U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COAST Toolkit: The Forested Land Management decision support tool Cassandra Ladino, U.S. Geological.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Advertisements

Salt Marsh Restoration Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Ranking Potential Salt Marsh Restoration Sites Using Social and Environmental Factors.
Planning for Our Future:
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jonathan Doherty National Park Service.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Wild Salmon Policy Update Yukon River Panel March 23, 2011.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS/EROS Data Center Global Land Cover Project – Experiences and Research Interests GLC2000-JRC.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
How many possums and where? The National Possum Model James Shepherd & Mandy Barron.
Participatory GIS in the Upper Sangamon Watershed: Geovisualization, Collective Decision-Making, and Environmental Governance Miriam A. Cope Sara McLafferty.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Jeremy Erickson, Lucinda B. Johnson, Terry Brown, Valerie Brady, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of MN Duluth.
2012 West Virginia GIS Conference The Nature Conservancy of West Virginia Ruth Thornton Conservation Information Manager.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Presented by Insert your name, title, and district Lower Hudson Coalition of Conservation Districts Volunteer Streamwalk Program Developed by the Westchester.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Digital Watershed: Institute of Water Research Michigan State University A Nationwide Web Application Tool for Effective Watershed Management.
Chesapeake's Future Forests: Crafting a Forest Restoration Strategy for the Bay Watershed Partners.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ASPRS Panel on USGS Progress on Remote Sensing Calibration and Quality The National Map Quality.
Spatial Water Data Subcommittee Update to Coordination Group Wendy Blake-Coleman, EPA (Representing Tod Dabolt, EPA & Bob Pierce, USGS)
Coastal Web Atlases in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Examples from Virginia and Maryland Marcia R. Berman Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia.
Strengthening Coastal Decision- making in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick Making coastal development geospatial data available and delivering tools needed.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey LANDFIRE Paul Bourget SGT, Inc., contractor to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources.
Assessing Alternative Policies for the Control of Nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Catherine L. Kling, Silvia Secchi, Hongli Feng, Philip.
LINDA’S INTERVIEWSGAP ANALYSES Task 1: DEVELOP OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS AND INTERFACE ELEMENTS IMPORTANT TO STAKEHOLDERS Drivers, Goals, Barriers Spatial habitat.
U.S. Department of the Interior Chesapeake Bay Watershed Land Cover Data Series 1984, 1992, 2001, and 2006 U.S. Geological SurveyThe Chesapeake Bay Program.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Integrated Waterbird Management & Monitoring Program IWMM Andy Wilson USGS Patuxent, Laurel, Maryland
David Nail USGS Geospatial Liaison to Indiana March 13 th, 2007 Update on National Hydrography Data.
Energy and Minerals for America’s Future: Energy and Minerals for America’s Future: Science Planning Overview, Opportunities for Input U.S. Department.
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
SSWD Advisory Committee on Water Information Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data Herndon, VA September 15, 2004.
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
FY2012 ChesapeakeStat Development Team Enhancements – content, design, function 1.Redesign Goal Overview Pages Objective: Communicate the mission and vision.
Assessing pine bark beetle mortality in Southern CA Forests Presented by California Department of Forestry Mark Rosenberg Rich Walker Bill Stewart Visit.
Community Vulnerability and Climate Change Dr. Shawn Dalton, Director, ESDRC, UNB, Fredericton Prativa Pradhan, MPHIL in Policy Studies, ESDRC, UNB, Fredericton.
Tools to Inform Protection, Restoration, and Resilience in the Hudson River Estuary The North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC)
Green Infrastructure Network Design & Optimization The Conservation Fund Will Allen, Director of Strategic Conservation
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
THE NATIONAL MAP: AN AGENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING USING THE WORLD WIDE WEB 8 June 2004 Michael P. Finn Jeffrey D. Spooner David K. Shaver E. Lynn Usery.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Decision Support Tools and USGS Data Management Best Practices Cassandra Ladino USGS Chesapeake.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Who Is Using Our Datasets and Data Products? Carol A. Deering, Innovate!, contractor to the U.S.
Chesapeake Forest Restoration Strategy Kick-off webinar May Strategy Teams 60+ representatives 30+ federal, state, ngos Draft/public input July.
Condition of Forests in San Diego County: Recent Conifer Tree Mortality and the Institutional Response Presented by California Department of Forestry Mark.
Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview MARY ANDREWS NOAA JULIE DEVERS USFWS ERIK MARTIN THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CHESAPEAKE BAY FISH PASSAGE.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
What is it about? Presents first results of applying MAES analytical framework and outlines the advantages and constraints of European ecosystem assessments.
SUSTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL (SEC) INITIATIVE Providing resources for applying ecosystem services in public land & water management.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Manage and Provide Information: Examples from fish health, contaminants, and water quality data.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Colorado River Water Resources Vulnerability Project for Hill Country Conservancy Daniel Zavala Araiza.
Aquatic Data & Decision Information Compilation Tool (ADDICT) SARP Science and Data Committee Meeting January 2012 Will Duncan (U.S. Fish and Wildlife.
April 4, 2011 Princesa VanBuren Hansen Environmental Quality Board.
Illustrating NOAA’s Geospatial Role in Resilient Coastal Zones Joseph Klimavicz, NOAA CIO and Director of High Performance Computing and Communications.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Sean D. Rafferty Research Director and Associate Director
National Hydro Data Programs
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Science Center
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Water Quality – Bacteria Dashboard
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COAST Toolkit: The Forested Land Management decision support tool Cassandra Ladino, U.S. Geological Survey On Behalf of the COAST Development Team 10/05/11 Forest Conservation Demo

