IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Using Idea Maps to Plan for Evaluation CVD Risk Reduction Group Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Choctaw Nation Diabetes Wellness Center
Advertisements

Program Planning: Community Nutrition Assessment
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
99.98% of the time patients are on their own “The diabetes self-management regimen is one of the most challenging of any for chronic illness.” 0.02% of.
Does It Work? Evaluating Your Program
Healthy Child Development Suggestions for Submitting a Strong Proposal.
Doris Young, John Furler, Christine Walker, Margarite Vale, James Best, Leonie Segal, Trisha Dunning (NHMRC GP clinical research grant July ) PEACH:
Terrell W. Zollinger, DrPH Evaluation Consultant Healthy Women, Healthy Hoosiers Conference October 7, 2011.
Developing a Logic Model
Competitive Grant Program: Year 2 Meeting 2. SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Competitive Grant Program: Year 2 Meeting 2 HH Data Coordinator Training.
Community Based Activities Yvette Roubideaux MD MPH University of Arizona.
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 3: Using Idea Maps to Plan for Evaluation Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips,
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 1: Introduction to Idea Mapping Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D.
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Refining Idea Maps Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa Wyatt.
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Using Idea Maps to Plan for Evaluation Diabetes Prevention Group Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa.
SDPI Competitive Grant Program Planning Meeting 1 IHS Diabetes Competitive Grant Program: Overview and Update Kelly Acton, MD, MPH, FACP Director, IHS.
Special Diabetes Program for Indians Competitive Grant Program SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Competitive Grant Program Technical Assistance Meeting.
Chronic Disease A Public Health Perspective. Chronic Disease Overview The most prevalent, costly, and preventable chronic diseases –cardiovascular disease.
Core Elements: Case Management Recruitment Yvette Roubideaux, MD, MPH.
Overview of the CVD Risk Reduction Demonstration Project Kelly Acton, MD, MPH, FACP IHS Division of Diabetes Treatment & Prevention.
SDPI Healthy Heart Project SDPI Competitive Grant Program Technical Assistance Meeting October 23-24, 2006 Tucson, AZ Core Elements: Case Management –
CVD Risk Factor Reduction Kelly Moore, MD, FAAP IHS Division of Diabetes Treatment & Prevention.
SDPI Healthy Heart Project SDPI Competitive Grant Program Technical Assistance Meeting October 23-24, 2006 Tucson, AZ Core Elements: Recruitment and Screening.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium How to Develop a Program Logic Model.
CVD Risk Reduction Group Case Management Core Elements: Update July 2005.
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 1: Introduction to Idea Mapping Diabetes Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa Wyatt.
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Refining Idea Maps Diabetes Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa Wyatt Knowlton,
CVD Risk Reduction Group Case Management Core Elements May 2005.
Chronic Disease A Public Health Perspective Ronald Fischbach, Ph.D.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
Council for Disabled Children May What is Independent Support? A 2-year programme to provide additional support to young people and parents during.
Quality Management Chart Review Pamela Casey, MS, RD June 24, 2014.
Integration of 5 Public Health Programs Jan Norman, RD, CDE Chronic Disease Prevention Unit Washington State Department of Health.
Evaluating REACH Funded Projects Using the REACH Theory of Change.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Healthcare Reform The “Affordable Care Act” How Will It Affect Substance Abuse Care?
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Umpqua Health Alliance Umpqua Community Health Center Extended Care Clinic Integrated clinic for patients with complex health and addiction issues.
Evelyn Gonzalez Program Evaluation. AR Cancer Coalition Summit XIV March 12, 2013 MAKING A DIFFERENCE Evaluating Programmatic Efforts.
Healthy Heart Initiative and the Role of the Pharmacist Alexis Beyer, PharmD, NCPS Cherokee Indian Hospital Healthy Heart Pharmacist.
The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC. Diabetes Prevention Ann.
ABSTRACT Diabetes is a public health issue of growing magnitude. It currently ranks among the top ten leading causes of death in the United States. To.
Healthy Heart Project 2011 Review of Services Presented to the Taos-Picuris Health Board September 2011 Review of program services Taos-Picuris Service.
Accelerating Reform Initiative Developing Integrated care: Fayette Companies and Heartland Community Health Center Mike Bolye.
Addressing Maternal Depression Healthy Start Interconception Care Learning Collaborative Kimberly Deavers, MPH U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
Lessons from the CDC/RTC HIV Integration Project Marianne Zotti, DrPH, MS, FAAN Team Leader Services Management, Research & Translation Team NCCDPHP/DRH/ASB.
Mapping the logic behind your programming Primary Prevention Institute
Maine Prenatal Collaborative Susan Swartz, M.D. Judy Soper, RT(R), RDMS, BS Tim Cowan, MSPH Principal Investigator Project Director Data Analyst December.
Monitoring and Evaluation West Virginia’s Review of Funded Projects, Services and Activities.
Incorporating Preconception Health into MCH Services
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
Using Logic Models to Create Effective Programs
North Rising. Partnership: North Rising is a collaboration between Pillsbury United Communities and North Memorial Health Care.
Self-Management Support Strategies for Improving your Patients’ CVD Risk Bonnie Jortberg PhD, RD, CDE Robyn Wearner RD, MA Department of Family Medicine.
Workplace Health and Wellness Consulting Assess Plan Implement Evaluate March 11, x3x3 Wellness Strategy We’re committed to the development of an.
Increased # of AI/AN receiving in- home environmental assessment and trigger reduction education and asthma self-management education Increased # of tribal.
Nurse Education Practice Quality and Retention- Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Behavioral Health Integration (NEPQR-IPCP:BHI) Program FY 2016.
Chronic Disease A Public Health Perspective. Chronic Disease Overview The most prevalent, costly, and preventable chronic diseases –cardiovascular disease.
Improving Client Engagement in Primary Health Care Services Jewish Guild For The Blind.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Meeting Monday November 7, :00 – 11:30 am.
Research Questions Does integration of behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location, improve patient-centered outcomes in.
SPECIALIST NURSE SUPPORT IN PRIMARY CARE
“MOVEdiabetes” 12 months intervention
Public Health Interventions
Seminole County H.O.P.E. Partnership between KAD Foundation and the Casselberry Senior Center Serving Hispanic Seniors 55+ throughout the County Community.
Quality Framework Overview
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Using Idea Maps to Plan for Evaluation CVD Risk Reduction Group Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa Wyatt Knowlton, Ed.D. Evaluation Training ̶ March 2005

