TOPOGRID Hydrologically Correct Digital Elevation Model A central goal of our research is to develop landscape-level indicators that can be used to predict.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functional Linkage of Water Basins and Streams: FLoWS v1 ArcGIS tools David Theobald, John Norman, Erin Peterson Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Dept of.
Advertisements

VARYING RESIDUAL VARIABILITY SEQUENCE OF GRAPHS TO ILLUSTRATE r 2 VARYING RESIDUAL VARIABILITY N. Scott Urquhart Director, STARMAP Department of Statistics.
Hydro Networks in GIS Network model Flow on Networks Hydrologic networks Linear referencing on networks Some slides in this presentation were prepared.
A framework for landscape indicators for measuring aquatic responses David Theobald, John Norman, Erin Poston, Silvio Ferraz Natural Resource Ecology Lab.
Updating the National Hydrography Data for the Twin Cities with Local Subsurface Drainage Information NHD Stewardship Conference Lakewood, Colorado April.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Perform raster based network delineation from digital elevation models Perform raster based.
Robust sampling of natural resources using a GIS implementation of GRTS David Theobald Natural Resource Ecology Lab Dept of Recreation & Tourism Colorado.
0 The National Hydrography Dataset Plus a tool for SPARROW Watershed Modeling Richard Moore (presented by Alan Rea)
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
Linking watersheds and streams through functional modeling of watershed processes David Theobald, Silvio Ferraz, Erin Poston, and Jeff Deems Natural Resource.
Functional linkage of watersheds and streams using landscape networks of reach contributing areas David Theobald, John Norman, Erin Peterson, Silvio Ferraz.
Functional linkage of watersheds and streams: ArcGIS FLoWS tools David Theobald, John Norman, Erin Poston, Silvio Ferraz Natural Resource Ecology Lab,
Ecologically representative distance measures for spatial modeling in stream networks Erin Peterson, David M. Theobald, and Jay Ver Hoef Natural Resource.
Concept Course on Spatial Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Application of GIS in Watershed Analysis Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Institute of Water and Flood.
Quantifying fragmentation of freshwater systems using a measure of discharge modification (and other applications) David Theobald, John Norman, David Merritt.
Quantifying fragmentation of freshwater systems using a measure of discharge modification (and other applications) David Theobald, John Norman, David Merritt.
Distribution Function Estimation in Small Areas for Aquatic Resources Spatial Ensemble Estimates of Temporal Trends in Acid Neutralizing Capacity Mark.
Example For simplicity, assume Z i |F i are independent. Let the relative frame size of the incomplete frame as well as the expected cost vary. Relative.
Developing GIS indicators and metrics David Theobald Natural Resource Ecology Lab Colorado State University.
Hydrologic network metrics based on functional distance and stream discharge David Theobald & Mary Kneeland Natural Resource Ecology Lab Dept of Recreation.
Distribution Function Estimation in Small Areas for Aquatic Resources Spatial Ensemble Estimates of Temporal Trends in Acid Neutralizing Capacity Mark.
Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Hands on training on surface hydrologic analysis using GIS Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
Distribution Function Estimation in Small Areas for Aquatic Resources Spatial Ensemble Estimates of Temporal Trends in Acid Neutralizing Capacity Mark.
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan IS&T Academic Computing Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
NHD Watershed: Tools and Applications
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
NHD Stream Order Possibilities Timothy R. Bondelid Research Triangle Institute Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (919) ; fax (919)
Frank Kenny and Bryce Matthews Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
A Simple Drainage Enforcement Procedure for Estimating Catchment Area Using DEM Data David Nagel, John M. Buffington, and Charles Luce U.S. Forest Service,
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Understanding How to use Reading
Introduction National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus) Version 2.
ArcHydro – Two Components Hydrologic  Data Model  Toolset Credit – David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin.
NHD Products and Applications InterMountain GIS 2014 NHD Workshop April 7, 2014.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Implementation of the U.S. Geological Survey’s StreamStats Program in Kansas— A Web Application.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
Characterization of Hydrological Networks and Surfaces Theory and Tools.
