An Online Calorimeter Trigger for Removing Outsiders from Particle Beam CalibrationTests Denis O. Damazio José Manoel de Seixas Signal Processing Lab –

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Introduction This project used cosmic rays to test a prototype Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillator (MBTS) that will be used in the ATLAS experiment at CERN.
Status of DHCAL Slice Test Data Analysis Lei Xia ANL-HEP All results preliminary.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Peter Speckmayer, LCWS2010, Beijing 1P. Speckmayer, LCWS2010, Beijing3/27/2010.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
Interactions of hadrons in the SiW ECAL (CAN-025) Philippe Doublet - LAL Roman Pöschl, François Richard - LAL CALICE Meeting at Casablanca, September 22nd.
A segmented principal component analysis applied to calorimetry information at ATLAS ACAT May 22-27, Zeuthen, Germany H. P. Lima Jr, J. M. de Seixas.
Pascal PERRODO, ATLAS-LAPP
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
Single Particle Energy Resolution Vishnu V. Zutshi.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
DSP online algorithms for the ATLAS TileCal Read Out Drivers Cristobal Cuenca Almenar IFIC (University of Valencia-CSIC)
A preliminary analysis of the CALICE test beam data Dhiman Chakraborty, NIU for the CALICE Collaboration LCWS07, Hamburg, Germany May 29 - June 3, 2007.
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
05/11/2006Prof. dr hab. Elżbieta Richter-Wąs Physics Program of the experiments at L arge H adron C ollider Lecture 5.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
Hadron Calorimeter Readout Electronics Calibration, Hadron Calorimeter Scintillator Upgrade, and Missing Transverse Momentum Resolution due to Pileup Zishuo.
Tracking within hadronic showers in the SDHCAL Imad Laktineh.
Status of Atlas Tile Calorimeter and Study of Muon Interactions L. Price for TileCal community Short Overview of the TileCal Project mechanics instrumentation.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
Jiawen Zhang, IHEP, 2008, April 10, frascati Status of BEPCII/BESIII and Physics preparation Jiawen Zhang 2008/4/7—10 , PHIPSI08, Frascati.
Status of Projectile Spectator Detector A.Kurepin (Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow) I. Introduction to PSD. II. Conception and design. III. Development.
The CALICE Si-W ECAL - physics prototype 2012/Apr/25 Tamaki Yoshioka (Kyushu University) Roman Poschl (LAL Orsay)
The Forward Liquid Argon Calorimeter of the ATLAS Detector Geant4 Workshop' September. Triumf, Vancouver Patricia Méndez Lorenzo. CERN EP/SFT 1.
1 A ROOT Tool for 3D Event Visualization in ATLAS Calorimeters Luciano Andrade José de Seixas Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/COPPE.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
The Atlas Tile Calorimeter Muon Studies at 90° Presented at CERN by Michael Borysow for the University of Michigan REU Program 14/08/03.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
CMS Calorimeter HB- HB+ HE- HE+ HF- HF+ HO-2 HO-1 HO0 HO+1 HO+2
Călin Alexa, CERN, July /8 ATLAS Tilecal: pion – proton comparison C. Alexa, S. Constantinescu, S. Dita 2002 test-beam data QGSP 2.7 LHEP 3.6 Groom.
EXAMINATION OF CORRUPTED DATA IN THE TILE CALORIMETER Stephanie Hamilton Michigan State University The ATLAS Collaboration Supervisor: Irene Vichou (U.
January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:
8/18/2004E. Monnier - CPPM - ICHEP04 - Beijing1 Atlas liquid argon calorimeter status E. Monnier on behalf of the Atlas liquid argon calorimeter group.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.
ATLAS Tile Hadronic Calorimeter:
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Performance of Shower Maximum Detectors Saori Itoh (Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group (KEK,Kobe,Konan,Niigata,Shinshu,Tsukuba) Introduction Detector.
The ATLAS Tiles Hadronic Calorimeter
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
The ATLAS Electromagnetic and Hadronic End-Cap Calorimeter in a Combined Beam Test Tamara Hughes University of Victoria WRNPPC 2004.
Test Beam Results on the ATLAS Electromagnetic Calorimeters Lucia Di Ciaccio – LAPP Annecy (on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group) OUTLINE Description of the.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
Muon Detectors Tile Calorimeter Liquid Argon Calorimeter Solenoid Magnet Toroid Magnets 46m 22m SemiConductor Tracker(SCT) Pixel Detector Transition Radiation.
DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
CALICE scintillator HCAL
Individual Particle Reconstruction
IX International Workshop ACAT
Comparison between Geant4, Fluka and the TileCal test-beam data
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams
Reports for highly granular hadron calorimeter using software compensation techniques Bing Liu SJTU February 25, 2019.
Dual readout calorimeter for CepC
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Status of CEPC HCAL Optimization Study in Simulation LIU Bing On behalf the CEPC Calorimeter working group.
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Presentation transcript:

