New muon EF trigger with offline supertools Sergio Grancagnolo INFN Lecce & Salento University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.
Advertisements

Trigger Data Formats From CBNT to ESD and/or DPD June 11, 2008 Fabrizio Salvatore, Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
Tentative flow chart of CMS Multi-Muon analysis 1 – DATASETS 2 - RESOLUTIONS 3 – FAKE RATES 4 – NUCLEAR INT MODEL 5 – IP TEMPLATES MODEL 6 – SAMPLE COMPOSITION.
Stefania.Spagnolo, Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce CERN, Nov. 2006, ATLAS Trigger and Physics week Muon Event Filter Stefania Spagnolo Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce.
Simulation Tasks  Understanding Tracking  Understanding Hardware 1.Two types of tasks: a.Implementing known functions in ATLAS framework b.Understanding.
GLAST LAT ProjectOnline Peer Review – July 21, Integration and Test L. Miller 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I&T Integration Readiness Review.
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
Trigger-aware analysis Current status Under development What’s missing Conclusions & Outlook Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL)
TRIGGER-AWARE ANALYSIS TUTORIAL ARTEMIS Workshop – Pisa – 18 th to 19 th June 2009 Alessandro Cerri (CERN), Ricardo Gonçalo – Royal Holloway.
Architecture styles Pipes and filters Object-oriented design Implicit invocation Layering Repositories.
The New TrigDecision Nicolas Berger, Till Eifert, Ricardo Gonçalo Physics Analysis Tools session ATLAS Software Workshop – Munich, March 2007.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Requirements for a Next Generation Framework: ATLAS Experience S. Kama, J. Baines, T. Bold, P. Calafiura, W. Lampl, C. Leggett, D. Malon, G. Stewart, B.
CERN Tutorial, September Job Options and Printing.
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
Darren Price – HLT B-trigger offline status report :: B-Physics meeting July 23 rd ‘08Page 1 HLT B-trigger offline monitoring status Darren Price, LANCASTER.
Event Data History David Adams BNL Atlas Software Week December 2001.
1 Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) and the HLT.
1 Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) and the HLT.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
Gnam Monitoring Overview M. Della Pietra, D. della Volpe (Napoli), A. Di Girolamo (Roma1), R. Ferrari, G. Gaudio, W. Vandelli (Pavia) D. Salvatore, P.
Level 2 ID-tracking truth association Trigger AOD discussion 13 December 2006 Ricardo Gonçalo - RHUL.
TAU entered in various places. Manpower – Yan Benhammou++ (N. Guttman, N. Hod, E. Reinherz, A. Kreizel). Working on online Monitoring of TGC. Looking at.
Overview of trigger EDM and persistency Focusing on the e/  slice Referring to the work of several people Ricardo Gonçalo.
LVL2 ID ESD/AOD classes Status and plans. PESA L2 ID Algorithms Review - RAL 25 July Ricardo Goncalo ESD/AOD More and more interest from physics.
DPDs and Trigger Plans for Derived Physics Data Follow up and trigger specific issues Ricardo Gonçalo and Fabrizio Salvatore RHUL.
Trigger input to FFReq 1. Specific Issues for Trigger The HLT trigger reconstruction is a bit different from the offline reconstruction: – The trigger.
Trigger ESD/AOD Simon George (RHUL) Ricardo Goncalo (RHUL) Monika Wielers (RAL) Reporting on the work of many people. ATLAS software week September.
Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.
Jose A. Hernando Trigger Gaudies Reconstruction Tools & Algorithms Inspectors MC & Data Algorithms Template preserved container Jose A. Hernando.
LHCb Lausanne Workshop, 21st March /12 Tracking Software for DC’06 E. Rodrigues, NIKHEF LHCb Tracking and Alignment Workshop  To do list, and done.
AMB HW LOW LEVEL SIMULATION VS HW OUTPUT G. Volpi, INFN Pisa.
Navigation Timing Studies of the ATLAS High-Level Trigger Andrew Lowe Royal Holloway, University of London.
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
AOD/ESD plans Status and plans focusing on LVL2 e/  and some items for discussion On behalf of: J.Baines, P.Casado, G.Comune, A.DiMattia, S.George, R.Goncalo,
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
Muon Event Filter Status Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the muon EF working group INFN Lecce & Salento University.
PFA on sidloi3: update Ron Cassell 4/27/10. 2 Proposed changes Calibration Tracking Extrapolation Subcluster finding Muon finding Structure.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
DØ Offline Reconstruction and Analysis Control Framework J.Kowalkowski, H.Greenlee, Q.Li, S.Protopopescu, G.Watts, V.White, J.Yu.
4/9/2007RPC converter1/18 RPC bytestream converter: Brainstorming a summary of discussions involving M.Bianco, G.Cataldi, G.Chiodini, E.Gorini, A.Guida,
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
Level 2 ID-tracking truth association How it works Information in POOL How to use it.
1 Offline Week, October 28 th 2009 PWG3-Muon: Analysis Status From ESD to AOD:  inclusion of MC branch in the AOD  standard AOD creation for PDC09 files.
DaVinciAssociators How to relate physics objects to MC truth.
Muon Persistency Persistent Analysis Objects Muon Persistency Norbert Neumeister µ-PRS meeting February 10, 2004.
Status report for LVL2 e/  ESD/AOD Aims and constraints Tracking status Calorimetry status (Monika) Monika Wielers Ricardo Gonçalo.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Overview of EMU Software Rick Wilkinson. Slice Test DAQ We succeeded in using Slice Test DAQ code to take test beam data, combining chamber and trigger.
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
1 HcalAlCaRecoProducers : Producer for HO calibration Outer hadron calorimeter is expected to improve jet energy resolution Due to different sampling/passive.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Muon identification in ATLAS Peter Kluit (NIKHEF).
LoF Rejection for Your Analyses & Preliminary Report on Multijet Background May 3, 2011 Steve Alkire.
Developments of the PWG3 muon analysis code
Electronics system overview from TKlayout
Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=1031
Progress with MUON reconstruction
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
Silicon Tracking with GENFIT
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Muon Trigger Software Status
integration in HLT-status and prospects
Samples and MC Selection
M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)
Presentation transcript:

