The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Development of a Regional Routing Model Bruce Lambert Institute of Water Resources US Army Corps of Engineers NETS Briefing Package.
Advertisements

Oregon Freight Plan July 28, Linking Freight Improvements to Economic Growth Travel Time Freight Transportation Improvements Productivity Competitiveness.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics Key Improvements and Initial Findings in 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Steven Beningo Adapted from a presentation that.
November 20, :00 – 2:30 pm ET Coral Torres Ed Strocko Overview of the Draft Highway Primary Freight Network 1.
July 22, Model Objectives Forecast ADT on the Rural State Highway System Autos & Trucks Autos & Trucks Arterial System Arterial System Complement,
Freight Facilities and their Intermodal Connections BTS Webinar Series Olu Ajayi Michael Sprung Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research and Innovative.
Andre Tok, Miyuan Zhao, Joseph Y.J. Chow, Stephen G. Ritchie, and Dimitri Arkhipov, University of California at Irvine 2010 Innovations in Freight-Demand.
“Does Moving from A to Z Matter?” Thoughts on Freight Corridors in the Southeast.
Freight Transportation in the Upper Midwest Transportation Border Working Group Calgary, Alberta Mr. Travis Gordon Midwest Regional University Transportation.
Prepared for: The 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio Phillip J. Mescher, AICP, Iowa Department.
Analysis and Multi-Level Modeling of Truck Freight Demand Huili Wang, Kitae Jang, Ching-Yao Chan California PATH, University of California at Berkeley.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Freight Trends/Issues, Multimodal System Flows and Forecasts, and Policy Implications EU/US Forum April 2001 Gary Maring, USDOT.
Copyright  2003 Global Insight, Inc. and Reebie Associates T RANSEARCH I NSIGHT Integrated Freight Data & Forecasting System Produced by Reebie Associates.
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
MAG New Generation Freight Model SHRP2 C20 IAP Project Vladimir Livshits, Ph.D AMPO Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA October 23, 2014 Freight Session.
FREIGHT PLANNING – MPO’S ROLE Ms. Pragati Srivastava Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) February 27, 2014.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
Freight and Transportation Planning Workshop- Executive Summary Presented by the Federal Highway Administration Date Location.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
1 Briefing on Study for Enhancing Consideration of Freight in Regional Transportation Planning Freight Subcommittee Andrew J. Meese, AICP Metropolitan.
U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration.
Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
TRANSEARCH Data for Planning in Tennessee By Jerry Everett The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Using the Oregon Statewide Integrated Model for the Oregon Freight Plan Analysis Prepared for the TRB SHRP2 Symposium: Innovation in Freight Demand Modeling.
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2011 Potential Freight Implications FHWA Talking Freight December 2011 Tony Furst, Director FHWA.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,
Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT) William W. Stoeckert I-95 Corridor Coalition.
Data Expansion Efforts in the Great Lakes Maritime Information Delivery System Peter S. Lindquist GLMRI Affiliates Meeting September 23, 2010 INTERMODAL.
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
1 Florida Trade Flow Study presented to Florida Transportation Commission November 5, 2010 presented by Carrie Blanchard, Ph.D., Florida Chamber Foundation.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
How We Estimated The CFS Out-of-Scope Sectors Felix Ammah-Tagoe, Ph.D. Senior Research Consultant/Project Manager MacroSys Research and Technology.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Freight Data and Decision-Making Tools Talking Freight Seminar Series September 17, 2003 Felix Ammah-Tagoe,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
The U.S. Department of Transportation and the International Trade Data System Steven Beningo Transportation Border Working Group Border Data Workshop June.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Talking Freight Seminar Freight Analysis Framework, version 3 Diane Davidson Center for Transportation.
Technology and the National Freight Action Agenda U.S. Department of Transportation Richard M. Biter Deputy Director US DOT, Office of Intermodalism November.
Commodity Origin-Destination Provisional Estimates Edward Fekpe, Ph.D., PEng. Research Leader Transportation Market Sector.
FAF 2 The Second Generation of Freight Analysis Framework Office of Freight Management and Operations Federal Highway Administration Tianjia Tang, PE,
FAF2 Data Disaggregation Methodology and Results presented to Model Task Force presented by Vidya Mysore, Florida DOT Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics,
Visualizing Freight Data and Freight System Operation A useful, perhaps essential tool, but don’t expect a crystal ball! R. Hughes, M. Manore, S. Karthikeyan.
Innovation for a Nation on the Move U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Purpose,
1 Sources of Transportation Statistics September 23, 2009 Rosalyn Alleman National Transportation Library Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research.
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Network Assignment of Highway Truck Traffic in FAF3 Maks Alam, PE Research Leader Battelle.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
National Modeling TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Research Project #3 Develop Common Denominators for Safety Measures.
The Transportation Logistics Company Indiana Logistics Summit Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities September 26, 2007.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics Inter-American Development Bank Freight Transport and Logistics Observatories October 19, 2010.
Economic Dynamics of Freight & Modes. The Trucking Industry.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
The Freight Transportation System Background on domestic highway, rail, and waterborne freight modes.
October 22, 2013 Ontario Ministry of Transportation Transportation Planning Branch Systems Analysis and Forecasting Office Rob Tardif Ontario Update on.
Statewide Transportation Planning Oklahoma DOT Planning Process Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan Statewide Freight Transportation Plan Arkansas.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Critical Commerce Corridors
Analysis of Freight Flows for Transportation Planning
Presentation transcript:

