Testing the critical potential role of earth system science classes for STEM success in middle and high schools: A new NSF MSP effort William I Rose, Jacqueline.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Strengthening Institutional Commitment to STEM Teacher Preparation and STEM Education: Lessons Learned from The Leadership Collaborative (TLC). Miami,
The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
A DAY IN PRE-K CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT. Clarke County School District’s Vision Our vision is for all students to graduate as life-long learners.
Purpose of Instruction
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Barbara Miller Education Development Center Implementing a Teacher Leadership Program with Sustainability as a Goal: Lessons from Math/Science Partnerships.
Consequences of Changing the STEM Education Program We Shall Achieve.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’06 Institute Partnerships  Focus on:  Development of school-based intellectual leaders and.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Association of Science-Technology Annual Conference October 31-November 1, 2009 Session Leader: Diane LaFollette, Network Coordinator, Arkansas Discovery.
Oregon State Board of Education October 2012
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Aerospace Education Services Project (AESP) William S. Carlsen, Director Pennsylvania State University.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Cindy M. Walker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Development and Publication Earth System Science in the Community.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
Implementation of District- Wide Middle School Student Research Projects A Three Year Plan to Build Inquiry Skills and Create Sustained Vertical Articulation.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
A New Collaborative to Improve Broader Impacts Kevin Niemi, U. Wisconsin-Madison Kemi Jona, Northwestern U. Jane Horwitz, U. Penn
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Investigating K-12/University Partnerships: A Case Study Analysis Zulma Y. Méndez, Ph.D. Rodolfo Rincones, Ph.D. College of Education Department of Educational.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
K-12 Mathematics in Rapid City Longitudinal Findings from Project PRIME Ben Sayler & Susie Roth November 5, 2009.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 1 February 4-6, 2009 Dallas, TX.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Professional Development for High-Poverty Schools Joseph F. Johnson, Jr., Ph.D. MSP Conference January 10, 2007 Phoenix, AZ.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
1 Rossier School of Education Defining Excellence in Urban Education.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Broadening Participation through K-12 and Community Partnerships
WG 10: Research on Institutional Change and Faculty Professional Development, TA training Grand Challenge Goals How to most effectively/efficiently promote.
NJCU College of Education
THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

Testing the critical potential role of earth system science classes for STEM success in middle and high schools: A new NSF MSP effort William I Rose, Jacqueline Huntoon, Bradley Baltensperger and Kedmon Hungwe Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan We made earth system science the focus of a math and science partnership research proposal to NSF, something that apparently has not been tried before. Earth Science focus is a quite appropriate focus in our opinion because man’s motivation to develop math and science came originally from man’s desire to understand the earth and earth processes (eg Aristotle, Ptolemy) and because the central issue of the environmental future and sustainability of life on earth depends on earth system science investigations. Earth Science education has a badly neglected role in middle and secondary schools, but we believe it is now so critically needed that effective educational attention to it could result in more students that will see clearly that math and science are desperately needed to solve urgent and vital environmental problems. As the first course most students get in real science, if its focus can holistically address global warming and environmental quality and be made vital and compelling through inquiry based teaching, we believe it can motivate students to math and science. Lead Partner: Michigan Technological University Core Partner: Grand Rapids Public Schools (GRPS) Supporting Partners: Grand Rapids Area Pre-College Engineering Program (GRAPCEP), Midwest National Parks (NPS), Cass Technical High School, American Geological Institute (AGI), Grand Valley State University Geology Department, Kalamazoo Area Mathematics and Science Center Michigan Teaching Excellence Program (MITEP) is a multi-year program of teacher leadership development that empowers middle-grade science teachers to lead their schools and districts through the process of systematically improving science teaching and learning. The project uses Earth Systems Science (ESS) content and inquiry-based instructional practices to emphasize themes that unite all sciences and mathematics. MITEP includes both summer and academic-year components, and uses a variety of on-site, residential, field, distance, and in-service delivery methods. Components promote leadership skills, collaboration, urban place-based inquiry, access to cutting-edge data and materials, technology, engagement of diverse learners, study of key scientific concepts that cross disciplinary boundaries, pedagogical innovation. The project will also implement and test lessons and units that challenge students and prepare them for further science study. Teachers receive stipends and credit as incentive for participating in the project and testing its approach to reform. The project is based on the premise that successful reform depends on the full involvement of teachers who have the skills to lead their colleagues through the process of developing and implementing new instructional approaches. MITEP teacher-leaders and research university faculty are full partners in the process. Teacher-leaders are at the forefront of their schools' and district's efforts to evaluate, design, implement, and test new inquiry-based instructional programs. MITEP teacher-leaders help develop common pacing schedules and course assessments. They assist with planning professional development activities and providing ongoing assistance to colleagues. MITEP teacher-leaders are encouraged to disseminate information about the project through presentations at state and national conferences, to submit papers for publication. MODIS image, April 10, 2003 Isle Royale Rift axis Teacher-led reform is strongly supported by the administration of the core school district partner as an innovative way to generate enthusiasm for curricular and instructional change. To encourage development of leadership skills, school administrators give teacher- leaders progressively increased responsibility for strengthening curriculum, improving instructional strategies, and designing assessments. District administrators are providing the resources required for teachers' success in implementing and coordinating the project by assisting with the selection of teachers with exceptional leadership qualities for participation in MITEP; assisting in the design of professional development activities that meet the needs of teachers and their students; providing flexibility in teachers' schedules; utilizing middle-grade teachers' expertise in the dissemination of information to primary and high-school teachers; recognizing, rewarding, and encouraging teachers who serve as leaders; fostering growth of a teacher network; and creating a district-wide atmosphere that nurtures teacher-led reform efforts. Intellectual Merit: The ultimate goal of MITEP is to improve the quality of K-12 students’ science learning by increasing access to, participation in, and successful completion of challenging courses and curricula. MITEP focuses on 8 th -grade earth science, typically the first full science course taken by students. Middle school earth science teachers are in an ideal position to conceptualize and lead longitudinal curriculum reform efforts because they have the perspective necessary to ensure that childrens’ science education is appropriately scaffolded from the primary through the high school grades. MITEP is a potential model for nationwide science education reform because the evaluation results will provide data needed to demonstrate that teachers who have access to high-quality curricular materials, are skilled in inquiry-based instruction, and have collegial and collaborative relationships with content-area and pedagogical experts can be successful in leading change that results in improved student outcomes. Although this project focuses on earth science, the results of evaluation will serve to inform efforts in other disciplines because the basic structure of the project is not discipline- specific. Broader Impacts: Over the five project years, three cohorts of GRPS teachers (45-60 total) as well as other teachers who are not cohort members will be trained by MITEP. In year three, scale-up activities will begin as teachers associated with the Kalamazoo Area Mathematics and Science Center will join the GRPS teachers, forming a “double” cohort. Upon completion of the project, MITEP teachers will impact over 2,900 predominantly minority, middle-grade students each year. MITEP focuses on urban educational reform in an effort to address achievement gaps that exist in urban and predominantly minority or low-income school districts. Results will be disseminated widely through the Michigan Earth Science Teachers Association, the Michigan Science Teachers Association, the National Science Teachers Association, and the National Science Foundation’s dissemination network.