Learning Objectives  Increased knowledge of how to move from idea maps to evaluation measures  Skill to further discuss and refine idea maps with evaluation in mind  Shared understanding of draft measurement model

Overview  Connecting Idea Maps to Evaluation  Developing Evaluation Questions  Core CVD Program Idea Map Example  “Hands-on” Evaluation Planning Exercise  Updating Your Case Management Idea Map  BREAK  Maps to Measures  Indicators  Measurement Model  Discussion  Implications

Connecting Idea Maps to Evaluation

Evaluation Design IM--Questions Example: Family Vacation

Case Management SAMPLE – CVD Risk Reduction Program Idea Map RESOURCESACTIVITIESOUTPUTSSHORTER- TERM OUTCOMES LONGER-TERM OUTCOMES IMPACT In order to accomplish our set of activities we will need the following: In order to implement our program we will need to do: Evidence of program implementation: Results we hope to see soon (6-12 months) Results that may take longer (1-3 years, still during grant period) Results that may take even longer (beyond grant period) Funding Staff Participants Guidelines Training Space for classes and visits Supplies Medications Materials Recruit people with DM to enter Case management team Individual care plans Treatment to target goals Self-management education People recruited and entered into project Team meets regularly Document and monitor care plan Clinic visits Medications started or changed Appointments and referrals made Participation in activities Education, classes Increased knowledge of risk of CVD in diabetes and how to reduce risk Improvements in CVD risk factors, such as BP, A1C, lipids, smoking cessation, etc. Reduced risk of CVD Reduced prevalence of CVD in people with diabetes

EXERCISE: Updating Your Idea Map In your project teams: 1. Compare your case management idea map (from last time) with the sample and draft protocol from yesterday. 2.Update your original idea map as needed to make sure it includes all of the elements from the sample and draft protocol. 3.Jot down a few of the issues and/or insights that came up for your group during the exercise.

