MCI Inversion Comparisons. CarbonTracker vs MCI Inventory MAX CROP SIGNAL In general, looks pretty reasonable However, max crop signal might be reversed?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resolving CO 2 Flux Estimates from Atmospheric Inversions and Inventories in the Mid-Continent Region Stephen M. Ogle 1, Andrew Schuh 1, Dan Cooley 1,
Advertisements

Quantification of the sensitivity of NASA CMS-Flux inversions to uncertainty in atmospheric transport Thomas Lauvaux, NASA JPL Martha Butler, Kenneth Davis,
Detection and Quantification of Urban Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Ground- based results from the INFLUX Experiment Map of road emissions from Hestia with.
UC IRVINE: SCOTT MILLER, ED READ, CHRIS DOUGHTY, MIKE GOULDEN USP: HELBER FREITAS, HUMBERTO DA ROCHA Boat-Based Eddy Covariance Measurements of CO 2 Exchange.
Preliminary results on Formation and variability of North Atlantic sea surface salinity maximum in a global GCM Tangdong Qu International Pacific Research.
Estimating the contribution of agricultural land use to terrestrial carbon fluxes in the continental US Keith Paustian 1,2, Steven Ogle 2, Scott Denning.
PBL simulated from different PBL Schemes in WRF during DICE
Objective –Attempt to utilize flux tower records to evaluate the validity of continental flux estimates submitted to the regional interim synthesis activity.
Andrew Schuh 1, Thomas Lauvaux 2,, Ken Davis 2, Marek Uliasz 1, Dan Cooley 1, Tristram West 3, Liza Diaz 2, Scott Richardson 2, Natasha Miles 2, F. Jay.
Slides for IPCC. Inverse Modeling of CO 2 Air Parcel Sources Sinks wind Sample Changes in CO 2 in the air tell us about sources and sinks Atmospheric.
Andrew Schuh 1, Stephen M. Ogle 1, Marek Uliasz 1, Dan Cooley 1, Tristram West 2, Ken Davis 3, Thomas Lauvaux 3, Liza Diaz 3, Scott Richardson 3, Natasha.
Stephen M. Ogle, Dan Cooley, Tristram West, Andrew Schuh, Ken Davis, F. Jay Breidt, Arlyn Andrews, Linda Heath, Kevin Gurney, and Scott Denning Resolving.
Inversion plan and current progress on MCI Andrew Schuh Colorado State University MCI Workshop June 17, 2009.
Near-Real Time Analysis of the Modern Carbon Cycle by Model-Data Fusion Scott Denning, David Baker, Chris O’Dell, Denis O’Brien, Tomohiro Oda, Nick Parazoo,
Andrew Schuh 1, Stephen M. Ogle 1, Marek Uliasz 1, Dan Cooley 1, Tristram West 2, Ken Davis 3, Thomas Lauvaux 3, Liza Diaz 3, Scott Richardson 3, Natasha.
GERFS1 Top-down approach to estimation of the regional carbon budget in West Siberia S. Maksyutov (1) T. Machida, K. Shimoyama, N.Kadygrov, A. Itoh (1)
Estimation of daily CO 2 fluxes over Europe by inversion of atmospheric continuous data C. Carouge and P. Peylin ; P. Bousquet ; P. Ciais ; P. Rayner Laboratoire.
Simulations of carbon transport in CCM3: uncertainties in C sinks due to interannual variability and model resolution James Orr (LSCE/CEA-CNRS and IPSL,
Prabir K. Patra Acknowledgments: S. Maksyutov, K. Gurney and TransCom-3 modellers TransCom Meeting, Paris; June 2005 Sensitivity CO2 sources and.
Evaluating Spatial, Temporal, and Clear-Sky Errors in Satellite CO 2 Measurements Katherine Corbin, A. Scott Denning, Ian Baker, Aaron Wang, Lixin Lu TransCom.
Andrew Schuh, Scott Denning, Marek Ulliasz Kathy Corbin, Nick Parazoo A Case Study in Regional Inverse Modeling.
Climatic changes in the last 200 years (Ch. 17 & 18) 1. Is it warming? --climate proxy info (recap) -- info from historical & instrumental records 2. What.
Atmospheric Research Inverting high temporal frequency data: latest results Rachel Law Peter Rayner, Ying-Ping Wang Law et al., GBC, 16(4), 1053, doi: /2001GB001593,
C CO CO 2 CO 2 ? CO 2 ! SiB-RAMS LPDM.
Modeling approach to regional flux inversions at WLEF Modeling approach to regional flux inversions at WLEF Marek Uliasz Department of Atmospheric Science.
1 Software: Hymodelc stable, without signs of premature terminations. Consider the latest bug fixes “serious” (i.e., meriting re-runs). Need to re-run.
FEW RESULTS LINKED TO INVERSE MODELING at LSCE - IAV comparison from 3 inversions - Impact of Obs. error correlations - How to define flux error correlations.
Modeling framework for estimation of regional CO2 fluxes using concentration measurements from a ring of towers Modeling framework for estimation of regional.
Andrew Schuh 1, Thomas Lauvaux 2,, Ken Davis 2, Marek Uliasz 1, Dan Cooley 1, Tristram West 3, Liza Diaz 2, Scott Richardson 2, Natasha Miles 2, F. Jay.
Interannual inversions with continuous data and recent inversions with the CSIRO CC model Rachel Law, CSIRO Atmospheric Research Another set of pseudodata.
Trends in Terrestrial Carbon Sinks Driven by Hydroclimatic Change since 1948: Data-Driven Analysis using FLUXNET Trends in Terrestrial Carbon Sinks Driven.
Near-Real Time Analysis of the Modern Carbon Cycle by Model-Data Fusion: Applying to ASCENDS Lots of help from Scott Denning, David Baker, Chris O’Dell,
Estimating Terrestrial Wood Biomass from Observed Concentrations of Atmospheric CO 2 Kevin Schaefer 1, Wouter Peters 2, Nuno Carvalhais 3, Guido van der.
