Chemicals Management in a Transatlantic Perspective Henrik Selin November 10, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 Christopher Dang Mr. Bodas P.4.
Advertisements

Food Quality Protection Act 1996 Nate Walker. FQPA FThis is a national law that was created and passed by congress in The EPA enforces it. FThe.
National GHS implementation in Belarus: preparatory stage Dr. Irina Zastenskaya, Republican Scientific Practical Center of Hygiene, Belarus.
Chapter 8 AP Environmental Science. * 1. Gives the EPA the authority to control pesticides. Which act is this? * A. Toxic Substances Control Act * B.
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Larrica AC Devin.
Building trust, consumer protection & TTIP Johannes Kleis IMCO/INTA joint public hearing European Parliament, Brussels 24 February 2015.
The Economic Benefits of a Green Chemical Industry: Renewing Manufacturing Jobs While Protecting Health and the Environment James Heintz and Robert Pollin,
 Enacted August 3, 1996  No amendments since  United States Federal Law  Amended:  Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)  Federal.
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Chemicals Policy in Europe: New Directions Rachel Massey Policy Analyst April 2006.
Controlling Toxic Chemicals: Production, Use, and Disposal Chapter 19 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Controlling Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Chapter 20 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternThomas and Callan, Environmental Economics.
Chapter 20 Pesticides and Pest Control
BY ANDREA BUTLER PERIOD 6 5/4/10 Food Quality Protection Act 1996.
The European Parliament and chemicals policy Axel Singhofen Adviser for Public Health and Consumer Policy.
Forsigtighedstilgang – gevinst eller stopklods Precautionary Principle good or bad for innovation Bjorn Gaarn Hansen Head of Unit: Chemicals Directorate:
Environmental Legislation & Regulations Professor Bernie Engel ASM 336 September 13, 2004.
The Substitution Approach in the “White Paper on the Future EU Chemicals Policy” European Conference on Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals Hamburg, 13.
1 REACh Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals and Restriction! Ohio Valley SOT Wednesday, August 26, 2009 REACh: The New Toxicology Frontier.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 45 Environmental Law Chapter 45 Environmental Law.
June 16-19, USEPA Cancer Guidelines: Mode of Carcinogenic Action 1 ICABR – Impacts of the Bioeconomy on Agricultural Sustainability, the Environment.
 Draft Year: 1996  Amendment Years: Not amended  The FQPA is a National act By: Shelby Weaver per:4.
The role of NGOs in promoting sustainable consumption and production Dr. Nadia Haiama-Neurohr Senior policy officer “2nd international expert meeting on.
Postwar Marketing of New Chemicals for Civilian Use.
Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling (GHS)
Get out your HW & In your notes…
1 10. Food Safety & Agricultural Chemicals as an Ethical Issue Larry D. Sanders AGEC 4990: Spring 2002 Dept. of Ag Economics Oklahoma State University.
Managing Farm Chemical Risks in Australia Roger B Toffolon Program Leader, Chemical Risk Management Australia China Agricultural Forum University of Western.
Food safety – an introduction Lecture 35 Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans08-1 Unit 13 Regulation of Pesticides Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
A Precautionary Approach - The Way Forward Anne-Sofie Andersson, Director ChemSec Kemien Dag, Copenhagen November 2014.
The Precautionary Principle in the Sweden, the EU and the US Comparative Risk Regulation Workshop at University of California, Berkeley December
The Precautionary Principle “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” is worth a pound of cure” “Better safe than sorry” “Look before you leap”
1 REACH, the Future EU policy for Chemicals European Conference in Eretria April 27, 2004 Tony Musu – European Trade Union Technical Bureau/ETUC.
1 Risk Governance of Manufactured Nanoparticles, Joint Workshop EP STOA Panel – European Commission, Brussels, 21 November 2011 Interfaces between Science.
Chemical & Environment Considerations in Product Safety: Current research, legislation, and the public and industry response Chemical Safety Regulations.
Europe vs. Toxics Building support for stronger legislation Per Rosander, The International Chemical Secretariat.
Review of veterinary medicines legislation in 2010 Mario Nagtzaam Unit F2 „Pharmaceuticals“ Directorate-General Enterprise and Industry European Commission.
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 By: Travis Cooke.
Regulatory Processes for Pesticides Mark Hartman Antimicrobials Division (AD) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances United States Environmental.
Employment and Chemical risks Tony Musu, ETUI-REHS Developing trade union activities on sustainable development and employment Torino, 27 October 2006.
Environmental Legislation & Regulations Ecology and the Environment Mr. Corsini - NWHS.
Industry Perspective on TSCA Modernization ABA Conference June 11, 2010.
New Framework for EPA’s Chemical Management Program Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, Director.
NS3040 Fall Term 2014 The New Protectionism. New Protectionism I “New Protectionism Will Hit Business,” Oxford Analytica, December 14, 2012 The emergence.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings 14 Environmental Health and Toxicology Part C PowerPoint ® Slides prepared by.
Purpose, Scope and Application of the GHS 1. The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) is a rational and comprehensive.
The Development of Environmental Protection in Information Age: Using Information as a Regulatory Tool and Its Perspective -- the Overview of US Experience.
Introduction to REACH Flavie Guérin U.S. Mission to the EU 15 November 2011.
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA) Draft year: October 11, 1976; Amendment years: 1976; National.
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) Rochelle Weerackoon.
Core Values & Principles in Organic Organic Methods in Agriculture Jay Feldman US Congressional Hearing June 14, 2016.
Lecture #4 Risk Assessment, philosophical approaches to risk & regulation.
The US Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA)
External influences.
E.U. Public Policy Professor John Wilton Lecture 10 Environment policy
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA)
Toxic Substances control act.
Chapter 13 Environmental Health
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA)
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA)
From Lab to Label: Innovations That Feed The World
THE OECD WORK SHARING WORK PROGRAMME FOR BIOCIDES
Unit 6: Part VI: Pesticides and Pest Control
FIFRA 1972, 1988 (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act)
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
Herbicide Registration & Environmental Impact
Presentation transcript:

