MULTIPLE PREDICTION & ATTENUATION Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb. 2004 Feb. 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb. 2003
Advertisements

Multiple Removal with Local Plane Waves
Introduction to GeoProbe
Processing: zero-offset gathers
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Specular-Ray Parameter Extraction and Stationary Phase Migration Jing Chen University of Utah.
Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
TARGET-ORIENTED LEAST SQUARES MIGRATION Zhiyong Jiang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Interferometric Prediction and Least Squares Subtraction of Surface Waves Shuqian Dong and Ruiqing He University of Utah.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu, GXT Bob Estill, Unocal Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Gerard T. Schuster, University of Utah.
Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction.
Improve Migration Image Quality by 3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Arbitrary Parameter Extraction, Stationary Phase Migration, and Tomographic Velocity Analysis Jing Chen University of Utah.
Wavefield Prediction of Water-layer Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Oct Oct
FAST VELOCITY ANALYSIS BY PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 Quality Factor Inversion from Prestack CMP data using EPIF Matching Jing Zhao, Jinghuai Gao Institute of Wave and Information,
LEAST-SQUARES MIGRATION OF BOTH PRIMARIES AND MULTIPLES Ruiqing He, Gerard Schuster University of Utah Oct
Youli Quan & Jerry M. Harris
Midyear Overview of Year 2001 UTAM Results T. Crosby, Y. Liu, G. Schuster, D. Sheley, J. Sheng, H. Sun, J. Yu and M. Zhou J. Yu and M. Zhou.
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Applications of Time-Domain Multiscale Waveform Tomography to Marine and Land Data C. Boonyasiriwat 1, J. Sheng 3, P. Valasek 2, P. Routh 2, B. Macy 2,
Imaging Every Bounce in a Multiple G. Schuster, J. Yu, R. He U of Utah.
Imaging of diffraction objects using post-stack reverse-time migration
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
3-D Migration Deconvolution: Real Examples Jianhua Yu University of Utah Bob Estill Unocal.
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: P-to-S Converted Wave Case Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Crosscorrelation Migration of Free-Surface Multiples in RVSP Data Jianming Sheng University of Utah February, 2001.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution in Common Offset Domain Jianxing Hu University of Utah.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
3D Tomography using Efficient Wavefront Picking of Traveltimes Abdullah AlTheyab and G. T. Schuster King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
Topographic Phase Shift with Applications to Migration and Multiple Prediction Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb
An Efficient Multiscale Method for Time-Domain Waveform Tomography C. Boonyasiriwat 1, P. Valasek 2, P. Routh 2, W. Cao 1, G.T. Schuster 1, and B. Macy.
Attribute- Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation 3D CONSTRAINED LEAST-SQUARES KIRCHHOFF PRESTACK TIME MIGRATION Alejandro.
Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data J. Sheng, G. T. Schuster, K. L. Pankow,
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Wave-equation migration Wave-equation migration of reflection seismic data to produce images of the subsurface entails four basic operations: Summation.
Physical Modeling: Time Lapse, 3D, and VSP Robert W. Wiley Allied Geophysical Laboratories University of Houston.
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Migration Velocity Analysis 01. Outline  Motivation Estimate a more accurate velocity model for migration Tomographic migration velocity analysis 02.
Signal Analysis and Imaging Group Department of Physics University of Alberta Regularized Migration/Inversion Henning Kuehl (Shell Canada) Mauricio Sacchi.
AUTOMATON A Fuzzy Logic Automatic Picker Paul Gettings 1 UTAM 2003 Annual Meeting 1 Thermal Geophysics Research Group, University of Utah.
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Interferometric Traveltime Tomography M. Zhou & G.T. Schuster Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Bob Estill ( Unocal) Jianhua Yu (University of Utah)
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
Raanan Dafni,  PhD in Geophysics (Tel-Aviv University)  Paradigm R&D ( )  Post-Doc (Rice University) Current Interest: “Wave-equation based.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 10 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Seismic Reflection Travel-Time Cont’d Dix Equations for multiple layers:
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Efficient modeling and imaging of pegleg multiples Morgan Brown and Antoine Guitton Stanford University, Department of Geophysics Multiples can be bad…
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
WAVEFIELD PREDICTION OF WATER-LAYER-MULTIPLES
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Accuracy of the internal multiple prediction when the angle constraints method is applied to the ISS internal multiple attenuation algorithm. Hichem Ayadi.
Source wavelet effects on the ISS internal multiple leading-order attenuation algorithm and its higher-order modification that accommodate issues that.
Some remarks on the leading order imaging series
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
LSMF for Suppressing Multiples
Reflected, Refracted and Diffracted waves
Presentation transcript:

MULTIPLE PREDICTION & ATTENUATION Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb Feb. 2004

Outline Introduction Multiple traveltime prediction & examples Multiple traveltime prediction & examples Multiple attenuation & examples Multiple attenuation & examples Conclusion Conclusion

Introduction Facts about multiple problems: Multiple removal is important for quality seismic imaging.Multiple removal is important for quality seismic imaging. Multiple waveform prediction is difficult.Multiple waveform prediction is difficult. Multiple traveltime prediction is feasible.Multiple traveltime prediction is feasible. Multiples can be attenuated along their moveout in seismic traces.Multiples can be attenuated along their moveout in seismic traces.

