PPA 691 – Seminar in Public Policy Analysis Lecture 1d – The Belmont Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Principles of Research Ethics
Advertisements

Chapter 10 Ethical Issues in Nursing Research. Perspectives for Assessing Ethical Acceptability Utilitarian Perspective - the good of a project is defined.
24 April Elements of Research Ethics Review II Social Value Malik Fernando M.B.,Ch.B. (Bristol)
A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Darran Boyer, Moderator Alicia (Ali) Craig-Rodriguez President, Comprehensive Neuroscience, Inc. Kim Lerner Chief Executive.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Behavioral Research Chapter Three Ethical Research.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
Subject Selection and Recruitment David Wendler Department of Clinical Bioethics NIH, USA.
Justification of Research in Humans Impossible to reach the important conclusions without studying humans Impossible to reach the important conclusions.
ETHICAL TREATMENT OF HUMAN SUBJECTS All research projects must be approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Federal law APA (American Psychological.
Ethical Issues in Human Experimentation The Role of the IRB The IRB is an administrative body established to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects.
Detectives in the Classroom - Investigation 2-3: What's Wrong with This Picture? What's Wrong with This Picture?
© HRP Associates, Inc. Ethics & Regulation of Human Subjects Research Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethical Treatment of Participants in Studies of Online Behaviors Barbara M. Wildemuth School of Information & Library Science University of North Carolina.
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
Human Subject Protection Judith Birk IRB Health / Behavioral Sciences.
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
Fair participant selection Dr Enoka Corea. Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Where the study will be conducted How the participants will be recruited.
Ethical Principles of Human Subjects Protection
Chapter 3 Ethics in research.
Human Subject Research Ethics
What and Why HUMAN SUBJECTS.  Science – explanation and prediction  What is the purpose of those explanations and predictions?  Science as a social.
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
BIOE 301 Lecture Eleven. Summary of Lecture 10 Difficulties associated with HIV vaccine: Many forms of the virus Virus mutates rapidly Virus attacks the.
Ethics and ethical research
What makes Clinical Research Ethical? Dr Enoka Corea Co-secretary, ERC Faculty of Medicine, Colombo.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
THE ETHICS OF PLACEBO-CONTROLLED RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS
Effectiveness in Review & Oversight of Human Subjects Research Steven Joffe, MD, MPH Assistant Professor of Pediatrics.
1 Protection of Vulnerable Subjects in Research Melody Lin, Ph.D. December 2012.
Eugenics Movement Nuremberg Code Declaration of Helsinki WWII – Time Line for Human Subject Research and.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
“ Research with human subjects ” SUA IRB Committee OrientationIRB Committee.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
The ethical conduct of research with human participants Nancy E. Kass, ScD Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of.
PRINCIPLES OF BIOETHICS IMPERATIVES GUIDING BEHAVIOR “ONE SHOULD...“
Research Ethics. Ethics From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character Implies a judgment of character.
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework. THEORY Theory is: a generalized abstraction about the relationship between two or more concepts a systematic abstract.
Sociological Research Methods Chapter 3 Ethics in Research.
The Ethics of Research on Human Subjects. Research Activity on Human Subjects: Any systematic attempt to gain generalizable knowledge about humans A systematic.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
ETHICAL ISSUES AND INFORMED CONSENT Juan M. Lozano, MD, MSc Department of Paediatrics and Clinical Epidemiology Unit School of Medicine, Javeriana University.
IRB Review: Beyond the Basics Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE) March.
M6728 Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results.
Pediatric Research Ethics and the Research Subject Advocate Tomas Jose Silber, MD, MASS RSA and Director, Office of Ethics, CNMC Professor of Pediatrics,
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Research Ethics Dr Nichola Seare Aston Health Research & Innovation Cluster.
Ethical principles & practice [Bai12] M. Bailey, D. Dittrich, E. Kenneally, and D. Maughan. The Menlo report. IEEE Security and Privacy, 10(2):71-75, Mar.
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
Ethical Dilemma Research that is most likely to reveal something important about human nature is also the most likely to violate human rights. A number.
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
The Importance of Ethics and the Protection of Subjects By Westley R
Ethical Principles of Research
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE CONDUCT OF HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Ethics in Research.
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
Unit 8 Principles of Biomedical Ethics
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
Presentation transcript:

PPA 691 – Seminar in Public Policy Analysis Lecture 1d – The Belmont Report

Boundaries between Research and Practice “Practice” refers to interventions that are designed solely to enhance the well-being of an individual patient or client and that have a reasonable expectation of success.