Chemicals Management in a Transatlantic Perspective Henrik Selin November 10, 2008

The Chemicals Issue Modern chemistry provides many benefits Modern chemistry provides many benefits Industrial production; agriculture; public health Industrial production; agriculture; public health Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring in 1962 Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring in 1962 Persistence; toxicity; bioaccumulation; biomagnification Persistence; toxicity; bioaccumulation; biomagnification Regulating chemicals in an effective and socially acceptable way Regulating chemicals in an effective and socially acceptable way Competing political, economic, and social interests under conditions of scientific uncertainty Competing political, economic, and social interests under conditions of scientific uncertainty Maintaining benefits while controlling risks Maintaining benefits while controlling risks

US Chemicals Law and Policy I Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976 “Existing” and “new” chemicals 1978; requires pre- manufacture notification of “new” “Existing” and “new” chemicals 1978; requires pre- manufacture notification of “new” Covers over 80,000 chemicals including 61,000 “existing” Covers over 80,000 chemicals including 61,000 “existing” Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act of 1947 Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act of 1947 Requires registering and labeling of pesticides Requires registering and labeling of pesticides Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1906 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1906 Sets maximum residue levels of pesticides in food and products Sets maximum residue levels of pesticides in food and products

US Chemicals Law and Policy II EPA prove harm before regulation; high threshold EPA prove harm before regulation; high threshold Detailed process-oriented approach to assessment and regulation Detailed process-oriented approach to assessment and regulation Lower requirements for “existing” chemicals than for “new” chemicals Lower requirements for “existing” chemicals than for “new” chemicals Lack of assessment data for most chemicals Lack of assessment data for most chemicals Use of the legal system to challenge regulatory decisions Use of the legal system to challenge regulatory decisions

EU Chemicals Law and Policy I Old EU system reminiscent of US legislation Old EU system reminiscent of US legislation Multitude of Directives and Regulations Multitude of Directives and Regulations Separating “existing” and “new” chemicals (1979); over “existing” Separating “existing” and “new” chemicals (1979); over “existing” Slow assessment and regulatory processes Slow assessment and regulatory processes Inadequate environmental and human health protection Inadequate environmental and human health protection Growing political and public pressure for change in the 1990s Growing political and public pressure for change in the 1990s

EU Chemicals Law and Policy II The 2007 regulation on the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) The 2007 regulation on the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) Multi-tiered process covering both “existing” and “new” chemicals to be implemented over a decade-long period Multi-tiered process covering both “existing” and “new” chemicals to be implemented over a decade-long period The creation of a new European Chemicals Agency working with the European Commission and member states’ regulatory agencies The creation of a new European Chemicals Agency working with the European Commission and member states’ regulatory agencies

Key Principles of REACH Abolishes the distinction between “existing” and “new” chemicals; large assessment effort Abolishes the distinction between “existing” and “new” chemicals; large assessment effort Reversing the burden of proof; firms to show data that a chemical does not pose a risk Reversing the burden of proof; firms to show data that a chemical does not pose a risk Identifies generic characteristics of concern Identifies generic characteristics of concern Carcinogenic and mutagenic affecting reproduction Carcinogenic and mutagenic affecting reproduction Persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity Persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity Operationalizing the precautionary principle Operationalizing the precautionary principle Promotes substitution and innovation Promotes substitution and innovation

Transatlantic Disagreements Much US lobbying against REACH (federal agencies and the chemical industry) Much US lobbying against REACH (federal agencies and the chemical industry) Growing EU-US policy divergence Growing EU-US policy divergence Regulatory opposition focusing on data generation, precaution and basis for regulation Regulatory opposition focusing on data generation, precaution and basis for regulation Financial opposition arguing that costs outweigh benefits for industry and regulatory agencies Financial opposition arguing that costs outweigh benefits for industry and regulatory agencies Market-based opposition relating to issues of standard setting and trade Market-based opposition relating to issues of standard setting and trade

EU’s Global Influence EU million people with a market the value of that of the US EU million people with a market the value of that of the US The EU trading-up regional standards to the global level The EU trading-up regional standards to the global level Political and technical importance of global standard setting (soft power) Political and technical importance of global standard setting (soft power) Other countries (China and Japan) and sub- national jurisdictions (CA and MA) are copying EU policy ideas Other countries (China and Japan) and sub- national jurisdictions (CA and MA) are copying EU policy ideas

US Federal Policy Change? In 2005, the Child, Worker and Consumer Safe Chemicals Act proposed by Senators Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Jeffords (I-V) – Not passed In 2005, the Child, Worker and Consumer Safe Chemicals Act proposed by Senators Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Jeffords (I-V) – Not passed In 2008, the Kid Safe Chemical Act proposed by Senator Lautenberg and Representatives Solis (D-CA) and Waxman (D-CA) – Not passed In 2008, the Kid Safe Chemical Act proposed by Senator Lautenberg and Representatives Solis (D-CA) and Waxman (D-CA) – Not passed Explicitly based on same principles as REACH Explicitly based on same principles as REACH Generating more risk assessment data Generating more risk assessment data Reversing the burden of proof Reversing the burden of proof Targeting more chemicals for restrictions and bans Targeting more chemicals for restrictions and bans