DAMARS/STARMAP 8/11/03# 1 STARMAP YEAR 2 N. Scott Urquhart STARMAP Director Department of Statistics Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO
Section 5. New England SPARROW River Reach Network Assembling the stream network Generation of reach catchments Estimation of Stream-flow and velocity.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Characterization of Watersheds from DEMs using Spatial Analyst/ArcHydro Robert G. Burns, P.G. Engineering Geologist DWR – Division of Safety of Dams Watershed.
GISWR 2015 Midterm Review. Definition of Latitude,  (1) Take a point S on the surface of the ellipsoid and define there the tangent plane, mn (2) Define.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia (703) NHD Flow and Velocity Project Greg Schwarz, Reston,
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
Water Availability Modeling in the State of Texas CE 394 K.2 - Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas at Austin David Mason.
VARYING DEVIATION BETWEEN H 0 AND TRUE  SEQUENCE OF GRAPHS TO ILLUSTRATE POWER VARYING DEVIATION BETWEEN H 0 AND TRUE  N. Scott Urquhart Director, STARMAP.
Section 5. Chesapeake Bay Network Generation CB watershed –~ 64,000 square miles –~ 166,000 square kilometers Constructed 3 models Version I –ERF1, ~1300.
Using the NHDPlus for drainage area delineation and site matching Kirsten Cassingham, NC Water Science Center Silvia Terziotti, NC Water Science Center.
Bdsfbdsfb NHDPlus for Corpus Christi Bay Term Project Report Nishesh Mehta Nishesh Mehta 21 st November st November 2006.
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
Key Concepts from Exercise 4
National Hydro Data Programs
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Calculating Hydrologic Parameters for Estimating Surface Water Flow at Ungaged Locations Richard Hoffpauir Water Resources Engineering.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
GISWR 2015 Midterm Review.
Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models (TauDEM)
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by Ayse Irmak, David R
Presentation transcript:

TOPOGRID Hydrologically Correct Digital Elevation Model A central goal of our research is to develop landscape-level indicators that can be used to predict associated aquatic response variables derived from EPA EMAP data. Because the target end-users of this work are states, tribes, and other water resource agencies, we aim to produce methods and tools that are robust and use widely-available hydrologic and topographic data to model specific aspects of watersheds at both regional and national levels. To that end, we have identified two primary research objectives: Objective 1: Delineate catchment boundaries to link watersheds to stream reaches Objective 2: Develop GIS tools to assist computation of landscape metrics for use with aquatic responses The initial development of the methodologies to meet our objectives were conducted using USGS/EPA National Hydrography Data (NHD) within the Mid Atlantic Highlands Project (MAHA) study area, Colorado, and the Northern Coast of Oregon. Once our methods were refined, we ran the model for the entire US using ERF1 v2 (Enhanced River Reach File version 2.0 USGS/EPA) in order to test its robustness and efficiency. Network-based metrics Most measures that link watersheds to streams rely on surrogate variables, such as Strahler stream order. These are widely-used and have been useful in distilling complex variables into a reasonable metric. However, with the combination of widely-available spatially-explicit data, network data structures, and fast computer processing, a new opportunity has emerged to develop indicators that directly measure various aspects of hydrology. A primary benefit is that these metrics will be more robust to possible artifacts introduced by scaling (e.g., 1 st order streams change with map scale) and field-survey method (e.g., hydrology networks change at boundaries of quadrangles). A first step was to use the length streams (e.g., upstream from a location, or between two locations on a stream or network) as a surrogate for the catchment area. Given that we can estimate the catchment area fairly well, we felt we could combine the idea of catchment area with the hydrologic network. For each stream reach, we are to associate the measured catchment area directly to the stream reach. Moreover, the catchment GRID has been used to associate ancillary information that will assist direct measurement of flow. To date, we have computed the volume of precipitation (in acre feet) input into each reach catchment based on the average annual precipitation (from PRISM) and the catchment area. We have also computed the downstream affect of dams based on the normal volume capacity of dams identified in the BASINS data. We have developed ArcGIS scripts (using Visual Basic) to build an ArcGIS geodatabase, display, and analyze the stream data as a hydrologic network (using the available Geometric Network Modules). The Geometric Network data structure and associated tools allows the network structure to be created from geometric coincidence of features (e.g., a reach connecting to its upstream reaches). We developed a script to trace upstream from each reach, calculate total precipitation, and record the value in each reach’s attributes. This allows metrics to be accumulated down the hydrologic network, such as watershed area or predicted discharge. It also allows metrics to take into account other features within the watershed, such as dams. Flow modification can be computed to depict the proportion of discharge at any reach that is modified by dams upstream (below). This provides an initial picture of the “shadow of a dam”, and could be used in an analysis to understand the relative impacts of remove or add a particular structure or structures. Delineating reach catchments There are a number of different methods to automate the delineation of watershed boundaries using GIS, and most methods involve computing the cell-to-cell direction of flow. By back-tracing the paths from a single cell, the catchment area of any given point can be found. In most methods, tracing the catchment of a stream reach is usually found by identifying the location at the end of the reach (the “to” node) and identifying the catchment from that point. However, in practice this method requires extensive pre- processing of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data to fill in artificial “pits” that cause artificial “striping” (long, linear catchments) and artificial ridge lines. The USGS NHD program has developed a watershed tool that relies on this method, and is beginning to produce fine-scale (using 1:24K hydrology) watershed boundaries that will become available over time. We sought to develop a method that was more robust to possible artifacts in the DEM. Moreover, because we want to delineate the catchment area for each stream reach, not basins per se, we were able to develop a method that uses a hyrdologically correct DEM and the reach (stream line) to identify its catchment. Our method “grows” catchments around each unique stream reach. We found that during the watershed “growing” process, artificial ridges caused an incorrect watershed boundary to form. Our method corrects this problem by finding the artificial ridge areas and buffering the portion of the watershed boundary, thereby ‘bumping’ it past the artificial ridges. Our method works as follows: 1. Convert stream reaches to GRID using reach Ids  S 2. Compute Hydrologically correct DEM using TOPOGRID (ArcInfo)  T 3. Compute the flow direction from the DEM (T)  D 4. Find the catchment using WATERSHED (D)  C 5. Locate artificial ridges along watershed boundaries  A 6. Buffer A by 1 cell to “bump” it out of artificial boundaries  A’ 7. C = A’, then Go To 4 until catchments are space-filled 8. End. Networked catchments based on delineation and flow accumulation methods Mary Kneeland and David Theobald, Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State University ; ) NHD 1:100K Streams We compared the catchments delineated using the growing algorithm against a set of hand- delineated watersheds in Colorado. The delineated basins closely approximated the hand-delineated basins, resulting in an average percent difference of 6 percent. These results are highly encouraging given that we used 1:100K hydrology and 30 m DEM, and thus can be improved considerably when 1:24K hydrology becomes available. We also have tested this method using RF1 (ERF1v2) reach data and 1 km DEM for the coterminous US, creating nearly 64,000 catchments. We developed an extensive database for the development of the catchment delineation model and for the calculation of metrics associated with a hydrologic network. This data include: ERF1 v2Enhanced River Reach File (National)EPA / USGS NHDNational Hydrography Data (Regional)EPA / USGS NEDNational Elevation Dataset(National)USGS PRISMParameter-Elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (National)OSU Stream GaugeMonthly and Annual(National)USGS DamsBASINS(National)EPA STATSGOState Soils Geographic Database (National)USGS GeologyEMAP(Regional)EPA NLCDNational Land Cover Dataset(Regional)USGS SitesEPA Perennial/NonPerennial Sampling Sites(Regional)EPA We are developing these models and tools using ArcGIS as a platform and will make the extension available for widespread use. Funding/Disclaimer: The work reported here was developed under the STAR Research Assistance Agreement CR awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Colorado State University. This presentation has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed here are solely those of the presenter and STARMAP, the Program (s)he represents. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this presentation. The hydrologically correct DEM was created by the ArcInfo module: TOPOGRID. TOPOGRID is an interpolation method which uses a spatially varying RMS error to interpolate an elevation grid based on input datasets of streams, waterbodies, and elevation. This method creates accurate representation of areas with flat valleys adjacent to steep mountains. This research is funded by U.S.EPA – Science To Achieve Results (STAR) Program Cooperative Agreement # CR