Nikolaj Foged*, A.V. Christiansen**, and Esben Auken* *HydroGeophysics Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark **Geological Survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to the Global Positioning System
Advertisements

Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) Satellite Mission
Nye data – nye muligheder? Esben Auken, Anders V. Christiansen, Nikolaj Foged and Kurt Sørensen HydroGeophysics Group Department of Earth Sciences, University.
Arbejdsgruppemøde - SkyTEM processering Esben Auken and Nikolaj Foged HydroGeophysics Group Department of Earth Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
Filtrering og LCI inversion Esben Auken HydroGeophysics Group Department of Earth Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark
ESTO Advanced Component Technology 11/17/03 Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations GSFC CO 2 Science and Sounder.
Large Scale Mapping of Groundwater Resources Using a Highly Integrated Set of Tools Verner H. Søndergaard Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Denmark.
Predicting the yield of small wind turbines in the roof-top urban environment S J Watson, D G Infield and M R Harding Centre for Renewable Energy Systems.
CSIR-NGRI, Aarhus University, CGWB Mapping groundwater resources in India – a pilot project covering six areas and more than 3000 km 2 of land.
Imaging a Fault with Magnetotellurics By Peter Winther.
Nyeste erfaringer med processering af SkyTEM data Esben Auken GeoFysikSamarbejdet Geologisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet.
Validation of local gravity Mr. Neville Tayler South African National Accreditation System.
Analysis of Tomographic Pumping Tests with Regularized Inversion Geoffrey C. Bohling Kansas Geological Survey SIAM Geosciences Conference Santa Fe, NM,
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer Richard Hills University of Cambridge Mark Holdaway NRAO Tucson.
Inversion of Z-Axis Tipper Electromagnetic (Z-TEM)‏ Data The UBC Geophysical Inversion Facility Elliot Holtham and Douglas Oldenburg.
Workbench følgegruppemøde Esben Auken GeofysikSamarbejdet, Geologisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet.
Assessment of OIB 2009 Data over Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers K. Jezek OIB Science Team Meeting.
HYPACK® Multibeam Training Seminar
Integrated planning on hydrogeophysical data on a national scale: From processing, interpretation and storage to visualisation Ingelise Møller, Flemming.
Exploration of Ground Truth from Raw GPS Data National University of Defense Technology & Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Exploration of.
Crossbow Products Presented by: Stephen Justice. Topics Brief view of gyros Brief view of gyros A look at MEMS A look at MEMS The two types of sensors.
Comparing to CloudSat Cloud Profiles TutorialTutorial National Aeronautics and Space Administration
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
European Metrology Research Program (EMRP) MeteoMet Project (October 2011) WP3. Traceable measurements methods and protocols for ground based meteorological.
What is Physics? Physics is a branch of science that involves the study of the physical world: energy, matter, and how they are related. Physicists investigate.
Bell ringer What is your study plan for midterms on Monday and Tuesday?
Sensitivity study of TEM data at La Bajada Fault Tobyn W. VanVeghten University of Missouri-Rolla July 11, 2004.
FLEX-US 2013 Airborne Campaign
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Ministry of Climate and Energy ProSUM Meeting Diamant Business and Conference Centre, Brussels Jørgen.
Ecology Unit 1 What is Science?. Ecology Unit 1 Vocabulary (vocab section of notebook) 1.Scientific Method 2.Control 3.Variable 4.Independent Variable.
Extrapolation of Extreme Response for Wind Turbines based on Field Measurements Authors: Henrik Stensgaard Toft, Aalborg University, Denmark John Dalsgaard.
Scaling Surface and Aircraft Lidar Results for Space-Based Systems (and vice versa) Mike Hardesty, Barry Rye, Sara Tucker NOAA/ETL and CIRES Boulder, CO.
AMFIC second progress meeting MariLiza Koukouli & Dimitris Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
SWOT Near Nadir Ka-band SAR Interferometry: SWOT Airborne Experiment Xiaoqing Wu, JPL, California Institute of Technology, USA Scott Hensley, JPL, California.
CERES on Terra & Aqua validation and participation in SCALES Z. Peter Szewczyk G. Louis Smith The GIST 19, RAL 08/27-29, 2003.
Wu Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) New York.
Teaching Near-Surface Geophysics in the Field Sarah Kruse University of South Florida *see notes on Powerpoint file for details.
Sea ice thickness from CryoSat – A new data set for operational ice services? Christian Haas German CryoSat Office AWI.
POLIS – Portable Lidar System High Resolution Cloud Top Height Measurements using an Airborne Lidar System during BBC 2 Campaign May 2003 Birgit Heese.
Technical Specifications for Monitoring Ground Displacements at a National Highway Project K. Lakakis, P. Savvaidis and I. Ifadis Laboratory of Geodesy.
ASIRAS Pre Report ● Part 1: ASIRAS campaigns 2004 ● System characteristics ● Data acquisition ● Part2: preliminary data processing report ● GPS processing.
Comparison of OMI NO 2 with Ground-based Direct Sun Measurements at NASA GSFC and JPL Table Mountain during Summer 2007 George H. Mount & Elena Spinei.
CLN QA/QC efforts CCNY – (Barry Gross) UMBC- (Ray Hoff) Hampton U. (Pat McCormick) UPRM- (Hamed Parsiani)
Sub-hourly Variation of Tropospheric Ozone Profiles Measured by the Huntsville DIAL Shi Kuang 1*, John Burris 2, M. J. Newchurch 1*, Steve Johnson 3, and.
By: Will Schubert. Determine how the height you drop a ball from affects the height the ball bounces back up. Problem.
Mapping Greenland Using NASA’s Full- Waveform, Medium/High-Altitude, LVIS Lidar System: Potential 2009 Coverage and Expected Performance Michelle Hofton.
Earth and Space Science Ms. Pollock Topographic Maps  Show surface features – topography – of Earth  Natural and constructed features  Made.
C H A M P International Laser Ranging Service - General Assembly, October 2005 Eastbourne, UK L. Grunwaldt, R. Schmidt, D. König, R. König, F.-H. Massmann.
Nikolaj Foged, and Esben Auken HydroGeophysics Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark Coil response inversion in Aarhus Workbench,
Liang Liao Goddard Earth Sciences & Technology Research Morgan State University Greenbelt, MD Robert Meneghini NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt,
Integrated hydrological modelling with selected climate scenarios for assessment of future changes in groundwater levels and runoff in coastal areas Torben.
Ten Frame Practice Directions - Click the space bar. Look at the Ten Frame. Without counting, say the number of dots that are shown. Then, click the space.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Airborne Geophysics for Mapping Groundwater New Delhi – April Dr. Sanjay Rana – Parsan Gary Tipper – SkyTEM UAE.
Parts of a Map. o Title o Data frame o Labels o Compass (compass rose) o Legend (Key) o Scale o Colors.
CEO, Dr. Flemming Efferso SkyTEM Surveys ApS
Comparing AEM with lithological data using a comprehensive database system for geological and downhole geophysical information Esben Auken, Professor HydroGeophysics.
Huailin Chen, Bruce Gentry, Tulu Bacha, Belay Demoz, Demetrius Venable
WIS Discovery Metadata and why it is not WIGOS Metadata
Scientific Method.
Validation of airborne 1
Statistics of turbulence profiles at Cerro Tololo
Speeding up and slowing down - Answers
NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Moblas 4 Monument Peak, CA LRO and HPWREN Scott Wetzel NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Program Near Earth Networks Programs.
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA
• Introduce and explain the background and the details of your project
Throttle, Yaw, Pitch, Roll
Key Points of the Lesson
Complete the family of four
Presentation transcript:

