quality Planning & Standards Division, and the DOE.
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
North American Sound Management of Chemicals Initiative Commission for Environmental Cooperation Ned Brooks, Chemicals Program Manager Commission for Environmental.
EU legislation chemical substances and products. The action undertaken by the European Community in the field of chemical products is part of an ongoing.
Human Health and Environmental Toxicology. Human Health  2 indicators of human health  Life expectancy - how long people are expected to live  Infant.
Public Health Assessment Process Jack Hanley, M.P.H. Environmental Health Scientist Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Mel Jordan & Taylor Park.
Management of threats to fish and wildlife from PBTs Scott Redman, Puget Sound Action Team Puget Sound Plankton - The Ultimate Seafood Experience, Jan.
Risk Assessment.
Health Outcomes in Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties Issue:  Higher health risks found in: Infants Infants Elderly (age >65) Elderly (age >65) Blacks Blacks.
A project of the Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: Breast Cancer Fund, Healthy Building Network, People For Puget Sound, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility,
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems  Amphibians are valuable indicators of environmental health because they’re sensitive to chemical changes.
Topic 22: Environmental Hazards and Human Health, Part 1.
Chapter 4 Human Health and Environmental Hazards.
THE PERSISTENT AND PERNICIOUS Devon Villacampa Salome Escobar-Chaffee.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
Human Health and Environmental Toxicology Chapter 7.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Finding Information on Environment and Health Presented by the JSI Center for Environmental Health Studies with support from the National Network of Libraries.
1 Role of Public Health Nursing in Environmental Health Presented by Marita Santos, RN, MSN Stella Fogleman, RN, MSN/MPH Los Angeles County Department.
The Challenge of PCBs in the Spokane River
Contaminated Fish: The Mercury Connection
BIOACCUMULATION.
Back in 1987 there was some concern over the health of women in an industrial neighbourhood of Quebec City.
Apes Ch 11 Risk, Toxicology, and Human Healthy
Health Assessment and Contaminants:
Health Assessment and Contaminants:
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Health Issues and Priorities in the Pacific Northwest Robert Duff Director Office of Environmental Health Assessments Washington State Department of Health Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 20, 2005

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Comparative Risk Projects EPA and states – US EPA in 1987 issued Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems –Regions and states followed Highest ranking issues –Indoor air –Outdoor air –Others Lead, pesticides, food

Risk Assessment Methods Non-cancer RiskCancer Risk Non-cancer Risk Cancer Risk ResponseThresholdNo Threshold Type of Result Yes/No Probability

Non-Cancer Assessment DOSE RESPONSE Threshold Health benchmark “Safety Factors”

Assessment Methods Non-cancer RiskCancer Risk Non-cancer Risk Cancer Risk ResponseThresholdNo Threshold Type of Result Yes/No Probability New guidance moving toward a more qualitative approach that acknowledges thresholds

1,000 in 10,000 DOSE # of Cancers 500 in 10, in 10, in 10,000 Measurable Range (Epidemiology or Animal Study) Predicted Range (Risk Assessment) Threshold? Cancer Assessment

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Challenges - Uncertainty Exposure –Models versus measurement –“Background” Toxicity –Cancer – low dose extrapolation –Mixtures –Endocrine disruption Environmental justice

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Challenges - Background Exposure EPA is not calculating an RfD (Reference Dose) for dioxin….. –“Any RfD that the Agency would recommend under the traditional approach for setting an RfD is likely to be 2-3 orders of magnitude (100-1,000) below current background intakes and body burdens. Because exceeding the RfD is not a statement of risk, discussion of an RfD for an incremental exposure when the RfD has already been exceeded by average background exposures is meaningless.”

