Lecture 17: Continuous-Time Transfer Functions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Signal Processing in the Discrete Time Domain Microprocessor Applications (MEE4033) Sogang University Department of Mechanical Engineering.
Advertisements

Laplace Transform (1).
Lecture 3: Signals & Systems Concepts
Lecture 7: Basis Functions & Fourier Series
Leo Lam © Signals and Systems EE235 Lecture 16.
Familiar Properties of Linear Transforms
EE-2027 SaS 06-07, L11 1/12 Lecture 11: Fourier Transform Properties and Examples 3. Basis functions (3 lectures): Concept of basis function. Fourier series.
Chapter 7 Laplace Transforms. Applications of Laplace Transform notes Easier than solving differential equations –Used to describe system behavior –We.
EE-2027 SaS, L13 1/13 Lecture 13: Inverse Laplace Transform 5 Laplace transform (3 lectures): Laplace transform as Fourier transform with convergence factor.
Lecture 19: Discrete-Time Transfer Functions
Lecture 16: Continuous-Time Transfer Functions
EE-2027 SaS, L15 1/15 Lecture 15: Continuous-Time Transfer Functions 6 Transfer Function of Continuous-Time Systems (3 lectures): Transfer function, frequency.
EE-2027 SaS, L11/7 EE-2027 Signals and Systems Dr Martin Brown E1k, Main Building
Lecture 8: Fourier Series and Fourier Transform
Lecture 14: Laplace Transform Properties
EE-2027 SaS, L11 1/13 Lecture 11: Discrete Fourier Transform 4 Sampling Discrete-time systems (2 lectures): Sampling theorem, discrete Fourier transform.
Lecture 9: Fourier Transform Properties and Examples
EE-2027 SaS, L18 1/12 Lecture 18: Discrete-Time Transfer Functions 7 Transfer Function of a Discrete-Time Systems (2 lectures): Impulse sampler, Laplace.
Lecture 6: Linear Systems and Convolution
9.0 Laplace Transform 9.1 General Principles of Laplace Transform linear time-invariant Laplace Transform Eigenfunction Property y(t) = H(s)e st h(t)h(t)
Lecture 12: Laplace Transform
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Loop Transfer Function Real Imaginary.
Leo Lam © Signals and Systems EE235 Lecture 31.
Leo Lam © Signals and Systems EE235. Leo Lam © Merry Christmas! Q: What is Quayle-o-phobia? A: The fear of the exponential (e).
EE513 Audio Signals and Systems Digital Signal Processing (Systems) Kevin D. Donohue Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Kentucky.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition EE 3512 – Signals: Continuous and Discrete Objectives: Stability and the s-Plane Stability of an RC Circuit 1 st and 2 nd.
10.0 Z-Transform 10.1 General Principles of Z-Transform linear, time-invariant Z-Transform Eigenfunction Property y[n] = H(z)z n h[n]h[n] x[n] = z n.
University of Khartoum -Signals and Systems- Lecture 11
EE3010 SaS, L7 1/19 Lecture 7: Linear Systems and Convolution Specific objectives for today: We’re looking at continuous time signals and systems Understand.
CISE315 SaS, L171/16 Lecture 8: Basis Functions & Fourier Series 3. Basis functions: Concept of basis function. Fourier series representation of time functions.
Signal and Systems Prof. H. Sameti Chapter 9: Laplace Transform  Motivatio n and Definition of the (Bilateral) Laplace Transform  Examples of Laplace.
Lecture 24: CT Fourier Transform
ME375 Handouts - Spring 2002 MESB System Modeling and Analysis System Stability and Steady State Response.
CHAPTER 4 Laplace Transform.
CHAPTER 4 Laplace Transform.
Signals and Systems Fall 2003 Lecture #17 4 November Motivation and Definition of the (Bilateral) Laplace Transform 2. Examples of Laplace Transforms.
Signal and Systems Prof. H. Sameti Chapter 9: Laplace Transform  Motivatio n and Definition of the (Bilateral) Laplace Transform  Examples of Laplace.
Chapter 6 The Laplace Transform and the Transfer Function Representation.
Course Outline (Tentative) Fundamental Concepts of Signals and Systems Signals Systems Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) Systems Convolution integral and sum.
MESB374 Chapter8 System Modeling and Analysis Time domain Analysis Transfer Function Analysis.
ES97H Biomedical Signal Processing
Signal and System I Analysis and characterization of the LTI system using the Laplace transform Causal ROC associate with a causal system is a right-half.
Subsea Control and Communications Systems
Signal and Systems Prof. H. Sameti Chapter 10: Introduction to the z-Transform Properties of the ROC of the z-Transform Inverse z-Transform Examples Properties.
SURF 2015 lecture: Jun 24, 2015 Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
Chapter 7 The Laplace Transform
Meiling chensignals & systems1 Lecture #06 Laplace Transform.
Course Outline (Tentative) Fundamental Concepts of Signals and Systems Signals Systems Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) Systems Convolution integral and sum.
4. Introduction to Signal and Systems
Motivation for the Laplace Transform
Signals and Systems Fall 2003 Lecture #19 18 November CT System Function Properties 2.System Function Algebra and Block Diagrams 3.Unilateral Laplace.
Dr. Tamer Samy Gaafar Lec. 2 Transfer Functions & Block Diagrams.
The Fourier series handles steady-state sinusoidal functions, but does not have the ability to model transients effectively. As we have seen, the Fourier.
ENEE 322: Continuous-Time Fourier Transform (Chapter 4)
Math for CS Fourier Transforms
Lecture 7: Basis Functions & Fourier Series
EE4262: Digital and Non-Linear Control
Lecture 24 Outline: Circuit Analysis, Inverse, LTI Systems
Lecture 25 Outline: LTI Systems: Causality, Stability, Feedback
Transfer Functions.
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Feedback Control Systems (FCS)
Signal and Systems Chapter 9: Laplace Transform
Signals and Systems EE235 Lecture 31 Leo Lam ©
9.0 Laplace Transform 9.1 General Principles of Laplace Transform
Signals and Systems Revision Lecture 1
Transfer Function and Stability of LTI Systems
10.0 Z-Transform 10.1 General Principles of Z-Transform Z-Transform
CHAPTER 4 Laplace Transform. EMT Signal Analysis.
Lecture 3: Signals & Systems Concepts
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 17: Continuous-Time Transfer Functions 6 Transfer Function of Continuous-Time Systems (3 lectures): Transfer function, frequency response, Bode diagram. Physical realisability, stability. Poles and zeros, rubber sheet analogy. Specific objectives for today: System causality & transfer functions System stability & transfer functions Structures of sub-systems – series and feedback EE-2027 SaS, L17