Outline  Chesapeake Online Adaptive Support Toolkit (COAST) What is COAST Adaptive Management concepts  Forested Land Management Mapper Demo PowerPoint slide overview Live demo with Q/A  Discussion and Next Steps

The Chesapeake Online Adaptive Support Toolkit (COAST)  Science based Decision- support tool WWW based Integrated framework of models and information Adaptive management  Implement and assess actions Chesapeake Action Plan Executive Order Water quality Watersheds (forest management)  User groups State, federal, local, NGO’s

Adaptive Management  A specific kind of structured decision making  Learning by doing and adapting to what is learned  Improves both the operation of restoration programs and meeting restoration goals

Executive Order Strategy

Decision Support Tools Amongst Partners COAST ChesapeakeStat Bay Barometer Environmental Measures Accountability stating process for measuring progress toward program goals Spatial selection of priority areas for resource management through the use of scientific information and data

Representing Adaptive Management The Toolkit provides web map applications to support adaptive management steps.

Data Characteristics:  Data list determined by COAST working group subject experts Vulnerability to Conversion Economic Importance Forest Hub Size Soil Productivity Stream Order Stream Density Soil Moisture Adjacent Land Cover Slope Impaired Streams $ ! Site Index (Avg Tree Height) FLM Data

Forested Land Management Tool (FLM)

Data Characteristics:  Analysis by HUC, County, or State  Analysis Unit = NHDplus catchment $ ! Site Index (Avg Tree Height) FLM Data

LAYERSOURCEYEARCELL SIZEVALUE RANGE Vulnerability to ConversionRLA meter1 - 4 Economic ImportanceRLA meter Forest Hub SizeRLA meter acres Soil ProductivitySSURGO.Site_Index_r meter years Stream OrderNHDplus HUCStrahler Order 1 -7 Stream DensityNHDplus HUC Soil MoistureSSURGO.Soimoistdept_r meter meters Adjacent LandcoverCBLC meterLand cover classes SlopeNHDplus meter % Impaired StreamsEPA HUCYes (1) or No (0)

LayersData Scale Parameter43210 Vulnerability to conversionHighModerateLow 0= not forest Large Blocks (Forest Hub Size) (acres) < = 200 0= not forest Soils Productivity ( Forest Suitability)Highly suitable = 90-80Mod. Suitable= 79-75Low Suitability=74-64Very poor suitability=63-10= not forest Stream order/HUC1 st order/12 digit2 nd order/11 digit3 rd order> 3 rd order/8 digit HUCNA Stream Density/ HUC> NA Importance to economyVery valuableHigh valueMod valueLow value0= not forest Soil Moisture<1 meter1 - 2 meters2 - 5 meters meters0= >10 Adjacent Land CoverAgricultural LandsOpen SpaceUrbanForested0= not forest Slope>25%15-25%5-15%0-5%0= not forest Impaired Streams Yes0= No FLM Data

FLM Interface Highlights  Online Public Access  User creates prioritization  Source data are accessible  View other related datasets  * Under development this year *

FLM DEMO – Select an area of interest Frederick County

FLM DEMO – Select layers for analysis In this scenario:  We are prioritizing layers based on Preservation potential.  Vulnerability to Conversion and Forest Hub Size were of equal and highest importance to us.  Stream Order and Stream Density were of equal and lowest importance.  Soil Productivity is three times as important as Stream Density and Stream Order.  Economic Importance is two times as important as Stream Density and Stream Order.

FLM DEMO – Map the data

FLM DEMO – Investigate the results

Live Demo with Q/A Go to: Lets create a scenario...  Objective?  State/ County?  Which Layers?

Next Steps  Next Steps Release the COAST Forested Land Management decision support tool Continue presentations and demonstration to key user groups

Questions and Contacts COAST Website URL:   Keywords: USGS COAST U.S. Geological Survey Contacts:  Cassandra Ladino,  Paul Hearn – Apps Team Leader  Scott Phillips – COAST Project Manager