Greenhouse gas fluxes derived from regional measurement networks and atmospheric inversions: Results from the MCI and INFLUX experiments Kenneth Davis.
Sharon M. Gourdji, K.L. Mueller, V. Yadav, A.E. Andrews, M. Trudeau, D.N. Huntzinger, A.Schuh, A.R. Jacobson, M. Butler, A.M. Michalak North American Carbon.
Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also.
Stephan F.J. De Wekker S. Aulenbach, B. Sacks, D. Schimel, B. Stephens, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder CO; T. Vukicevic,
CO over South America Modeling inter annual variability of biomass burning emissions Pim Hooghiemstra & Maarten Krol 28 November 2011 – TM meeting.
Indianapolis flux (INFLUX) in-situ network: quantification of urban atmospheric boundary layer greenhouse gas dry mole fraction enhancements 18 th WMO/IAEA.
The Big Picture To assess the Global Carbon Budget we need information that is ‘Everywhere, All of the Time’ Many Complementary Methods exist, Each with.
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS J28 Earth Science for National Action on Climate Change Canada Water Accounts AET estimates for.
Transport analysis and source attribution of the tropical CO seasonal and interannual variability in the UT/LS Junhua Liu and Jennifer Logan School of.
Natasha Miles, Scott Richardson, Arlyn Andrews, Kathy Corbin, Kenneth Davis, Liza Diaz, Scott Denning, Erandi Lokupitiya, Douglas Martins, Paul Shepson,
Integration of biosphere and atmosphere observations Yingping Wang 1, Gabriel Abramowitz 1, Rachel Law 1, Bernard Pak 1, Cathy Trudinger 1, Ian Enting.
P. K. Patra*, R. M. Law, W. Peters, C. Rodenbeck et al. *Frontier Research Center for Global Change/JAMSTEC Yokohama, Japan.
Toward a mesoscale flux inversion in the 2005 CarboEurope Regional Experiment T.Lauvaux, C. Sarrat, F. Chevallier, P. Ciais, M. Uliasz, A. S. Denning,
Quantification of anthropogenic emissions from an urban region: First results of time-integrated flask samples from the Indianapolis Flux Project (INFLUX)
Regional Flux Estimation using the Ring of Towers Scott Denning, Ken Davis, Scott Richardson, Marek Uliasz, Dusanka Zupanski, Kathy Corbin, Andrew Schuh,
A direct carbon budgeting approach to study CO 2 sources and sinks ICDC7 Broomfield, September 2005 C. Crevoisier 1 E. Gloor 1, J. Sarmiento 1, L.
Investigating Land-Atmosphere CO 2 Exchange with a Coupled Biosphere-Atmosphere Model: SiB3-RAMS K.D. Corbin, A.S. Denning, I. Baker, N. Parazoo, A. Schuh,
Forward and Inverse Modeling of Atmospheric CO 2 Scott Denning, Nick Parazoo, Kathy Corbin, Marek Uliasz, Andrew Schuh, Dusanka Zupanski, Ken Davis, and.
Wind Stress Data Products for Model Comparison 2012 ECCO Meeting California Institute of Technology David Moroni 10/31/12.
MCI Break-Out Coordination Time Lines Deliverables Topic Groups –Subregional intensive group –Top-down group –Bottom-up group.
Space-Time Variability in Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation Scott Denning, Peter Rayner, Dusanka Zupanski, Marek Uliasz, Nick Parazoo, Ravi Lokupitiya, Andrew.
Andrew Schuh 1, Thomas Lauvaux 2,, Ken Davis 2, Marek Uliasz 1, Dan Cooley 1, Tristram West 3, Liza Diaz 2, Scott Richardson 2, Natasha Miles 2, F. Jay.
Analysis of PBL Turbulent and Non-turbulent Fluxes M. Hicks 1, S. Kang 2, B. Demoz 1, E. Joseph 1, 1 Howard University, Washington, DC, USA 2 UCAR, Boulder,
Detection and Quantification of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Greenhouse Gas Dry Mole Fraction Enhancements from Urban Emissions: Results from INFLUX NOAA.
Andrew Schuh 1, Thomas Lauvaux 2,, Ken Davis 2, Marek Uliasz 1, Dan Cooley 1, Tristram West 3, Liza Diaz 2, Scott Richardson 2, Natasha Miles 2, F. Jay.
Cheas 2006 Meeting Marek Uliasz: Estimation of regional fluxes of CO 2 … Cheas 2006 Meeting Marek Uliasz: Estimation of regional fluxes of CO 2 …
Intercomparison of Mesoscale and Global Atmospheric Transport Models over Western Europe P. Ciais2), A.T. Vermeulen1), C. Geels3), P. Peylin2), M. Gloor4),
Using atmospheric radiocarbon ( 14 CO 2 ) to constrain North American fossil and biogenic CO 2 fluxes John B. Miller Scott Lehman, Arlyn Andrews, Colm.
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
Model-Data Comparison of Mid-Continental Intensive Field Campaign Atmospheric CO 2 Mixing Ratios Liza I. Díaz May 10, 2010.
Spatial Coherence of NEE Response of Different Ecosystems to the Same Climate Anomaly Martha Butler 1, Ken Davis 1, Peter Bakwin 2, David Hollinger 3,
Ring2.psu.edu Natasha Miles, Scott Richardson, Ken Davis, and Eric Crosson American Geophysical Union Annual Meeting 2008: 17 Dec 2008 Temporal and spatial.
Evaluating Local-scale CO 2 Meteorological Model Transport Uncertainty for the INFLUX Urban Campaign through the Use of Realistic Large Eddy Simulation.
Toward improved understanding of mass and property fluxes through Bering Strait Jaclyn Clement Kinney 1, Wieslaw Maslowski 1, Mike Steele 2, Jinlun Zhang.
Atmospheric Tracers and the Great Lakes
Linear and non-linear properties
March 21-22, University of Washington, Seattle
Presentation transcript:

MCI Inversion Comparisons

CarbonTracker vs MCI Inventory MAX CROP SIGNAL In general, looks pretty reasonable However, max crop signal might be reversed? CarbonTracker has little flexibility to adjust sub-ecoregion scale fluxes, even if fine spatial scale data is available. -350gCm -2 yr gCm -2 yr -1

SiB-CROP Prior NEE (TgC/deg 2 ) (June 1 – Dec 31, 2007) Posterior NEE (TgC/deg 2 ) (June 1 – Dec 31, 2007) Lauvaux et al (in prep) Notice the max C drawdown in prior is somewhat similarly placed (NW Iowa/SW MN) to CarbonTracker (CASA). The posterior appears to ‘spread’ out the crop signal as well as relocate the max C drawdown location to central/northern Illinois.

My inversion appears to capture the location of the maximum sink but can’t obtain the overall source/sink total for area Max sink less than 50% of max sink of inventory Strong efflux in SE GgC/0.5°

Posteriors Priors UMich 2008 CSU 2008 annual nee estimates for 2008 (GgC/gridcell) gC/m2?

Posteriors Priors UMich 2008 CSU 2008 annual nee estimates for 2008 (GgC/gridcell) Has corn belt been re-located? … probably not Something in CO2 records seem to point to anomalous fluxes to north of Iowa LAI anomaly in MODIS? Notes: inversions acting on long spatial scales, correction occurs OUTSIDE of Ring2, inventory more uncertain outside of corn belt,

Transport: Comparing infl functions

Comparison of integration of passive flux tracer between inversions, as function of distance from tower. This is sensitivity of afternoon observations to “daytime” fluxes (GPP>0)

A bit stronger signal coming in for SiBRAMS and implying possibly a stronger far-field signal

Nighttime obs, nighttime fluxes Nighttime obs, daytime fluxes Night time trapping

Integrating up to time series at towers General point is that my signal (blue) is somewhat stronger than Thomas’s signal (green) my far field effect (grey-blue), which is over 500 km from tower, comprises of a significant portion of the overall signal.

Spatially…

Interior Nudging effect? u,v winds

Interior Nudging effect? w winds

No smoking gun, where to go? Investigate sensitivity of LPDM to biases in vertical velocity (long distance effects) Best results so far are with short backwards integration time (a couple days) and CarbonTracker inflow. However, there are likely non-trivial far field flux contributions to towers and we know CT has positive bias. Reinvestigating SiB / RAMS surf energy interface (and co2 exchange) and trying to make more consistent