John Rawls, 1921-2002. Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Justice & Economic Distribution (2)

Advertisements

Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.

John Rawls A Theory of Justice.

Roderick T. Long Auburn Dept. of Philosophy

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.

2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Political theory: Social justice and the state Barr: Economics.

Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?

"... reason accepts no authority above itself and is necessarily subversive." - Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind (1987), p. 258.

PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.

L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:

Ethical Frameworks and The Social Construction of Technology HSCI E137 Feb. 9, 2011 Announcements: Look for announcements on home page of website

John Rawls' theory of justice ~ slide 1 John Rawls’ theory of justice zIn A Theory of Justice –1. The basis for the theory äA revised version of.

Justice as Fairness: A Closer Look by Tom Lupkie James Noonan Brian Rodriguez October 6, 2008 A-115, Professor Charles Willie.

RAWLS 1 JUSTICE IS FAIRNESS. John Rawls Teachers: H. L. A. Hart Isaiah Berlin Students: Thomas Nagel Martha Nussbaum Onara O’Neill.

THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham

Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.

Contemporary Liberalism: John Rawls: Justice as Fairness l All citizens should share in a society’s wealth and be given equal economic opportunities l.

Magnasanti by Vincent Ocasla on SimCity3000. Is it possible to produce a Just Urban Environment? I.« Justice as Fairness », a quick overview of John Rawls’

Deontological tradition Contractualism of John Rawls Discourse ethics.

A Theory of Justice. “What is justice?” The Code of Hammurabi (Babylon, 18 th c. BCE) Judaism, Christianity, Islam: scales (balance, regulation, harmony),

January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.

Collective Action and Collective Decision Making

Ethics Theory and Business Practice

Business Ethics Week 3. Article on: You See, the Ends Don’t Justify the Means: Visual Imagery and Moral Judgment Visual imagery and Moral judgement –

Ethical Theories Presentation LP 5 Melissa Sweet, Tara Guelig, Katherine Norton April 9 th,2009.

Justice & Fairness Approach LP: Ethical Theories Presentation By: Nelita, Brandon Keshia,Jennifer Section: Tuesday 5:30 April 1, 2008.

Rawls II: Another version of the social contract PHIL 2345.

Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.

Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.

Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.

January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.

Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.

Contractualism and justice (4) Methodological issues.

Justice as Fairness John Rawls PHL 110: ETHICS North Central College.

Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.

Equity and Sustainability. Roseland and Equity North/South comparison … fairness The developed nations need to consider ‘our own poor’ … Definitional:

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. Rawls looks at justice. Kant’s ethics and Utilitarianism are about right and wrong actions. For example: Is it ethical.

John Rawls Theory of Justice. John Rawls John Rawls (February 21, 1921 – November 24, 2002) was an American philosopher and a figure in moral and political.

Rationality in Decision Making In Law Nisigandha Bhuyan, IIMC.

Equity: Ethical Approaches to Social Justice “Excuse me, but its important to get those drinks to those who need them the most.”

DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.

Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.

Kantian Ethics Good actions have intrinsic value; actions are good if and only if they follow from a moral law that can be universalized.

WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)

Rawls’ Justice Srijit Mishra IGIDR, HDP, Lectures 5, 6 and 7 13, 18 and 20 January 2012.

Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.

Philosophy 219 Rawls, A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism.

Political theory and law

PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.

Deontological tradition

Political theory and law

John Rawls Ronald Dworkin

Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance

John Rawls’ theory of justice

Rawls, A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism

Rawls’ Theory of Justice

Dennis Thompson Theories of Legislative Ethics

John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher

Theories of justice.

Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.

Outline of John Rawls from “Justice as Fairness” and A Theory of Justice (1921) pp The Second Article on Rawls.

Chapter 5 Ethical Decision Making

INCOME REDISTRIBUTION: CONCEPTUAL ISSUES

Ethics: Theory and Practice

John Rawls Theory of Justice.

Rawls, A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism

Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.

Presentation transcript:

John Rawls,

Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian – Intuitionism

Is there a decision procedure that leads to our intuitions? What qualities must a population have? What would they choose? – TWO PRINCIPLES OF JUSTICE Equal right to equal liberty Inequalities work out to advantage of worst off – Pareto Optimality – Objection

Counter to Objection: – VEIL OF IGNORANCE – DIFFERENCE PRINCIPLE In addition: – Life Plan – Primary goods

“JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS” constitutional democracy what has history given us? What is politics and justice about? Justice and historical contingency Who is a citizen conception of the good Author of their own claims Responsibility Autonomy?