Boundaries between Research and Practice “Research” designates an activity designed to test a hypothesis, permit conclusions to be drawn, and thereby to contribute to generalizable knowledge.

Basic Ethical Principles Respect for persons. –Individuals should be treated as autonomous agents. –Persons with diminished capacity are entitled to protection. Respect for persons. –Individuals should be treated as autonomous agents. –Persons with diminished capacity are entitled to protection.

Basic Ethical Principles Beneficence (making efforts to secure their well-being). –Do not harm. –Maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harms. Beneficence (making efforts to secure their well-being). –Do not harm. –Maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harms.

Basic Ethical Principles Justice (who ought to receive the benefits of research and bear its burdens). –Possible criteria (equal share, individual need, individual effort, societal contribution, merit). –Avoid systematic subject selection because of availability, compromised position, or manipulability. –Avoid research results that may only go to those who can afford them or involve subjects unlikely to receive the benefits of subsequent applications. Justice (who ought to receive the benefits of research and bear its burdens). –Possible criteria (equal share, individual need, individual effort, societal contribution, merit). –Avoid systematic subject selection because of availability, compromised position, or manipulability. –Avoid research results that may only go to those who can afford them or involve subjects unlikely to receive the benefits of subsequent applications.

Applications Informed consent (Respect for persons). –Information. –Comprehension. –Voluntariness. Informed consent (Respect for persons). –Information. –Comprehension. –Voluntariness.

Applications Risk/benefit assessment (Beneficence). –The nature and scope of risks and benefits. The probabilities and magnitudes of potential risks and benefits. –The systematic assessment of risks and benefits. Determination of the validity of the presuppositions of the research Nature, probability, and magnitude of risk should be distinguished with clarity. Reasonableness of risk and benefit probabilities. Risk/benefit assessment (Beneficence). –The nature and scope of risks and benefits. The probabilities and magnitudes of potential risks and benefits. –The systematic assessment of risks and benefits. Determination of the validity of the presuppositions of the research Nature, probability, and magnitude of risk should be distinguished with clarity. Reasonableness of risk and benefit probabilities.

Applications Risk/benefit assessment (Beneficence). –Application of several principles. Brutal or inhumane treatment of human subjects is never morally justified. Risk should be reduced to those necessary to achieve the research objective. When research involves serious risk, review committees must be insistent on justification for the risk. When vulnerable populations are involved, the appropriateness of involving them should itself be demonstrate. Relevant risks and benefits must be thoroughly arrayed in documents and procedures used in the informed consent process. Risk/benefit assessment (Beneficence). –Application of several principles. Brutal or inhumane treatment of human subjects is never morally justified. Risk should be reduced to those necessary to achieve the research objective. When research involves serious risk, review committees must be insistent on justification for the risk. When vulnerable populations are involved, the appropriateness of involving them should itself be demonstrate. Relevant risks and benefits must be thoroughly arrayed in documents and procedures used in the informed consent process.

Applications Selection of subjects (justice). –Fair procedures for the selection of research subjects. Individual justice in the selection of subjects would require that researchers exhibit fairness. Social justice requires that distinction be drawn between classes of subjects that ought, and ought not, to participate in any particular kind of research, based on the ability of members of that class to bear burdens and on the appropriateness of placing further burdens on already burdened persons. Selection of subjects (justice). –Fair procedures for the selection of research subjects. Individual justice in the selection of subjects would require that researchers exhibit fairness. Social justice requires that distinction be drawn between classes of subjects that ought, and ought not, to participate in any particular kind of research, based on the ability of members of that class to bear burdens and on the appropriateness of placing further burdens on already burdened persons.