BREAK

Idea Map Questions Indicators Methods

Question Examples AudienceTypical QuestionsEvaluation Use Program Management and Staff Are we reaching our target population? Are our participants satisfied with our program? Is the project delivering the program as intended? How can we improve our program? Programming decisions, day- today operations ParticipantsDid the program help me and people like me? What would improve the program next time? Decisions about continuing participation. Community Members Is the program suited to our community needs? What is the program really accomplishing? Decisions about participation and support. Public OfficialsWho is the program serving? What difference has the program made? Is the program reaching its target population? What do participants think about the program? Is the program worth the cost? Decisions about commitment and support. Knowledge about the utility and feasibility of the program approach. FundersIs the project achieving results as intended? Is the program worth the cost? Accountability and improvement of future grantmaking efforts.

RESOURCESACTIVITIESOUTPUTSSHORTER- TERM OUTCOMES LONGER- TERM OUTCOMES IMPACT In order to accomplish our set of activities we will need the following: In order to implement our program we will need to do: Evidence of program implementation: Results we hope to see soon (6-12 months) Results that may take longer (1-3 years, still during grant period) Results that may take even longer (beyond grant period) Funding Staff Participants Guidelines Training Space for classes and visits Supplies Medications Materials Recruit people with DM to enter Case management team Individual care plans Treatment to target goals Self- management education People recruited and entered into project Team meets regularly Document and monitor care plan Clinic visits Medications started or changed Appointments and referrals made Participation in activities Education, classes Increased knowledge of risk of CVD in diabetes and how to reduce risk Improvements in CVD risk factors, such as BP, A1C, lipids, smoking cessation, etc. Reduced risk of CVD Reduced prevalence of CVD in people with diabetes Case Management Is the project delivering the program as intended? ? ? ? ? Is the project achieving results as intended?

Indicators  The specific statements you develop as markers of “success” for activities and outcomes  SMART across each part of the idea map  Meaningful and manageable  May require technical assistance to develop data collection tools

Focus AreaIndicatorsHow to Evaluate Influential FactorsMeasures of influential factors--may require general population surveys and/or comparison with national data sets. Compare the nature and extent of influences before (baseline) and after the program. ResourcesLogs or reports of financial/staffing status.Compare actual resources acquired against anticipated. ActivitiesDescriptions of planned activities. Logs or reports of actual activities. Descriptions of participants. Compare actual activities provided, types of participants reached against what was proposed. OutputsLogs or reports of actual activities. Actual products delivered. Compare the quality and quantity of actual delivery against expected. Outcomes & Impacts Participant attitudes, knowledge, skills, intentions, and/or behaviors thought to result from your activities. Changes in health status factors specified for the program (uniform core) Compare the measures before and after the program Indicator Examples

CVD Risk Reduction: Measurement Model for Individual Participant LESS INTENSIVE ACTIVITIES: Community-based, awareness activities VARIABLES UNLIKELY TO CHANGE VARIABLES THAT MAY CHANGE (AND INFLUENCE OUTCOMES) OUTCOMES (INTERVENTION DESIGNED TO CHANGE) INTENSIVE ACTIVITIES: Screening - Recruitment - Consent - Baseline Exam - Case Management - Treatment - Follow up ENTRY AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA Enter: Dx Diabetes Exclude: * Current pregnancy * Active alcohol or sub- stance abuse * End stage renal disease * ≤ 18 years of age Demographics: * Age * Gender * Height * Education * Family History of Diabetes or CVD * Socioeconomic Status Other: * Other comorbidities * Distress * Depression * Trauma and PTSD * Alcohol use * Smoking/ tobacco use * Social support * Perceived health competence * Resilient coping * Spirituality * Knowledge, attitudes & behaviors o high fat foods o weight o exercise * Readiness to change * Participation o attendance o engagement PRIMARY * Reduce CVD in DM SECONDARY * Risk of CVD ↓ BP ↓ LDL;  HDL; ↓TG ↓ A1C ↓ BMI; wt; waist circum Smoking cessation Aspirin/day Stress reduction Improved nutrition Regular phys activity  awareness of CVD INDIRECT * Subjective health

DISCUSSION: In your project teams: 1.Discuss the draft measurement model and list the implications for your project on the flipchart. 2.From this list of implications:  What actions will your team need to take?  Where will your team most need assistance? 2. Review your list and be prepared to briefly share your team insight with the whole group.

Wrap-up