The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 2 Presentation Outline 1.Why did HOFM develop the FAF 2.How has the FAF been used to date 3.What has HOFM learned 4.Future Product Development

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 3 1. Why did HOFM develop the FAF Simply trying to develop database of freight movement across modes, commodities and time periods to support research efforts in the Freight Office. Involved:  Synthesis of diverse data.  Expanded scope from other studies.  Understanding the relationship of freight, geography, and infrastructure.

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 4 DATA SOURCES BTS/Census Bureau Commodity Flow Survey (All Modes) BTS Transborder Freight Statistics (Truck, Rail, Pipeline) STB/FRA Rail Waybill Sample (Rail) MarAd and US Army Corps data (Water) BTS/FAA (Airport) Reebie (Truck) Census Bureau 5-year Census and Annual Survey of Manufacturers (Truck, Water, Air) Private Port Directories (Water) DRI Industrial Production Indices (Truck, water, air) HPMS Database (Truck) Truck Configuration estimates (Truck) National Highway Network (NHN) Agricultural Production Statistics (USDA) Trade Association Production & Shipment Reports (Truck, water, air) US Geological Survey Mineral Industry Reports (Truck, water) Reebie Associates Freight Locater/InfoUSA Street-Address Industrial Employment & Activity (Truck) County Population Data (Truck) Inter-Industry Trade Patterns (Input/Output Table) (Truck, Air) Motor Carrier Industry Financial & Operating Statistics (Truck) Railroad Industry Proprietary Rebill Factors (Truck) Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey (Truck) Latin American Trade and Transportation Study (LATTS) – All Modes State Traffic Count Data (Truck)

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 5 FAF Development Initial Commodity Database Delivered - 00 Commodity Forecast Developed - 01 Additional Commodity Database Elements Highway Capacity Database

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 6 Development of Domestic Commodity Database (tons) Estimate State Economic Activity Estimate County Economic Activity Residual - Truck RailWaterTruckAir Apply Forecasted Growth Rates County to County Freight Flows

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 7 Development of International Commodity Database (tons) Estimate O/D using Supplemental Databases Estimate Residual Flows using Domestic Traffic Patterns Border and Maritime Data Apply Forecasted Growth Rates County to County Freight Flows