Nikolaj Foged*, A.V. Christiansen**, and Esben Auken* *HydroGeophysics Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark **Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland - GEUS Validating SkyTEM Data Against Ground-based TEM Data at the Danish National Test Site by Upward Continuation

z-receiver z-receiver coil x-receiver coil Transmitter frame instrumentation Super low moment (SLM), Am 2 High moment (HM), Am 2 SLM + HM is applied sequential SkyTEM at the extended Test site Laser altimeters inclinometers, pitch and roll

SkyTEM, extended Test site - dataset Altitudes: 15 m, 25 m, 35 m Four repetitions per line and altitude. Total of 12 repetitions per line Standard processing and inversion is applied Sounding/model spacing: 20 m Independent LCI-inversion of each line repetitions 1 km

Validation of SkyTEM - model space

Repeated line, altitude 15 m Line1A Line 1B

Validation of SkyTEM - model space Repeated line, altitude 15 m Background: SkyTEM, Line 1A Front bars: SkyTEM, Line 1B Line1A Line 1B

Validation of SkyTEM - model space Repeated line, altitude 15 m and 35 m 15 m 35 m

Validation of SkyTEM - model space Repeated line, altitude 15 m and 35 m Background: Altitude 15 m Front bars: Altitude 35 m 15 m 35 m

Validation of SkyTEM - model space Comparison with ground based TEM: Altitude 15 m SkyTEM Ground TEM

Validation of SkyTEM - model space Comparison with ground based TEM: Altitude 15 m Background: SkyTEM, altitude 15 m Front bars: Ground based TEM

Background: Altitude 35 m Front bars: Altitude 15 m Validation of SkyTEM - model space Comparison with ground based TEM: Altitude 15 m, 35 m Background: SkyTEM, altitude 15 m, 35 m Front bars: Ground based TEM 15 m 35 m

Validation of SkyTEM - data space

Repeatability, 15 m, data space 115  s Altitude ~15 m Raw data

Repeatability, 15 m, data space 115  s Altitude ~15 m Raw data

Repeatability, 15 m, data space 115  s Altitude ~15 m Raw data

Repeatability, altitude 15 m 115  s Altitude ~15 m Raw data

Upward continuation to a nominal height Forward 23.1 m, 25 m Model Calculate correction factor per time gate Data, 25 m Apply correction factor to data How ? Data, 23.1 m Inversion

Upward continuation of ground based TEM Forward, SkyTEM system, 25 m Reference model SkyTEM refe- rence responce To compare/evaluate the SkyTEM system with the ground based TEM in data space How ? Ground TEM Inversion

Repeatability, nomial altitude 15 m 115  s Nominal altitude Raw data

Repeatability, nomial altitude 15 m 14  s 3.6 ms 115  s

Repeatability, nomial altitude 15, 25, 35 m 115  s

Match to reference section, 15, 25, 35 m 115  s Reference response

Match to reference section, 15 m 14  s 3.6 ms 115  s Reference response

Conclusion Calibration on the National test site insures consistence mapping results Validation of the SkyTEM system Repeatability - same altitude Repeatability - different altitudes Match to ground based TEM / reference section Also validation of: the detailed and carefull processing scheme the high precision inversion code (em1dinv) Validation is demanded for any TEM-system to participate in the Danish groundwater mapping campaign

All data to nominal height of 25 m