Lecture 17: Resources Core material SaS, O&W, 9.2, 9.7, 9.8 Background material MIT Lectures 9, 12 and 19 EE-2027 SaS, L17

Review: Transfer Functions, Frequency Response & Poles and Zeros H(jw) The system’s transfer function is the Laplace (Fourier) transform of the system’s impulse response H(s) (H(jw)). The transfer function’s poles and zeros are H(s)Pi(s-zi)/Pj(s-pi). This enables us to both calculate (from the differential equations) and analyse a system’s response Frequency response magnitude/phase decomposition H(jw) = |H(jw)|ejH(jw) Bode diagrams are a log/log plot of this information EE-2027 SaS, L17

System Causality & Transfer Functions Remember, a system is causal if y(t) only depends on x(t), dx(t)/dt,…,x(t-T) where T>0 This is equivalent to saying that an LTI system’s impulse is h(t) = 0 whenever t<0. Theorem The ROC associated with the (Laplace) transfer function of a causal system is a right-half plane Note the converse is not necessarily true (but is true for a rational transfer function) Proof By definition, for a causal system, s0ROC: If this converges for s0, then consider any s1>s0 so s1ROC s-plane Im x Re s=jw EE-2027 SaS, L17

Examples: System Causality Consider the (LTI 1st order) system with an impulse response This has a transfer function (Laplace transform) and ROC The transfer function is rational and the ROC is a right half plane. The corresponding system is causal. Consider the system with an impulse response The system transfer function and ROC The ROC is not the right half plane, so the system is not causal EE-2027 SaS, L17