New muon EF trigger with offline supertools Sergio Grancagnolo INFN Lecce & Salento University

Summary Current status of the muon trigger EF Current ESD/AOD content Proposal for ESD/AOD content

Event Filter: follow up with the new Moore style for A new package: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMuonEF hosts 4 HLTalgorithms: –TrigMuonEFSegmentFinder wrapper for MooSegmentCombinationFinder (offline tool invoked with vector of pointers to prd collections) DONE –TrigMuonEFTrackBuilder wrapper for the offline tool MuonCombiTrackMaker (invoqued with vector of pointers to segment combination) DONE –TrigMuonEFExtrapolator wrapper for MuidBackTracker DONE –TrigMuonEFCombiner wrapper TO BE DONE for the main tool of MuidCB (COMING SOON ?) Running with release producing standalone EF muons propagated to the interaction point Most work is just in configuration – from a very first look at the performance in comparison with old TrigMoore and offline Moore some mis-configuration of the tools has been identified The new chain (up to the available implementation) will be in –defined temporary extra muon trigger sequences to be run concurrently with the standard EF (TrigMoore) –needs to revise the trigger AOD for the EF

Revision of muon EF trigger AOD The separate step of segment finding allow for another early hypothesis algo –As an example if the number of segments in inner/middle/outer MS layers is stored At least combined match  2 fit must be stored –Fit  2 could be saved at different track building steps Link to the ID track used in combination –Use of ElementLink if ID info is already stored in AOD –Store ID info if missing (21 bytes) More space needed?

Muon EF info in AOD: now One independent object for each istance of MooHLTAlgo muon code used to distinguish between them Size: 44 bytes + size of the string / EF muon Total for all 3 instances, w/ and w/o improvements: 117 bytes and 132+3*string size bytes intdoublestring codecharge 1/pT cot(  )  mass RoI Possible improvements: charge: double  bool RoI : string  unsigned short int Required 3 bytes for both Improved size: 39 bytes Store charge with 1/pT sign? Saves 1 more byte/istance but no abs(Pt) allowed See Attila’s talk - 13 Dec Trigger AOD Discussion

Muon EF in AOD: proposal (1/3) Only one object keeping information for all muon EF steps Avoid duplicate information Avoid muon code Reuse space saved to store other useful info Note: I verified that it is possible to attach a feature to a TE in a trigger algorithm and update the same feature in another trigger algorithm  the same object can be updated many times, with all the muon trigger information, before to be stored in AOD

Muon EF in AOD: proposal (2/3) Minimal implementation: –One istance of TrigMuonEFInfo –One component of the vector of TrigMuonEFTrack for each step of the trigger TrigMuonEFTrackBuilder TrigMuonEFExtrapolator TrigMuonEFCombiner Total space: 101 bytes –With same information amount as current version P4IPtCotThPhiM double IPt double CotTh double Phi double Mass TrigMuonEFTrack:: P4IPtCotThPhiM bool m_charge TrigMuonEFInfo unsigned short int m_RoI std::vector

Muon EF in AOD: proposal (3/3) Additional information: –N segment/layer (6 bytes) –Fit  2 for each step (24) –Match  2 for CB step (8) –ID info for CB track (21 bytes) double d0, pT unsigned short int SCT hits, pixel hits bool B layer Total space: 160 bytes –information needed for  /K rejection do not require segments or fit  2 –Strictly needed for  /K are 130 bytes  less than now TrigMuonEFCbTrack:: TrigMuonEFTrack double chi2match ID Info TrigMuonEFInfo unsigned short int m_RoI unsigned short int nSegments[3] std::vector TrigMuonEFTrack:: P4IPtCotThPhiM double chi2fit

Conclusions New muon EF trigger working in –Firsts checks on performances up to extrapolation already possible Possibility to optimize muon EF current information in AOD –Reduce space for current information –Add more information required for  /K rejection I am not a real expert on AOD: input, support and suggestions are more than welcome! Going to 14.X.0 nigthlies as soon as temporary extra muon trigger sequences are defined in TriggerCommon (help from Takanori) –Template defined already in place and tested