C-23 The effective length factor (K) was introduced in page (C-7) for six ideal conditions, these are not encountered in practical field conditions. LRFD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEAMS (FLEXURE) BEAM- COLUMNS SHEAR / CONC. LOADS
Advertisements

Erection of steel portal frame for warehouse Construction
Chapter 7 Column Design (Part 2). Shearson Lehman/American Express Information Services Center, New York City. (Courtesy of Owen Steel Company, Inc.)
Beam-Columns.
Elastic Stresses in Unshored Composite Section
CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering
Structural System Overview
Commercial Framing C D Prints Unit 13.
Design of Tension Members
Second order effects.
Design of Tension Members
Compression Member Design
Buckling Critical Load Considerations
Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures
Ch. 16: Rigid Body Kinematics
Compression Members.
BC-11 The horizontal beam column shown below is subjected to service live loads as shown. The member is laterally braced at its ends. Check its capacity.
Slender Columns.
ENGR 220 Section 13.1~13.2.
Combined Bending & Axial Forces (BEAM – COLUMNS)
Combined Bending & Axial Forces (BEAM – COLUMNS)
Michelle Perticarari Rebeca Peña
for Earthquake Resistance
LRFD-Steel Design 1.
Bridge Structure Types and Components. BRIDGE STRUCTURE TYPES AND COMPONENTS TECHNICAL STANDARDS BRANCH INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION Slide 2.
High Rise Structural Systems
Composite Beams and Columns
Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester
Chap. (6) Compression Members Columns: Beam-Columns: Columns Theory:
LRFD- Steel Design Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester.
Reading Structural Drawings
BEAMS AND COLUMNS PRESENTED BY K.ROSHIN RUKSHANA.
Lesson 5: Load Path and Tributary Area
1.
Frames and Walls Lateral Stability
1 HVACR116 – Trade Skills Structural Drawings. 2.
LRFD- Steel Design Dr. Ali I. Tayeh second Semester Dr. Ali I. Tayeh second Semester.
Moment Connection Requires Bolts Outside the Flanges
Department of Building Engineering An-Najah National University
Fundamentals of Structural Detailing
Structural Curriculum for Construction Management and Architecture Students 1 Prepared by: Ajay Shanker, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor Rinker School.
Lesson 5: Load Path. Concrete Slabs on Beams One-Way SlabTwo-Way Slab.
Flange Plates to be Welded to Beam Flanges.
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
N.W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar 1 By: Prof Dr. Akhtar Naeem Khan Lecture 09: Compression Members.
Structural Systems Design for a Laramie Office Building
Structural Systems Design of the Lincoln Fire Department Headquarters Michelle Burback Structural Engineering Capstone and Senior Honors Project.
Design of Bracing Connections in Concentrically Braced Frames
BIM in Structural Design October-2014Dr. Walid Al-Awad 1 Building Information Modelling.
Lesson 10: K Practice.
Molasses explosion 1919 Boston
Lesson 5: Gravity Load Path
62323: Architectural Structures II
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Outline: Introduction: a ) General description of project b) Materials
FRAMING CONECTIONS Session 3.
Week 2 Experimentation TS Term 2.
Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester
Columns and Other Compression Members
Effective Length Coefficients
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Physical-Model-Based Data Interpretation
REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN
Find: KCE λc>1.50 E = 2.9 * 107 [lb/in2] AC, CE  W12x120 BC 
Beam-Columns.
Idealized Model of Column Buckling in Frame Column Buckling in Frame
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Equilibrium Of a Rigid Body.
The Bunker Steel Structure – Structural Analysis
Lesson 5: Gravity Load Path
Presentation transcript:

C-23 The effective length factor (K) was introduced in page (C-7) for six ideal conditions, these are not encountered in practical field conditions. LRFD commentary provides both real conditions and standard ideal conditions (C-C2.2) (page to 242) Braced Frames: No lateral movement is allowed (0.5 < K < 1.0) (sideway prevented) Unbraced Frames: Lateral movement possible (1.0 < K < 20.0) (sideway allowed) a)Diagonal bracing b) Shear Walls (masonry, reinforcement concrete or steel plate)

C-24 * For fixed footing G = 1.0 * For pinned support G = 10.0 where A is top of column where B is bottom of column

C-25 In the rigid frame shown below, Determine K x for columns (AB) & (BC). Knowing that all columns webs are in the plane. Column (AB): Joint (A): Example C – 8 :- Solution: A B C W24 x 55 W24 x 68 W12 x 120 W12 x 96 12' 15' 12' 18' 20'

C-26 For joint B,:- From the alignment chart for sideways uninhibited, with G A = 0.94 and G B = 0.95, K x = 1.3 for column AB. Column (BC): For joint B, as before, G = 0.95 For joint C, at a pin connection the situation is analogous to that of a very stiff column attached to infinitely flexible girders – that is, girders of zero stiffness. The ratio of column stiffness to girder stiffness would therefore be infinite for a perfectly frictionless hinge. This end condition is only be approximated in practice, so the discussion accompanying the alignment chart recommends that G be taken as From the alignment chart with G A = 0.95 and G B = 10.0, K x = 1.85 for column BC.