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 8 Freight Forecast Development Top-down analysis  National freight tonnage flows, 1980 through 1998  2-digit STCC commodities  Reduced form equations and forecasts for 2020 Bottom-up analysis  29 “regions” MSAs and 9 Census divisions  2-digit STCC commodities by mode  Linked to business demographics, business transactions, and trade flows  Constrained to national freight tonnage forecasts

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 9 Development of FAF Capacity Analysis Need to understand relationship between capacity and demand  Developed capacity estimates for Highways  Developed ability to manipulate truck flows on a national scale  Unable to determine national capacity models for other modes

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 10 Highway Capacity Analysis Approach Conversion of truck tonnage to truck trips Traffic flow map Assign base case (1998) freight Calibrate network & flow with traffic flow data Assign forecast freight (2010 and 2020) Commercial Truck Traffic Patterns Freight network and impedance

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations How Has the FAF been used to Date National Policy Analysis Support localized Freight Studies Public Awareness of Freight Activity Specialized Freight Analysis

Red lines indicate Interstate Sections. Blue lines indicate all other roads.

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 16

Estimated Peak Period Congestion, 1998

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 19 Projected Change in Truck Flow from Collapse of Webbers Falls, OK (Regional)

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 20 Projected National Truck Flow Changes from Collapse of Webbers Falls, OK

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 21 Items Released from the FAF Data release –  Commodity Database – State to State flows, by Mode, Domestic/International, for 2 Digit STCC, 1998, 2010, 2020  Highway Capacity Database – Segment level traffic counts of total vehicles, total trucks and estimated FAF trucks, estimated capacity Maps of freight activity for nation, states, selected metro areas and gateways State Freight Profiles

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations What Have We Learned?

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 23 The FAF Outputs Successful in conveying importance of freight. Developed a benchmark for regional studies. Illustrated a basic lack of national transportation data at a localized level. Need for a freight analytical tool for various projects and studies. The maps have been the most useful product to date.

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 24 Who are the FAF’s Users? Federal Highway Administration Other DOT Offices (FMCSA, MarAd) State DOT’s MPO’s Multistate coalitions Trade Associations Transportation Providers Other Federal Government Users (DOD\ Homeland Security-Commerce, USDA, INS)

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 25 Working with non Federal Offices Limited release because of data agreement with Reebie  Only State to State Commodity flows by mode  Loaded Truck Networks  Maps  Total truck counts for all MPO’s (spreadsheet) Working with some states on freight data issues The FAF and the Local Research  The FAF is a supplement, not a replacement, for local knowledge  Users need to understand how to link local knowledge and the FAF

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 26 There is a need for a national level transportation information that provides information on: When and where is the truck (or rail car) operating? What does the vehicle carry? What is the true movement of the cargo, including intermediate shipments? Where are the freight terminals? How many trucks are moving on the system? What is exposure to congestion, incidents, nature, safety? How does freight influence system use, and conversely, how does system use influence freight?

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 27 The FAF can not answer all questions Annual basis Forecast is somewhat dated State traffic counts do not match with HPMS Databases Unable to assign all trucks to FAF Commodities Only a national or regional analysis with some degree of certainty, not a localized, specific planning tool.

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations Future Product Development

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 29 The Freight Toolkit – Methodology, User Guides and Summary reports Truck Counts for each State and MPO region Additional maps and analysis of congestion, trucking activity Highlight linkages to other traffic planning/policy modules Re-releasing the Highway Capacity Network with total tons and value for each segment. Look at adding economic variables to the database. GeoFreight with BTS and the Office of the Secretary

Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 30 We are developing a “freight toolbox” but: Are these the correct tools? How does the FAF link to other FHWA, DOT data and analytical research efforts? Will these tools be sufficient to program projects that are beneficial to freight? Can tools be developed to effectively address the wide range of local, State, multi-state, national, and international needs? Can we develop Expertise at all levels to assist people in making effective decisions; Federal, State, MPO