An Online Calorimeter Trigger for Removing Outsiders from Particle Beam CalibrationTests Denis O. Damazio José Manoel de Seixas Signal Processing Lab – LPS COPPE-EE

Outline Introduction Outsiders Results Conclusions

Introduction Attempting to search deeper in the matter, CERN is now preparing a new proton to proton collider, the LHC. The LHC will be colliding bunches of particles at 14 TeV. For operating at LHC conditions, the ATLAS detector is presently being built.

Introduction The ATLAS detector relies very much on the calorimeter system, which comprises hadronic (Tilecal) and e.m. (Liquid Argon) sections. The Tilecal prototyping is finished and the detector modules are being constructed.

Introduction Tilecal is split into a central section (Barrel) and two lateral sections (Extended Barrels). Tilecal is made of iron (absorber) and scintillating tile (active). Detector segmentation comprises 3 sampling layers, which produce 92(Barrel)/56(EB) signals.

Introduction A fraction of the modules is calibrated using particle beams. Despite beam quality, contamination is unavoidable.  pions and muons for electron beam selection.  muons in pion beam selection

Introduction Classically, contamination (outsiders) is removed offline, using both calorimeter and auxiliary detectors information. In terms of beam period efficiency, it would be attractive to remove outsiders online (shorter acquisition time periods).

Introduction Neural networks may use the detailed energy deposition profiles furnished by Tilecal to accomplish this online task. Online training Neural networks  Efficient for pattern recognition problems.  Easy to implement digitally.  high-speed processing

Introduction The online neural system used in the September/ 2001 testbeam was running in the Read-Out Driver Crate. Data are fetched from the Rod, normalized (by the total energy) and feed the NN. The NN response is added to the event data structure (as Status Word).

Introduction The neural network was a feed-forward fully conected network and was trained with the supervised backpropagation algorithm. Data coming from the beam line, was kept in a circular buffer to be used for training. New events substitute older ones. Using multithread processing, one thread trained the network, while the other just answered to incoming events. This assures fast response and fast training.

Introduction The methodology was divided in three steps : 1) Muon events are acquired to form the profile pattern for this particle. 2) Pion events (with outsider muons) begin to be acquired. A network to descriminate between these two particle is trained. 3) Electron events (with outsider pions and muons) begin to be acquired. Another network is trained to discriminate between these three particle types.

Online Results " The online test was perfomed in the second phase (pion/muon) of the methodology, with 180 GeV pions. " Most of the identified pions were close to their target (1). " Outsiders are in the muon target (-1).

Online Results The correlation between NN and energy cut shows that the technique works, although some pion events seem to be mixed with muons.

Online Results

The pions classified as muons have a muon like profile. Only an energy reference may allow discrimination. Thus, being independent in energy (normalizing by the total energy) produces this bias (pions penetrating deeply in the calorimeter may not be detected.

Online Results " Alternate approach: Ein = Ein SQRT(| Et |) " Energy dependence is introduced to eliminate the bias.

Online Results Is there any bias in the data now?!

Online Results - Barrel Comparison between the normalization by the total energy (left) and square root (right). 20 GeV.

Online Results - Barrel Comparison between the normalization by the total energy (left) and square root (right). 100 GeV.

Online Results - Barrel Comparison between the normalization by the total energy (left) and square root (right). 180 GeV.

Global Parameters Study Barrel Bellow is the evaluation of the parameters of the distributions for the different methodologies.

Cherenkov Counter The Cherenkov counter can be used to help discriminating between electrons and pion This helps to validate the NN system when electron-pion-muon separation is of concern.

Electron-pion-muon separation - 20 GeV Agreement with both energy cut and Cherenkov counter. NN trained with data normalized by the sum of energy (left) and square root (right).

Electron-pion separation

Preliminary Results Electrons x Muons analysis

Preliminary Results

Electrons x Pions analysis

Preliminary Results

Conclusions An online neural network trigger was tested during Tilecal testbeam calibration period. The system was running the pion-muon discrimination. Due to the normalization applied (energy independent), the system was introducing some bias in the pion data. Analysis suggested the usage of SQRT(|Et|) as normalization factor to eliminate such bias. This introduces energy dependency. Global calorimeter performance was insensitive to NN cut. Preliminary results for electron-pion and electron-muon discrimination showed alternative ways for online trigger. The event rate was around 2200 events/spill, which meets the speed requirements. A peak on 5502 was registered.