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Major Issues in the Pacific Northwest Persistent, bioaccumulative toxics (PBTs) –Fish consumption advisories Area-wide soil contamination –Arsenic and lead

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 What are Persistent, bioaccumulative toxics (PBTs)? Polychlorinated biphenlys (PCBs), methyl mercury, organochlorine pesticides (DDT, chlordane), dioxin, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (flame retardants) Build-up in our environment and our bodies –Slow to breakdown in the environment –Uptake exceeds elimination rate –Often store in fat (not methylmercury) Also known as POP’s

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Why are we concerned? Recent fish consumption studies show in utero exposure results in developmental problems –PCBs and methylmercury –Learning and behavior deficits PBDEs – flame retardants –Similar effects in animal studies

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 What is a fish advisory? General advice –Choosing fish with lower contaminant levels –Cooking and preparation –Variety Meal limits –Generally bounded by upper and lower limits for effectiveness 4, 2, 1, 0 meals/month EPA guidance

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 What is a fish advisory? Species specific –Most advice is broken down by species Surrogates can be used for trophic levels Water body specific –Hazardous waste release or just a lake that was sampled? –DOH currently has 14 water body specific advisories Statewide advice –Mercury

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Who are we trying to protect? High-end consumers –Native American tribes –Asian and Pacific Islander communities Women of child-bearing age and children –Clearly a concern for the developing fetus –PCBs and mercury –Flame retardants, dioxin? General population –For PCBs not mercury –No consensus on mercury effects in adults Blood pressure

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Key Messages Eat fish, Be smart –Fish are good for you Omega-3 fatty acids –Moving away from “limit, limit, limit” –Provide info so consumers can eat heart health 2 meals/week - American Heart Association Most people do not eat 2 meals per week –Many choices are safe to eat at this rate

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Key Messages Work with high consumers –Tribes, Asian Pacific islanders communities –Benefits of more than 2 meals per week likely still outweigh risks Cutoff???? What are we doing to get/keep PBTs out of our food web???

From Oregon – Portland Harbor/Willamette River Presentation – D. Stone Communication is Key

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Global Efforts to reduce PBTs International –Persistent Organic Pollutants –Stockholm Convention Europe –REACH Registration, evaluation and authorization of chemical products Precautionary principle

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Global Efforts to reduce PBTs US EPA –Toxics Substances Control Act (TSCA) PBDE Significant New Use Rule –Clean Air Act Mercury Washington –PBT Initiative –Mercury, flame retardants - PBTs

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Area-wide Soil Contamination Arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) in Washington State –Old orchard lands –Tacoma smelter plume –Everett smelter –Northport smelter

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Area-wide Soil Contamination Orchard lands not well characterized –Spraying was sporadic –GIS with aerial photography Identifying old sites Targeting both sampling and education

Libby, Montana

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Vermiculite - asbestos Libby, MT –background Vermiculite –Contained high-levels 30-50% asbestos (tremolite) Direct link to health effects Nationwide problem –Exfoliation facilities –Attic insulation

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Vermiculite - asbestos Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry –Medical screening –Nationwide follow-up on over 200 sites 28 priority sites including one in Spokane and Portland –National Asbestos Exposure Review EPA cleanup of site and homes in Libby ongoing

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Vermiculite - asbestos Pleural Findings – All Views Interstitial - PA View Exposure Class nNormalAbnormalNormalAbnormal No Apparent Exposure (95%)6 (5%)121 (99%)1 (1%) 1-3 Exposure Pathways (89%)175 (11%)1559 (99%)10 (1%) 4-5 Exposure Pathways (85%)226 (15%)1471 (99%)17 (1%) 6+ Exposure Pathways (76%)587 (24%)2390 (99%)21 (1%) Total (17.8%) 49 (0.9%) Background 0.2 to 2.3 %

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005 Vermiculite - asbestos Legislation –Liability and compensation –Ban – Sen. Murray Asbestos is not banned in the US –US District court overturned EPA ban of most uses in 1990 Future activities - EPA and ATSDR –Assess 28 exfoliation facilities across US –Address vermiculite in attic insulation

Highline Community College – Tacoma, WA May 21, 2005