Models and Modeling in the High School Physics Classroom

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Physics-Chemistry-Biology: A Logical and Effective Sequence Rex P. Rice Clayton High School Clayton, Missouri.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
Mathematics in the MYP.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
As a result of activities in grades 9-12, all students should develop: abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry. understandings about science inquiry.
An Introduction to Modeling Instruction Mark Schober Columbia Secondary School, New York City Jeff Saul University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Investigations in Number, Data, and Space: Teaching Philosophy.
Planning Value of Planning What to consider when planning a lesson Learning Performance Structure of a Lesson Plan.
Copyright 2001 by Allyn and Bacon Social Cognitive and Constructivist Views of Learning: Chapter 9.
The Modeling Method of Physics Teaching Taken from the MM Web Site.
The Modeling Method of Instruction for Science and Mathematics Arizona State University Modeling Method Web Site.
Integrating Initiatives Module 5 Presenters: Dr. Regina Cohn Dr. Robert Greenberg.
Status and Plans for Professional Development in Modeling in Indiana in Physics, Chemistry and Biology Gordon Berry, Physics Department University of Notre.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
Grade 1 Mathematics in the K to 12 Curriculum Soledad Ulep, PhD UP NISMED.
Physics Curriculum Projects Modeling Method Active Physics Comprehensive Conceptual Curriculum for Physics (C 3 P) Constructing Physics Understanding (CPU)
The 5 E Instructional Model
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 2: Matching Clusters of Standards to Critical Areas in one.
Introductions Tell your neighbor about one memorable event that happened this year during one of your ISI kit lessons.
Meaningful Social Studies & Meaningful Learning
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
Models and Modeling in the High School Physics Classroom.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
Moving to LDC in Chemistry. What is LDC? An Instructional Framework that builds in the instructional shifts that move us toward common Core Implementation.
2014 Mathematics Institutes Grade Band: High School Algebra 1.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
Copyright © Pearson Allyn & Bacon 2009 Chapter 5: What Inquiry Methods Help Learners To Construct Understanding? Teaching Science for All Children An Inquiry.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
Engaging Learners and Realizing the Development of Mathematical Practices ALM Conference July 15, 2015 Trena L. Wilkerson Professor, Mathematics Education.
Models and Modeling in the High School Chemistry Classroom
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
TEA Science Workshop #3 October 1, 2012 Kim Lott Utah State University.
SOL Changes and Preparation A parent presentation.
Science Pacing and Content Grade 3 Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor 8/9-8/16/101.
RAKESS PYP Mathematics Parents’ Evening February 1 st, 2010.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
1 Science as a Process Chapter 1 Section 2. 2 Objectives  Explain how science is different from other forms of human endeavor.  Identify the steps that.
Science Pacing and Content Earth Space Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor 8/9-8/16/101.
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
The Evolution of ICT-Based Learning Environments: Which Perspectives for School of the Future? Reporter: Lee Chun-Yi Advisor: Chen Ming-Puu Bottino, R.
An Introduction to the Cycles of Modeling Mark Schober John Burroughs School, St. Louis, Mo. Hilary Haugen California High School, San Ramon Matt Greenwolfe.
Process & Inquiry Skills: Scientists in EC Classrooms CDAEYC Annual Meeting May 19, 2015 Albany, New York.
Science and Engineering Practices: Models and Argumentation “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
1 A Modeling Approach to Science Teaching Nicholas Park Greenhill School.
National Research Council Of the National Academies
3D Science Research Based Science Education Ricky Scott K-12 Science Education Specialist Utah State Office of Education.
How to Apply it in the Classroom Elicit ideas Elaboration & Reconstruc- tion Frequent problem based activities Variety of info. & resources Collaboration.
Preparing for NGSS: Analyzing and Interpreting Data Add your information here:
WELCOME HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATORS Help yourself to breakfast. Please have a seat in a desk with your subject-specific materials. Introduce yourself to the.
Key Ideas In Content Math 412 January 14, The Content Standards Number and Operations Algebra Geometry Measurement Data Analysis and Probability.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Principles to Actions Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices The Case of Wobberson Torchon and the Calling Plans 1 Task Algebra I Principles to Actions.
Why Change How We Teach?. 2 The “Modeling Chemistry” Approach to Science Teaching Cheryl Litman.
Conceptual Change Theory
5 E’s - Instructional Model
Models and Modeling in the High School Physics Classroom
Modeling Instruction in the High School Physics Classroom
Models and Modeling in the High School Chemistry Classroom
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
SCIENCE DEPARTMENT CURRICULUM NIGHT
Common Core State Standards Standards for Mathematical Practice
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES
Teaching Science for Understanding
Presentation transcript:

Models and Modeling in the High School Physics Classroom Larry Dukerich Modeling Instruction Program Arizona State University Dobson HS - Mesa, AZ We’re here to tell you about the Modeling Method of instruction: developed in a collaborative effort by Malcolm Wells, a HS teacher and David Hestenes, prof of physics at ASU. These are the folks who developed the FCI and MB test which appearedin Mar 92 TPT. The MM, using results of physics education research attemprs to match instructional design to the way we believe students learn

The Problem with Traditional Instruction It presumes two kinds of knowledge: facts and knowhow. Facts and ideas are things that can be packaged into words and distributed to students. Knowhow can be packaged as rules or procedures. We come to understand the structure and behavior of real objects only by constructing models. First some background on what is the problem with conventional instruction. p1 Leads to marketing model of education: researchers and university professors as producers , HS teachers as retailers, and students as consumers of knowledge. p2

“Teaching by Telling” is Ineffective Students usually miss the point of what we tell them. Key words or concepts do not elicit the same “schema” for students as they do for us. Watching the teacher solve problems does not improve student problem-solving skills. Our students don't share our background, so key words, which conjure up complex relationships between diagrams, strategies, mathematical models mean little to them. To us, the phrase inclined plane conjures up a complex set of pictures, diagrams, and problem-solving strategies. To the students, it's a board. All my careful solutions of problems at the board simply made ME a better problem-solver.