Outline Introduction Multiple traveltime prediction & examples Multiple traveltime prediction & examples Multiple attenuation & examples Multiple attenuation & examples Application to synthetic and real data Application to synthetic and real data Conclusion Conclusion

Multiple Traveltime Prediction Predict solely from primary traveltimes. Predict solely from primary traveltimes. Recent works: - Landa E., Reshef M., Schuster G., 2003 This work: Data structure for implementation No subsurface information needed. No subsurface information needed. Valid for regular seismic acquisitions. Valid for regular seismic acquisitions.

Naming Convention: Type of Rays e.g. multiple: SG 21201

Prediction of Pegleg Multiple Traveltime by Format’s Principle SGp e.g. multiple: T 201

Prediction of Interbed Multiple Traveltime by Format’s Principle S S G G p p q q e.g. multiple: T 212

Multiple Prediction Algorithm 1.Primary traveltimes are firstly picked and saved. 2.Primary-primary-interference multiples traveltimes are predicted and saved. 3.Primary-multiple-interference multiples traveltimes are predicted and saved. traveltimes are predicted and saved. 4. Multiple-multiple-interference multiples traveltimes are predicted and saved. traveltimes are predicted and saved.

Part of The SMAART Model Depth (m) (m) 0 9 km Offset (m) 0 15 km reflector 0 reflector 1 reflector 2 reflector 3

Pick Traveltime of Primary 1

Picked Primary 1 Picked

Prediction of Multiple 101 Picked Predicted

Prediction of Multiple Picked Predicted Newly Predicted

Prediction of pegleg 102 Picked Predicted

Prediction of pegleg 201 Picked Predicted

Order of Peglegs 102 and 201 are different multiples. They are identical to each other only when They are identical to each other only when the model is 1 D, and all the reflectors are the model is 1 D, and all the reflectors are horizontal. horizontal. They are similar in most cases. They are similar in most cases.

Prediction of pegleg 323 Picked Predicted

Unocal Multiple 101 Time (s) Offset (km) 0.2 3

Unocal Multiple Time (s) Offset (km) 0.2 3

Outline Introduction Multiple traveltime prediction & examples Multiple traveltime prediction & examples Multiple attenuation & examples Multiple attenuation & examples Conclusion Conclusion

Multiple Attenuation Deterministic methods:Deterministic methods: –Multiple waveform prediction Non-deterministic methods:Non-deterministic methods: –Prediction filtering and median filtering

NMO of Multiples dt offset T Original window Predictedmultiple dt T offset NMO window Predictedmultiple

Prediction Filtering Prediction filter F satisfies: A(x) * F = A(x+d) where, A: amplitude A: amplitude x: offset x: offset d: is prediction distance d: is prediction distance *: is convolution operator *: is convolution operator

Multi-channel Prediction Filtering (MPF) Multi-channel Prediction filter F:Multi-channel Prediction filter F: A (t) (x) * F = A (t) (x+d) where, A (t) is the amplitude at the relative time in NMO window. F is the prediction filter for all (time) channels simultaneously.F is the prediction filter for all (time) channels simultaneously. Avoid local anomalies.Avoid local anomalies.

Experiments on Synthetic Data Offset (km) Time (s) One part of zero-offset SMAART data

Median Filtering Filter length=10 Filter length=20 Linear zone Non-linear zone zone

Mul-tichannel Prediction Filtering Linear zone Non-linear zone zone Filter length=5 Filter length=10

MPF & Median Filtering Offset (km) Time (s)

MPF & Median Filtering

Unocal Field Data Demultiple Offset (km) Time (s)

Unocal Field Data Demultiple

Offset (km) Time (s)

Unocal Field Data Demultiple

Outline Introduction Multiple traveltime prediction & examples Multiple traveltime prediction & examples Multiple attenuation & examples Multiple attenuation & examples Conclusion Conclusion

Conclusion Without knowing subsurface model, multiple travel-time can be accurately predicted. travel-time can be accurately predicted. By prediction filtering or median filtering, By prediction filtering or median filtering, multiple can be attenuated. multiple can be attenuated. However, there are multiples can not be treatedHowever, there are multiples can not be treated by the proposed method, then a multiple by the proposed method, then a multiple waveform prediction for them is required. waveform prediction for them is required.

Reference Houston L., 1998: Multiple suppression using a local 1. Houston L., 1998: Multiple suppression using a local coherence filter, Geophysics, Volume 63, Issue 2, coherence filter, Geophysics, Volume 63, Issue 2, Landa E., 1999, Multiple prediction and attenuation using wavefront characteristics of multiple-generating using wavefront characteristics of multiple-generating primaries: The Leading Edge, January, primaries: The Leading Edge, January, Reshef M., et al. 2003, Multiple prediction without prestack data: an efficient tool for interpretive processing: prestack data: an efficient tool for interpretive processing: First Break, Vol. 21, March, First Break, Vol. 21, March, Schuster G., 2003, Imaging the most bounce out of multiples: UTAM 2002 annual meeting. multiples: UTAM 2002 annual meeting.

Thanks 2003 members of UTAM for financial support.2003 members of UTAM for financial support.