System Stability Remember, a system is stable if , which is equivalent to bounded input signal => bounded output This is equivalent to saying that an LTI system’s impulse is |h(t)|dt<. Theorem An LTI system is stable if and only if the ROC of H(s) includes the entire jw axis, i.e. Re{s} = 0. Proof The transfer function ROC includes the “axis”, s=jw along which the Fourier transform has finite energy Example The following transfer function is stable s-plane Im x Re s=jw EE-2027 SaS, L17

Causal System Stability Theorem A causal system with rational system function H(s) is stable if and only if all of the poles of H(s) lie in the left-half plane of s, i.e. they have negative real parts Proof Just combine the two previous theorems Example Note that the poles of H(s) correspond to the powers of the exponential response in the time domain. If the real part is negative, they exponential responses decay => stability. Also, the Fourier transform will exist and the imaginary axis lies in the ROC s-plane Im x x -2 -1 Re s=jw EE-2027 SaS, L17

LTI Differential Equation Systems Physical and electrical systems are causal Most physical and electrical systems dissipate energy, they are stable. The natural state is “at rest” unless some input/excitation signal is applied to the system When performing analogue (continuous time) system design, the aim is to produce a time-domain “differential equation” which can then be translated to a known system (electrical circuit …) This is often done in the frequency domain, which may/may not produce a causal, stable, time-domain differential equation. Example: low pass filter w H(jw) wc -wc EE-2027 SaS, L17

Structures of Sub-Systems How to combine transfer functions H1(s) and H2(s) to get input output transfer function Y(s) = H(s)X(s)? Series/cascade Design H2() to cancel out the effects of H1() Feedback Design H2() to regulate y(t) to x(t), so H()=1 System 1 System 2 x y System 1 x y + - System 2 EE-2027 SaS, L17

Series Cascade & Feedback Proofs Proof of Series Cascade transfer function Proof of Feedback transfer function x w y H1(s) H2(s) y x + H1(s) - w H2(s) EE-2027 SaS, L17

Example: Cascaded 1st Order Systems Consider two cascaded LTI first order systems The result of cascading two first order systems is a second order system. However, the roots of this quadratic are purely real (assuming a and b are real), so the output is not oscillatory, as would be the case with complex roots. x w y H1(s) H2(s) EE-2027 SaS, L17

Example: Feedback Control The idea of feedback is central for control (next semester) The aim is to design the controller C(s), such that the closed loop response, Y(s), has particular characteristics The plant P(s) is the physical/electrical system (transfer function of differential equation) that must be controlled by the signal u(t) The aim is to regulate the plant’s response y(t) so that it follows the demand signal x(t) The error e(t)=x(t)-y(t) gives an idea of the tracking performance Real-world example Control an aircraft’s ailerons so that it follows a particular trajectory C(s) x(t) P(s) e(t) u(t) y(t) + - EE-2027 SaS, L17

Example Continued … High Gain Feedback Simple control scheme (high gain feedback), C(s)=k>>0 u(t) = ke(t) For this controller, the system’s response as desired, when k is extremely large The controller can be an operational amplifier While this is a simple controller, it can have some disadvantages. EE-2027 SaS, L17

Lecture 17: Summary System properties such as stability, causality, … can be interpreted in terms of the time domain (lecture 3), impulse response (lecture 6) or transfer function (this lecture). For system causality the ROC must be a right-half plane For system stability, the ROC must include the jw axis For causal stability, the ROC must include Re{s}>-e We can use the block transfer notation to calculate the transfer functions of serial, parallel and feedback systems. Often the aim is to design a sub-system so that the overall transfer function has particular properties EE-2027 SaS, L17

Exercises Theory Prove the closed loop transfer function on Slide 12 SaS, O&W, 9.15, 9.16, 9.17, 9.18 Matlab Verify the cascaded response on Slide 11 in Simulink, by cascading two first order models and comparing the response with the equivalent 2nd order model (i.e. pick values for a and b (which are not equal)), NB the Continuous-System Simulink notation is of the form 1/s, s, 1/(s+a), I.e. the system blocks can be expressed as transfer functions and they can be chained together which just multiplies the individual transfer functions. EE-2027 SaS, L17