Memorization vs Understanding What does it mean when students can readily solve the quantitative problem at left, yet not answer the conceptual question at right? For the circuit above, determine the current in the 4 W resistor and the potential difference between P and Q. Bulbs A, B and C are identical. What happens to the brightness of bulbs A and B when switch S is closed?

Instructional Objectives Construct and use scientific models to describe, to explain, to predict and to control physical phenomena. Model physical objects and processes using diagrammatic, graphical and algebraic representations. Small set of basic models as the content core of physics. Evaluate scientific models through comparison with empirical data. Modeling as the procedural core of scientific knowledge. What should we teach? Our students should learn to do the following: They should see that physics involves learning to use a small set of models, rather than mastering an endless string of seemingly unrelated topics.

Why modeling?! To make students’ classroom experience closer to the scientific practice of physicists. To make the coherence of scientific knowledge more evident to students by making it more explicit. Construction and testing of math models is a central activity of research physicists. Models and Systems are explicitly recognized as major unifying ideas for all the sciences by the AAAS Project 2061 for the reform of US science education. Robert Karplus made systems and models central to the SCIS elementary school science curriculum. Emphasis on points 1 and 2.

Models vs Problems The problem with problem-solving Students come to see problems and their answers as the units of knowledge. Students fail to see common elements in novel problems. “But we never did a problem like this!” Models as basic units of knowledge A few basic models are used again and again with only minor modifications. Students identify or create a model and make inferences from the model to produce a solution. We use the ability to solve problems as a means for evaluating our students’ understanding. But our students come to see problems and their answers as the essential units of knowledge. They call for us to show them as many examples as possible and pray that the test has problems like the ones they saw. How do novices solve problems? They reach into their gunny sack of equation and find one with nearly the same variables. How do experts solve problems? They start by drawing a diagram.

What Do We Mean by Model? This word is used in many ways. The physical system is objective; i.e., open to inspection by everyone. Each one of us attempts to make sense of it through the use of metaphors. Unfortunately, there is no way to peek into another’s mind to view their physical intuition. Instead, we are forced to make external symbolic representations; we can reach consensus on the way to do this, and judge the fidelity of one’s mental picture by the kinds of representations they make. So the structure of a model is distributed over these various representations; later we’ll provide some specific examples. with explicit statements of the relationships between these representations

Multiple Representations Multiple representations. We all use them, but before I began to use this method, I didn't make the connection between the features of the various representation explicit. with explicit statements describing relationships

constructivist vs transmissionist How to Teach it? constructivist vs transmissionist cooperative inquiry vs lecture/demonstration student-centered vs teacher-centered active engagement vs passive reception student activity vs teacher demonstration student articulation vs teacher presentation lab-based vs textbook-based Here are the key ways in which the modeling method differs from conventional instruction. Students present solutions to problems which they have to defend, rather than listen to clear presentations from the instructor. The instructor, by paying attention to student’s reasoning, can judge the level of student understanding.

I - Model Development Students in cooperative groups design and perform experiments. use computers to collect and analyze data. formulate functional relationship between variables. evaluate “fit” to data. Instead of following a set of pre-determined instructions, students devise their own procedures. (collectively, with guidance?) Computers are used in the collection and analysis of data - a novel use when you consider what students ordinarily use computers for is word-processing or tutorial activities. All of the kinematic equations we use in mechanics come from experimental results.

I - Model Development Post-lab analysis whiteboard presentation of student findings multiple representations verbal diagrammatic graphical algebraic justification of conclusions Students articulate their findings to their peers using white boards. We all know that the first time we really learned a topic was when we had to prepare to teach it. Giving our students the same opportunity allows them to work out the details clearly in their minds.

Preparing Whiteboard

Making Presentation

II - Model Deployment In post-lab extension, the instructor brings closure to the experiment. fleshes out details of the model, relating common features of various representations. helps students to abstract the model from the context in which it was developed. Instructor reinforces what students have learned in the lab, points out essential features of the model, and demonstrates appropriate modeling techniques.

II - Model Deployment In deployment activities, students learn to apply model to variety of related situations. identify system composition accurately represent its structure articulate their understanding in oral presentations. Students get to apply model to a variety of situations. They develop confidence because they realize there is NOT a separate approach to each situation. Instructor elicits thorough explanation from presenters, encourages students to appeal to a model for justification of their claims, and brings students to confront their misconceptions. Instructor is no longer the source of explanations or the final authority. are guided by instructor's questions: Why did you do that? How do you know that?

II - Model Deployment Objectives: Ultimate Objective: to improve the quality of scientific discourse. move toward progressive deepening of student understanding of models and modeling with each pass through the modeling cycle. get students to see models everywhere! Ultimate Objective: autonomous scientific thinkers fluent in all aspects of conceptual and mathematical modeling.